发现 Zc(3900)
-- BESIII实验粲偶素研究 --
Yuan Changzheng (苑 长 征)
IHEP, Beijing
2013年4月18日
1
•子不语怪力乱神
• Confucius did not talk about
exotics, strong force, chaos, and
mystery.
《论语·述而》
2
Outline
• Introduction [北京谱仪/粲偶素]
• Charmonium spectroscopy
• Charmoniumlike states
• What do we do at BESIII
• Summary
3
The Beijing Electron Positron Collider
Satellite view of IHEP, Beijing
LINAC
My office
BEPC
(Beijing electronpositron collider)
BES
detector
• Founded: 1984, Ecm=2-5 GeV
• 1989-2005 (BEPC):
Lpeak=1.0x1031 /cm2s
• 2008-now (BEPCII):
Lpeak=6.5x1032/cm2s
Main entrance to IHEP
4
BEPC II: Large crossing angle, double-ring
RF
RF
Compton back-scattering
for high precision beam
energy measurement
0.1c
22
2.5m
mra
d
m
8ns
BESIII is here
IP
1.5c
m
Beam energy:
1-2.3 GeV
Luminosity:
1×1033 cm-2s-1
Optimum energy:
1.89 GeV
Energy spread:
5.16 ×10-4
No. of bunches:
93
Bunch length:
1.5 cm
Total current:
0.91 A
SR mode:
5
0.25A @ 2.5 GeV
BESIII Detector
Magnet yoke
SC magnet, 1T
RPC
TOF, 90ps
Be beam pipe
MDC, 130 m
0.5% at 1 GeV/c
Total weight 730 ton,
~40,000 readout chnls,
Data rate: 5kHz, 50Mb/s
CsI(Tl) calorimeter, 2.5% @ 1 GeV
6
BESIII Physics Programs
E
•
•
•
•
B
E
S
T
This is not a BESIII logo!
T
(looks like DD for D or charm physics)
(looks like cc for charmonium physics)
(for light hadron Spectroscopy)
7
(for tau physics, looks like a Roman number “III”)
基本粒子（费米子）
8
第
一
代
、
第
二
代
、
第
三
代
Onia
FORCES
Ground triplet state 13S1
System
binding
decay
Name
(v/c)2
G
(MeV)
Number of
states below
dissociation
energy
n 3 S1
all
0.001 ~0.0
2
8
Mass (GeV)
POSITRONIUM
EM
e+e-
EM
Ortho-
5x10-15
QUARKONIUM
S
T
R
O
N
G
S
T
R
O
N
G
E
M
E
M
weak
uu,dd
r
150
0.8 ~1.0
0
0
ss
f
4
1.0 ~0.8
“1”
“2”
2
8
cc J/y
bb
tt

0.09
3.1
~0.25
0.05
9.5 ~0.08
3
30
(3000.0)
(350.) <0.01
0
0
Quarkonium is the bound state of quark and
anti-quark by the gluon.
9
Charmonium is charm anti-charm bound state!
Discovery of the J/ψ
“November Revolution of
Particle Physics!”
Charm quark was proposed in 1964, first application in 1970!
PRL33, 1404 (1974)
PRL33, 1406 (1974)
PRL33, 1408 (1974)
ADONE
confirmed!
BNL
SLAC
Design:
10
Max. Ecm~3 GeV!
Discovery of the y(2S)
PRL33, 1453 (1974)
Predictions of the charmonium spectroscopy
Argument
and
Potential model
PRL34, 365 (1975)
PRL34, 369 (1975)
SLAC
11
From then on, there is a new field in HEP: Charmonium Physics.
粲偶素命名规则
States below charm threshold are all observed now,
still many missing states above charm threshold.
n(2S+1)LJ
n radial quantum number
S total spin of c & cbar
L orbital angular momentum
L = 0, 1, 2 ... correspond to S, P, D, …
Godfrey & Isgur, PRD32, 189 (1985)
J=S+L
P = (–1)L+1 parity
12
C = (–1)L+S charge conj.
The P-wave spin-triplet cJ
CBAL：PRD34, 711 (1986)
13
Most states from e+e- experiments
BESIII
CLEOc
+ MK3, DM2, … old generation
14
Charmonia study in e+e -annihilation
BESIII
Advantages:
1. Background small
2. Production rate high
3. All kinds of final states
250
4. Inclusive/exclusive
J/ψ Sample 225+
200
Disadvantages:
in Million
1000
150
1. Only JPC=1-- can be
58
100
formed directly
Earlier exp. not listed
50
2. Resolution sometimes
0
is not good
MKII
Hundreds of papers,
hundreds of channels,
thousands of measurements
listed by the Particle Data Group
in 2012.
