2014 Co-Curricular Assessment REPORT Rubric Matrix

advertisement
2014 Co-Curricular Assessment REPORT Rubric Matrix
Reviewers (Team #):
Date:
Unit:
Unit Rubric Score:
Please circle the box that best describes the unit response for each selected question, as well as a holistic score.
Question (with #)
Exemplary-4
Proficient-3
Progressing-2
Inadequate-1
1. Learning outcome
stated.
The learning outcome is clearly written,
measurable, and focused on a single skill or
knowledge set.
Learning outcome is
measurable.
3. Learning outcome data
collected.
Clear description and effective choice of two
measures to evaluate achievement of learning
outcome. At least one is a direct measure.
Should include number assessed and summary
results.
4. & 5. Key strength and
challenge identified.
Clearly related to the learning outcomes
measures and supported by data collected; may
bring in other sources of data to support
conclusion.
Action (or lack thereof) firmly based on analysis
of strengths and challenges, as well as
professional judgment. Includes discussion of
how actions may be influenced by context, such
as fiscal or human resources.
Both internal and external stakeholders are
clearly identified. Both the type and frequency of
communication is explained. Specific reference
to both active communication and inclusion of
students as a stakeholder group.
Effective choice of at
least one measure.
Uses only indirect
measures. Should
include summary
results and number
assessed.
Uses data to identify
at least one strength
and one challenge.
6. Action step provided.
8. Communication with
major stakeholders.
Holistic score: The unit
has successfully and
clearly completed the
report, with particular
attention to questions 2, 7,
9, and 10 (do not consider
question 12)
Unit strives to completely and accurately answer
all other questions in report. Clear intent to
provide full and accurate information, as well as
context relevant to reviewer’s understanding.
Action step based on
data collected.
Internal and external
stakeholders
identified and the
modes of
communication
explained.
A good faith effort
was used to
complete all
questions. Some lack
of context
acceptable.
Page 1 of 2
No Response-0
Attempt at a learning outcome
included, but may not be
measurable or focused on student
learning.
Includes at least one measure,
but may not be aligned with
learning outcome or measure
student learning. Incomplete
information about those being
assessed or summary results.
Little or no reference to
learning outcome.
Item left blank.
No measures identified.
No data included.
Item left blank.
Identifies strength and challenge,
but may not be related to learning
outcome or may not be based on
data.
Action step mentioned, but not
grounded in strengths/challenge
analysis.
No strength and challenge
identified, not related to
students (e.g., program
challenge discussed).
Action step not provided,
or not related to student
learning.
Item left blank.
Stakeholders identified, but may
exclude significant stakeholders
or major groups (e.g., excludes
external stakeholders). May
incompletely explain ways or
frequency of communicating with
stakeholders.
The unit did not put forth effort to
completely answer questions;
some incomplete or confusing
answers make clear
understanding difficult.
No relevant stakeholders
identified and no
description of how or
when the unit
communicates with
stakeholders.
Item left blank.
Many/most other
questions were incomplete
or incomprehensible. May
have some answers left
blank.
Most or all items left
blank.
Item left blank.
Revised 5/9/14
2014 Co-Curricular Assessment REPORT Rubric Matrix
Did the unit ask for
feedback or assistance
that requires additional
action from the Office of
Assessment (OOA)
Yes
No
Overall Score; Comments/Recommendations made by the assessment team:
Strengths of the Report:
Score
/24
Feedback/Recommendations:
If revisions are needed please list the items:
Scoring: With the total possible points on the rubric equal to 24, the following scale will summarize the quality of reports. Please indicate the
holistic rubric score at the top right corner of the first page.
Quality Rating
Exemplary
Proficient
Progressing
Inadequate
Rubric Score
22-24
16-21
11-15
10 or less
Page 2 of 2
Revised 5/9/14
Download