Online Resource 1. Summary of published studies including site

advertisement
Online Resource 1. Summary of published studies including site elevation (Elev), latitude north (Lat), longitude west (Long), climatic indicators: mean annual precipitation
(MAP), mean annual temperature (MAT), study duration (DUR), crop or crops grown during the study, number of crops in rotation (ROT), soil baseline bulk density (BD), pH,
sand and clay content, initial soil organic carbon concentration (SOCi), sample and tillage depth, and reported or estimated slope and minimum annual residue (MAR) needed to
maintain SOCi.
Pub
#a
State
Elev
m
19
3
3
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
2
5
7
1
1
1
9
10
18
CA
CO
CO
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
IA
KS
MI
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
MN
20
1384
1384
350
350
370
370
340
340
402
402
390
390
340
340
340
340
340
300
1095
260
290
290
290
350
350
408
Lat
oN
38
41
41
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
42
42
42
42
42
42
42
41
38
42
45
45
45
44
45
44
Long
-o W
122
104
104
94
94
96
96
93
93
95
95
95
95
94
94
94
94
94
95
101
85
93
93
93
95
95
95
MAP
cm
46.2
40
40
100
100
77
77
133
133
143
143
77
77
92
92
92
92
92
93.4
44
78
82
82
82
63
61
63.2
MAT
oC
15.5
10
10
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.4
7.4
10.7
10.7
9
9
10
10
10
10
10
10.4
10.7
8.6
7.2
7.2
7.2
6.2
5.7
6.2
DUR
Cropb
ROT
pH
Sand
g cm-
Yr
10
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
3
3
3
3
11
10
19
13
13
13
10
29
10
BD
g
3
CTWL
CR
CR
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
CS
C
CR
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.22
1.22
1.21
1.21
1.31
1.31
1.11
1.11
1.18
1.18
1.42
1.42
1.42
1.42
1.42
1.3
1.4
1.7
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.27
Clay
7.2
7.0
7.0
6.2
6.2
6.5
6.5
5.7
5.7
6
6
6.3
6.3
7
7
7
7
7
6.5
7.1
6.5
6.4
6.4
6.4
7
7.5
150
250
250
217
217
26
26
342
342
18
18
15
15
100
100
100
100
100
80
190
850
200
200
200
322
370
175
SOCi
Sample
depth
kg-1
300
420
420
453
453
348
348
243
243
291
291
347
347
300
300
300
300
300
360
256
65
150
150
150
331
250
350
Tillage
depth
cm
9.9
8
8
36
36
30
30
29
29
27
27
33
33
31
31
31
31
31
18
10
9.4
20
20
18
38
26
22
15
30
30
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
23
30
30
30
15
20
30
-35
0
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
22
0
20
22
40
25
25
0
30
0
25
17
30
25
30
Slope
ΔSOC
Mg-1
biomass
yr-1
0.076
0.017
0.024
0.21
0.04
0.1
0.07
0.06
-0.04
0.02
0.14
0.02
0.25
0.23
0
0
0
0.025
0.133
1.44
0.153
0.135
0.229
----
MAR
Mg
ha-1
yr-1
7.31
8.62
5.5
7.14
7.54
5.77
6.13
8.81
9.1
9.03
8.65
8.4
8.64
7.33
6.65
7.4
7.8
7.9
6
6.8
6.4
6.87
6.6
8.12
7.2
8.25
6.68
18
4
22
11
6
11
8
13
13
18b
14
17
21
21
20
20
23
MN
NE
NE
SD
SD
SD
WI
KS
KS
MN
KS
MT
MT
MT
MT
MT
OH
408
369
366
500
530
500
330
324
324
408
320
754
690
690
886
886
244
44
41
41
44
44
44
43
39
39
44
-48
47.5
47.5
48
48
40
95
63.2
6.2
97
96
70.8
76.5
10.5
10.5
10
14
9
10
8
10
25
11
11
10
42
-4
4
--14
CS
2
1.27
175
350
22
30
30
-6.82
C
1
1.4
6.5 150
300
9.5
15
10
-6
C
1
1.3
6.5 90
310
12.7
30
0
0.18
0
96
58
7.2
C
1
1.4
6.4 420
185
18
15
25
3.19
8
96
60
6.3
CS
2
1.3
7
135
280
26
15
20
-4
96
58
7.2
CS
2
1.4
6.4 420
185
18
15
25
3.86
6.2
89
79
7.6
C
1
1.4
6.7 100
300
19
20
25
0.043
5.1
96
84
12.8
SSr
2
1.36
5.5
264
12.4
15
22
0.1
4.1
96
84
12.8
SSr
2
1.4
5.5
264
12.4
15
0
0.27
3.2
95
63.2
6.2
S
1
1.27
200
380
22
30
30
-6.96
---W
1
----13
-25
-4.7
104
36
5
W
1
1.4
6.8 -200
17
---0.65
104
34
6
WPBCd 3
1.4
6.1 350
325
12.1
20
0
0.33
4.7
104
34
6
WPBC
3
1.4
6.1 350
325
12.1
20
8
1.18
4.1
110
30
5.5
WLP
2
1.31
8.3 230
260
15.6
20
0
0.072
1.04
110
30
5.5
WLP
2
1.31
8.3 230
260
15.6
20
10
0
-83
93.2
11
W
0
1.3
6.5 180
260
11.4
15
0
0.05
2.3
straw
15
OR
455
46
119
40.5
11
45
W
1
10
6.8 120
180
12.5
60
25
0.18
4.9
24
OR
438
42
118
40
11
30
wWF
1
1.37
6.8 120
180
12.5
60
23
0.66
7.8
24
OR
438
42
118
40
11
22
wWF
1
1.37
-120
180
12.5
60
25
0.152
5.8
24
OR
438
42
118
40
11
10
wWP
2
1.37
