Freymueller

advertisement

Subduuction Zone Observatory:

Faulting and Deformation

Jeff Freymueller

Geophysical Institute and Dept. of

Geology and Geophysics

University of Alaska Fairbanks

Along-Strike Variations are Nearly Ubiquitous

Freymueller et al. (2008)

Q– What controls along-strike and downdip variations in the extent of slip?

Hikurangi Spatial/Temporal Variation

McCaffrey et al. (2008, Nature Geosciences)

Estimated Plate Coupling

from GPS data 1995-2000

Meade and Loveless (2010)

Estimated Plate Coupling

from GPS data 1995-2000

Slow Slip Events

Meade and Loveless (2010)

Estimated Plate Coupling

from GPS data 1995-2000

Slow Slip Events Afterslip from 1994 quake

Meade and Loveless (2010)

Estimated Plate Coupling

from GPS data 1995-2000

Slow Slip Events Afterslip from 1994 quake

Meade and Loveless (2010)

Comparison of Locked Zone to Slip

• Colors: Loveless and

Meade (2010) interseismic model

• Contours: Jack Loveless’ slip model contours

• To first order, the rupture area of the earthquake is the same as the interseismic locked zone

Loveless and Meade, 3/14/11

Loveless and Meade (2011)

relative plate motion

Trench

Along-Strike Variation

Along-Strike Variations are Nearly Ubiquitous

Freymueller et al. (2008)

Q– What controls along-strike and downdip variations in the extent of slip?

Slip Spectrum I: Seismogenic Zone Slip Modes

• What do we want to know for understanding the slip modes?

– Locked or creeping interface?

– Need better constraints on depth, thickness and properties of plate interface and properties of slab.

– Are there earthquakes at the updip/downdip end? What is the slip behavior?

– Detailed distribution of earthquakes. On interface or not?

– Structural controls/influences?

• Time dependence of above properties?

• Outcomes controlled by interface properties or surrounding medium?

Slip Spectrum II: Slow Slip

• Where is there slow slip on a subduction thrust?

– Tremor is one marker of slow slip, but there can be slow slip without tremor (why?)

– Small migrating earthquakes can be an indication of slow slip?

– What conditions are necessary for tremor genesis?

• Dewatering? Chattering of slip?

• Space/time distribution of tremor?

– Alaska tremor patchy, are there special locations/conditions?

– Japan has examples of both patchy and continuous

• Sustained or episodic?

• Spectrum of Duration/Size?

– One >9 (12?) year event now identified (Li et al., S53C-4511)

Some Complications We Think We

Understand (sort of)

• Postseismic deformation

– Afterslip (on the plate interface)

– Viscoelastic relaxation (in mantle wedge)

• Along-strike variations

– Extent of slip deficit varies along strike: why?

• Slow slip events

– The locked to creeping transition is dynamic

• Common theme: slip along interface varies with time – not just interseismic + coseismic.

Q– Why are the amounts of afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation so variable?

Earthquake

1960 Chile (M9.5)

Afterslip

??

Viscoelastic Relaxation

Large, lasted for decades

1964 Alaska (M9.3)

2004 Sumatra-Andaman

(M9.2)

2005 Sumatra (M8.7)

~6 meters (25-30% of coseismic), decades

Large, lasting > several years

Large, lasted for decades

Large, lasting > several years

Large, both updip and downdip

Clearly present in far-field data

1995 Antofagasta (M8.1) Small, gone within ~3 years None?

2007 Kurils (M 8.1)

1994 Sanriku (M 7.7)

Ended within 0.5 year

Equal to coseismic

Large, will last ~ decade minimal

We have not been successful in making advance predictions of postseismic deformation following large or great earthquakes.

Deformation of Upper Plate

• Deformation of upper plate is complex, and highly varied along the Americas

– Broad zones of diffuse deformation

– Slip partitioning of oblique subduction and motion of forearc slivers

– Back-arc convergence, fold&thrust and basement

• Linked to subduction, but need to fully measure stress state and strain field.

Motion of Overriding Plate

What is the Arc velocity?

Cross and Freymueller (2008)

 SW arc translation of 4 mm/yr

 Updip limit is poorly constrained by land-based data

 But, moment rate deficit is well constrained

Upper Plate Slivers are Common

Nocquet et al. (2014, ngeo)

Measurement Needs

• Geodesy and Deformation

– Measurements of long-term and short term steady deformation and transients

– Response to loads, earthquakes reveals rheology

• Seismology

– Seismicity

– Source

– Structure (velocity, anisotropy, attenuation)

• Integration

Questions?

Download