References
References
Aarten, P. G. M., Denkers, A., Borger, M. J., & Van Der Laan, P. H. (2013).
Reconviction rates after suspended sentences: Comparison of the effects of
different types of suspended sentences on reconviction in the Netherlands
. DOI:
10.1177/0306624X13508929
Abraham, M., Van Dijk, B., & Zwaan, M. (2007). Inzicht in toezicht: De uitvoering van
toezicht door de reclassering. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: DSP groep, WODC.
Achterberg, P. (2006). Het einde van links en rechts: realiteit of populaire mythe.
, 51-63.
Ackerman, S. J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics
and techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance.
(1), 1-33.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.
Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010).
. Newark, NJ:
LexisNexis.
rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology.
52.
(1), 19-
correctional treatment: A meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of
(1), 88-100.
Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective
correctional practices: A summary of the CaVic research. In R. R. Ross & P.
Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 441-463). Toronto, Canada:
Butterworths.
Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F.
T. (1990b). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and
psychologically informed meta-analysis.
, 369-404.
Antonowicz, D. H., & Ross, R. R. (1994). Essential components of successful
rehabilitation programs for offenders.
(2), 97-104.
Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What
works and what does not. Olympia: Washington State Institute of Public Policy.
Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. (1997). Public support for correctional
treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. The Prison Journal,
(3), 237-258.
Armstrong, S., McIvor, G., McNeill, F., & McGuiness, P. (2013). International evidence
review of conditional (suspended) sentences. Final report. Glasgow, UK: The Scottish
Centre for Crime & Justice Research.
151
References
Bagaric, M. (1999). Suspended sentences and preventive sentences: Illusory evils
and disproportionate punishments.
22, 535-563.
Barber, J., & Doob, A. N. (2004). An analysis of public support for severity and
proportionality in the sentencing of youthful offenders. Canadian Journal of
(3), 327-342.
Barber, J. P., Luborsky, L., Crits-Christoph, P., Thase, M. E., Weiss, R., Frank, A.,
Onken, L., & Gallop, R. (1999). Therapeutic alliance as a predictor of outcome
in treatment of cocaine dependence.
(1), 54-73.
Barnes, G. C., Ahlman, L., Gill, C., Sherman, W., Kurtz, E., & Malvestuto, R. (2010).
Low-intensity community supervision for low-risk offenders: a randomized,
controlled trial.
(2), 159-189.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction
in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical
considerations.
(6), 1173-1182.
Bartels, L. (2007). The use of suspended sentences in Australia: Unsheathing the
sword of Damocles.
, 113-132.
Bartels, L. (2009). The weight of the sword of Damocles: A reconviction analysis
of suspended sentences in Tasmania. Australian & New Zealand Journal of
(1), 72-100.
Becker, H. S. (1963).
. New York: Free Press.
Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Sensitivity analysis for average treatment
effects.
(1), 71-83.
Beerthuizen, M. G. C. J., & Wartna, B. S. J. (2013). Vrijheid binnen de perken. Een
verkennend onderzoek naar de inzet van voorwaardelijke vrijheidsstraffen. The Hague,
the Netherlands: WODC.
Bernburg, J. G. (2009). Labelling theory. In M. D. Krohn, A. J. Lizotte & G. P. Hall
(Eds.), Handbook on crime and deviance (pp. 187-207). London: Springer.
Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: communication criteria of
fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on
negotation in organizations (pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Bleichrodt, E. (1996). Onder voorwaarde: een onderzoek naar de voorwaardelijke veroordeling
en andere voorwaardelijke modaliteiten. Deventer, the Netherlands: Gouda Quint.
Bleichrodt, E. (2000). Creativiteit en voorwaardelijke sanctionering. Justitiële
Verkenningen, 26(4), 44-51.
Bleichrodt, E. (2009). De herontdekking van de bijzondere voorwaarde. Proces,
(6), 304-313.
Bleichrodt, F. W., & Vegter, P. C. (2013). Sanctierecht. Deventer, the Netherlands:
Kluwer.
152
References
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Nagin, D. S. (1978). Deterrence and incapacitation: Estimating
the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
of Sciences.
Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007).
and rehabilitation. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.
Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., &
in evidence-based community supervision.
(11),
1127-1148.
Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. K. (2008). Exploring
the black box of community supervision.
(3),
248-270.
Boone, M. (2010). Only for minor offences: Community service in the Netherlands.