CBAL
MKIII
DMII
BESI
BESII BESIII
A typical event
in BES detector
ψ(2S)J/ψπ+πJ/ψ e+e-
120
100
80
106+
ψ(2S) Sample 350!
in Million
60
25
40
14
20
0
MKI
MKII MKIII CBAL BESI BESII CLEOc BESIII
15
Initial States Radiation (ISR)
From PDG
}
JPC
=
1--
y’, y’’, Y…
The Y states should
also appear in
this plot (between
16
4.0 and 4.7 GeV!)
Charmonia study in B decays
Advantages:
• Free gift from B-factories
• Cabibbo favored B decays
• XYZ-particles
17
Potential models
• Cornell potential：
V(r) = -4S/3r + kr
（库仑势+线性势）
• 解薛定谔方程能级, 波函数
• This is not QCD! But the model works well!
Why?
18
Charmonium spectroscopy
States below charm threshold are all observed now,
still many missing states above charm threshold.
No much progress in last century!
n(2S+1)LJ
n radial quantum number
S total spin of c & cbar
L orbital angular momentum
L = 0, 1, 2 ... correspond to S, P, D, …
Godfrey & Isgur, PRD32, 189 (1985)
J=S+L
P = (–1)L+1 parity
19
C = (–1)L+S charge conj.
Then we found lots of XYZ states
Z(4430)
Z(4250)
Z(4050)
特点：衰变产物中有粲偶素，
What are they ?
但很难轻易解释为粲偶素，
也叫类粲偶素(charmoniumlike)。
?
X(3872)
XYZ(3940)
X(3915)
X(4160)
Y(4008)
Y(4140)
Y(4260)
Y(4360)
X(4350)
Y(4660)
Charmonium?
Hybrid?
Tetraquark?
Molecule?
…
Not all XYZ states are charmonia!
20
X(3872)p+p- J/y
PRD84, 052004 (2011) 711 fb-1
latest results
PRD 77, 111101 (2008) 413 fb-1
B±XK±
Ns=93±17
8.6
B0XK0
Ns=9±5
2.3
B±XK±
B0XK0
M=MX(3872)-MD0D*0 = -0.16 ± 0.32 MeV
21
What is X(3872)?
•
•
•
•
Mass: Very close toD0D*0 threshold
Width: Very narrow, < 1.2 MeV
JPC=1++ (is it c1(2P)? Small E1 transition to J/y)
Production
– inpp/pp collison – similar to charmonia
– In B decays – KX similar to cc, K*X smaller than cc
• Decay BR: open charm ~ 50%, charmonium~O(%)
• Nature (very likely exotic)
– LooselyD0D*0 bound state (like deuteron?)?
– Mixture of excited c1 andD0D*0 bound state?
– Many other possibilities (if it is not ’c1, where is ’c1?)
22
The Y states
Belle: PRL99, 142002, 670/fb
BaBar: 1211.6271
1304.0121
967/fb
PRD86, 051102
454/fb
Y(4008)
Y(4260)
Y(4360)
Y(4660)
Y(4630)
Above DD threshold, decay to open charm?
PRL101, 172001
695/fb
M(c+c-)
23
High mass charmonia
What is the nature of the
newly observed states?
Charmonium?
Hybrid?
Hadro-charmonium?
Tetraquark?
Molecular?
…
Can BES3 answer?
24
What do we do at BESIII
• Below open-charm: Spin-singlet states:
1. c – high precision resonance parameters
2. hc – resonance parameters/production rate
3. c(2S) – missing radiative transition in y(2S)
• Above open-charm
1. Better resonance parameters
2. New charmonium-(like) states [XYZ particles]
• Charmonium decays [pQCD rule, …]
• Other new phenomena (chance for discovery?)
25
BESIII: y(2S)p0hc transition
BESIII: PRL 104, 132002 (2010)
Mass: 3525.400.130.18 MeV
Width: 0.730.450.28 MeV
(<1.44 MeV @ 90% C.L.)
CLEOc: PRL101, 182003 (2008)
Mass: 3525.280.190.12 MeV
Width: fixed to 0.9 MeV
Mhf= <M(3PJ)>-M(1P1)
Agrees with zero within ~0.5 MeV
Information on spin-spin interaction.
