Presentazione di PowerPoint

advertisement

The Role of Intensive Care to Improve

Perioperative Mortality

Pelosi Paolo

Department of Surgical Sciences and

Integrated Diagnostics (DISC)

University of Genoa – IRCCS AOU San Martino

IST – Genoa , Italy ppelosi@hotmail.com

Dubai Anaesthesia 2013

Annual figures for the European high-risk surgical population

Ghaferi A. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1368-75

Weiser T Lancet 2008; 372: 139-144; Pearse R Crit Care 2006; 10: R81

• 21 million in-patient general procedures

• 2.6 million high-risk procedures

• 1.3 million patients develop complications

• 315,000 deaths in hospital

Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bainbridge et al Lancet 2012; 380: 1075 –81

Perioperative mortality per year

Post-op mortality at 30 days in different countries

Country

UK

(Findlay G. 2011)

Netherlands

(Noordzij PG. 2010)

Brasil

(Yu PC. 2010)

USA

(Glance LG. 2012)

Spain

(Canet J. 2010)

Patients (n) and Mortality (%)

13.513 1.60

3.667.875 1.84

32.659.515 1.77

322.398 1.34

2.464 1.44

Surgical deaths: Size, Risk and Mortality

Pearse et al. Crit Care 2006; 10: R81.

80% of surgical deaths are from the high-risk population

5

4

3

2

1

0

15

10

5

Overall

Size

Standard High-risk

M ortality

0

Surgical complications decrease long-term survival

Khuri et al. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 326 –343

Pts w/o complications Pts w/o complications

Pts with 1/more complications Pts with 1/more complications

Variation in hospital mortality associated with in patient surgery

Ghaferi AA et al N Engl J Med 2009;361:1368-75.

Complications

Pneumonia 1.8-2.4 %

MV>48hr 6.3-8.1 %

Mortality

Pneumonia 17-25.5%

MV>48hr 20.6-30.1%

Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:592 –597

Euroanaesthesia 2010, Sunday, 13 June 2010

ESA Clinical Trials Network (ESA CTN)

Research Committee research@euroanaesthesia.com

Did you know that the most important and challenging clinical questions are more likely to be solved if several centres join forces ?

Poor quality of surgical outcome data

• Inaccurate healthcare systems data

• Specialty society data on limited subsets

• Mostly retrospective analyses

• Too much focus on elective surgery

• No comparative data across Europe

EuSOS

Eu

ropean

S

urgical

O

utcomes

S

tudy

International seven day cohort study of standards of care and clinical outcomes for non-cardiac surgery

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

EuSOS: Inclusion criteria

All adult patients undergoing in-patient non-cardiac surgery during the seven day study period

Start: 09:00 4 th April 2011

Finish: 08:59 11 th April 2011

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

EuSOS: Exclusion criteria

• No planned overnight hospital stay

• Neurosurgery

• Obstetrics

• Cardiac surgery (thoracic surgery is included)

3

1923 Investigators !

17

16

56

97

21 4

8

13

13

14

35

12

6

5

4

8

16

29

2

7

3

4

2

3

28

17

1

EuSOS Cohort

46539

Patients admitted in ICU

3612 (8%)

Died in ICU

287 (8%)

Died in ward after ICU discharge

217 (6,5%)

Patients admitted in ward

42927 (92%)

Died in ward

1358 (3%)

Total Mortality 1682 (4%)

EuSOS Cohort

46539 patients

1864 (4%) deaths

Urgent surgery

8919 (19%)

483 (5% )

Elective surgery

35040 (75%)

1132 (3%)

Emergency surgery

2557 (5%)

249 (10%)

Planned admission to ICU

1864 (5%)

32 (2%)

Unplanned admission to ICU

278 (1%)

22 (8%)

Planned admission to ICU

490 (5%)

54 (11%)

Discharged to ward alive

2088 (97,5%)

104 (5% )

Unplanned admission to ICU

391 (4%)

63 (16%)

Discharged to ward alive

764 (87%)

63 (8%)

Planned admission to ICU

201 (8%)

37 (18%)

Unplanned admission to ICU

356 (14%)

79 (22%)

Discharged to ward alive

441 (79%)

49 (11%)

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

Variable

Mortality Risk Factors

Odds Ratio

Age (per year)

ASA IV-V

Metastatic Cancer

Cirrhosis

Urgent-Emergency surgery

Upper gastro-intestinal surgery

1

4.75-18.03

1.39

2.13

1.78-3.23

1.57

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

Which are the “safer” types of surgery ?

Laparoscopic surgery

Odds Ratio

0.75 – 0.25

Plastic/Cutaneous

Kidney/Urology

0.71 – 0.66

0.23 – 0.82

Head and Neck 0.66 - 0.81

EuSOS

European Surgical Outcomes Study

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065

EuSOS: Conclusions

• Large numbers of patients die following in-patient non-cardiac surgery

• Large variations in mortality between countries suggest the need for national and international strategies to improve care for this patient group

• Patterns of critical care admission suggest process failure in the allocation of these resources

Eu

ropean

S

urgical

O

utcomes

S

tudy

What factors affect mortality after surgery?

Vonlanthen R and Clavien PA. Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1034-6

Message to be delivered:

Dear Colleagues funding medical care, …… care.

