LOCAL EDUCATION AGENCY (LEA) SPECIAL EDUCATION PERFORMANCE PROFILE
Albertville City
2012-2013 School Year
In accordance with the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), each state has in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the state’s efforts to meet
the requirements and purposes of Part B of the IDEA. The SPP (2005-2012) is a plan that describes Alabama’s performance on 20 Indicators. The state has established
measurable and rigorous targets for each indicator and reports annually on the performance of the state under the SPP in the Annual Performance Report (APR). The
Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) in the U.S. Department of Education requires states to report annually to the public on the performance of the state and
each local education agency (LEA) on the following Indicators for this reporting period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.
Indicator
SPP Indicator 1 – Percent of youth with IEPs graduating with
a regular diploma. Data collection aligned with ESEA; *Target
and reported data are from the 2011-2012 school year.
Data
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
State Target for
2012-2013
*Using 2011-
*Using 2011-2012
2012 data
data
53.7%
53.79%
Indicator
SPP Indictor 2 – Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of
high school. Data collection aligned with ESEA; *Target and
reported data are from the 2011-2012 school year.
Met State
Target
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
61.1%
Yes
Data
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
State Target for
2012-2013
*Using 2011-
*Using 2011-2012
2012 data
data
3.45%
1.10%
Indicator
Met State
Target
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
0.00%
Yes
Data
SPP Indicator 3 – Participation and performance of children
with IEPs on statewide assessments.
3A.2 Percent of districts with a disability subgroup that meets
the State’s minimum “n” size that meet the State’s AMO
targets for the disability subgroup.
State Target for
2012-2013
N/A
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
2.29%
3B. Participation rate
Reading: 98%
Math:
98%
Reading: 99.69%
Math: 99.54%
Met State
Target
N/A
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
Baseline
N/A
Reading: 98.70%
Math: 98.70%
Yes
1 of 6
3C. Proficiency rate
Rdg/Lang Arts
Grd 3 – 60.2%
Grd 4 – 56.2%
Grd 5 – 57.1%
Grd 6 – 54.2%
Grd 7 – 50.1%
Grd 8 – 41.9%
Gr. 11 – 41.4%
Math
Grd 3 –61.7%
Grd 4 – 58.1%
Grd 5 – 68.4%
Grd 6 –43.5%
Grd 7 – 50.1%
Grd 8 – 45.0%
Grd 11 –46.9%
Rdg/Lang Arts
Grd 3 – 53.4%
Grd 4 – 54.3%
Grd 5 – 52.6%
Grd 6 – 48.8%
Grd 7 – 48.1%
Grd 8 – 37.2%
Grd 11 – 44.8%
Math
Grd 3 – 55.4%
Grd 4 –49.4%
Grd 5 – 67.2%
Grd 6 – 31.5%
Grd 7 – 27.9%
Grd 8 – 37.0%
Grd 11 –51.7%
Rdg/Lang Arts
Grd 3 – No
Grd 4 – No
Grd 5 – No
Grd 6 – No
Grd 7 – No
Grd 8 – No
Gr. 11 –Yes
Math
Grd 3 – No
Grd 4 – No
Grd 5 – No
Grd 6 – No
Grd 7 – No
Grd 8 – No
Gr. 11-Yes
Rdg/Lang Arts
Grd 3 –50.00%
Grd 4 – 55.56%
Grd 5 – 28.57%
Grd 6 – 42.86%
Grd 7 – 35.29%
Grd 8 – 51.85%
Grd 11 – 50.00%
Math
Grd 3 – 61.76%
Grd 4 – 59.26%
Grd 5 – 42.86%
Grd 6 – 33.33%
Grd 7 – 43.75%
Grd 8 – 33.33%
Grd 11 –70.00%
Rdg/Lang Arts
Grd 3 – No
Grd 4 – No
Grd 5 – No
Grd 6 – No
Grd 7 – No
Grd 8 – Yes
Grd 11 –Yes
Math
Grd 3 – Yes
Grd 4 – Yes
Grd 5 – No
Grd 6 – No
Grd 7 – No
Grd 8 – No
Grd 11 – Yes
2 of 6
Indicator
Data
SPP Indicator 4 – Rates of suspension and expulsion:
4A. Percent of districts that have a significant discrepancy in the
rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10 days in a
school year for children with IEPs.
4B. Percent of districts that have (a) a significant discrepancy,
by race or ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of
greater than 10 days in a school year for children with IEPs; and
(b) policies, procedures, or practices that contribute to the
significant discrepancy and do not comply with requirements
relating to the development and implementation of IEPs, the use
of positive behavioral interventions and supports, and
procedural safeguards.
4A. Districts with a rate of suspensions and expulsions > 3.02%
have a significant discrepancy. *Target and reported data are
from the 2011-2012 school year.
Alabama
State Target for
2012-2013
*Using 20112012 data
4A. Significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and
expulsions. State Target 8%; LEA Target ≤ 3.02%.
8%
4B. Districts with a rate of suspensions and expulsions by
race/ethnicity > 3.02% with more than one student suspended or
expelled and policies, procedures or practices that contribute.
