1
Fifth attempt
The first idea
Contents
Our twin nature
The truth about reality
The normal spatial perception
Normal time
Outside space and time
Operating
The two starting points
The general phenomenological truth
2
4
5
5
6
10
12
15
2
Our twin nature
Psychologists are working with inner phenomena as hatred, fear, rage, etc. and physicists with
external phenomena, eg black holes, quarks and elementary particles.
The two concepts and phenomena time and space are perceived in certain contexts as two
genuine mental phenomena but they can also in other contexts be interpreted as two physical
phenomena in the material world.
Are there in fact any external or physically in space and time?
It may not be the case for either space or time can show something purely external or
physically.
Wise physicists have obviously corrected this deficiency by defining space and time.
That which is measured by eg an atomic clock is physicists' definition of the time. Time has
become a kind of thing in physics - and the same has happened in the spatial
respect.
René Descartes (1596 -1650) is historically one of the most known doubters.
He did not concern himself primarily with space and time, but pointed out that one of the
priorities of his own thinking was that most of what happening in the material world is
nothing but illusions.
What he did not doubt was his own thoughts and everything else in his inner world. Tailpiece
for Descartes right here can be that he placed the inner world before the outer or that the inner
is the outer world´s condition - and not vice versa.
What had Immanuel Kant (1724 -1804) to say in an almost similar context?
One of his stated goals was to solve the conflict between his time´s rationalists and
empiricists - about the origin of knowledge.
Kant concluded that time, space, causality and other of the empirical world´s mandatory
elements can´t exist as an independent reality, but only as internal mental forms for all
possible experience.
3
If we assume that the outer world we experience, with the forms it now has, is something that
exists as an independent reality, it give rise to a series of contradictions.
Regarding time and space Kant set the rationalists thesis "the world is limited in space and
time” - against - the empiricists antithesis “the world is unlimited in time and space” - and
showed that both arguments were equally strong.
It thus became equally possible or impossible to imagine that space and time are limited or
unlimited.
___________________________________________________________________________
We are making a fundamental mistake when we take the things as they appear to us - for the
things as they are in themselves.
Our experience can never be any independent reality, but only just experience and as such
shaped by us as subjects - we who perceive.
When we assume that the empirical world shows us things as they are in themselves becomes the empirical world a paradox - that at the same time can be both finite and infinite,
and ultimately consist of simple parts or not, etc.
On the other hand if we are looking at the empirical world as an interpretation - these
problems disappear - as time, space, causality, etc then only becomes a necessary pattern for
this interpretation.
If the knowledge apparatus hade been constituted in a different way - this pattern also had
been different.
It's only in the phenomenal inner world as it exists temporal, spatial, and causal
relationships.
In the other world - the material or external - where everything is considered to exist by itself,
regardless of whether it´s perceived - these relationships can´t exist.
It is thus only our own experience of the inner world that is accessible to scientific
investigation and that we can gain knowledge of.
4
We can never get any knowledge of the thing in itself - we can only gain knowledge of the
phenomena in our mind or consciousness.
The knowledge that science has given us so far has only touched the phenomena of our
consciousness.
Science hasn´t any access to the most primary/basic of the things or the material/materialistic.
The material things say nothing directly to us - about themselves.
It´s only we humans that can tell something - about us and our twin nature. Inter alia about
what´s in our minds about things or the material/materialistic and how they ended up there in the first place - and fundamentally - through our intuition and phenomenological manner to
interpret our twin nature.
___________________________________________________________________________
Thus, a general truth about the reality has been presented.
Through this general truth, one can obviously dig deeper down in it - and maybe discover
something resembling the reality in its truest, simplest and purest essence, core, form or idea.
However, there are a lot of further development before anything of this nature may be deemed
to exist, and what primarily must be done is to try to illuminate and penetrate deeper into the
concepts and phenomena of space and time.
___________________________________________________________________________
The normal spatial perception
We mean that space in the traditional sense exists in all kinds of voids, in all materials and
bodies volumes, in all vacuum in the absolutely empty space, in the entire microcosmic space
for example on the Higg´s boson´s particle level and in all the telescoping outer space.