“We suggest that even use of expensive resources, such as additional ICU beds, could rapidly become cost effective by reducing complications ”.

Peri-op Mortality and GDP/inhabitant

Lancet 2012; 380:1059-1065; Intensive Care Med 2012; 38:1647-1653

R = 0.55

P < 0.01

MORTALITY (%)

What factors affect mortality after surgery?

Vonlanthen R and Clavien PA. Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1034-6

 The definition of ICU beds (recovery room vs post-op

ICU vs General ICU) and resources might differ between countries

 Other factors are important:

Use of surgical safety checklists

- Clinical pathways

- Enhanced recovery strategy (fast track surgery)

- Volume of cases

- Presence of general versus specialised surgeons

- Ability to recognise and manage complications

- Quality of care and Economic resources

Comorbidity

Age (per year)

ASA IV-V

Metastatic cancer

Cirrhosis

Need of Surgery

High risk surgery

Urgent/emergency

Upper gastro-intestinal

No comorbidity

No high risk surgery

Surgical ward

High risk surgery and

No comorbidity

Surgical ward/ monitoring

Comorbidity and

No High risk surgery

Surgical ward/monitoring or

Post-op ICU

High risk surgery and comorbidity

Post-op ICU and monitoring in ward after discharge

PPCs: are they a problem?

• Variable incidence (2%-40%), depending on definition, kind of surgery and patients

• Prevalence: as cardiac complications

• Leading cause of long hospital stay and mortality

• Etiology: anesthesia and surgery induce changes

Post-operative pulmonary complications:

EFFECTS ON SURVIVAL

Fernandez-Perez et al Thorax 2009;64;121-127

PPCs

Pelosi P and Gama de Abreu M

Anesthesiology 2011: 115: 10-11

How to evaluate the risk of PPCs ?

Canet J et al for ARISCAT, Anesthesiology. 2010; 113(6):1338-50.

13 % (score 26-44) – 54 % (score >45) risk to develop PPCs

11

P rospective E valuation of a RIS k Score for postoperative pulmonary CO m P lications in E urope research@euroanaesthesia.com

Steering Committee:

Jaume Canet (S)

Sergi Sabaté (S)

Valentín Mazo (S)

Lluis Gallart (S)

Marcelo Gama de Abreu (G)

Javier Belda (S)

Olivier Langeron (F)

Andreas Hoeft (G)

Paolo Pelosi (I)

Brigitte Leva (ESA Secretariat) (B)

Methods 1/5

 Design

Prospective, multicenter, observational, cohort study

 Geographic scope

ARISCAT: 51 Anesthesiology Departments

(Catalonia, Spain)

PERISCOPE: 63 Anesthesiology Departments

(21 European countries)

Methods 2/5

 Data collection

7 days

• ARISCAT : January 2006 – January 2007

– Randomized days (one for each day of the week) for each center.

• PERISCOPE : May 2011 – August 2011

– Continuous days (a full week)

Methods 3/5

• Inclusion criteria

– Undergoing a surgical procedure under regional or general anesthesia (epidural, spinal or saddle block) ...

– ... on the selected days at a participating center

– Informed consent

Methods 4/5

Exclusion criteria

Age < 18 years

Obstetric/childbirth procedures

Local or peripheral nerve anesthesia with or without sedation

Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside the operating room

Intubated on arrival at the operating room

Re-operation due to an in-hospital postoperative complication

Transplantss and brain-dead patients

Methods 5/5

 Primary outcome (composite)

 Respiratory insufficiency

 Bronchospasm

 Pleural effusion

 Respiratory infection

 Atelectasis

 Aspiration pneumonitis

 Pneumothorax

 Unified definitions of variables

PPCs Incidence

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

9

8

PPC (%)

5384 patients

4.37%

ARISCAT development subsample

6.21%

ARISCAT validation subsample

7.92%

PERISCOPE sample

PPCs or CHF ?

PPCs &

Surgical Speciality

Lenght of Hospital Stay

Median (10th -90th percentile)

Patients without PPCs

Periscope

3

(1-10.9)

Patients with PPCs

9

(4-33)

Ariscat

3

(1-11.0)

12

(4-36.8)

Patients with PPCs

Post-Op In-Hospital

Mortality (%)

Periscope

Patients without PPCs

0.2

8.0

Ariscat

8.3

23.6

PLOS and In–Hospital

Mortality & PPCs

Conclusions

• Postoperative pulmonary complications are frequent, expensive and associated with increased mortality

• There is increased national focus on the need for higher quality, safer and more appropriate care.

• Readmission of surgical patients with pneumonia is a significant source of increased healthcare costs.

Conclusions

• Strongest risk factors for PPCs are age, preoperative SpO

2

, previous respiratory infection, anemia, kind of surgery and surgical aggressiveness

• More than 50% of the risk is related to patient factors

• A risk index based on 7 objective factors discriminates well across a wide range of patients, surgeries and geographic areas.

• Stratifying risk for PPCs can be calculated preoperatively and, in case, recalibrated.

The ICUs & Hospital activities

Out of Hospital

Emergencies

In Hospital

Emergencies

In Hospital

Planned

Critical Care

General

ICU

Ward

Specialized

ICUs

Step-

Down ICU

Thanks

Download