*Target and reported data are from the 2011-2012 school year.
State Target and LEA Target 0% set by OSEP.
State Target for
2012-2013
4B. Significant discrepancy by race/ethnicity and policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to discrepancy.
Albertville City
% Districts with
Significant Discrepancy
*Using 2011-2012 data
Met
State
Target
6.06%
Yes
*Using 20112012 data
% Districts
with
Significant
Discrepancy
*Using 20112012 data
% With
Policies
Procedures
Practices
That
Contribute
Met
State
Target
0%
7.75%
0%
Yes
Indicator
Significant
Discrepancy
4A. Rate
*Using
2011-2012
data
0.00%
4B. Significant
Discrepancy
*Using 2011-2012 data
No
Met State
Target
No
Yes
Policies
Procedures
Practices
That
Contribute
Met State
Target
No
Yes
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
Met State
Target
5A. Inside the regular class 80% or more of the day.
62.26%
84.82%
Yes
91.18
Yes
5B. Inside the regular class less than 40% of the day.
6.70%
6.68%
Yes
5.15%
Yes
2.75% or
decrease
1.56%
Yes
0.37%
Yes
SPP Indicator 5 – Percent of children with IEPs aged 6
through 21 served:
5C. In separate schools, residential
homebound/hospital placements.
facilities,
or
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
3 of 6
Indicator
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
52.5%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
49.83%
Met State
Target
No
6.58%
5.68%
Yes
SPP Indicator 7 – Percent of preschool children aged 3
through 5 with IEPs that demonstrate improved:
7A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social
relationships):
Of those children who entered the program below age
expectations in Outcome A, the percent who substantially
increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the
program.
State Target for
2012-2013
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
Met State
Target
85.8%
91.7%
Yes
100%
Yes
The percent of children who were functioning within age
expectations in Outcome A by the time they exited the program.
7B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early
language/communication and early literacy):
Of those children who entered the program below age
expectations in Outcome B, the percent who substantially
increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the
program.
60.7%
76.1%
Yes
100%
Yes
80.8%
91.3%
Yes
100%
Yes
The percent of children who were functioning within age
expectations in Outcome B by the time they exited the program.
7C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs:
32.4%
56.5%
Yes
50.00%
Yes
Of those children who entered the program below age
expectations in Outcome C, the percent who substantially
increased their rate of growth by the time they exited the
program.
85.2%
90.6%
Yes
100%
Yes
The percent of children who were functioning within age
expectations in Outcome C by the time they exited the program.
72.3%
83.3%
Yes
100%
Yes
SPP Indicator 6 – Percent of children with IEPs aged 3 through
5 with IEPs attending a:
6A. Regular early childhood program and receiving the majority
of special education and related services in the regular early
childhood program.
6B. Separate special education class, separate school or
residential facility.
Indicator
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
59.52%
Yes
0.00%
Yes
Data
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
4 of 6
Indicator
SPP Indicator 8 – Percent of parents with a child receiving
special education services who report that schools facilitated
parent involvement as a means of improving services and results
for children with disabilities.
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
89%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
73.70%
Indicator
SPP Indicator 9 – Percent of districts with disproportionate
representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education
that is the result of inappropriate identification. Target set by
OSEP.
State Target for
2012-2013
0%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
0%
77%
No
Met State
Target
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
0%
Yes
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
0%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
0%
State Target for
2012-2013
100%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
99.7%
Indicator
SPP Indicator 11 – Percent of children who were evaluated
within 60 days of receiving parental consent for initial evaluation
or, if the state establishes a timeframe within which the
evaluation must be conducted, within that timeframe. Target
set by OSEP.
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
Data
Indicator
SPP Indicator 10 – Percent of districts with disproportionate
representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Target set by OSEP.
Met State
Target
No
Met State
Target
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
0%
Yes
Data
Met State
Target
No
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
100%
Yes
5 of 6
Indicator
SPP Indicator 12 – Percent of children referred by Part C,
prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have
an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Target set by OSEP.
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
Met State
Target
100%
99.56%
No
Indicator
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
100%
Yes
Data
State Target for
2012-2013
100%
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
100%
SPP Indicator 14 – Percent of youth who are no longer in
secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left
school, and were:
14A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving
high school.
State Target for
2012-2013
Alabama
Percentage for
2012-2013
Met State
Target
13.9%
24.9%
Yes
20%
Yes
14B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
45.6%
60.7%
Yes
50%
Yes
14C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other
postsecondary education or training program; or competitively
employed or in some other employment within one year of
leaving high school.
63.8%
68.8%
Yes
60%
No.
SPP Indicator 13 – Percent of Youth with IEPs aged 16 and
above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable
postsecondary goals, that are annually updated, and transition
assessments and services, including courses of study, that will
reasonably enable the student to meet those postsecondary goals;
including evidence that the student and, if appropriate, a
representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP
Team meeting with the prior consent of the parent or student who
has reached the age of majority to discuss transition services.
Target set by OSEP.
Indicator
Met State
Target
Yes
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
100%
Yes
Data
Albertville City
Percentage
Met State Target
6 of 6