Location: Home > ask a rocket scientist > aerodynamics > q0151
Search
Rocket Nose Cones and
Altitude
Does the shape of the nose on a rocket affect how high it goes?
- question from Eve
Yes, the shape of the nose on any flying vehicle is important because it
affects the amount of drag the craft experiences. Drag is one of the four
forces of flight, as illustrated below.
Four forces acting on an aircraft in flight
A rocket primarily travels in a vertical direction rather than the horizontal
flight path followed by most aircraft. The same four forces of flight still act
on a rocket, but the directions in which they act and their magnitudes vary
as shown below.
Four forces acting on a rocket in flight
In particular, the lift force acting on a rocket in vertical flight is usually pretty
small. The other three forces, however, all directly impact the maximum
height the rocket can achieve. Weight is a function of how each component
of the rocket is designed. The lighter the rocket is, the higher it will be able
to go all else being equal. Thrust is generated by the rocket's motor. The
more thrust the motor produces, the higher it will go. However, neither of
these forces is heavily dependent on the nose shape. The force that does
vary significantly with the shape of the nose is drag.
Drag is the force that resists the motion of the vehicle through the air and
opposes thrust. The lower the drag, the higher the rocket will be able to go.
Drag is due primarily to friction between the surface of the vehicle and the
fluid through which it travels, that fluid being air in the case of a flying
object. Drag results because the molecules of a fluid must be moved aside
as an object moves through it. This process takes energy, and the energy
needed to move the fluid aside reduces the remaining energy available to
move the object forward. Drag is minimized when the air flowing past a
flying object is smooth because less energy is imparted to the airflow when
it is smooth than when it is turbulent.
Air that flows smoothly over a surface is said to be laminar. In laminar flow,
the air acts as if it were in layers above the surface of the vehicle. These
layers of air slide over each other smoothly, and the velocity of each layer
increases in a smooth and regular distribution moving further away from the
surface. In a turbulent flow, however, the layers of air mix together creating
an irregular and uneven pattern.
A simple analogy is to compare the layers of air to lanes of traffic on a
highway. Each molecule of air can be thought of as an individual car. In a
laminar flow, the "slow lane" is closest to the surface, and lanes further
away become increasingly faster. There is no interaction between the
different layers, so a molecule from a slower layer cannot "switch lanes"
and move to a faster layer. The same cannot be said of a turbulent flow.
Here, molecules are free to move from layer to layer, causing the air flow to
randomly speed up in some places and slow down in others. The end result
is a chaotic and unpredictable pattern of air that creates greater drag than a
smooth, laminar airflow.
Many factors of rocket design can increase the drag it experiences in flight.
One of the most important of these factors is the shape of the nose. The
ideal aerodynamic nose shape is primarily related to the speed at which the
rocket flies. Moreover, the same principles hold true for aircraft, missiles,
bombs, and other flying vehicles as well. In fact, it is often possible to tell
what speed regime an aerial vehicle was designed to fly in simply by
observing the shape of its nose.
For example, the ideal nose shape for vehicles that fly at subsonic speeds,
defined as less than the speed of sound, is more rounded. That is why
commercial aircraft like the Boeing 777 usually have rounded noses called
parabolic nose shapes.
Rounded parabolic nose of the Boeing 777
Similar nose shapes can be seen on other subsonic vehicles, such as the
Tomahawk cruise missile pictured below.
Rounded nose of the Tomahawk cruise missile
The ideal nose of a high speed, supersonic fighter like the F-15 Eagle, on
the other hand, is a more pointed shape like a cone. Most supersonic
aircraft, rockets, and missiles use a nose shape very similar to a cone but a
little more rounded to provide more internal volume. This shape is called an
ogive (pronounced "oh-zheeve" or "oh-zhive").
Ogival nose of the F-15 Eagle
The faster the vehicle is designed to go, the more pointed the ideal
aerodynamic nose shape becomes. Compare the nose of the Mach 2 F-15
with that of the Mach 5 Phoenix air-to-air missile shown below. The
limitation on nose shape is temperature. At very high Mach numbers, the
nose must become more rounded than the ideal low-drag shape in order to
spread the high temperatures over a larger area and prevent the nose from
melting.
Ogival nose of the AIM-54 Phoenix missile
The ideal nose shape for a rocket that minimizes its drag and maximizes its
altitude depends on how fast the rocket is designed to travel. Most model
rockets that you can buy in a store fly well below the speed of sound. As a
result, the ideal nose for a model rocket is not the pointed cone or ogive
shape you might expect, but the more rounded parabola. The shape that
produces the highest drag is the blunt, or flat-face shape. Several common
nose shapes and the drag they generate as a relative percentage of the
blunt nose are compared in the following figure.
Comparison of the drag for different nose shapes for a model rocket
Proof of these trends can be seen in the results of experimentation
conducted by yours truly. The purpose of the project was to determine the
effect of different nose shapes on the altitude of a model rocket. Four nose
shapes were tested, a parabola, ogive, cone, and a blunt shape, similar to
those shown below.
Nose shapes tested on a model rocket
All tests were conducted using the same rocket body and using solid
propellant motors of equal thrust. In addition, each nose was adjusted to
the same length and weight to ensure that only the nose shape would vary
from flight to flight. A ground-based altitude tracker based on simple
trigonometry was used to measure the maximum altitude achieved on each
flight. The results of the study are illustrated in the following figure.
Altitudes achieved using different nose shapes on the same rocket
The only variable that could not be controlled was the weather, particularly
the strength and direction of the local winds. Though the wind did vary over
the course of the experiments which could affect the accuracy of the
results, the trends do clearly confirm the characteristics discussed earlier.
The parabolic nose produced the best performance by far, with an average
maximum altitude of 308 ft (94 m). At the other extreme, a blunted nose
was the worst performer at an average altitude of 237 ft (74 m), a decrease
of nearly 25%. The conical and ogival noses were pretty comparable,
achieving average altitudes 15% and 12% lower than the parabola,
respectively.
In conclusion, the shape of the nose does indeed have a significant impact
on the height it can reach. For most model rockets that fly at speeds far
less than the speed of sound, a rounded, parabolic shape is ideal to
minimize drag and reach the highest altitude. If you are designing a highperformance rocket that can reach supersonic speeds, however, a more
pointed nose like the ogive is the ideal shape.
- answer by Jeff Scott, 23 November 2003