Synthesis, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial

advertisement

S 1

Synthesis, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial screening of newer thiophene fused arylpyrazolyl 1,3,4-oxadiazoles

Pravin Mahajan, 1 Mukesh Nikam, 1 Asha Chate, 1 Urja Nimbalkar, 1 Vrushali Patil, 2 Anil

Bobade, 2 Abhay Chaudhari, 2 Dattatray Deolankar, 3 Balasaheb Javale, 3 Charansingh Gill 1*

1

Department of Chemistry, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad,

Maharashtra 431 004, India

2

Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400 012,

India

3

National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India

Email: chgill16@gmail.com

Supplemental Materials

Pharmacological Evaluation

Antioxidant activity

The reaction was performed in 2 mL of solution containing 0.2 mM freshly prepared DPPH in methanol and different concentration of synthesized compounds (10-100 µg/mL). After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the absorbance at 517 nm was measured spectrophotometrically

29

. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The activity was compared with BHT (Butylated Hydroxy Toluene) standard. DPPH radical scavenging capacity was measured by using formula,

Percentage scavenging activity = A control

– A test

/A control

×100

A control

= Absorbance of the control, A test

= Absorbance of the test compounds.

The antioxidant activity was expressed as the concentration of a compound where 50% of its maximal effect is observed (EC

50

) using graph pad prism.

S 2

As shown in Table S 1 , among the tested compounds 3a-3h , compound 3f with EC

50

( 12.21

± 1.89

) showed most promising antioxidant activity compared to standard BHT and compound 3b with EC

50

(

14.98 ± 3.57

) possess good activity. Amongst 5a-h , the compound 5c and 5h are most active for DPPH radical scavenging activity. This result indicated that the sulfur linkage in the compounds 3a-3h may be enhancing the activity than the compounds with no sulfur link 5a-5h .

Table S 1 In vitro antioxidant activity of compounds 3a-3h and 5a-5h

Compounds EC

50

± SD

3a

73.89 ± 1.89

3b

3c

14.98 ± 3.57

70.31 ± 1.90

3d

3e

3f

3g

3h

85.20 ± 1.27

76.11 ± 1.92

12.21 ± 1.89

79.79 ± 1.16

54.66 ± 1.65

BHT

8.25 ± 0.33

Compounds

5a

5b

5c

5d

5e

5f

5g

5h

BHT

EC

50

50.00 ± 2.13

62.31 ± 1.08

34.21 ± 3.54

89.00 ± 1.03

74.23 ± 0.99

64.23 ± 1.00

66.34 ± 0.63

34.03 ± 0.77

8.25 ± 0.33

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).

± SD

BHT (Butylated Hydroxy Toluene).

Anti-inflammatory activity

Compounds 3a-h and 5a-h were screened for in vitro anti-inflammatory activity. Fresh whole human blood was collected and it was mixed with equal volumes of sterilized Alsever’s solution (Dextrose 2%, Sodium citrate 0.8%, Citric acid 0.05%, Sodium chloride 0.42% and

Distilled water 100 ml). This blood solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and was washed three times with equal volume of normal saline. The volume of the blood is measured and reconstituted as 10% v/v suspension with normal saline. The reaction mixture consists of 1.0mL of test sample of different concentrations in normal saline and 0.5mL of 10% HRBC suspension,

S 3

1 ml of 0.2 M phosphate buffer, 1 mL hypo saline were incubated at 37 o

C for 30 min and centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 30 mins. The hemoglobin content of the supernatant solution was estimated spectrophotometrically at 560 nm. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.

Dichlorofenac sodium was used as standard and distilled water as control in this study. Where the blood control represents 100% lysis or zero percent stability, the percentage of HRBC heamolysis calculated by formula,

% Heamolysis = (O. D. of Control- O. D. of Test sample / O. D. of Control) X 100

The concentration of a compound where 50% of its maximal effect is observed (EC

50

) using graph pad prism was measured.

The anti-inflammatory activity of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives ( Table S 2 ) showed that the compound 3a with EC

50

(15.23 ± 2.18)

was found to possess good anti-inflammatory activity i. e. the compound with S linkage and electron withdrawing group. Among other compounds 3e , 5a ,

5b , 5d showed moderate activity against anti-inflammatory agent.

S 4

Table S 2 In vitro anti-inflammatory activity of compounds 3a-3h and 5a-5h

Compounds

2

3a

3b

3c

3d

3e

3f

3g

3h

DFS

EC

50

± SD

54.00 ± 2.13

15.23 ± 2.18

98.74 ± 1.35

61.02 ± 1.12

111.32 ± 1.10

30.13 ± 0.38

66.19 ± 0.23

68.94 ± 0.54

138.13 ± 0.23

11.70 ± 0.98

Compounds

-

5a

5b

5c

5d

5e

5f

5g

5h

DFS

EC

50

± SD

-

23.20 ± 6.12

27.20 ± 6.12

98.74 ± 1.35

24.01 ± 4.13

61.02 ± 1.12

61.32 ± 1.10

38.13 ± 0.38

66.19 ± 0.23

11.70 ± 0.98

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3),

DFS- Dichlorofenac sodium.