European Journal of Probation, 2(1), 22-40.
Boone, M., & Moerings, M. (2007). Growing Prison Rates. In M. Boone & M.
Moerings (Eds.), Dutch Prisons (pp. 51-76). The Hague, the Netherlands: BJu
Legal Publishers.
Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the
working alliance.
(3), 252-260.
Bottoms, A. E. (1995). The philosophy and politics of punishment and sentencing.
In C. M. V. Clarkson & R. Morgan (Eds.), The politics of sentencing reform (pp. 1750). Oxford: Clarendon.
Bottoms, A. E. (2001). Compliance with community penalties. In A. Bottoms, L.
Gelsthorpe & S. Rex (Eds.),
(pp. 87116). Cullompton: Willan.
Bourgon, G., Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., & Yessine, A. K. (2010). The role
of program design, implementation and evaluation in evidence-based “real
world” community supervision.
(1), 2-15.
in criminal justice: A review of the British research literature. In A. Jokinen,
E. Ruuskanen, M. Yordanova, D. Markov & M. Ilcheva (Eds.), Review of need:
for the Study of Democracy.
Brody, S. R. (1976). The effectiveness of sentencing - a review of the literature. London: Her
Brouwers, M., & Eggen, A. T. J. (2012). Berechting. In S. N. Kalidien, N. E. De
Heer-De Lange & M. M. Van Rosmalen (Eds.), Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving
2012: Ontwikkelingen en samenhangen (pp. 133-152). Meppel, the Netherlands:
Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
153
References
assisting offenders to desist from crime.
(3), 247-268.
Casper, J. D., Tyler, T., & Fisher, B. (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law
(3), 483-507.
CentERdata. (2013). Longitudinal Internet Studies for the Social sciences (LISS) panel.
Tilburg University, the Netherlands
Chung, C., Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1991). Survival analysis: A survey. Journal of
(1), 59-98.
Cid, J. (2005). Suspended sentences in Spain: Decarceration and recidivism.
(2), 169-179.
Cid, J. (2009). Is imprisonment criminogenic? A comparative study of recidivism
rates between prison and suspended prison sanctions. European Journal of
(6), 459-480.
Clarke, S. H., Lin, Y. W., & Wallace, W. L. (1988). Probationer recidivism in North
(Vol. University of North Carolina
at Chapel Hill School of Government): Chapel Hill, NC.
Cocker, S. (2006).
West Yorkshire. West Yorkshire: National Probation Service.
Commissie Vrijheidsbeperking. (2003). Vrijheidsbepekring door voorwaarden. De
voorwaardelijke veroordeling en haar samenhang met de taakstraf, de voorlopige hechtenis en
de voorwaardelijke invrijheidsstelling. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu.
Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables.
(2), 187-220.
Cullen, F. T., Fisher, B. S., & Applegate, B. K. (2000). Public opinion about
punishment and corrections.
, 1-79.
De Keijser, J. W. (2000).
action. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Thela Thesis.
De Keijser, J. W., & Elffers, H. (2009). Punitive public attitudes: A threat to the
legitimacy of the criminal justice system? In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck & J.
Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.),
(pp. 55-74).
UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
De Koster, W., Van Der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., & Houtman, D. (2008). The rise
of the penal state. Neo-liberalization or new political culture? British Journal of
(6), 720-734.
Dekker, P., & Van Der Meer, T. (2007). Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak nader onderzocht.
The Hague, the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Dignan, J. (1984). The sword of Damocles and the clang of the prison gates:
Prospects on the inception of the partly suspended sentence. The Howard
(3), 183-200.
154
References
DiPrete, T. A., & Gangl, M. (2004). Assessing bias in the estimation of causal
effects: Rosenbaum bounds on matching estimators and instrumental variables
estimation with imperfect instruments.
(1), 271-310.
Directoraat-Generaal Preventie Jeugd en Sancties. (2008). Maatregelen recidivireductie:
nadruk op nazorg. The Hague, the Netherlands: Ministerie van Veiligheid en
Justitie.
Dirkzwager, A., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Fiselier, J. P. S. (2009). Onbedoelde gevolgen
van vrijheidsstraffen: Een literatuurstudie.
(1), 2141.
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in
delivering effective correctional treatment: a meta-analytic review of Core
Correctional Practice.
(2), 203-214.
Downes, D., & Van Swaaningen, R. (2007). The road to Dystopia? Changes in the
penal climate of the Netherlands.
