TRAUMA QI & PEER REVIEW

advertisement

TRAUMA QI & PEER REVIEW

How’s it happen?

Katrina Strowbridge, BSN, RN, CWS

Why a review process?

Trauma Designation

Organized trauma program required for all levels of designation to include:

Multidisciplinary trauma committee

Trauma Peer Review (with multidisciplinary committee)

Performance Improvement activities related to the findings of chart review and Peer Review

Whatsa

“Multidisciplinary Committee”???

RN’s

MD’s

Support Staff

Prehospital Providers

= Trauma

Committee

………..right?

that does peer review of charts …….

…..right?

Multidisciplinary Trauma

Committee is NOT the Medical Staff

Peer Review Committee

……so, how do ya do peer review of trauma cases

….

TRAUMA

COMMITTEE

PEER REVIEW

New Process

Case Selection for record review:

Record Selection via Daily Rounds

Trauma Coordinator gleans information from staff

Trauma Registrar review of ED log

ER charge review by RN

Chart identified by staff, physicians, department, etc

Meditech reports – ICD-9 diagnosis codes & discharge disposition

Focusing on:

Discharge Disposition

Treated and discharged home or transferred

Identified via daily review as described

If immediate concerns, reviewed by TC and

Trauma Medical Director/Chief of Staff

If no immediate concerns, coded by HIM

Record reviewed by TC and TR using a review worksheet.

Discharge Disposition cont.

Treated and Admitted to IP or OPO

Identified via daily reviews as described

Allows for concurrent review with more immediate documentation available in the form of progress notes, physician orders,

H&P, etc.

Immediate concerns reviewed with Trauma

Medical Director/Chief of Staff

Case identified, review begins

Trauma Committee Case Review

Worksheet

PI form used to abstract record

Indicators approved by Medical Staff & Trauma

Committee

Tracks key indicators used for QI processes

Developed from samples received from other CAH’s &

WRTAC sample forms.

Driving force for data collection of trauma related QI activities and documentation source for the review process.

Case Review “types” drive process

Primary Review

Secondary Review

Tertiary Review

Primary Review

Trauma Registrar

Initiates Trauma Committee Review form for each case reviewed

Forwards patient record and TCR form to Trauma

Coordinator

Trauma Coordinator

Review record, validates findings, finds new issues

Immediate resolution, feedback with identified issues & documentation of PI loop closure

Secondary Review

Trauma Coordinator reviews/validates findings, finds new issues

Medical Staff review of identified issues, supports investigation and assists in plan development

1:1 education (any discipline {RN: RN, MS: MS}, group education @ TC

May be closed at this level or forwarded for further action based on findings

Refer to Multidisciplinary Trauma Committee or

Medical Staff Peer Review Process

Tertiary Review

Trauma Coordinator & Medical Staff/Peer Review

WRTAC &/or STAC

Findings documented in PI loop closure

Education may still be 1:1, generally group @ large via Trauma Committee or regional efforts if required

Clinical Indicator Report

Trauma Registrar is responsible for completion of and reporting of data

Data pulled from Trauma Committee Case

Review form

Entered into Clinical Indicator Report

Clinical Indicator Report shared with Trauma

Committee

Used for ongoing monitoring

Identification of trends and issues

Peer Review

Confidential – confidential – confidential

– confidential – confidential – confidential

Peer Review Process

It is important that providers feel “safe” giving honest feedback to colleagues and this trust environment takes time to establish. The providers also need to feel empowered by Administration to tackle hard issues, require changed behaviors and performance of some peers and be able to hold colleagues accountable.

Trauma Committee

Peer Review Process

Trauma Coordinator is responsible for

 setting up the Trauma Peer Review Committee meetings, obtaining the charts,

Keeping the Trauma Committee Case review form with the chart and initiating peer review form, engaging in discussion regarding any issues, transcribing the confidential feedback, participating in any performance improvement activity that may be initiated as a result of the

Peer Review Worksheet

Form developed to assist the physicians when performing chart review.

Issue - Physicians are made aware of the reason the chart has been brought to the Peer Review

Committee. In reviewing the chart, other issues may be identified as well.

Findings - The reviewing physician documents findings

Confidentiality – issues are later transcribed into a confidential report that is forwarded to the provider involved in the care of the patient.

Recordkeeping

Once review is completed, forms routed to

Trauma Registrar

A unique identification number is assigned

Entered into the Trauma Committee log book

A individual file is created

Feedback reports filed from Medical Staff

& Trauma Peer Review

Recordkeeping cont.

State Trauma Registry abstraction

Assigned a different number (with the TC#)

Entered into the State Trauma Registry log book.

Feedback reports from the State & abstract are all filed in the Trauma Committee file for future reference.

QUESTIONS?????

Contact information

Leah Emerson, RN, DON, TC

406-528-5224 lemerson@stlukehealthnet.org

Katrina Strowbridge, RN, QI Coordinator, TR

406-528-5201 kstrowbridge@stlukehealthnet.org

Download