9:50-10:30 J. McEnery (Invited): Observations of Gamma

advertisement
Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope
Observations of Gamma-ray
Bursts
Julie McEnery
NASA/GSFC and University of
Maryland
On behalf of the Fermi-LAT and
Fermi-GBM collaborations
1
Fermi Observatory
Large Area Telescope (LAT):
• 20 MeV - >300 GeV
• 2.4 sr FoV (scans entire sky every
~3hrs)
Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
• 8 keV - 40 MeV
• views entire unocculted sky
Launched on June 11, 2008
2
All Sky Coverage
LAT sensitivity on 4
different timescales:
100 s, 1 orbit (96
mins), 1 day and 1
year
•
•
•
In survey mode, the LAT observes the entire sky every two orbits (~3
hours), and covers 20% of the sky at any time.
Can also perform pointed observations of particularly interesting regions
of the sky.
• Autonomously repoint for 2.5 hours following on-board detection of a
bright, hard GBM burst
GBM covers the entire unocculted sky
3
GRB090902B - Autonomous repoint
•
LAT
–
–
–
–
–
pointing in celestial coordinates from -120 s to 2000 s
Red cross = GRB 090902B
Dark region = occulted by Earth ( z>113°)
Blue line = LAT FoV (±66°)
White lines = 20° (Earth avoidance angle) / 50° above horizon
White points = LAT events (no cut on zenith angle)
4
Fermi and GRB
•
•
•
LAT: <20 MeV to >300 GeV. With both onboard and ground burst triggers.
GBM: 12 NaI detectors— 8 keV to 1 MeV. Used for onboard trigger, onboard and
ground localization, spectroscopy: 2 BGO detectors— 150 keV to 40 MeV. Used for
spectroscopy.
Total of >7 energy decades!
Good spectral
observations of the
prompt phase of lots of
GRB
5
Alerts and Data Flow
1s
Instrument
Trigger(s)
Fast
signal
GBM>LAT
10 s
Alerts and
updates
100s
1000 s
103 s
Repoint Repoint
to GCN with request request
localization GBM- LAT->SC
>LAT
Science processing
parameters reviewed by
Users Committee
•
104 s
Slew to keep burst
within LAT FOV
(dwell time 2.5 hrs)
105 s
Regularly-scheduled
data downlinks (10-12/day)
Planned repoint frequency (adjustable):
• bursts starting within LAT FOV ~2/month
• bursts starting outside LAT FOV ~2/year
Onboard processing (both LAT and GBM) - GCN alerts: location, intensity (cnts),
hardness ratio, trigger classification (GRB, solar flare etc)
•
GBM Prompt ground processing (10-30 mins): updated location, lightcurve.
Quicklook GBM products available at FSSC
•
•
GBM Burst Advocate localization
LAT ground processing (5-15 hours): updated location, high energy spectrum, flux
(or upper limit), afterglow search results. LAT count data available.
•
Final ground processing (24-48 hours): GBM model fit (spectral parameters, flux,
fluence), joint LAT-GBM model fit, raw GBM data available.
6
Science Data Availability
No proprietary gamma-ray data - Everyone gets access to
the data at the same time
Latency
requirement is
72 hours, typical
latency is much
less ~<10 hours
•
LAT and GBM instrument teams generate additional high level data
(lightcurves, transient alerts, pulsar timing solutions etc) which are served to the
community by the FSSC
7
GBM Triggers/Month
• Nov 9, 2009 - add new TGF trigger
• TGF trigger rate increased by factor of ~10 to 1 per 3.7 days
8
Fermi GRB detections
GRB 130427A
GRB 131108A
14 LAT bursts with measured redshift from z=0.145 (GRB130702A via iPTF!) to 4.35
(GRB080916C)
9
GBM Spectra - Thermal Components?
GRB100724B - bright GBM burst
Non
thermal
Expect thermal/blackbody component
from photosphere
• Black body components have been fit in
several GRB - GRB080916C,
GRB090902, GRB100724B…
Guiriec et al, 2011, Ryde et al 2011
Total
Non
thermal
Thermal(kT≈
38keV)
kT~constant, evolving nonthermal component
10
Continuous high time resolution data
• The initial GBM configuration was to return count rates binned
in time and energy.