Combined inclusive and E1-photon-tagged spectrum (First measurements)
B(y’p0hc) = [ 8.4±1.3(stat.) ±1.0(syst.)]×10-4 Agree with predictions of Kuang,
26
B(hcgc) = [54.3±6.7(stat.) ±5.2(syst.)] %
Godfrey, Dudek, et al.
hc via y(2S)p0hcp0gc transition
PRD86，092009 (2012)
BESIII
16 modes, 832 events
Mass: 3525.310.110.15 MeV
Width: 0.700.280.25 MeV
CLEOc: PRL101, 182003 (2008)
Mass: 3525.280.190.12 MeV
Width: fixed to 0.9 MeV
Dominant errors in mass and width measurements are
from photon energy calibration, resolution calibration,
and kinematic fit.
27
Can be improved with more data!
c resonant parameters from y'gc
arXiv:1111.0398, PRL108, 222002 (2012)
KsKp
K+K-p0
p+p-
KsK3p
2K2pp0
6p
Simultaneous fit with modified Breit-Wigner (hindered M1) by
28
considering possible interference between c and non-c decays
Mass and width of c
arXiv:1111.0398, PRL108, 222002 (2012)
Mass = 2984.3±0.6±0.6 MeV/c2 [LQCD found a higher mass!]
Width = 32.0±1.2±1.0 MeV
f = 2.40±0.07 ±0.08 rad or 4.19±0.03 ±0.09 rad
(two solutions of the interference)
World average in PDG2012 uses earlier measurements.
29
c properties from hcgc
PRD86，092009 (2012)
M(c) [MeV]
G(c) [MeV]
N(c)
2984.49±1.16±0.52
36.4±3.2±1.7
1035
E1 transition! Eg suppression less severe than in M1 transition!
30
Irreducible non-c background is smaller than in y’ decays!
First observation of ygc
arXiv:1205.5103, PRL109, 042003 (2012)
• Simultaneous fit with:
Statistical significance > 10
• c’ signal: modified BW (M1) (Resolution extrapolated from cJ)
• cJ signal: MC shape smeared with Gaussian
• BGs from e+ e- KKp (ISR), y'  KKp (FSR), y'  p0KKp: are31
measured from data
First observation of ygc
18年的努力！
arXiv:1205.5103, PRL109, 042003 (2012)
• M(c) = 3637.6±2.9±1.6 MeV/c2
• G(c) = 16.96.44.8 MeV
• Br(y'gcgKKp)=(1.30±0.20±0.30) ×10-5
Br(cKKp)=(1.9±0.4±1.1)% from BaBar
Br(y' gc)=(6.8±1.1±4.5) ×10-4
CLEO-c: <7.610-4
Potential model: (0.1-6.2)10-4
(PRD81,052002(2010))
(PRL89,162002(2002))
32
XYZ粒子研究前景
• CLEOc已停止运行，合作组已不复存在，没有足够的数
据进行相关研究；
• BaBar和Belle已停止运行，利用全部数据更新进行中，
精度没有显著改善；
• PANDA(Germany)/SuperC(Italy)/Tau-Cfactory(Russia)遥遥无期，5(10?)年内不可能开始运
行；
• LHC实验（ATLAS, CMS, LHCb）背景复杂，仅能对非常
少的过程进行测量。
• BESIII是近5年唯一可以系统研究cc +XYZ的实验！
• BelleII 2016年采集数据，在2018年前不会有足够数
33
据,但2018开始将再次主导该领域（cc +bb +
BESIII: 粲偶素、类粲偶素的产生
From PDG
BEPCII can reach here!
y/Y 粒子可以直接产生（出现在上图中）
电荷共轭宇称为正的粒子可以通过辐射跃迁产生
34
通过R值扫描研究矢量态
• 目标：确定y激发态和Y态的共振参数和衰变特性
• 方法：精确测量不同能量点各主要过程截面
• 利用耦合道信息拟合数据
35
通过矢量态辐射跃迁研究C=+的态
• y(nS/nD)g+XYZ
[X(3872), XYZ(3940)等]
– 跃迁几率没有理论预期
• 寻找cJ(2P)、cJ(3P)、c(3S)、 c(4S)、 …
– B(y(3S)g’cJ)=(7, 3, 1)x10-4 for J=2,1,0
[E. Eichten et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1161 (2008) ]
• 完善粲偶素能谱
MC study
确认奇特态粒子
36
寻找矢量态强子跃迁中的共振结构
• 目标：寻找Zc态，寻找hc(2P)态
• 方法：分析Y(4260)ppJ/y、pphc(1P)中的中间态
分析Y(4360)ppy’、pphc(2P)中的中间态
37
Check Dalitz Plots & mass projections
(M(ppJ/y)[4.2, 4.4] GeV)
Y4260
Peaks at 12 & 15 GeV2?
