```Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
Lab- Circular Motion
Design
Aim: To find a relationship between the weight of a suspended object (causing circular
motion) and the speed of the object describing circular motion
Independent variable: Weight of a suspended object (causing circular motion)
Dependant variable: Speed of the object describing circular motion
Controlled variables:
1) Mass of ball
2) Radius of rotation
3) Wind / air resistance
4) Stationary length of string
5) Friction between tube and string
6) Angle between tube and string (string should be horizontal as it rotates)
Tube
Ball
Mass
Method:
1) Close doors and turn off air conditioner3
2) Tie a 100g mass to the bottom end of the string
3) Thread the string through a long narrow tube. Oil top of tube to reduce friction5
Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
4) Attach the other end to a small steel ball using masking tape
5) Swing the ball around at a constant radius of 17cm by putting a mark on the string at the
17cm mark2. (Have an observer watch from side-on to ensure all rotations are on horizontal
plane.)6
6) Count the number of rotations in 10s. Perform three times
7) Measure string at end of trial to make sure it hasn’t stretched 4
8) Repeat steps 1-5 for 200g, 300g, 400g masses
*Note: 100g chosen as smallest mass. Anything smaller would not be able to provide
enough centripetal force. Anything over 400g at high speed rotation becomes dangerous.
*Note: be sure to use the same ball for each trial1
Raw Data
Mass
m/kg
0.1
0.2
Trial 1
29
35
Rotations in 10 seconds
R/#
∆R = ±2
Trial 2
30
34
0.3
47
39
r/cm
∆r = ±3 cm
Trial 3
29
35
17
17
43
17
Justification of Uncertainty:
Mass- The uncertainty is negligible because it's reasonable to trust the manufacturer's
stated values.
Rotations- There is an uncertainty of 2 rotations as it is reasonable as it's difficult to count
the fast moving object.
Radius- There is an uncertainty of 3 cm as it is difficult to maintain a constant radius during
spinning.
Observations
The mass did not stay in a horizontal plane during rotation.
Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
Processed data
Mass Weight
m/g
W/N
0.1
0.2
0.3
Average rotations in 10
seconds
R/#
0.98
1.96
2.94
29 ± 1
35 ± 1
43 ± 4
Time taken
for 1
Rotation
t/s
Speed
v/ms-1
Speed²
v²/(ms-1)2
.34 ± 0.02
.29 ± 0.02
.24 ± 0.03
3.14 ± 0.01
3.68 ± 0.01
4.45 ± 0.02
9.86 ± 0.02
13.57 ± 0.02
19.80 ± 0.04
Sample calculation (Using mass of 100 grams):
Weight:
=  = 100(9.8) ≈ 980
Take taken for 1 rotation:
=
10
10
=
≈ 0.34 ± 0.02
29 ± 1
Speed:
=
2 2(0.17 ± 0.03) 2(0.17 ± 0.18%)
=
=
=
= 3.14 ± 0.24%

0.34 ± 0.02
0.34 ± 0.06%
= (3.14 ± 0.01)  −1
Velocity2:
2 = (3.14 ± 0.01)2 = 9.86 ± 0.02
Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
Weight vs. Speed2
3.5
3
Line of Best Fit: W = 0.193v² - 0.821
Max. Line: W = 0.246v² - 1.700
Weight/N
2.5
2
Min. Line: W = 0.164v² - 0.474
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
5
10
15
Speed2/(ms-1)2
Equation of Line of Best Fit:
= 0.193 2 − 0.821
Uncertainty of slope:
−   0.246 − 0.164
=
= 0.041 ≈ 0.04
2
2
Uncertainty of y-intercept (c):
−   −1.700 − (−0.474)
=
= 0.615 ≈ 0.62
2
2
Final equation:
= (0.19 ± 0.04) 2 + (0.82 ± 0.62)
20
25
Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
Conclusion
Aspect 1:
From the graph, it can be seen that there is a linear relationship between weight and
speed2, namely,  = (0.19 ± 0.04) 2 + (0.82 ± 0.62).
The graph of the equation shows a non-proportional relationship between weight and
speed2. However, it should be proportional as at zero speed, there shouldn’t be any
centripetal force. The W-intercept of the equation is (0.82 ± 0.62) which means the value
lies between 0.2 and 1.4. This suggests that there is a systematic error in the experiment,
which has increased the centripetal force, most probably due to friction.
The formula for centripetal force equation is  =
indicating that
represents

2

and can be written as  =

2,
is the slope of the Weight vs. Speed2 graph. The slope of the line

. In the centripetal force equation,

is the coefficient of v2. Therefore,
=  ×  = (0.19 ± 0.04) × 0.17 = 0.32 ± 0.06.
The scatter of plots indicates random errors in the experiment, possibly because of human
error in counting the number of rotations.
(Aspect 2)
Evaluating data
a. The data was reasonably consistent which suggests that there were sufficient trials.
b. The range of values for the rotation was appropriate. A lower speed would not be
able to overcome friction. Extremely high speed would be dangerous.
Evaluating materials
c. There was friction between the tube and the string.
d. The tube was appropriate.
e. String is not strong enough to support a more massive object.
Evaluating Techniques
f. It is difficult to rotate the object at a constant speed therefore the string did not
remain in the horizontal plane.
g. Radius was not constant throughout the experiment.
h. It was difficult to accurately count the number of rotations.
Devyani Gupta
IB Physics I SL
Block E
(Aspect 3)
(c) Grease the end of the tube to reduce friction so there is less energy lost.
More
grease
Less
friction
Higher
speed
More
rotation
in a
given
time.
Reduced
slope of
graph
(e) Using a steel cable instead of a string would allow for a more massive object to be
rotated.
(f) A spotter should have been used to make sure that the angle is exact while rotating.
It would be useful to use a spinning machine that could rotate at a constant speed.
(g) The machine would ensure a constant radius.
(h) A video could be taken and then could be analyzed for an accurate count.
To obtain a more accurate value for Centripetal force, we could use a more accurate timer:
```