5.8 120
180
12.5
60
25
16.1
5.2
16
WS
553
47
118
25
10
23
W
1
-6.8 120
180
8.7
-25
-2.7
a1=[2, 5, 19]; 2=[17]; 3=[3]; 4=[30]; 5=[10]; 6=[6, 7]; 7=[31]; 8=[29]; 9=[8, 15]; 10=[26, 32]; 11=[23]; 12 = [1]; 13= [12]; 14 (Hobbs as reported by Rasmussen et al., 1980=[13,
24]; 15=[22, 24, 25]; 16=[14, 24]; 17=[4, 24], 18 = [8, 15]; 19 =[11, 16, 21]; 20 = [27]; 21=[28] (excluding WPCB rotation form CT calculation, if included slope became
negative); 22 = [9]; 23=[18]; 24=[20, 25]
bB=barley, C=corn, F=fallow, L=other legume, P= pea, R=multiple rotation combinations, S=soybean, Sr=sorghum, T=tomato, W=wheat, wW=winter wheat
cHuggins et al., [15] – reported minimum shoot and root C, using Shoot:root ratio of 0.97 for corn and 1.22 for soybean, estimated the amount of C from shoot, assuming shoot C
concentration was 43%.
dEstimated texture from soil type if not included in publication, using average from official soil series description (http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html)
used to estimate and a general bulk density based on texture (http://www.pedosphere.ca/resources/bulkdensity/triangle_us.cfm).
eExcluded from corn based as corn was grown in one of possible rotation combinations.
References
1. Al-Kaisi MM, Yin X, Licht MA (2005) Soil carbon and nitrogen changes as affected by tillage system and crop
biomass in a corn-soybean rotation. Appl Soil Ecol 30:174-191
2. Allmaras RR, Linden DR, Clapp CE (2004) Corn residue transformations into root and soil carbon as related to
nitrogen, tillage, and stover management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1366-1375
3. Benjamin JG, Halvorson AD, Nielsen DC, Mikha MM (2010) Crop management effects on crop residue
production and changes in soil organic carbon in the central great plains. Agron J 102:990-997
4. Black AL (1973) Soil property changes associated with crop residue management in a wheat-fallow rotation. Soil
Sci Soc Am J 37:943-946
5. Clapp CE, Allmaras RR, Layese MF, Linden DR, Dowdy RH (2000) Soil organic carbon and 13-C abundance as
related to tillage, crop residue and nitrogen fertilizer under continuous corn management in Minnesota. Soil Tillage
Res 55:127-142
6. Clay DE, Carlson CG, Clay SA, Reese C, Liu Z, Chang J et al. (2006) Theoretical derivation of stable and
nonisotopic approaches for assessing soil organic carbon turnover. Agron J 98:443-450
7. Clay DE, Chang J, Malo DD, Carlson CG, Reese C, Clay SA et al. (2001) Factors influencing spatial variablity of
apparent electrical conductivity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32:2993-3008
8. Crookston RK, Kurle JE, Copeland PJ, Ford JH, Leuschen WE (1991) Rotational cropping sequence affects yield
of corn and soybeans. Agron J 83:108-113
9. Follett R, Vogel K, Varvel G, Mitchell R, Kimble J (2012) Soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass and no-till
maize grown for bioenergy. BioEnergy Res 5:866-875
10. Halvorson AD, Schlegel AJ (2012) Crop rotation effect on soil carbon and nitrogen stocks under limited
irrigation. Agron J 104:1265-1273
11. Hasegawa H, Labavitch JM, McGuire AM, Bryant DC, Denison RF (1999) Testing CERES model predictions
of N release from legume cover crop residue. Field Crops Res 63:255-267
12. Havlin JL, Kissel DE (1997) Management effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the east-central Great
Plains of Kansas. In Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (ed.) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems:
Long-term experiments in North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 381-386
13. Hobbs JA, Brown PI (1965) Effects of cropping and management on nitrogen and organic carbon contents of a
western Kansas soil. In Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 144. Kansas State Univ., Mahattan, KS,
14. Horner GM, Overson MM, Baker GO, Pawson WW (1960) Effect of cropping practices on yield, soil organic