Chen Dian-Yong & Liu Xiang
PRD84, 034032 (2011)
Y4260
38
Observation of the Zc(3900)
— a charged charmoniumlike structure —
BESIII: 3月24日
Belle： 3月30日
CLEOc：4月10日
Zc established！
Hadrons：normal & exotic
• Hadrons are composed from 2 (meson) quarks or
3 (baryon) quarks
Quark model
• QCD doesnot forbid hadrons with Nquarks2, 3
–
–
–
–
glueball：
Nquarks = 0 (gg, ggg, …)
hybrid：
Nquarks = 2 (or more) + excited gluon
multiquark state： Nquarks > 3
molecule：
bound state of more than 2 hadrons
40
A bit history on exotics hunting
• “The absence of exotics is one of the most obvious
features of QCD” – R. L. Jaffe, 2005
• Deuteron  H state, -- bound state, …
• No solid signature of glueballs
• Pentaquark state appeared and disappeared
(“The story of pentaquark shows how poorly we
understand QCD” – F. Wilczek, 2005)
• There are lots of new states from low to high mass
in various experiments! Are they normal or exotic?
41
Why hard to identify exotic state?
• Which dwarf was named “Happy”?
• I donot know …
No solid signature!
42
Why hard to identify exotic state?
• Which beauty is “Snow White”?
• Yes, I know! “Hair black as ebony [乌木, 黑檀]”.
• Very clear signature!
43
How to identify an exotic meson?
• Find a clear signature for exotic state!
• Decays to charmonium thus has a cc pair!
• With electric charge thus has two more light quarks!
 Nquark  4 !
• Do searches in πJ/ψ, πψ(2S), πcJ, …
44
What do we do at BESIII
We may search for such state if it decays into πJ/ψ !
• (e+e-  p+p-J/y) reaches maximum at ~4.26 GeV
• We proposed a 45 days’ data taking for 500 pb-1 data at peak
• ~1500 reconstructed events are expected [3xB-factories]45
Data taking at BESIII
Accumulated 525 pb-1 in 30 days!
40 times of CLEO-c data!
• Highest energy BEPCII ever reach, Lpeak ~ 5.3x1032/cm2/s !
• BEMS measures Ecm at 1 MeV level !
46
• Low background, low noise, all sub-detectors excellent !
Data quality is excellent
D0Kp
MD = 0.5  0.2 MeV
MD = 6.0  0.1 MeV
ISR y’
My’ = 0.2  0.1 MeV
My’ = 2.0  0.1 MeV
• Data calibration, reconstruction, MC simulation were finished
shortly after the data taking …
47
• Production version was ready earlier March …
Select e+e- p+p-J/y events
Typical
J/y +-
Typical
J/y e+e-
• Select 4 charged tracks and reconstruct J/y with lepton pair.
• Very clean sample, very high efficiency. Use kinematic fit.
48
• Only use MDC & EMC information, MC simulation reliable.
The J/y signals
BESIII: arXiv:1303.5949
88233
J/y +-
•
•
•
•
59528
J/y e+e-
Dominant background e+e-p+p-p+pJ/y signal: [3.08,3.12] GeV
J/y sideband: [3.0,3.06] GeV or [3.14,3.20] GeV, 3xsignal
At least 4 independent analyses, all get similar results ! 49
Cross section of e+e- p+p-J/y
Belle: 1304.0121
BaBar: PRD86, 051102 (2012)
BESIII: arXiv:1303.5949
BESIII: (e+e- p+p-J/y)
= (62.91.93.7) pb
Agree with BaBar & Belle!
Best precision!
50
Dalitz plots & 1D projections
BESIII: arXiv:1303.5949
51
Is it a real signal?






Is it due to p+p- S-wave states, like , f0(980), …?
Is it due to p+p- D-wave states, like f2(1270), …?
Are there two states, one at 3.4, the other 3.9 GeV?
Exist in both e+e- & +- samples?
Exist in both p+p- low mass and high mass samples?
Background fluctuation?