, 3171.
Durham, A. M. (1993). Public opinion regarding sentences for crime: Does it exist?
Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(1), 1-11.
Durnescu, I. (2012). What matters most in probation supervision: Staff
characteristics, staff skills or programme?
(2),
193-216.
Misdrijven: Opgelegde straffen en
maatregelen. Retrieved 31 January 2014, from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/pub
lication/?DM=SLNL&PA=03727&D1=4-6&D2=0&D3=0&D4=0&D5=(l10)-l&VW=T.
Elffers, H., & De Keijser, J. W. (2008). Different perspectives, different gaps: Does
the general public demand a more responsive judge? In H. Kury (Ed.), Fear of
(pp. 447-470). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.
Elffers, H., De Keijser, J. W., Van Koppen, P. J., & Van Haeringen, L. (2007).
attitudes towards the criminal justice system.
, 163-182.
Farrington, D. P. (1983). Randomized experiments on crime and justice. Crime and
Justice, 4, 257-308.
Farrington, D. P., & Welsh, B. C. (2006). A half century of randomized experiments
on crime and justice.
, 55-132.
Faulkner, D. (2005). Parties, politics and punishment. Criminal Justice Matters, 60(1),
6-39.
155
References
Flanagan, J. T. (1996). Community corrections in the public mind. Federal Probation,
60(3), 3-9.
Flight, S., Nauta, O., Terpstra, J., De Jonge, G., Hulshof, P., Abraham, M., & Roorda,
W. (2011). Voorwaardelijk vrij: Evaluatie van de wet voorwaardelijke invrijheidsstelling.
The Hague, the Netherlands: WODC.
Franke, H. (1996). Twee eeuwen gevangenisstraf in Nederland. De macht van het lijden. The
Netherlands: Balans.
Freiberg, A., & Moore, V. (2009). Disbelieving suspense: Suspended sentences of
Australian
(1), 101-122.
Friendship, C., Beech, A. R., & Browne, K. D. (2002). Reconviction as an outcome
measure in research: A methodological note.
,
442-444.
Frigo, D. (2006). Therapeutic alliance: Improving treatment outcome. Minnesota: Butler
Center for Research, Hazelden Foundation.
American
(5), 420-424.
Gaston, L. (1990). The concept of the alliance and its role in psychotherapy:
Theoretical and empirical considerations.
(2), 143-153.
Gaston, L., Marmer, C. R., Gallagher, D., & Thompson, L. W. (1991). Alliance
prediction of outcome beyond in-treatment symptomatic change as
psychotherapy processes.
(2), 104-113.
Geerken, M., & Gove, W. R. (1975). Deterrence: Some theoretical considerations.
(3), 497-513.
Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1981). Correctional potency: Treatment and deterrence
on trial. In R. Roesch & R. R. Corrado (Eds.),
.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Glaze, L. E., Bonczar, T. P., & Zhang, F. (2010). Probation and parole in the
United States 2009 (BJS Special Bulletin NCJ 2231674). Washington, DC: U.S.
Department of Justice.
Gray, M. K., Fields, M., & Maxwell, S. R. (2001). Examining probation violations who, what and when.
(4), 537-557.
Guo, S., & Fraser, M. W. (2010).
applications. Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Henderson, H., Wells, W., Maguire, E. R., & Gray, J. (2010). Evaluating the
measurement properties of procedural justice in a correctional setting. Criminal
(4), 384-399.
Hirschi, T. (1969).
. Berkeley: University of California Press.
156
References
Horvath, A., & Symonds, D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and
outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis.
(2), 139-149.
Hough, M. (1996). People talking about punishment. The Howard Journal of Criminal
(3), 191-214.
Hough, M., & Roberts, J. V. (1998). Attitudes to punishment: Findings from the British
. London, UK: Home
Hough, M., & Roberts, J. V. (1999). Sentencing trends in Britain: Public knowledge
and public opinion.
(1), 11-26.
Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness.
(3), 243258.
Ignazi, P. (1992). The silent counter-revolution: Hypotheses on the emergence of
extreme right-wing parties in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 22,
3-34.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012).
institutions.
(6), 1051-1071.
Jacobs, M. J. G., Siesling, M., & Van Kalmthout, A. M. (2009). Optimalisering van
voorwaardelijke sancties. Een procesevaluatie. The Hague, the Netherlands: WODC.
