For use with the following types of changes:

Expanding programs at current degree levels (when the new program is a significant departure from current programs)

Initiating programs at a lower degree level
Statement Regarding the Report
The Board of Trustees of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on
Colleges (SACSCOC) is responsible for making the final determination on reaffirmation of accreditation based on the findings contained in this committee report, the institution’s response to issues contained in the report, other assessments relevant to the review, and application of the Commission’s policies and procedures. Final interpretation of the Principles of Accreditation and final action on the accreditation status of the institution rest with SACSCOC Board of
Trustees.
:
:
Form Updated: MAR 2012

Directions to Committee Chair for Part I: Typically the overview can be copied and pasted from the institution ’s Documentation for the Substantive Change Committee form and then edited as appropriate.
This section is intended to capture an overview of and rationale for the change, as well as the institution’s capacity for implementing the change. Delete these directions prior to printing the final report.
A. Describe the program expansion. Include the location, initial date of implementation, projected number of students, primary target audience, projected life of the program
B.
(single cohort or ongoing), and instructional delivery methods.
Discuss the rationale for the change, including assessment of need. List currently offered certificate and/or degree programs that are related to the program expansion. List the institutional strengths that facilitate implementing the change.
Directions to Committee for Part II: If the Committee determines that an institution is out of compliance with a standard or requirement, write a recommendation. Because a recommendation requires an institution to take corrective action, specific evidence of non-compliance must be included in the narrative. See Appendix I of the Handbook for Review Committees for guidelines for writing a recommendation. Number recommendations consecutively throughout the report and provide a summary list in Appendix B.
If the Committee determines that an institution is in compliance with a standard or requirement and a recommendation is not necessary, develop a c omment in accordance with “Guidelines for
Writing Comments for Committee Reports,” which is available in Appendix H of the Handbook for
Review Committees.
Delete these directions prior to printing the final report.
Directions to the Institution for Part II: For each of the standards or requirements listed below, make the case for compliance and describe the impact of the program expansion on that aspect of the institution. See the Commission policy “Distance and Correspondence Education,” if appropriate.
A. Integrity:
PR 1.1 The institution operates with integrity in all matters. (Integrity)
[No response necessary. This statement will be addressed by the visiting committee, not by the institution.]
B. Programs:
CR 2.7.1 The institution offers one or more degree programs based on at least 60 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the associate level; at least 120 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the baccalaureate level; or at least 30 semester credit hours or the equivalent at the post-baccalaureate, graduate, or professional
2

level. If an institution uses a unit other than semester credit hours, it provides an explanation for the equivalency. The institution also provides a justification for all degrees that include fewer than the required number of semester credit hours or its equivalent unit. (Program Length)
CR 2.7.2 The institution offers degree programs that embody a coherent course of study that is compatible with its stated mission and is based upon fields of study appropriate to higher education. (Program Content)
CS 3.4.3 The institution publishes admissions policies that are consistent with its mission. (Admissions Policies)
CS 3.4.11 For each major in a degree program, the institution assigns responsibility for program coordination, as well as for curriculum development and review, to persons academically qualified in the field. In those degree programs for which the institution does not identify a major, this requirement applies to a curricular area or concentration. (Academic Program Coordination)
CS 3.5.3 The institution publishes requirements for its undergraduate programs, including its general education components. These requirements conform to commonly accepted standards and practices for degree programs. (See Commission
policy “The Quality and Integrity of Undergraduate Degrees.”) (Undergraduate program requirements)
CS 3.6.1 The institution’s post-baccalaureate professional degree programs, master’s and doctoral degree programs, are progressively more advanced in academic content than its undergraduate programs. (Post-baccalaureate program rigor)
CS 3.6.2 The institution structures its graduate curricula (1) to include knowledge of the literature of the discipline and (2) to ensure ongoing student engagement in research and/or appropriate professional practice and training experiences.
(Graduate curriculum)
CS 3.6.3 At least one-third of credits toward a graduate or a post-baccalaureate professional degree are earned through instruction offered by the institution awarding the degree. (See Commission policy “Collaborative Academic
Arrangements.”) (Institutional credits for a graduate degree)
CS 3.6.4 The institution defines and publishes requirements for its graduate and post-baccalaureate professional programs. These requirements conform to commonly accepted standards and practices for degree programs. (Postbaccalaureate program requirements)
FR 4.4 Program length is appropriate for each of the institution’s educational programs.
(Program length)
FR 4.9) The institution has policies and procedures for determining the credit hours awarded for courses and programs that conform to commonly accepted practices in higher education and to Commission policy. (See Commission policy “Credit
Hours.”)
. (Definition of credit hours)
3