N
N
N
Y
Y
N
52
The Zc(3900) signal
Significance
>8




BESIII: arXiv:1303.5949
•
•
•
•
Couples tocc
Has electric charge
At least 4-quarks
What is its nature?
S-wave Breit-Wigner with efficiency correction
Mass = (3899.0±3.6±4.9) MeV
Width = (46±10±20) MeV
Fraction = (21.5±3.3±7.5)%
53
Observed in two experiments!
Belle with ISR: 1304.0121
BESIII: 1303.5949
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
M = 3894.56.64.5 MeV
G = 632426 MeV
159  49 events
>5.2
M = 3899.03.64.9 MeV
G = 461020 MeV
307  48 events
>8
54
Confirmed!
CLEO at 4.17 GeV: 1304.3036
BESIII: 1303.5949
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
M = 388551 MeV
G = 34124 MeV
81  20 events
6.1
M = 3899.03.64.9 MeV
G = 461020 MeV
307  48 events
>8
55
11 citations since results released
1. arXiv:1304.3036 Title: Observation of the Charged Hadron Zc(3900) at sqrt(s)=4170 MeV
Authors: T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, Kamal K. Seth
2. arXiv:1304.2882 Title: Electromagnetic Structure of the Z_c(3900)
Authors: E. Wilbring, H.-W. Hammer, U.-G. Meißner
3. arXiv:1304.1850 Title: Could Z_{c}(3900) be a I^{G}J^{P}=1^{+}1^{+} D^{*}\bar{D} molecular state?
Authors: Chun-Yu Cui, Yong-Lu Liu, Wen-Bo Chen, Ming-Qiu Huang
4. arXiv:1304.1301 Title: Interpreting Z(3900)
Authors: Namit Mahajan
5. arXiv:1304.0345 Title: The doubly heavies: (Qbar Q qbar q), (Q Q qbar qbar) tetraquarks and (Q Q q) baryons
Authors: Marek Karliner, Shmuel Nussinov
6. arXiv:1304.0380 Title: Z_c(3900) - what is inside?
Authors: M.B. Voloshin
7. arXiv:1304.0121 Title: Study of e+ e- to π+ π- J/ψ and Observation of a Charged Charmonium-like State at Belle
Authors: Belle Collaboration
8. arXiv:1303.6857 Title:A J^PG=1++ Charged Resonance in the Y(4260) to pi+pi- J/psi Decay?
Authors: R. Faccini, L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. Pilloni, A.D. Polosa, V. Riquer
9. arXiv:1303.6842 Title: Predictions of charged charmonium-like structures with hidden-charm and open-strange channel
Authors: Dian-Yong Chen, Xiang Liu, Takayuki Matsuki
10. arXiv:1303.6608 Title: Consequences of Heavy Quark Symmetries for Hadronic Molecules
Authors: Feng-Kun Guo, Carlos Hidalgo-Duque, Juan Nieves, Manuel Pavon Valderrama
11. arXiv:1303.6355 Title: Decoding the riddle of Y(4260) and Z_c(3900)
Authors: Qian Wang, Christoph Hanhart, Qiang Zhao
56
What next?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
We are accumulating 3x more data
Precise resonant parameters
Spin-parity [PWA on going]
More decay modes
Production mechanisms, production rate
Test various theoretical models
Neutral partner of Zc
Other Zc states? Zc’ states?
…
XYZ group expanding rapidly since Jan., but more are welcome
B424 (40.96 m2) B410 (95.04 m2)
57
Everyone is working excitedly and passionately!
Summary and Outlook
• Charmonium physics is a gold mine:
– Large data samples collected in e+e- annihilation at BES-III
– more than 1 Billion B pairs at Belle and BaBar
• Similar progress in theory (NRQCD, Lattice QCD)
• Longer range outlook:
–Charmonium results from BES-III/BEPC-II [Zc and more …]
–Belle II (start from 2016) will continue to produce charmonium
results from even more B-meson decays, ISR study, double
charmonium production, two-photon processes
–Charmonium physics from hadronic machines? (LHCb, CMS, Atlas, …)
–Charmonium at dedicatedpp machine PANDA/GSI: (>2018- )
• Wish charmonium physics a bright future!
Welcome to join us (IHEP or BES group in your University)!
58
Thanks a lot!
59
Thanks a lot!