Jacobs, M. J. G., Van Kalmthout, A. M., & Von Bergh, M. Y. W. (2006). Toepassing
van bijzondere voorwaarden bij voorwaardelijke vrijheidsstraf en schorsing van de voorlopige
hechtenis bij volwassenen. Tilburg, the Netherlands: IVA Beleidsonderzoek &
Advies.
Janssen, J. H. L. J. (2000). Laat maar zitten: Een exploratief onderzoek naar de werking van
de korte vrijheidsstraf. The Hague, the Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Kelk, C. (2004). De voorwaardelijke veroordeling en de voorwaardelijke
invrijheidsstelling onder de loep. Delikt en Delinkwent, 1(3), 33-59.
Kennealy, P., Skeem, J., Manchak, S., & Eno Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair and caring
Law and
(6), 496-505.
Klockars, C. (1972). A theory of probation supervision. Journal of Criminal Law,
, 550-557.
Lamet, W., Dirkzwager, A., Denkers, A., & Van Der Laan, P. (2013). Social bonds
under supervision: Associating social bonds of probationers with supervision
failure. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(7), 784-801.
Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (1993). Turning points in the life course: Why change
matters to the study of crime.
(3), 301-325.
Laver, M., & Budge, J. (1992).
. London, UK:
MacMillan Press.
157
References
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988).
. New York:
Plenum Press.
Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into
viability of effects. In T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartman,
L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis & F. Mosteller (Eds.),
explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation:
A review of systematic reviews.
, 297320. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
Lulham, R., Weatherburn, D., & Bartels, L. (2009). The recidivism of offenders given
suspended sentences: A comparison with full-time imprisonment. Sydney, Australia: NSW
Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works.
(4), 457-471.
MacKenzie, G., Spiranovic, C., Warner, K., Stobbs, N., Gelb, K., Roberts, L.,
Results from a national Australian survey on public opinion towards sentencing.
(1), 45-65.
Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic
alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of
(3), 438-450.
Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform.
, 22-54.
Maruna, S., & King, A. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. In T.
Bottoms, S. Rex & G. Robinson (Eds.), Alternatives to prison: Options for an insecure
. Portland, US: Willan Publishing.
Mascini, P., & Houtman, D. (2006). Rehabilitation and repression: Reassessing their
ideological embeddedness.
(5), 822-836.
Matthews, R. (2005). The myth of punitiveness.
(2), 175201.
Maxwell, S. R., & Gray, M. K. (2000). Deterrence: Testing the effects of perceived
sanction certainty on probation violations.
(2), 117-136.
McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes
toward six common crimes.
(2), 240-252.
Morgan, K. D. (1994). Factors associated with probation outcome. Journal of
Criminal Justice, 22(4), 341-353.
Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in
. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, K., & Tyler, T. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behavior: the
mediating role of emotions.
(4), 652-668.
158
References
Murphy, K., Tyler, T., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is
procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law?
, 1-26.
Nagin, D. S. (1998). Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the Twenty-First
Century.
, 1-42.
Nagin, D. S., Cullen, F. T., & Jonson, C. L. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending.
, 115-200.
Nagin, D. S., & Paternoster, R. (1991). The preventive effects of the perceived
risk of arrest: Testing an expanded conception of deterrence.
,
561-585.
Nagin, D. S., & Pogarsky, G. (2001). Integrating celerity, impulsivity and extralegal
sanction threats into a model of general deterrence: Theory and evidence.
, 865-892.
Nauta, B., Moolenaar, D. E. G., & Van Tulder, F. P. (2011). Kosten van criminaliteit.
In S. N. Kalidien, N. E. De Heer-De Lange & M. M. Van Rosmalen (Eds.),
Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving 2010: Ontwikkelingen en samenhangen (pp. 241270). Meppel, the Netherlands: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
Olson, D. E., & Lurigio, A. J. (2000). Predicting probation outcomes: Factors
associated with probation rearrests, revocations, and technical violations during
supervision.
(1), 73-86.
Paparozzi, M. A., & Gendreau, P. (2005). An intensive supervision program
that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational
supportiveness.
, 445-466.
Paternoster, R. (1987). The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity
of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues.
, 173217.
Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence?
(3), 765-823.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair
procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law &
(1), 163-204.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1986). The deterrent effect of perceived severity: A
reexamination. Social Forces, 64, 751-777.
Paternoster, R., & Iovanni, L. (1989). The labeling perspective and delinquency:
An elaboration of the theory and assessment of the evidence.
