2015-16 Prospective Report Template
Brooklyn College
Provide a target value for each metric (yellow-shaded cells) and complete sections B and C below.
Section A - University Goals
1 - Increase opportunities for students to be taught by full-time faculty
Percentage of annual instructional FTEs
delivered by full-time faculty
Percentage of annual instructional FTEs in
undergraduate courses delivered by fulltime faculty
Ratio of FTE student to full-time faculty
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
2012-13
2013-14
48.1
44.1
44.8
49.3
53.9
47.5
42.7
43.1
47.7
53.6
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
Fall 2014
23.9
23.3
22.6
23.0
22.9
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.5
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
2014-15
Fall 2015
2 - Increase faculty scholarship and research impact
Average number of pieces of
scholarship/creative activity (annual)
Number of funded research grants
Research awards (annual)
53
57
48
48
45
$6,670,988
$8,472,121
$6,116,651
$6,023,627
$7,631,310
2015
FY 2016
3 - Ensure that students make timely progress toward degree completion
Fall 2009
Entrants
Fall 2010
Entrants
Fall 2011
Entrants
Fall 2012
Entrants
Fall 2013
Entrants
25.6
25.1
25.4
26.8
26.3
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
34.4
34.8
32.3
34.8
32.4
Fall 2009
Entrants
Fall 2010
Entrants
Fall 2011
Entrants
Fall 2012
Entrants
Fall 2013
Entrants
One-year retention rate of baccalaureate
81.9
full-time first-time freshmen
Difference between actual and predicted
-0.4#
1-year retention rate of baccalaureate fulltime first-time freshmen
One-year retention rate of baccalaureate
76.5
full-time transfers
#Value is not statistically significantly different from 0.
82.0
84.2
86.4
82.0
-0.1#
1.3#
3.5
-1.2#
77.3
74.6
76.7
74.5
Fall 2006
Entrants
Fall 2007
Entrants
Fall 2008
Entrants
Fall 2009
Entrants
Fall 2010
Entrants
26.8
24.1
24.5
23.4
24.9
Average number of credits earned in one
year by baccalaureate full-time first-time
freshmen
Percentage of baccalaureate students who
earn 30 credits per year
Fall 2014
Entrants
Fall 2014
Fall 2014
Entrants
4 - Increase graduation rates
Four-year graduation rate of baccalaureate
full-time first-time freshmen
August 17, 2015
Fall 2011
Entrants
1
Difference between actual and predicted
4-year graduation rate of baccalaureate
full-time first-time freshmen
Four-year graduation rate of baccalaureate
full-time transfers
3.8
1.1#
1.1#
-2.0#
-0.2#
46.0
47.3
51.3
49.1
53.1
Fall 2004
Entrants
Fall 2005
Entrants
Fall 2006
Entrants
Fall 2007
Entrants
Fall 2008
Entrants
Six-year graduation rate of baccalaureate
48.5
full-time first-time freshmen
#Value is not statistically significantly different from 0.
48.4
53.8
51.2
50.4
Fall 2009
Entrants
5 - Improve student satisfaction with academic support and student support services
Satisfaction with academic advising
effectiveness (Noel-Levitz SSI)
Satisfaction with campus support services
(Noel-Levitz SSI)
2013
2015
4.8 (1.4)
5.0 (1.5)
5.3 (1.0)
5.4 (1.2)
2013
2015
4.7 (1.2)
4.8 (1.4)
4.7 (1.2)
4.8 (1.4)
5.0 (1.0)
5.1 (1.2)
6 - Improve student satisfaction with administrative services
Satisfaction with admissions and financial
aid effectiveness (Noel-Levitz SSI)
Satisfaction with registration effectiveness
(Noel-Levitz SSI)
Satisfaction with service excellence (NoelLevitz SSI)
7 - Increase revenues
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
Total voluntary support (annual)
$26,003,508
$11,505,162
$13,677,344
$5,918,201
$26,536,410
Grant and contract awards (annual)
$12,859,122
$12,484,151
$10,785,822
$10,417,435
$11,688,687
---
$644,973
$551,578
$841,345
na
Alternative revenues (annual)
FY 2016
8 - Use financial resources efficiently and prioritize spending on direct student services
Spending on student services and
instruction and departmental research as a
percentage of tax-levy budget
Spending on student services as a
percentage of tax-levy budget
Spending on instruction and departmental
research as a percentage of tax-levy
budget
Percentage of budget in reserve
FY 2011
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY 2014
FY 2015
(prelim)
69.4
69.7
70
69.9
na
10.1
9.8
10.2
10.0
na
59.3
59.9
59.8
59.9
na
2.7
2.8
2.8
1.9
na
Fall 2013
Fall 2014
FY 2016
9 - Increase the proportion of full-time faculty from under-represented groups
Fall 2010
August 17, 2015
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2015
2
Percentage of minority full-time faculty
Percentage of Italian American full-time
faculty
Percentage of women full-time faculty
23.5
5.4
24.1
5.8
24.4
4.7
24.2
4.3
25.2
4.2
43.5
44.2
45.2
44.7
45.8
10 – Increase faculty satisfaction
Colleges should report COACHE results on faculty satisfaction with nature of work (research, teaching and service),
tenure and promotion policies and processes, and interdisciplinary work, collaboration and mentoring.
Section B – Senior College Goals
1 - Increase enrollment in master’s programs
Headcount enrollment in master’s
programs
FTE enrollment in master’s programs
New master's student enrollment
One-year retention rate in master’s
programs
Fall 2010
Fall 2011
Fall 2012
Fall 2013
Fall 2014
3,353
3,133
3,073
3,065
2,977
2,005
1,026
1,907
926
1,796
986
1,803
1,106
1,788
1,076
Fall 2009
Entrants
Fall 2010
Entrants
Fall 2011
Entrants
Fall 2012
Entrants
Fall 2013
Entrants
84.9
83.7
85.8
83.7
84.8
Fall 2015
Fall 2014
Entrants
“Methodological Notes” for the 2014-15 metrics can be viewed and downloaded at http://www1.cuny.edu/sites/6/wpcontent/uploads/sites/6/media-assets/pmp_methodological_notes_20150727.pdf or navigating to
http://cuny.edu/pmp and clicking on the link on the right.
Section C – College Focus Goals




Consult broadly with campus constituencies, including elected faculty representatives, to identify important
priority areas for the college not already addressed by the university or sector goals. Presidents should provide a
brief description of the consultation process in the year-end self-assessment letter.
Identify three to five specific goals related to its strategic plan. Each focus goal will state an outcome to be
achieved by year’s end and will have at least one qualitative or quantitative metric by which progress can be
judged in one year.
Goals should follow the S.M.A.R.T. criteria1. Preparing a strategic plan and meeting milestones on regular
institutional accreditation processes are not acceptable focus goals, nor are activities and processes that lead to
desired outcomes. Focus goals should relate to strategic goals but be more specific
Set numeric targets on all quantitative outcomes measures associated with college focus goals.
Specify the goal, explain (briefly) how it is connected to the college’s strategic plan, and indicate how progress will be
measured. Provide trend data for any quantitative metrics, and set a target on the metric(s) for the coming year.
1
Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic (and/or Relevant), and Time-bound.
http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/smart-goals.php
August 17, 2015
See for example:
3
August 17, 2015
4