In a sort of tangible spirit, many believe that all “these spaces” are throughout one and the
same.
Most people who are asked about the matter, can´t imagine a world without ”these outer
spaces”, thus responding something like this:
5
"Where else would we find ourselves and have our place if space did not exist, and how could
we be able to exist without the volumes that our bodies occupy?"
It must have been an extraordinary experience for most people to hear about Albert Einstein's
relativistic space.
Still, no one on the street have been able to absorb the Einstein space-idea, ideally not as it
also considered to accommodate the time in itself as a fourth dimension or that time can be
bent or curved into space - it is considered to be so in the case of visible light.
In modern physics one deal with this space-time in very specific mathematical equations.
The results of the current equations has then been used as a basis to build theories about
certain phenomena in the material world, which in turn formed different models or maps for
specific empirical physical phenomena; material objects, processes or events.
Space-time in those equations is transformed physically, without that it in - any single way - at
any time - has been shown or proven that space-time exists in the outer/external world.
We will never get the ability to directly see or detect this curvature of time into space. No
humans have or will have it and none have ever had it, not even Einstein himself.
He also said about the curvature of time into space that we only could perceive or detect it
intuitively.
So - if we are missing the intuition for space-time we also lacking the ability to normally,
comprehend or perceive it.
The normal time
Time is normally perceived as infinite and without end - and always facing forward. Time
running back is generally considered to be impossible.
It´s, as one say, when time goes that we recognize different processes´ progress. Via our
ability to remember, we also remind us that time has passed while things did evolve in one
way or another.
This can very briefly considered to be what people generally, and eg modern physicists, mean
by space and time and what is called space-time.
6
"Outside (or inside) space and time"
But all that people in general and physicists in particular, think about space and time are –
from here and now - entirely pushed aside.
Time and space as part of that knowledge pattern which, according to Kant, presupposes our
inner interpretations and thus perceptions of eg the external physical phenomena - are
herewith assigned to their purest inner forms.
Time and space will thus keep their inner mental forms and at the same time no longer - and
so one-sided as before - only be used to assist in the internal downgrades of for example, the
outer world´s phenomena.
Thus - prepare - time and space for something that could exist in both the inner and outer
nature - simultaneously - and together.
But with such a proposal for a new pattern of knowledge - affected by Kant´s knowledge
apparatus - occasionally utilized during Kant's lifetime and which today is frequently used is it no longer reasonable to call time and space for just time and space.
What will happen to space and time in this new context?
Time and space are perceived within eg physics and mathematics as linear and infinite
concepts.
Instead, they now also will be treated as limited - as the external nature here has its limitation,
but at the same time, completely in the absence of the physically defined external forms of
space and time, such as the atomic clock, in mathematical equations, the folding rule, etc.
Which new character will then external space and time practically have in this just updated
knowledge pattern?
Primarily, we refer to what this new pattern should or must be somehow possible to translate
to.
In the works that preceded this one* have there already been coined some expressions or
names eg world of ideas, the most primordial memory and the first idea, which more or less
directly refer to what this new concerns.
*
For example, in the 3rd attempt
7
The first idea or the most primordial memory becomes in this new order completely in the
absence of temporal, spatial and material structure, and thus it´s also possible to perceive this
new as a nothing, equal to the modern physics vacuum with all its properties - in Paul Dirac's
spirit.
The physical space and the physical time deprived hereby their roles as pillars of our
traditional worldviews.
The most original memory codes, -forms, -structures, etc. to the external physical phenomena
that we normally claim to exist in the material world - is hereby represented - altogether - of
this the most primordial memory - the first idea.
Here and now it emerges that space and time no longer remain in either their inner or outer
traditional forms.
At the same time, it is precisely this state of internal spatial and temporal absence that are
providing this new knowledge pattern for the material world´s phenomena and how these
phenomena instead can be interpreted and thus perceived.
The concept, phenomenon and name the most primordial memory as an internal replacement
for the external space and time - is no coincidence.
We know today there are constantly different memory structures, forms, codes, etc., that in
different ways presupposes and founds the course of events on earth - even in our own bodies
- and for all that is happening out there in the universe.
