Real World Project

advertisement

DETERMINATION OF HEAVY

METAL AND ANION

CONCENTRATIONS IN WATER

SAMPLES

G A B B Y P I L L A & C A I T L I N V E R H A L E N

BACKGROUND

• Determination of contaminants in environmental, biological and food samples requires significant attention

• Some elements or their compounds have toxic or nutritional effects

• Regular monitoring of contaminant concentrations is required

• ICP and IC can be used for determination of various contaminants in water samples.

BACKGROUND

• Lead and copper enter water systems primarily through plumbing materials

• Can lead to symptoms ranging from stomach distress to brain damage

• An accumulation of cadmium in the body can affect several organ systems; nervous, gastrointestinal, reproductive and skeletal and biochemical activities.

• Health risks associated with arsenic include severe poisoning and carcinogenic, most importantly cancer of the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract.

• Fluoride can cause fluorosis or bone disease (Raja et al. 2013).

United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National

Primary Drinking Water Regulations:

Contaminant

Aluminum

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

¹MCL

0.05-0.2 mg/L

0.010 mg/L

0.005 mg/L

0

Health Effects

No evidence suggests it is harmful; has been reported to cause dementia

Skin damage, problems with circulatory system, increase risk of getting cancer

Kidney damage

Kidney problems, high blood pressure, physical or mental developmental delays in children

Increase in blood cholesterol, decrease in blood sugar Antimony 0.006 mg/L

¹Maximum contaminant level

Anion

Fluoride

Chloride

¹MCL

2.0 mg/L

250 mg/L

Health Effects

Bone disease

Toxicity has not been observed but reported to produce hypertension

Nitrite 1 mg/L Causes blue baby syndrome and shortness of breath in infants <6 months

Bromide

Nitrate

No limits

10 mg/L

No adverse health effects

Causes blue baby syndrome and shortness of breath in infants <6 months

Phosphate 5 mg/L

Sulfate 250 mg/L

¹Maximum contaminant level

No adverse health effects

Occurs naturally, when very high it can cause diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

• Our purpose was to investigate whether purified or filtered water contains less toxic materials than tap water.

• Hypothesis:

• Store brand filters or water bottles will contain higher concentrations of contaminants compared to name brand filters or water bottles

SAMPLES & ANALYTES

Sample

Brita Filter

Store Filter

Leading Bottle

Store Bottle

Tap Water

ICP

Analyte

Aluminum

Arsenic

Cadmium

Lead

Antimony

IC

Analyte

Fluoride

Chloride

Nitrite

Bromide

Nitrate

Phosphate

Sulfate

METHOD- ICP

• 3 standards for the metals were prepared with dilution method:

• 10 ppm = 1 ml of 1000 ppm stock solution

100 ml DI water

• 10, 30, 50 ppm

• Standards and 5 water samples were analyzed

• For each contaminant two wavelengths were chosen to be analyzed

• Calibration curves were created for each contaminant for the two wavelengths separately and then averaged

METHOD- IC

• 7 anion standard ran after instrument equilibration

• Regenerant was prepared and refilled, allowing for production of a better spectrum

• 5 samples ran and compared to the 7 anion standard spectrum

DATA- ICP

Water Sample

Brita Filter

Store Filter

Leading Bottle

Store Bottle

Tap Water

Aluminum

(ppm)

1.967

2.466

1.966

1.966

2.000

Arsenic

(ppm)

0.676

0.497

0.482

0.471

0.462

Cadmium

(ppm)

-0.807

-0.811

-0.815

-0.823

-0.823

Lead

(ppm)

2.961

2.943

2.958

2.931

2.969

Antimony

(ppm)

12.937

5.911

4.647

4.257

4.118

DATA- IC

Sample

Fluoride

(ppm)

Chloride

(ppm)

Nitrite

(ppm)

Bromide

(ppm)

Nitrate

(ppm)

Phosphat e (ppm)

Sulfate

(ppm)

Standard

Brita

1

N/A

Store Brita

Leading bottle

0.040

N/A

Store Bottle

Tap Water

N/A

0.120

1

0.861

0.714

0.155

0.027

0.864

1

0.206

0.038

N/A

0.003

0.070

1

N/A

0.029

N/A

N/A

0.088

1

N/A

0.145

N/A

N/A

0.234

1

N/A

0.037

N/A

0.002

N/A

1

0.119

0.159

0.003

0.006

0.199

DISCUSSION- ICP

• Aluminum, Arsenic, Lead, and Antimony levels are all high for each water sample

• Store brand filter contained the highest aluminum levels

• Brita filtered water contained the highest arsenic levels

• Tap contained the highest lead levels although they were all very close in concentration

• Brita filtered water contained the highest antimony levels

• Cadmium levels were safe for each water sample

DISCUSSION- ICP

• Possible risks for those in who encounter these contaminants:

• Skin damage

• Circulatory system problems

• Increase risk of getting cancer

• Kidney problems

• High blood pressure

• High blood cholesterol

• Low blood sugar

DISCUSSION- IC

• No levels exceeded the acceptable maximum contaminant level. Therefore, no one is at risk for adverse health effects.

• The store bought filter contained all of the anions though they were at acceptable levels.

• The leading water bottle contained the least amount of anions.

• The water bottle samples contained the lowest concentration of anions compared to the Brita, store filter, and tap water.

CONCLUSION

• Hypothesis was rejected based on ICP data:

• Name brand filters and water bottles contained higher levels of contaminants versus store brand filters and water bottles

• Cheaper is better!

REFERENCES

• United State Environmental Protection Agency. National

Recommended Water Quality Criteria. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swquidance/standards/current/index.

cfm (accessed May 10, 2013).

• Gholivand, M., Pourhossein, A., & Shahlaei, M. Simultaneous determination of copper and cadmium in environmental water and tea samples by adsorptive stripping voltammetry. 2011 Turkish Journal

Of Chemistry, 35(6), 839-846

• Raja, I. A., Khan, M. Y., Khan, N. A., Wani, M. R., & Bhat, A. A.

Assessment Of Some Metals In The Drinking Water Of Dal Lake

Kashmir. 2013. Nature & Science, 11(3), 63-64.

Download