Supplement 1

advertisement
1
1
Supplementary data
2
3
Table A: List of genotypes used in each experiment for each species.
Experiment 2
Species
#
Genotye
Species
#
Genotye
Bean
1
RAA21
Pigeon pea
1
ICPH 2740
2
SEQ 1003
2
ICPH 2671
3
AFR298
3
ICPL 87119
4
SER16
4
ICPB 2047
5
SER 22
5
ICPB 2043
6
SEC16
6
ICP 7035
7
SEQ11
7
ICPL 85063
8
VAX6
8
ICPL 88039
9
DOR 364
9
Maruti
10 BAT 477
Cowpea
1
IT845-2049
2
10 ICPL 161
Soybean
1
JS93-05
IT85F-3139
2
Bragg
3
IT93-693-2
3
RVS 2001
4
Mouride
4
JS 20-50
5
IT98K-1105-5
5
JS 20-53
6
IT98K-1111-1
6
JS 20-59
7
Kvx61-1
7
JS 20-71
8
IT93K-503-1
8
JS 20-73
9
Bambey21
9
JS 20-80
10 CB46
Ground nut 1
10 JS 20-86
ICGV97183
Experiment 1
2
55-437
Species
Genotype
3
ICG12879
Bean
DOR 364
1
2
4
ICG2106
Cowpea
CB 46
5
ICG2777
Groundnut
TMV2
6
ICG85667
Pigeon Pea
ICP 7035
7
ICG9961
Soybean
3 JS 335
8
ICGVSM87003
9
ICGV02290
10 ICG8106
4
5
6
2
3
7
8
9
Figure A. Sigmoid adjustments performed on cumulated transpiration for each species grown
10
on soil A50:S50 with 30 mm of water (Experiment 1) in order to determine day and then water
11
content at FTSW=0. The decrease in cumulated transpiration observed on the end of the
12
measurement period is an artifact due to the mean of calculation of transpiration (total water
13
loss - evaporation) when evaporation from non germinated pots exceeded evaporation from
14
germinated pots. The decreasing part of the dynamic of cumulated transpiration was discarded
15
to fit the adjustment. The red solid line represents the adjusted model. The horizontal dotted
16
line features 95% of maximum cumulated transpiration. Vertical dotted line indicate DAS at
17
which cumulated transpiration reached 95% of its maximum, which was assumed to be at
18
FTSW=0
3
4
19
20
Figure B. Sigmoid adjustments performed on cumulated transpiration for each species grown
21
on soil A24:S75 with 30 mm of water (experiment 2) in order to determine day and then water
22
content at FTSW=0r. The decrease in cumulated transpiration observed on the end of the
23
measurement period is an artifact due to the mean of calculation of transpiration (total water
24
loss - evaporation) when evaporation from non germinated pots exceeded evaporation from
25
germinated pots. The decreasing part of the dynamic of cumulated transpiration was discarded
26
to fit the adjustment. The red solid line represents the adjusted model. The horizontal dotted
27
line features 95% of maximum cumulated transpiration. Vertical dotted line indicate DAS at
28
which cumulated transpiration reached 95% of its maximum, which was assumed to be at
29
FTSW=0.
30
4
Download