California Air Quality: Governance - B. Croes

advertisement
California Air Quality
Governance
Bart Croes, Chief
Research Division
bcroes@arb.ca.gov
1-916-323-4519
Growth Stages of a Culture of
Environmental Management
Recognizing the Need
• Controls in the developed world came only after
major environmental disasters
o Donora, Pennsylvania
o London
o Los Angeles
• Controls depend on social consensus
Recognizing the Need
Donora, Pennsylvania
o October 26-31, 1948
o 20 people asphyxiated
o >7,000 sickened by air
pollution trapped in the
Monongahela Valley
London
o
o
o
o
1661 - John Evelyn: "Hellish and dismall cloud
of sea-coale"
1800s - Smokey fog known as a "London
particular”
1899 - London Smoke Abatement Society
founded.
December 1952 - Dense smoke-fog shrouds
London for four days, Ministry of Health reports
4,075 more people died than expected under
“normal” conditions
Los Angeles in 1940s
County air pollution
control districts established
2.8 million vehicles
Growth Stages of a Culture of
Environmental Management
Recognizing the Need
Finding the Will
•
Government, business community and public must
share commitment to be effective
History of Air Pollution Law
1947 – California Air Pollution Control Act signed,
established 35 local air pollution control districts
1959 – California begins developing ambient air
standards and controls for motor vehicles
1961 – California establishes automotive emission
control technology requirements
1963 – First Federal Clean Air Act
1967 – California Air Resources Board established to
coordinate all state’s air pollution activities
U.S. Clean Air Acts
•
•
•
•
1963: air quality criteria
1965: emission standards for motor vehicles
1967: air quality standards
1967: federal pre-emption of motor vehicles
standards, EXCEPT California
• 1970: Clean Air Act
–
–
–
–
–
enforceable air quality standards
State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
motor vehicle emission standards
air toxics program
citizen right to sue
Growth Stages of a Culture of
Environmental Management
Recognizing the Need
Finding the Will
Developing Institutions to Facilitate and Enforce
• Infrastructure must make compliance practical and
evasion painful
• Planning tools must tailor the program to local
situations
• Ongoing legal, public education and research efforts
necessary to sustain a justifiable control program
Developing Institutions to Facilitate and Enforce
Air Pollution Control
Control technologies are the least of the problem
Technical Assistance
• Permitting and compliance tracking
• Certifying complying products (new vehicles, diesel
filters, aftermarket parts, consumer products)
Planning Assistance
• Tools to track changing emissions, population, land
use and economic activity
• Technical and economic analysis skills
o Appropriate technologies
o Cost effectiveness
o Technology penetration
o Benefits estimation
Developing Institutions to Facilitate and Enforce
Air Pollution Control
Maintain Authorities
• Defend against legal challenges
• Legislative expertise
• Public education
Research Program
• Health and economic impacts of pollution
• Benefits of controls
• Technology feasibility demonstrations
Regulatory structure
• U.S. EPA
– Sets National Ambient Air Quality Standards
– Reviews, approves, enforces State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
• California Air Resources Board
–
–
–
–
–
–
Sets State Ambient Air Quality Standards
Regulates mobile sources (except ships, aircraft, trains)
Sets consumer products emission limits
Establishes air toxics risk reduction
Regulates greenhouse gases
Sets regional transportation planning targets
• Bureau of Automotive Repair
– Runs passenger car inspection and maintenance program
• Air quality management districts
– Control stationary point sources
– Control stationary area sources
California Air Resources Board
• The Board
– 11 part-time members
– Full-time chair
– Service “at the pleasure of the Governor”
– Appointment by Governor, approval by Senate
• CARB
– Staff of 1100, mostly engineers but also health
researchers and economists
– Annual budget of about $300 million
– Headquarters in Sacramento (California capitol)
– Motor vehicle programs in Los Angeles
Extra slides
13
California Clean Air Act
• First laws were enacted in 1947
• With exceptions, all who discharge air pollutants
must first get a permit
• All vehicles must adhere to California emission
control requirements
• Vehicular fuel must meet state requirements.
• ARB has specific research mandates such as
identifying toxic air contaminates and toxic hot spots
Federal Clean Air Act (1963)
• Regulates air emissions from area,
stationary, and mobile sources
• Sets National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) to protect public
health and the environment
• Directs the states to develop state
implementation plans (SIPs)
Summary
• California per capita emissions must be lowest in U.S.
• Current air pollution health risk
– PM2.5 >> ozone > air toxics
• Emissions control focus
– 1950s and 1960s: smoke
– 1970s and 1980s: lead, SOX, hydrocarbons and NOX
– 1990s to present: diesel PM and NOX, air toxics, GHG
• Air quality improved 75-90% despite growth
• On-road controls have greatest benefits
• Benefits much greater than control costs
16
Download