Antimicrobial activity

Sterile filter paper discs (6mm diameter) were moistened with the test compound solution in Dimethyl sulfoxide of specific concentration 100 µg/disc were carefully placed on the agar cultures plates that had been previously inoculated separately with the microorganisms. The plates were incubated at 37 °C and the results were recorded for antibacterial activity after 14 h and for antifungal activity after 30 h. Ciprofloxacin, streptomycin were used as a standard for the comparison of antibacterial activity and Fluconazole was used as a standard for the comparison of antifungal activity. Each experiment was carried out in triplicate.

The results for antimicrobial studies depicted in Table S 3 revealed that, the tested compounds displayed variable inhibitory effects on the growth of the bacterial and fungal pathogens. In general, compounds were found to exhibit good activity against fungal strains than

S 5 bacterial strains. Amongst all, 3d containing carboxylic acid group was noticeably the most active against bacterial strains E. coli comparable to streptomycin , and P. aeruginosa, S. aureus comparable to ciprofloxacin, which shows the importance of polar acid group for the better activity. Other derivatives mainly 3a , 3g , 3h , 3f exhibited good activity against all bacterial strains.

Antifungal study revealed that the synthesized compounds are more susceptible for fungal strains.

Interestingly, the compound 3c is equally potent against A. niger comparable to Fluconazole with zone of inhibition (16 ± 0.08) . Compound 5c is potentially close against A. niger compared to standard Fluconazole. Compounds 3f , 3g , and 3h of the same series with S linkage, 5d , and 5e of another series are also exhibited good antifungal activity against tested strains. The intermediate 2 was also found to exhibit good activity against E. coli , M. luteus and C. albicans . The above results therefore suggest that introduction of sulfur linkage in the compounds and different substituent noticeably influences the antimicrobial efficiency of the compounds.

S 6

Table S 3 In vitro antimicrobial activities of compounds 3a-3h and 5a-5h

Antibacterial activity a

Antifungal activity a

Compounds

Gram negative Gram positive

E. coli P. aeruginosa S. aureus M. luteus C. albicans A. niger

2

3a

3b

3c

3d

3e

3f

3g

3h

5a

5b

5c

5d

14 ± 0.08

13 ± 0.13

08 ± 0.23

09 ± 0.42

15 ± 0.21

07 ± 0.22

09 ± 0.52

14 ± 0.23

13 ± 0.29

06 ± 0.09

12 ± 0.17

08 ± 0.23

08 ± 0.13

10 ± 0.11

5e

5f

14± 0.11

07 ± 0.13

5g

5h

10 ± 0.11

Ciprofloxacin 20 ± 0.11

Streptomycin 19 ± 0.09

Fluconazole NA

13 ± 0.21 13 ± 0.09 14 ± 0.08 14 ± 0.08 13 ± 0.21

13 ± 0.15 14 ± 0.08 15 ± 0.15 13 ± 0.15 11 ± 0.21

06 ± 0.15 11 ± 0.21 08 ± 0.08 10 ± 0.07 08 ± 0.23

09 ± 0.07 08 ± 0.23 11 ± 0.17 15 ± 0.20 16 ± 0.08

15 ± 0.20 16 ± 0.08 14 ± 0.08 16 ± 0.22 09 ± 0.52

08 ± 0.22 09 ± 0.52 06 ± 0.11 08 ± 0.18 07 ± 0.22

08 ± 0.18 07 ± 0.22 09 ± 0.50 14 ± 0.25 13 ± 0.12

14 ± 0.25 13 ± 0.12 15 ± 0.08 14 ± 0.23 14 ± 0.25

13 ± 0.23 14 ± 0.23 14 ± 0.13 13 ± 0.29 13 ± 0.23

08 ± 0.23 09 ± 0.52 08 ± 0.13 09 ± 0.52 06 ± 0.11

10 ± 0.11 11 ± 0.11 06 ± 0.10 10 ± 0.22 09 ± 0.50

06 ± 0.09 06 ± 0.29 09 ± 0.52 13 ± 0.12 15 ± 0.08

07 ± 0.20 08 ± 0.21 06 ± 0.19 14 ± 0.23 14 ± 0.13

07 ± 0.13 08 ± 0.08 11 ± 0.13 13 ± 0.09 14 ± 0.08

13 ± 0.09 14 ± 0.08 13± 0.13 12 ± 0.52 06 ± 0.11

12 ± 0.19 11 ± 0.11 09 ± 0.52 11 ± 0.13 11 ± 0.19

08 ± 0.20 09 ± 0.53 11 ± 0.15 10 ± 0.11 08 ± 0.20

18 ± 0.12 19 ± 0.10 22 ± 0.13 NA NA

20 ± 0.08 21 ± 0.14 20 ± 0.17 NA NA

NA NA NA 20 ± 0.12 16 ± 0.14 a

Zone of inhibition (Mean three replicate ± standard deviation), NA- Not Applicable.

