CHAPS: HOW FUNDING MODELS IMPACTED OUR
SUSTAINABILITY
Follow Us:
WHO WE ARE: CENTRE FOR HIV AND AIDS PREVENTIONS
STUDIES
Mission:
To reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS in Southern Africa by providing
innovative and preventative health solutions through evidence-based
strategies, particularly the safe and efficient scale-up of voluntary medical
male circumcision (VMMC) as part of a fully comprehensive HIV prevention
package.
What We Do: CHAPS is structured under 4 Key Business Units:
Service Delivery
Technical Services/VMMC Training
Research
Technical Assistance/ VMMC Start-up
Our Journey- Operational Performance
 Over its 5 years of operation, CHAPS has grown in strength providing innovative preventative health solutions
•
•
CHAPS operates across 4 provinces and 12 districts in SA
Through the years 2010 – 2014, CHAPS has cumulatively prevented
approximately 61 545 cases of HIV/AIDS
2014
2013
2012
15 clinics
2011
2010
1 clinic
CHAPS pioneers the MMC
concept
Bill Gates visits the Orange Farm
MC clinic
Number of VMMCs: 9 075
Number of HIV/AIDS cases
prevented:
1 815
30 clinic
3 clinics
CHAPS lead NDOH and
Others in MMC Scale-Up
Number of VMMCs: 21 938
Improvement: 142%
Number of HIV/AIDS cases
prevented:
4 388
Completion of Symmacs
research
CHAPS begins PrePex
research
59 clinics
CHAPS applies to Prime
first
Number of VMMCs:
Number of VMMCs: 41 712
Number of VMMCs: 85 085
45 700 – June 2014
Projected 150 000
Improvement: 90%
Improvement: 104%
Improvement: 76%
Number of HIV/AIDS cases
Number of HIV/AIDS cases
Number of HIV/AIDS cases
prevented:
8 342
prevented:
17 000
prevented
30 000
Funding Models
Fixed Price Contract
Co-Op Agreement
 Awarded contract, fixed price per
package delivered
 Pre-approved budget, work plan,
intense over sight from funder
 Measured by: Quality of service and
delivery of targets agreed upon
 Funding received in advanced
 Less compliance and administrative
requirements
 More room to develop; expansion
 Flexibility
 Diversify investment to reduce
operational costs to NGOs
 Outcome measured against
targets
 Strict encumbrant compliance,
administrative requirements
 Rigid; little room for
development/expansion
1. National Institute of Statistics and Economics
2. principlesandpractices.org
Ongoing Challenges
o RFA’s: Funding
o INGO’s: Loopholes
• Cost of applying for RFAs
or RFPs
• Admin/bureaucratic
hurdles
• Competition from INGOs
with dedicated NBD
teams
Moving NGO’s from the Public to the Private:
Being Competitive!!!
Key Objectives
Input
Output
Improved Operational
Effectiveness
Improved Capacity
Enhanced Relationship
Management
Innovation
Maintaining and Growing
Funding Base
Sustained service delivery
model
Differentiated Business
Model
-7-
Questions
Thank you

This Presentation was developed by Dr Dino Rech and CHAPS Research
assistant, Genevieve N Dean