Frascold NRQT

advertisement
COMPRESSOR TECNOLOGY
FOR THE LOW GWP
REFRIGERANTS
London - 26° April 2012
RAC question time
1
Eng. Marco Caldara
Frascold R&D laboratory manager
Blue is
better
Introduction
Compressor
Technology
Refrigerants
and Application
Engineering
Manufacturing
and Process
Engineering
Frascold Research
Philosophy
Material
Sciences
Compressor
Design
2
Forensic
Engineering
Blue is
better
Current activities
Refrigerants
• HFO
• R407F
• CO2
Compressor design
• Design evaluation for drop-in allowance
• Design evolution for performance increasing
• Application envelope extensions
Validating application
• Suggest refrigerant choice
3
• Hybrid system
• Field test in different location for seasonal
TEWI calculation purposes
Blue is
better
R&D case study
R1234ze
TESTING
EXPERIENCE
4
Blue is
better
Summary
Testing routine instruction
Testing equipment and methods
Refrigerant properties databases
Results
Operations
Current state of test program
Design evolution
Selection software update
5
Blue is
better
Testing routine instruction
TEST PLAN
1. Measure compressor parts
2. Assembling compressor
3. Tightness test
4. Oil charge
5. Installing on test rig and evacuate for 12 h
6. Test and record time + working condition
7. Recover refrigerant and uninstall from test rig
8. Taking oil sample for analysis
9. Dismantle compressor
10.Measure compressor part (500 h).
Each test result contributes to the entire project final result
6
Blue is
better
Test equipment and methods
TEST RIG: 300kW
7
Blue is
better
Test equipment and methods
TEST RIG: 300kW
 Built by ILK Dresden in 2004.
 Test according to EN13771-1
 Two Coriolis mass flow meter
 LP side, method D1
 HP side, method D2
 Oil separator
 Power supply from stabilized grid
 Four independent PID controllers
 Pressure measurement uncertainty lower than 1%
 Temperature measurement uncertainty lower than 0,3 K
 Power measurement uncertainty lower than 1%
 Water cooled condenser and subcooler
 Performance uncertainty lower than 5%
8
Blue is
better
Test equipment and methods
PERFORMANCE DATA PROCESSING STEP
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Placing testing point
Expect limits
Break-in time (24 h)
Reproduce conditions
Go outside limits
Check results
Use interpolation software
Evaluate efficiency curve
Create performance model
9
Blue is
better
Refrigerant databases
REFRIGERANT PROPERTIES DATABASE:
 NIST refprop 9.0
 ILK REFLIB for MS Excel 2.1
10
Blue is
better
Results – key points
Compressor performance
 Performance test
 Numeric simulation
Refrigerant comparison
Oil behavior
Compressor parts wearing
11
Blue is
better
Results – performance test
12
Blue is
better
Results – Numeric simulation
13
Blue is
better
Results – Refrigerant Comparison
14
Blue is
better
Results – Oil behavior
EVALUATED OIL:
 POE 68 cst
 PAG 68 cst
 POE 170 cst (screw)
 POE 68 cst
Oil level was regulated at half of the sight glass on compressor
crankcase by an optical level switch.
 LUBRICATION AT COLD START UP
 SUDDEN PRESSURE DECREASE (FOAM)
 FORCED LUBRICATION – PUMP
DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE
 GAS TRAPPING WHEN DISCARDED
15
Blue is
better
Results – compressor parts wearing
EVALUATED COMPONENTS:
 PISTON AND PISTON RINGS
 SHAFT
 RODS
 BUSHES
 VALVE PLATE REEDS
 LIGHT WEARING (NORMAL)
 NO OVERHEATING SIGN ON VALVE
REEDS AND ROTATING PARTS
 ABSENCE OF DIRT OR PARTICLES
16
Blue is
better
Operations
NEEDING ADDITIONAL CARE FOR:
 LOADING – UNLOADING OF THE REFRIGERANT
 FLAMMABILITY ISSUE: VENTILATION OF AREA
 STOCK AND HANDLING
 VACUUM OPERATION
?
 No difference in loading operation, but
lower pressure at given temperature
 Same ambient condition
 Same stock area and procedure
 Additional vacuum time to sample oil
after test
17
Blue is
better
Test program
 1° step: drop in of refrigerant in standard model
 2° step: Evaluated R134a model
range
 3° step: HFO dedicated model to enhance
favorable behavior
 4° step: field test running and confirmation test
 99% compatible with standard model
(dedicated oil)
 different performances requires
technology adaption
18
Blue is
better
Design evolution
•New valve
plate
•Reduced
clearances
•Motor optimized
for HFO
•Optimized
bore-stroke
ratio
19
Blue is
better
Design evolution
 Different motor size tested to
catch higher efficiency
 different bore-stroke solutions
will be evaluated in future.
 New design of valve plate
under evaluation
 Thanks to lower power consumption
motor
efficiency
improvement
is
possible and necessary
 Shorter stroke compression helps with
low density refrigerant in suction stage
 Valve plate for higher specific volume
20
Blue is
better
Selection software update
 Refrigerant model available
 Compressor efficiencies available for tested models
 Other models could be calculated having tested
performaces with HFC and conversion tools
 Models need confirmation test on oher sizes
 Thanks to similarity with R134a
conversion is plausible and tested to
define accuracy
 Performance calculation in progress.
21
Blue is
better
Thanks !
COMPRESSOR TECNOLOGY
FOR THE LOW GWP
REFRIGERANTS
22
Blue is
better
Download