60
61
62
63
Belle observed
Z(4430)±→ψ(2S)π±
PRL100, 142001
(2008)
 Found in ψ(2S)π+ from B→ψ(2S)π+K. Z parameters from fit to M(ψ(2S)π+)
 Confirmed through Dalitz-plot analysis of B→ψ(2S)π+K
 B→ψ(2S)π+K amplitude: coherent sum of Breit-Wigner contributions
 Models: all known K*→Kπ+ resonances only
all known K*→Kπ+ and Z+→ψ(2S)π+  favored by data
M2(ψ(2S)π+)
Significance: 6.4σ
Z+(4430)
657M BB
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ fit for model with K*’s only
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ fit for model with K*’s and Z
15 +19
M  4433+-12
-13 MeV
K2*(1430)
K*(890)
M2(Kπ+)
+ 74
G  107 +-86
43 -53 MeV
M2(ψ(2S)π+) after K* veto
PRD80, 031104 (2009)
 [cu][cd] tetraquark? neutral partner in ψ’π0 expected
 D*D1(2420) molecule? should decay to D*D*π
64
BaBar doesn’t see a significant Z(4430)+
PRD79, 112001 (2009)
“For the fit … equivalent to the Belle analysis…we obtain mass
& width values that are consistent with theirs,… but only ~1.9
from zero; fixing mass and width increases this to only ~3.1.”
Belle PRL: (4.1±1.0±1.4)x10-5
65
Belle observed Two Z±→χc1π±
 Dalitz-plot analysis of B0→χc1π+K- χc1 →J/ψγ with 657M BB
 Dalitz plot models: known K*→Kπ only
K*’s + one Z →χc1π±
PRD 78, 072004 (2008)
K*’s + two Z± states  favored by data
Significance: 5.7
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶
–̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶ –̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶̶
fit for model with K*’s
fit for double Z model
Z1 contribution
Z2 contribution
M Z  4051 14 +-20
41 MeV
1
47
GZ  82 +-1721 -+22
MeV
1
44 +180
M Z  4248+- 29
-35 MeV
2
M(χc1π+)
+ 54 + 316 66
for 1<M2(K-π+)<1.75GeV2 GZ  177 -39 -61 MeV
2
BaBar doesn’t see significant Z±→χc1π±
PRD85, 052003 (2012)
Belle: (3.0+1.5-0.8+3.7-1.6)x10-5
Belle: (4.0+2.3-0.9+19.7-0.5)x10-5
“We find that it is possible to obtain a
good description of our data without
the need for additional resonances in
67
the c1p system.”
M(ppJ/y)[4.2, 4.4] GeV via ISR
550/fb at 10.58 GeV
Peaks at 12 & 15 GeV2?
Shown at QWG’2011
密康公母论小丑备物终必亡
恭王游于泾上，密康公从，有三女奔之。
其母曰：“必致之于王。夫兽三为群，人三
为众，女三为粲。王田不取群，公行下众，
王御不参一族。夫粲，美之物也。众以美物
归女，而何德以堪之？王犹不堪，况尔小丑
乎？小丑备物，终必亡。”康公不献。一年，
王灭密。
《国语·周语上》
69
neutral X and Y
Name
JPC
X(3872) 1++/2-+
XYZ states
Γ(MeV)
Decay modes
Experiments
interpretation
<1.2
ppJ/y, gJ/y, DD*, …
Belle/CDF/D0/BaBar/
LHCb
DD* molecule?
ηc’’(?)
X(3940)
0?+
~37
DD* (not DD, ωJ/ψ)
Belle
Y(3940)
??+
~30
ωJ/ψ (not DD*)
Belle/BaBar
Y(4140)
??+
~11
fJ/ψ
CDF(not Belle/LHCb)
ccss?
X(4160)
0?+
~140
D*D* (not DD, DD*)
Belle
ηc’’(?)
Y(4008)
1--
~220
ppJ/y
Belle (not Babar)
y(4040)?
Y(4260)
1--
~80
ppJ/y
BaBar/CLEO/Belle
ccg hybrid?
X(4350)
??+
~13
gg, fJ/ψ
Belle
ccss?
Y(4360)
1--
~75
ppy(2S)
BaBar/Belle
Y(4660)
1--
~50
ppy(2S), ΛcΛc (?)
Belle/BaBar
charged Z
Z±(4430)
???
~100
ψ(2S)π±
Belle (not Babar)
4-quark?
Z±(4050)
???
~80
χc1π±
Belle (not Babar)
4-quark?
Z±(4250)
???
~180
χc1π±
Belle (not Babar)
4-quark?
70