Building Sea Level Rise Narratives Through Interactive

advertisement

Building Sea Level Rise Narratives

Through Interactive Visualizations

Sonia H. Stephens

Postdoctoral Researcher

Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering

University of Central Florida sonia.stephens@ucf.edu

Outline

• Communicating SLR through narrativebuilding

• Study: interactive SLR viewer content analysis

– Characteristics of interactive SLR viewers

– Design recommendations

• Future research

Study motivation

• Communicating science results from

Ecological Effects of

Sea Level Rise in the

Northern Gulf of

Mexico project

• Target audiences:

– Resource managers

– Policymakers

– Coastal residents

Communicating about sea level rise

• Range of SLR projections and local conditions make public understanding of impacts difficult

• As part of global climate change, SLR is a “wicked” problem (Rittel & Webber,

1973)

Golden Gate Beach, NPS

Communicating through narrativebuilding

• Participatory narratives and scenarios: communication tools

– E.g., used in natural resource planning to help participants understand complexity and uncertainty (Vervoort et al., 2010)

NOAA-CSC

• In interactive visualizations, narrative is built through the developing interaction between user and visualization (Harrell & Zhu, 2009)

Interactive visualizations and narrative

• Interactive narratives create meaningful participatory story experiences (Dinehart, 2013)

• As “narrative builders,” these tools guide users to insight via discovery while lowering cognitive load (Dove

& Jones, 2012)

– Explore datasets

– Construct alternative explanations

– Draw parallels with personal experience

Tradeoffs between narrative elements

• The balance between author-driven and user-driven elements creates an overall narrative structure (Segel & Heer, 2010)

Author-driven

Linear ordering

Little interactivity

Strong primary message

User-driven

No prescribed ordering

Free interactivity

Weak messaging

Study purposes

• Focus on interactive SLR viewers (ISLRVs):

– Show SLR and coastal areas at risk for SLR

– Allow users to interact with the visualization by scrolling, zooming and other features

– Use a geographic map as a base layer

– Are available for free online

• Study purposes:

– Identify and characterize the narrative elements that contribute to ISLRVs

– Suggest ways to integrate elements for more effective communication

Methods

• Content analysis of 20 ISLRVs

– Identified through purposive Google-based sampling

• Identified intended audiences

• Evaluated narrative elements in four aspects of

ISLRV design (Hullman & Diakopoulos, 2011):

– Data (e.g., source & precision)

– Visual representation of SLR (e.g., SLR range)

– Annotations (e.g., text, photos)

– Interactivity (e.g., default views, navigation)

Sample of 20 ISLRVs

Name

Chesapeake Bay: The Increasing Effects of Sea-Level

Rise and Storm Surge

Coastal Resilience 2.0

Digital Coast (beta)

Flood Maps

Future Coast

Global Flood Map

Global Sea Level Rise Map

Impacts of Sea Level Rise on the California Coast

Creator(s)

Chesapeake Sea-Level Rise and Storm Surge Public Awareness and

Response (non-profit partnership)

The Nature Conservancy (non-profit org.) and partners

NOAA Coastal Service Center (government org.)

A. Tingle (independent creator)

K. Akerlorf (George Mason University) and colleagues

Map Large (commercial org.)

Geology.com (commercial org.)

Pacific Institute (non-profit org.)

Mapping Areas Potentially Impacted by SLR

New Jersey Flood Mapper

Relative Sea Level Trends

Sarasota Bay Sea Level Rise Map Viewer

J. L. Weiss and colleagues (University of Arizona)

Center for Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis (Rutgers University)

Permanent Service for Mean Sea Level (government org.)

Sarasota Bay Estuary Program (non-profit org.)

Sea Level Rise Explorer

Sea Level Rise Tool For Sandy Recovery

R. A. Rohde (independent creator)

NOAA (government org.) and partners

Sea Level Rise-Threatened Areas Map

Sea Levels Online

California Energy Commission (government org.)

NOAA (government org.)

Sea-Level Rise Visualization for Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida

National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (NOAA; government org.) and partners

SLAMM View U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (government org.) and partners

Surging Seas

What Could Disappear

Climate Central (non-profit org.)

New York Times (media org.)

Results: Design and narrative structure

Higher-level elements

Lower-level elements

Interactivity orients users, enables exploration, guides decision-making, constrains overall narrative

Annotations provide facts, interpret, create emotional links, enhance credibility

Visual representation communicates flooding and human and ecological responses

Data choices affect resolution, accuracy, dynamic capabilities

Key overall consideration: intended use and audience

Results: Intended audiences

• About 1/3 of ISLRVs explicitly identified audience or purpose

• Major audiences:

– Coastal residents and communities

– Coastal managers

– Decision-makers

– General public

– Scientific researchers

Results: Data design

• Topographic model and SLR projections led to large differences

• Creation date and type of creator also were factors

• Nearly all ISLRVs had bandwidth issues

(Global Flood Map, 2009)

Results: Visual representation of SLR

• Most ISLRVs used color shading

• A few ISLRVs also represented additional effects:

– Storm surge

– Flooding uncertainty

– Ecosystem response

• SLR magnitudes varied (Sarasota Bay SLR Map Viewer, 2011)

Results: Annotations

• Highly variable among

ISLRVs

– Purpose statement

– Logos

– Technical & interpretive help

– Social media

– Uncertainty

– Local sites

• Importance: context, tone, credibility

(Future Coast, 2011)

Results: Interactivity

• Plays large role in shaping narrative

– Orientation

– Narrative pathway

– Suggest appropriate ways to explore data

• Primary narrative choices involved selecting SLR scenarios and navigating map

(Surging Seas, 2013)

Results: Interactivity

• Most ISLRVs were more user-driven than author-driven

– Purpose to present data rather than create storyline

(Chesapeake Bay, n.d.)

Recommendations

1. Understand and articulate user needs

2. Explain uncertainty and risk (annotation level)

3. Use an appropriate level of realism (visual representation and annotation levels)

4. Incorporate cause and effect sequencing (data and interactivity levels)

5. Enable customization for user needs (annotation and interactivity levels)

6. Balance local and global elements (all levels)

7. Support users with on-demand explanation

(annotation level)

Future Research

• What aspects of ISLRV interfaces contribute to effective situated use by targeted users?

• How can designers balance narrative messaging while facilitating structured discovery?

• How are realism, risk and uncertainty represented and received?

• How do users respond to ISLRVs within the broader context of SLR communication?

Acknowledgements

Dr. Scott Hagen and Dr. Denise DeLorme, UCF

Ecological Effects of Sea Level Rise in the Northern Gulf of Mexico (EESLR-NGOM) Research Team

This research was funded in part under NOAA Award No.

NA10NOS4780146. The statements and conclusions are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA.

Download