C. Faculty:
CR 2.8 The number of full-time faculty members is adequate to support the mission of the institution and to ensure the quality and integrity of each of its academic programs. (Faculty)
CS 3.7.1 The institution employs competent faculty members qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution. When determining acceptable qualifications of its faculty, an institution gives primary consideration to the highest earned degree in the discipline. The institution also considers competence, effectiveness, and capacity, including, as appropriate, undergraduate and graduate degrees, related work experiences in the field, professional licensure and certifications, honors and awards, continuous documented excellence in teaching, or other demonstrated competencies and achievements that contribute to effective teaching and student learning outcomes. For all cases, the institution is responsible for justifying and documenting the qualifications of its faculty. (See Commission gu idelines “Faculty
Credentials.”) (Faculty competence)
[As part of the response, include a discussion of the impact of the program expansion on faculty workload. Identify new faculty hired to support this initiative.
Display faculty qualifications on the Commission’s “Faculty Roster Form.” Limit entries to those faculty members assigned to the new program(s). For graduate programs, include documentation of the scholarship and research capability of faculty. For doctoral programs, include documentation of faculty experience in directing dissertation research.]
D. Institutional Effectiveness:
CS 3.3.1.1 The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves these outcomes, and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of the results in each of the following areas: (Institutional Effectiveness)
CS 3.3.1.1
educational programs, to include student learning outcomes.
[As part of the response, include a description of how the institution is monitoring the quality of the new program(s). Summarize current procedures for the assessment of learning outcomes and achievement, and how results will be used to improve the new programs.]
E. Library/Learning Resources:
CR 2.9 The institution, through ownership or formal arrangements or agreements, provides and supports student and faculty access and user privileges to adequate library collections and services and to other learning/information resources consistent with the degrees offered. Collections, resources, and services are sufficient to support all its educational, research, and public service programs.
(Learning Resources and Services)
CS 3.8.1 The institution provides facilities and learning/information resources that are appropriate to support its teaching, research, and service mission.
(Learning/information resources)
CS 3.8.2 The institution ensures that users have access to regular and timely instruction in the use of the library and other learning/information resources.
(Instruction of library use)
4

CS 3.8.3 The institution provides a sufficient number of qualified staff —with appropriate education or experiences in library and/or other learning/information resources —to accomplish the mission of the institution. (Qualified staff)
F. Student Services:
CR 2.10 The institution provides student support programs, services, and activities consistent with its mission that are intended to promote student learning and enhance the development of its students. (Student Support Services)
CS 3.4.9 The institution provides appropriate academic support services.
(Academic Support Services)
FR 4.5 The institution has adequate procedures for addressing written student complaints and is responsible for demonstrating that it follows those procedures when resolving student complaints. (See Commission policy “Complaint Procedures
against the Commission or its Accredited Institutions.”) (Student complaints)
G. Financial Resources:
CS 3.10.1 The institution’s recent financial history demonstrates financial stability.
(Financial stability)
[As part of the response, include a business plan that includes the following: a. a description of financial resources to support the change, including a budget for the first year b. projected revenues and expenditures and cash flow c. the amount of resources going to institutions or organizations for contractual or support services d. the operational, management, and physical resources available for the change.
Include contingency plans if required resources do not materialize.
Assess the impact that the program expansion is having on the funding available for existing programs and services.
Institutions currently on sanction or being monitored by the Commission for
financial reasons must provide a copy of the most recent audit.]
5

Directions to Committee Chair: Although formal suggestions and commendations are no longer included in committee reports, the Committee may make advisory and laudatory comments regarding the institution and either include them here or embed them in the comments for the respective Core Requirement, Comprehensive Standard, or Federal Requirement. Delete these directions prior to printing the final report.
6

Directions to Committee Chair: Include the name, title, institution, city and state of each member. Delete these directions prior to printing the final report.
7

List recommendations consecutively. Include the Core Requirement or Comprehensive
Standard number, the recommendation number, the recommendation.
Example:
FR 4.4, Recommendation 1:
The committee recommends that the institution review and justify the compressed program length, which at 24 semester hours is considerably lower than comparable master ’s degree programs.
Delete this box prior to printing the final report.
8