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

NHNH

2

Figure S 1: LC-MS of compound 2

S 7

S 8

NO

2

85

80

70

60

H

3

C

N

N

S

S

O

N

N

50

1941

40

2848

30

3104.5

1 3 9 5 .7 3 cm -1

20

2921.3

10

1591.72cm-1

1 5 2 4 .3 4 c m -1

-1

4000 3500

Name

Administrator 03

3000 2500 2000 cm-1

Description

Sample 003 By Administrator Date Saturday, April 12 2014

1483

1500

Figure S 2: IR spectrum of 3a

WATERS, Q-TOF MICROMASS (LC-MS)

PRAVIN P-1 9 (0.143) AM (Top,4, Ar,5000.0,556.28,0.70,LS 10); Sm (Mn, 2x3.00); Sb (1,40.00 ); Cm (9:17-(28:60+1:6))

100

450.0667

688

521

691.06cm-1

1163.84cm-1

1343.64cm-1

852.10cm-1

746.89cm-1

710.29cm-1

678.13cm-1

1000 450

SAIF/CIL,PANJAB UNIVERSITY,CHANDIGARH

1: TOF MS ES+

688

NO

2

H

3

C

N

N

S

S

O

N

N

0

445.0869

19

445.6308

64

446.2984

26

448.0261;7

444 446 448 450

472.0469

186

452.0705

146

453.1466

111

452

462.5433

121

454.1099

8

454

459.2544

37

456.4239

19 457.1099

16

456 458

462.2818

69

460.4955

39

460 462

464.4593

32

465.0779

19

464 466

469.0720

32

470.1364

7

473.0513

33

474.0250

15

476.0496

15

468 470 472 474 476 478

478.6315

13

480 m/z

Figure S 3: LC-MS of compound 3a

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

S

NO

2

S 9

Figure S 4:

1

H NMR spectrum of 3a

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

S

Figure S 5: LC-MS of compound 3c

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

S

15

7.13

0.93

1.99

2.02

3.00

10 5

Figure S 6:

1

H NMR spectrum of 3c

TMS

0

S 10

N

N S

O

N N

S

S 11

Figure S 7:

1

H NMR spectrum of 3f

S 12

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

Figure S 8: LC-MS of compound 5a

S 13

0.35

0.30

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

0.60

0.55

0.50

0.45

0.40

2.03

8.0

5.15

7.5

7.0

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

6.5

3.00

6.0

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

Figure S 9:

1

H NMR spectrum of 5a

2.0

TMS

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

S 14

0.55

0.50

0.45

0.40

0.35

0.30

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

CH

3

TMS

8.0

3.18

2.87

7.5

7.0

6.5

3.17

6.0

5.5

5.0

4.5

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

Figure S 10:

1

H NMR spectrum of 5f

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

53

50

45

40

35

30

25

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

Cl

20

1656.5

15

10 2924.6

1592.12cm-1

3082.6

5

0

-1

4000

1509.20cm -1

3500

Name

Administrator 04

3000 2500 2000 cm-1

Description

Sample 004 By Administrator Date Saturday, April 12 2014

848.79cm-1

1011.02cm-1

1393.33cm-1 755.00cm-1

1277.77cm-1

1444.16cm-1

1500 1000

523.1

677.82cm-1

727.89cm-1

500 400

S 15

Figure S 11: IR spectrum of 5g

WATERS, Q-TOF MICROMASS (LC-MS)

PRAVIN P-2 12 (0.176) AM (Top,4, Ar,5000.0,556.28,0.70,LS 10); Sm (Mn, 2x3.00); Sb (1,40.00 ); Cm (8:15)

100

415.0291

18177

SAIF/CIL,PANJAB UNIVERSITY,CHANDIGARH

1: TOF MS ES+

1.82e4

393.0558

13969

H

3

C

N

N

S

O

N

N

Cl

417.0329

5589

395.0541

4585

0

385.2943

138

386 388

392.0537

69

390 392 394

396.0600

908

398.0563;55

403.0495

23

396 398 400 402

405.0339

43

404 406

409.1551

197

408

411.0657

204

410 412 414 416

Figure S 12: LC-MS of compound 5g

418.0366

1209

418

419.0315

402

420 422

425.1161

76

424 426

427.0838

43

428 m/z

Download