GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT IN WELLS

advertisement
Hydrologic Field Methods
Instructor: Jerry Fairley, jfairley@uidaho.edu
November 3, 2005
GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT IN WELLS
Introduction
One of the most fundamental skills in groundwater hydrology is the ability to accurately
measure and interpret the depth to groundwater in an observation well or piezometer.
Measuring the elevation of the potentiometric surface is a routine task for any
groundwater professional; however, the difference between a professional and the
summer help is that a professional is capable of understanding the resulting
measurements. In order to reliably interpret groundwater measurements, you must be
familiar with a few basic ideas.
Basic Concepts
It is commonly believed that “water runs downhill,” although this is not always true for
groundwater. Instead, water flows from regions of higher potential to regions of lower
potential. Hydrogeologists measure the driving force for groundwater flow in terms of
“head” [L]. Head is a combination of gravitational potential and pressure potential, and
is reported as an equivalent height of a column of water:

P 

H   z 
g 

where H [L] is the hydraulic head, z [L] is the elevation of the measurement point above
some datum, P [M/LT2] is the pressure at the measurement point, ρ [M/L3] is the density
of water, and g [L/T2] is the acceleration of gravity. Head is measured by determining
the height to which water will rise in a well open to the aquifer; it is therefore common
practice to report head in terms of elevation above sea level. When a well has a
significant length (or “screened interval”) open to the aquifer, the water level in the well
is an average of head for the entire screened interval. If the well has only a very limited
screened interval (approximating a point) the well is known as a “piezometer”, and the
water level measured is the head at the open point (see Figure 1). Wells are generally
open only at the screen- the bottoms are assumed to be sealed (although this may not be
true in practice, particularly in hard rock, where screening may be omitted).
Figure 1: Monitoring wells and piezometers
1
Hydrologic Field Methods
Instructor: Jerry Fairley, jfairley@uidaho.edu
November 3, 2005
So why would a groundwater professional prefer data from a piezometer, rather than
another type of well? If there is a vertical component to the groundwater flow, there
must be vertical differences in head (remember, water flows from high to low head). It is
possible to determine the vertical direction of flow if two or more piezometers are
available at the same location (but open to different depths). If head measurements from
regular wells are all that is available you may be able to tell the horizontal direction of
flow, but not whether vertical flow is occurring. By measuring head (water elevations) in
the monitoring wells 1 and 4 (MW-1 and MW-4), shown in Figure 2, it is clear that
groundwater is flowing from MW-1 towards MW-4, because the head is lower at MW-4
than at MW-1. However, only by noticing the difference in head between the two
piezometers, MW-2 and MW-3, would a groundwater professional know that water in the
aquifer is actually flowing upward, as well as left to right.
Figure 2: Measuring vertical and horizontal gradients
Most people are familiar with the idea of a “water table”. Hydrogeologists say water
table aquifers are “unconfined”, because the head in the aquifer is at (approximately) the
same elevation as the water table. Often, however, an aquifer may be “confined” by an
overlying layer of low-permeability material. Head in a confined aquifer is at a higher
elevation than the top of the aquifer. In a confined aquifer, the level of head forms an
imaginary surface above the aquifer known as the “potentiometric surface”. In an
unconfined aquifer the water table is equal in elevation to the head in the aquifer;
therefore, the water table is the same as the potentiometric surface (Figure 3).
Figure 3: Unconfined and confined aquifers
Vertical and horizontal gradients often become important when working in multiple
aquifer systems, because you may want to know if water is flowing from a deeper aquifer
to a shallower aquifer, or the other way around. More importantly, if you measure head
in several wells, and the wells are screened in different aquifers, you may not be able to
2
Hydrologic Field Methods
Instructor: Jerry Fairley, jfairley@uidaho.edu
November 3, 2005
make sense of the data (Figure 4). For this reason, always make sure you know what
intervals are screened in the wells you are taking measurements in, and be sure you
understand how the screened intervals relate to the local geology and hydrologic units!
Figure 4: A multi-aquifer system
Questions
 What is the difference between an ordinary well and a piezometer? What is the
difference between a monitoring well and a piezometer? Why are the differences
important?
 What is the difference between a water table and a potentiometric surface?
 In a multiple aquifer system, is it possible for groundwater to flow one direction
in one aquifer, and a different direction in another aquifer? If no, why not? If
yes, how would you detect it?
 What is the difference between a confined aquifer and an unconfined aquifer?
 What is the minimum number of wells you would need to detect a vertical
gradient? What is the minimum number of wells you would need to detect a
horizontal gradient? What is the minimum number of wells you would need to
determine the horizontal direction of flow?
 What is head? How is it measured? What are its units?
 A drinking glass of water is placed so that its bottom is 5280 feet above sea level.
The water in the glass is four inches deep. What is the head two inches from the
bottom of the glass? Three inches from the bottom? One inch?
3
Hydrologic Field Methods
Instructor: Jerry Fairley, jfairley@uidaho.edu
November 3, 2005
Assignment
The table below describes construction details for wells at the University of Idaho
Groundwater Research Site (UIGRS). The chart is reproduced from Nimmer (1998):
On the following page you will find a map (also from Nimmer, 1998) of the UIGRS
showing the locations of the wells noted above. Using the tape and e-tape, measure the
elevation of the water surface in the wells at the research site.
To Turn In:
A three page report on your findings, typewritten and formatted as a letter report for a
paying client (see attached example), including a brief summary of what you did, why
you did it, and how many independent aquifer units you believe exist at the UIGRS.
Page two should be a table summarizing your data, and the third page will be the map of
the UIGRS (map provided on following page).
References
Nimmer, R.E., 1998. Groundwater Tracer Studies in Columbia River Basalt, M.S.
Thesis, University of Idaho Department of Geological Sciences.
4
Hydrologic Field Methods
Instructor: Jerry Fairley, jfairley@uidaho.edu
5
November 3, 2005
Download