The concept and phenomenon the most primordial memory can therefore also be related to
the big bang or the accumulated ancient power that appeared in the actual moment of birth
and that scientists and researchers have not yet understood the origin of - in the traditional
physical sense.
It is also possible to re-connect it to the empirical research results, for through them the
modern physicists state that the outer reified time or the physical time, started at the moment
of big bang for about 13.7 billion years ago - because they still lack knowledge about what
kind of extreme power and energy source from the physical point of view caused the big bang.
Their lack of knowledge about the big bang also limits the physical distance to it - it is simply
impossible to physically see beyond the big bang´s fountainhead, which thus presently is
located about 13.7 billion light years away.
8
Here, we can very well ask ourselves:
What was "out there" before the big bang - or for a minute, an hour or a week ago - before the
moment of the big bang?
The latest in this text is a decent example of what the traditional knowledge pattern can
achieve if it´s used in a practical thinking about our twin nature.
For here in the next paragraph, we can now assert that the old outer space and the old
external time in the single most original memory bank is in the most priomordial memory or
in this nothingness, which also can be described as something that lacks both beginning and
end.
In another way the most primordial memory can be seen as something of eternal existence
and limitless memory capacity and because it´s contained in a nothing - or in an absolute
vacuum à la Paul Dirac - it also fills up the entire outer cosmic space.
Why?
That´s the case, because the outer physical space - in all its traditionel forms - has no access
within this "newly created knowledge pattern".
It should then also ”behave” so in what physicists names as the universe's expansion - as right
now just goes faster and faster - and which considered to be brought about by a "force" that
the physicists call dark energy.
What in reality and constantly is extending or expanding ”out there in the old” universe - is
the first idea; the most primordial memory - and nothing else.
That this expansion nowadays is accelerating all the time in the physical sense is mpossible
from a phenomenological point of view.
But that the dark energy causes this enlargement has some real status as both the phenomenon
dark energy and the enlargement as such has its origins rooted in the inner most primordial
memory´s fountainhead.
___________________________________________________________________________
9
The most primordial memory or the first idea is completely lack of internal borders or limits.
We can also perceive and experience it within ourselves.
In our inner mental life, we sometimes ”intuitively feel” this limitless, but we can never
perceive it among the phenomena in the external world - or more truthfully:
We can´t directly see or perceive this limitless out there in the material world with its external
phenomena.
10
Operating
For those who perceive the external movements as belonging to the material world and
interpret them in the physical way, often claim that there has to be a fixed reference point for
the movements.
One can also express it as Ernst Mach (1838-1916) did in his time about the phenomenon
inertia.
Mach suggested that the inertia is the "tendency" or "impulse" that makes a body at rest
remains at rest - and that a body in motion continues its motion in the same direction as it
already moves - and that these circumstances - are the result of the relationship between an
individual focused material object and the rest of all matter in universe.
Inertia, Mach argued, applies only as a function of the interaction between a body/materiality
and all other bodies/materialities in the universe, even at great distances.
All movements between the physical phenomena in the material world arises only when at
least one physical phenomenon is related to at least one other physical phenomenon in the
material world.
Intellectually or in our thoughts we must relate to the movement/motion in this way if we
mean that it in the most primary sense is rooted in the material world.
Imagine that all material objects in the universe have dissapeared except the earth, then the
earth as we normally consider moving around its own axis no longer is able to do so - as it
then no longer has anything to relate to.
There is no external movement in itself.
If we support the thought that self-motion of the earth disappears under the above conditions,
where in that thought do we find ourselves?
In consequence of what has already been written here, we must be on the earth in it.
But this statement encounter immediately several other issues, such as:
If life on earth floats on in the same tracks as now, we must assume that the sun continues to
function despite the fact that even the sun is lacking existenc in the current idea.What then
about the movements among the phenomena on earth? Do they also disappeare?
11
No they don´t, if we unilaterally let ourselves be influenced by the pure physical way to
interpret or perceive external movements.
___________________________________________________________________________
Each movement of and between the physical phenomena in our immediate vicinity - even in
one's own body - lack primary also its prerequisite and basis in the material world.