– After an onboard trigger enhance time and energy
resolution of the binned data for 10 mins and collect
individual time-tagged events for ~5.5 minutes.
• On November 26, 2012, we transitioned to continuously
collecting time-tagged event data
– This allows for sensitive ground-based analyses on short
timescales
• Excellent for TGFs, which typically have durations less
than the shortest onboard trigger integration time.
• Also helpful for searches for sub-threshold short GRB,
precursors etc.
• Pipeline to search for SGRB offline is currently under
development by the GBM team.
11
GBM Localization Contours
• GBM’s strength is its broadband spectral coverage of the prompt
emission of GRB, its weakness is relatively poor localization
– 68% containment: 15o (1st FSW), 11.5o (last FSW), 7.5o (GA), 5o (HitL)
• The GBM team have developed new data products to support
follow-up observations of GRB locations.
– Location of the GRB along with 1, 2 and 3 sigma contours that
include both the statistical and the current best-guess
systematic uncertainties on the GBM localizations.
• Already two successful follow-ups with iPTF using the contour files
(130702A & 131011A)
• These localization products will routinely be made publicly
available from the FSSC.
• Please see Adam Goldstein’s poster (or talk with Adam) for more
details.
12
Fermi-LAT Observations of GRB
• Onset of >100 MeV delayed w.r.t. keV flux
• Durations of high energy emission longer than keV emission
– Spectral and flux variability greatest at early times
– Spectral index ~constant at later times
• Hard power-law components seen in bright LAT GRB
• Cutoffs -> fewer detected GRB than hoped
• MeV-GeV counterparts to X-ray flares?
13
Energetics of Fermi-LAT GRBs
130427A
• LAT GRBs are among the most energetic both intrinsically and
observationally
14
Comparing MeV to GeV emission
• The GeV fluence is
typically ~10% of the
MeV fluence.
• The two short GRB
may be exceptions to
this, but need more
short GRB to confirm.
100%
10%
1%
15
Highest Energy Photons
Highest energy photons
provide constraints on
the
acceleration/emission
processes (need to be
able to produce the
photons) and on
conditions in the
emission region (need
to be able to get them
out)
• The highest energy photons are not correlated with spikes in
the prompt emission lightcurve, and often arrive after the end
of the prompt emission
16
Delayed onset of >100 MeV Emission
• The LAT >100 MeV
emission starts after the
keV emission, sometimes
by up to 80 seconds
• Seen for both long and
short GRB
17
Duration Distributions
•
We measure a systematically
longer duration in the LAT
– Emission at GeV energy
lasts longer than the
emission at MeV energy
18
Extra power-law components in most bright
bursts
Ackermann et al ApJ
Abdo, A. A., et al. 2009, ApJ, 706, L138
GRB 090902B
Best fit spectrum to interval b
(T0+4.6 s to T0 + 9.6 s) is a band
function (smoothly broken powerlaw) + power-law component.
GRB090510. First bright short GRB
Clear detection of an extra component,
inconsistent with the Band function.
19
GRB090926B
• Sharp spike seen at all
measured gamma-ray
energies
– Strongest below 15
keV and above 10
MeV
– Clear correlation
between keV and
MeV/GeV
lightcurves
Ackermann et al, 2011
20
GRB090926 - extra spectral component
•
•
Hard power-law component emerges during the bright spike, with
cutoff at 1.4 GeV
Power-law index remains constant through the afterglow (~5000
seconds)
21
Long-lived Emission with powerlaw temporal decays
GRB 090510
GRB 090902B
De Pasquale, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, L146
GRB 080916C
22
Breaks in the extended emission
• Significant (>3 sigma) breaks
seen in 3 bright GRB
• Transition from prompt to
afterglow?
