QUALITY IEP CRITERION CHECKLIST
The parents were invited to the meeting.
(IEP-3)
Evidence:
There is evidence/ documentation of attempts to ensure parent participation.
(IEP-8)
Evidence:
The parent agreed to a member’s absence when that area was not being discussed.
(IEP-9)
Evidence:
The parent consented to the excusal of a member when that area was being
discussed.
(IEP-10)
Evidence:
The appropriate team members were present at the IEP team meeting. (IEP-11)
(IEP-11)
Evidence:
The present level statement includes a description of the student’s current
educational and/or functional performance, written in objective, descriptive terms
that are sufficient to determine the goals and services required for the student to
receive FAPE and exceeds a label or test score.
(IEP-12)
Evidence:
The annual goals directly relate to the needs identified in the present level and are
different from the previous IEP.
(IEP-13)
Evidence:
There is a statement of related services, including location/dates/frequency.
(IEP-15)
Evidence:
YES
NO
N/A
QUALITY IEP CRITERION CHECKLIST
The accommodations for testing are different from “additional accommodations.”
(IEP-17)
Evidence:
There is data on the ESY justification form which reflects the regression/ recoupment
time necessary to provide FAPE.
(IEP-32)
Evidence:
If a special factor is checked, there is evidence in the IEP to indicate that these needs
were addressed.
(IEP-27 through
Evidence:
IEP-33)
The dates on the IEP/4/ 4C are accurate. (Date of meeting, initiation date, duration
date, date on goal pages, etc.)
(IEP-34)
Evidence:
The progress toward previous annual goal (PTAG data) is included in the present level.
(IEP-36)
Evidence:
The ESE 4 or ESE 4C matches the placement indicated on the IEP.
Evidence:
There is a connection between the Transition Plan and the annual goals.
(TP16-11)
Evidence:
The ESE 4B cover page and the subsequent ESE 4B program eligibility page(s) are
completed for initial placement, out of state transfers, or when adding a program.
Evidence:
YES
NO
N/A