___________________________________________________________________________
According to particle physic´s standard model the elementary particle virtually has no mass.
The mass in an elementary particle, and thus its inertia - derives from the so-called Higgs
mechanism* via exchange with the all-pervasive so-called Higgs field - in the physical
vacuum space.
This standard model is, despite its merits, however, not comprehensive - properties as the
inertia and the Higgs mechanism itself is still outside the area that this standard model
describes.
___________________________________________________________________________
*
Higgs mechanism is one (of Peter Higgs and François Englert) proposed theory to explain why an elementary
particle has its mass. Higgs mechanism is explained by a universal field that interacts with all matter in the
universe. The force-carrying particle was supposed to be a boson, the so-called Higg´s boson.
From CERN was reported July 4, 2012 that the evidence of this Higgs boson´s existence had been established
with a sufficient degree of probability.
12
The external physical movement´s and the inertia´s actual origin and the Higgs mechanism´s
position - float yet completely free and without any determination - even in modern physics.
The two ”starting points”:
Where is the most primordial memory "placed" in the external physical space - and what
"form" of inertia is the most promordial memory equipped with?
___________________________________________________________________________
The most primordial memory is everywhere - across the whole - physical space; both on the
micro- and macrocosmic level.
This means that the most primordial memory throughout fills (up) - all phenomena of both
external physical and inner mental nature and also all the outer power and energy forms and
all external movements and events.
With the intention to just simplify are herewith presented a fixed reference point that
everything is interpreted from.
For the same reason, hereby a virtual point is also focused whence the most primordial
memory can be regarded as composed of an infinite number of infinitely small bubbles,
shaped as soap bubbles which are interconnected with each other in different patterns.
Every bubble have this very simple form: Surface and nothing else.
How is it possible for us to perceive motion/movements when we translate them into real
events that taking place in the nonexistent physical space and that it takes x number of
seconds to perform in the nonexistent physical time.
The physical space and time are here and now - throughout - the most primordial memory.
It means that the most primordial memory already knows or remember how the movements or
events will develop and possibly run out before they even have started.
13
Why is that?
Because it´s humans who interpret these movements or events.
We humans can´t interpret anything at all - at least not in a human way - if we miss our
internal relationship with the most primordial memory, which consequently throughout is in
all of these virtual bubbles.
In each bubble, there is a constant exchange of information on what is happening in any other
bubble.
Each bubble "knows" or are able to remember - what has happened, what is happening and
what will happen, because there was, is or will not be any other possible motion or event.
Humans can´t see or interpret anything that is not already prepared in the most primordial
memory.
We simply lack the ability to interpret anything at all - on our own - we must do it together
with the first idea - or in direct relation with it.
We are not like animals, that unilaterally only react instinctively.
Being both animals and humans, we react both instinctively and as human beings.
To interpret through our particular human perspective is to constantly remember or be able to
remember – everything.
To see, discover, understand and to interpret something include that we human beings always
are in direct relation to the most primordial memory´s ongoing impact of eg the physical
phenomena in the material world.
To see, discover, recognize and interpret something can only be done in our human way,
which is to make it phenomenological or intuitive - incessantly - and from within.
There is no other possible human way to do it on.
* Third attempt: http://www.phenomenology.se
14
Remember "Plato's words" in the third attempt*:
"With the intention to provide a simple description of how physicists look at and interpret the
physical phenomena I say that she or he has an inveterate habit of doing it - from outside.
Or as if it were possible to place themselves beyond their present constantly progressive
effects of the direct connection and relation that exists between their inner mental/emotional
life - and world of ideas or the first idea.
But as I said before it´s impossible for us to go outside this relation.
With a similar image, you can also describe the psychologist's manner to interpreting our
nature. Just as the physicists the psychologists interpret their phenomena - from outside - thus
fundamentally materialistic.
But with the difference that the psychologist's research interest is directed towards the inner
mental phenomena that people in different ways show their external material aspects of,
among others, the so called mental or psychic diseases.
When physicists and psychologists interpret their natures they think they know what they do,
in both a conscious objectively as scientifically unassailable manner, although they in both
theory and practice, act like phenomenologists.