matter, and erosion in the Pacific Northwest wheat region. In Wash., Idaho, and Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. and ARSUSDA Coop. Bull. No. 1. Pullman, WA,
15. Huggins DR, Clapp CE, Allmaras RR, Lamb JA, Layese MF (1998) Carbon dynamics in corn-soybean
sequences as estimated from natural carbon-13 abundance. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:195-203
16. Kong AYY, Six J, Bryant DC, Denison RF, van Kessel C (2005) The relationship between carbon input,
aggregation, and soil organic carbon stabilization in sustainable cropping systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1078-1085
17. Larson WE, Clapp CE, Pierre WH, Morachan YB (1972) Effects of increasing amounts of organic residues on
continuous corn. II. Organic carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur. Agron J 64:204-208
18. Lenka NK, Lal R (2013) Soil aggregation and greenhouse gas flux after 15 years of wheat straw and fertilizer
management in a no-till system. Soil Tillage Res 126:78-89
19. Linden DR, Clapp CE, Dowdy RH (2000) Long-term corn grain and stover yields as a function of tillage and
residue removed in east central Minnesota. Soil Tillage Res 56:167-174
20. Machado S (2011) Soil organic carbon dynamics in the pendleton long-term experiments: Implications for
biofuel production in pacific Northwest. Agron J 103:253-260
21. Martini EA, Buyer JS, Bryant DC, Hartz TK, Denison RF (2004) Yield increases during the organic transition:
improving soil quality or increasing experience? Field Crops Res 86:255-266
22. Oveson MM (1966) Conservation of Soil Nitrogen in a Wheat Summer Fallow Farming Practice. Agron J
58:444-447
23. Pikul JLJ, Johnson JMF, Schumacher TE, Vigil MF, Riedell WE (2008) Change in surface soil carbon under
rotated corn in eastern South Dakota. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1738-1744
24. Rasmussen PE, Allmaras RR, Rohde CR, Roager NCJ (1980) Crop residue influences on soil carbon and
nitrogen in a wheat-fallow system. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:596-600
25. Rasmussen PE, Smiley RW (1997) Soil carbon and nitrogen change in long-term agricultural experiments at
Pendleton, OR. In Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliott ET, Cole CV (ed.) Soil organic matter in temperate agroecosystems:
Long-term experiment in North America. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 353-360
26. Reicosky DC, Evans SD, Cambardella CA, Allmaras RR, Wilts AR, Huggins DR (2002) Continuous corn with
moldboard tillage: Residue and fertility effects on soil carbon. J Soil Water Conserv 57:277-284
27. Sainju UM, Lenssen A, Caesar-Thonthat T, Waddell J (2006) Carbon sequestration in dryland soils and plant
residue as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. J Environ Qual 35:1341-1347
28. Sainju UM, Lenssen AW, Caesar-TonThat T, Jabro JD, Lartey RT, Evans R et al. (2011) Dryland residue and
soil organic matter as influenced by tillage, crop rotation, and cultural practice. Plant Soil 338:27-41
29. Vanotti MB, Bundy LG, Peterson AE (1997) Nitrogen fertilizer and legume-cereal rotation effects on soil
productivity and organic matter dynamics in Wisconsin. In Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (ed.) Soil
organic matter in temperate agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 105-119
30. Varvel GE, Wilhelm WW (2010) Long-Term Soil Organic Carbon as Affected by Tillage and Cropping
Systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:915-921
31. Vitosh ML, Lucas RE, Silva GH (1997) Long-term effects of fertilizer and manure on corn yield, soil carbon,
and other soil chemical properties in Michigan. In Paul EA, Paustian K, Elliot ET, Cole CV (ed.) Soil organic matter
in temperate agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 129-139
32. Wilts AR, Reicosky DC, Allmaras RR, Clapp CE (2004) Long-term corn residue effects: Harvest alternatives,
soil carbon turnover, and root-derived carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1342-1351
Download