23
LAT Detection during X-ray Flare Activity
•
GRB100728A
– Bright GBM burst->ARR
– No prompt LAT detection
(but was at edge of FoV,
58 deg)
– Hard spectrum (1.4+-0.2)
– Gamma-ray fluence
consistent with
extrapolation of the X-ray
flare spectrum
– Unable to distinguish
between afterglow or flare
emission due to weak
LAT detection
•
Sample of 140 Swift GRB
– 49 (35%) show flares at early times
– 12 with good LAT observations (in FoV and away from Earth limb)
– 29 flares with simultaneous Fermi/Swift observations, 1 detection!
24
How fast is the emission region
moving?
•
•
•
Relativistic motion of the emitting shell:
– A relativistic motion of the shell allows higher energy events in dense
region to escape.
– Observing high-energy events correlated with the fast variability allows
us to constrain to the speed (Gmin) of the emitting shell.
For target photon spectrum
assume band function, or powerlaw.
Caveat : target photon field
assumed uniform, isotropic, timeindependent
– More realistic modeling yields
significantly (~3 times) lower
values
25
GRB130427A
• One of the brightest
GRBs in gammarays ever detected
– Energy released
in gamma-rays
~1054 erg
• Highest energy
photon (95 GeV)
• Longest lasting GeV
emission – LAT
detected emission
for over 20 hours
• Redshift = 0.34
26
GRB130427A Synchrotron emission?
Equate radiation and
acceleration timescales
• The high energy LAT-detected
photons challenge synchrotron origin
from shock accelerated electrons
27
GRB131108A
• First onboard LAT detection in 4 years!
• Very bright burst in LAT
• Triggered Swift TOO based on LAT onboard location
– Swift found the X-ray afterglow
• Analysis is ongoing, but initial analysis suggests:
– Softer than usual LAT spectrum
– Highest energy LAT photon just 1.5 GeV
• The bright Fermi-LAT burst drought is over!
28
The Future
• We are continuing to find unusual bursts
– GRB130427A, GRB131108A
• Planned improvements to LAT FSW to boost LAT onboard
trigger rate (by taking advantage of the GBM->LAT fast signal)
• New observatories coming online especially high energy and
multi messenger
– HAWC (wide-field TeV observatory)
– VERITAS, HESS2, MAGIC etc
– Unique opportunities for joint gravitational wave/photon
detections of binary mergers with advanced LIGO and
Fermi
• New GBM localization data products, possible localization
improvements
• Significant improvements to LAT data reconstruction will bring
increased effective area, field of view and angular resolution
29
Updated event reconstruction
Analysis and configuration improvements coupled with robust
hardware means that we will continue to expand LAT science
capabilities
• The LAT collects a significant
amount of information for each
gamma-ray event
– Ground processing reduces this
to directions, energy, event type
(gamma-ray or background) and
associated errors
– Extensive scope for analysis
improvements tailored to specific
science questions or scenarios
– Extensive rework of low-level
algorithms is currently in
progress, ready for release in
2014/2015
Factor of two increase in acceptance
at 100 MeV
30
GRBs and Gravitational Waves
Fermi-GBM and Advanced LIGO (>2015) should see coincident
Gravitational wave/Electromagnetic emission or rule out NS-BH mergers
as the progenitors of short GRB
Large rate of short bursts
in GBM is key to
coincident detections
GBM Short GRBs in ALIGO
horizon:
N(z<0.11, NS-NS) ~ 2+4
yr-1
-1
-1
N(z<0.22, NS-BH) ~ 8+6
-3 yr
• Both observations bring complementary information: ALIGO → inspiral
characteristics ; Fermi → jet properties & environment
31
31
Summary
•
•
•
•
•
250 GRB/year detected by GBM
~10 GRB/year detected at high energy by the Fermi LAT
Prompt emission observed over a wide energy range
• Delayed time onset between the LAT and GBM data
• Extra spectral components in most bright bursts
• High energy cutoffs in several GRB
• Thermal components in several GBM detected GRB
• Band model is no longer the best phenomenological model
Temporally extended high energy emission is common
• Likely related to early afterglow, very constraining to
emission/acceleration models
• Flux decreases as a power-law with time
• 3 bursts observed to have breaks in the temporal decay
Bright GRB challenge standard models
• GRB130427a challenges commonly accepted models
• Look out for new results from GRB131108A
32
Download