Generally the professionally active natural scientists work basically as phenomenologists in
all their theoretical and empirical movements, but as said the vast majority of those involved
are so far and on the intellectual level almost completely unaware or ignorant of it. "
15
The general phenomenological truth
If one want to further upgrade this general phenomenological truth, one can say that we
basically interpret all natural phenomena, both the physical material and the mental
psychological basicly phenomenological - or in an absolute immediate, intuitive and mostly
unconscious way.
When we then tell other people what we have interpreted, we do it, for example, in the
physical and psychological ways.
We let tradition and practices prevail, we convey ourselves with a conceptual apparatus and
linguistic expressions as we feel comfortable with and which we since long ago have
accustomed us with.
But then we constantly end up in the dilemmas that makes it almost impossible to separate the
different interpretation results from each other.
We must give greater weight to some of them - or make it very clear to us - which are purely
materialistic - such as physical and psychological - and which are purely phenomenological.
And as said, the materialistic side of us, we must continually satisfy otherwise we would not
be able to live or survive in the corporeal sense.
But therefore we don´t need to reduce or deny our inner nature or the first idea or the domain
that founds all phenomena in our twin nature
Regarding movements or events of outer physical nature, we must look for their genuine
cause or causes elsewhere than in the material world or in the outer physical space.
This applies also for example the inertia and Higg´s boson.
In the first idea or in the most primordial memory there is no inertia.
The most primordial memory/the first idea is in its complete and unshakable calmness devoid
of mass/matter.
The most primordial memory harboring all reference points for the movements, the course of
events in the material world and in every person's inner world.
The most primordial memory is everything´s reference point, thus forming the common
reference point for all "forms" of the phenomena, such as the inertia, hatred and rage.
16
The theoretical discovery of the Higgs mechanism, involving eg the phenomenon Higg´s
boson* has - basically - been interpreted in a phenomenological way.
As the Higg´s boson in its physical basis is perceived as the main building block in that
foundation and has been around since the big bang there are similarities in the forms between
the Higg´s boson and the first idea/the most primordial memory.
What immediately strike you, is the differences, for example, that the first idea are of eternal
existence, the Higgs boson has only been around for about 13.7 billion years.
The most primordial memory lacks substantive structure and form, although its core carries
on, for example, all external forms of the physical phenomena.
Higgs boson constitutes the trigger for, among others, the so-called W and Z particles and
photons (light particles), which are mostly considered to be in - the absolute vacuum or the
absolutely empty physical space.
But there is no absolute void when nature is assessed and interpreted from this contextual
phenomenological perspective - and e g - if we are influenced by Paul Dirac´s thoughts on the
matter (1902-1984).
*
The first predictions of the Higgs boson and the Higgs mechanism was made in 1964 by François Englert in Brussels and a
month later by the British physicist Peter Higgs and later by Robert Brout and Carl Hagen. Their ideas were based on
previous results of Philip Warren Anderson, Gerald Guralnik, Carl R. Hagen.
Steven Weinberg and Abdus Salam were the first to use the Higgs mechanism to explain the electro-weak symmetry
breaking, leading to the electroweak theory.
17
Dirac was the modern physicist who during his lifetime made it clear for other modern
physicists that they could almost completely revert to the ether-idea again (from the ancient
Greek philosophy, including Plato and Aristotle as advocates) - which had been rejected a
couple of decades earlier - before Dirac's invisible vacuum matter came in focus - about 1935.
Theoretically/mathematically Dirac showed that the vacuum or the absolutely empty space is
full of invisible particles.
In this case, one sees similarities between the Higgs boson and the most primordial memory.
Today they speak in modern physics about the Higg´s field and that it completely permeates
all matter in the entire cosmos, which in turn - and for example - can be considered
thoroughly filled with Dirac's invisible vacuum matter, including Higg´s boson, which thus
have existed since the birth moment of physical space and physical time.
The first idea or the most primordial memory is the true progenitor for eg physical space,
physical time and the Higg´s mechanism.
Kinstad August 22, 2014
Bo Erik C Granath