6(3), 359-394.
Paternoster, R., Saltzman, L. E., Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1983). Perceived
risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter?
,
457-479.
159
References
Payne, B. K., Gainey, R. R., Triplett, R. A., & Danner, M. J. E. (2004). What drives
(3), 195-206.
Peel, M. J., & Makepeace, G. H. (2009).
. Retrieved 18 November
2012, from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1485734
Petersilia, J. (1998). Probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The handbook of crime
and punishment (pp. 563-568). New York: Oxford University Press.
Petersilia, J. (1999). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What
have we learned?
(3), 19-27.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Intensive supervision for high-risk probationers: Findings
from three California experiments. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice,
, 281-335.
Peterson, M. A., Braiker, H., & Polich, S. M. (1980). Doing crime: A survey of
California Prison Inmates. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Plaisier, J., & Pennekamp, S. (2009). Planevaluatie reclasseringstoezicht. The Hague, the
Netherlands: Impact R&D, WODC.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common
method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and
recommended remedies.
(5), 879-903.
Poort, R., & Eppink, K. (2009). Een literatuuronderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de
reclassering. The Hague, the Netherlands: WODC.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating
indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments
(4), 717-731.
Raynor, P. (2002).
. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (2001). Straight Thinking on Probation: Evidence-Based
Practice and the Culture of Curiosity. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A.
W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice: Implementing and Evaluating
Effective Programs (pp. 189-203). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Reclassering Nederland (2014). Onder toezicht. Retrieved 10 November 2013, from
http://www.reclassering.nl/wat-wij-doen/verdachten-en-veroordeelden/
onder-toezicht.
Reclassering Nederland (2014). Cijfers 2012. Retrieved 25 January 2014, from
http://www.reclassering.nl/wie-wij-zijn/feiten-en-cijfers.
Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and
Criminal Justice and Behavior,
(8), 1005-1028.
160
References
Reisig, M. D., & Mesko, G. (2009). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner
misconduct.
(1), 41-59.
Rex, S. (1999). Desistance from offending: Experiences of probation. The Howard
(4), 366-383.
Roberts, J. V. (1992). Public opinion, crime and criminal justice. Crime and Justice: A
Review of Research, 16, 99-180.
Roberts, J. V. (1997). Conditional sentencing: Sword of Damocles or Pandora’s
Box? Canadian Criminal Law Review, 2, 183-206.
Roberts, J. V. (2002). Public opinion and the nature of community penalties:
Changing attitudes to
punishment: Public opinion, crime and justice (pp. 33-62). Cullompton, Devon: Willan
Publishing.
Roberts, J. V., & Gabor, T. (2004). Living in the shadow of prison: Lessons from
the Canadian experience in decarceration.
(1),
92-112.
Roberts, J. V., & Hough, M. (2002). Public attitudes to punishment: The context.
In J. V. Roberts & H. Hough (Eds.), Changing attitudes to punishment: Public opinion,
crime and justice (pp. 1-14). Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.
Roberts, J. V., & Hough, M. (2005). The state of the prisons: Exploring public
knowledge and opinion. The Howard Journal, 44(3), 286-306.
Robinson, G., & McNeill, F. (2008). Exploring the dynamics of compliance with
community penalties.
(4), 431-449.
Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role for the propensity score in
observational studies of causal effects.
(1), 41-55.
Ross, E. C., Polaschek, D. L. L., & Ward, T. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A
theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior,
(6), 462-480.
Roundtree, G. A., Edwards, D. W., & Parker, J. B. (1984). A study of the personal
characteristics of probationers as related to recidivism. Journal of Offender
(3), 53-61.
Ruiter, S., Tolsma, J., De Hoon, M., Elffers, H., & Van Der Laan, P. (2011). De burger
als rechter. Een onderzoek naar geprefereerde sancties voor misdrijven in Nederland. The
Hague, the Netherlands: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
Sanders, T., & Roberts, J. V. (2000). Public attitudes towards conditional sentencing:
Results of a national survey.
(4), 199207.
Schuyt, P. M. (2011). Persoonsgericht straffen: De voorwaardelijke veroordeling
‘nieuwe stijl’.
, 169-180.
161
References
Schwartz, I. M., Guo, S., & Kerbs, J. J. (1993). The impact of demographic variables
on public opinion regarding juvenile justice: Implications for public policy.
(1), 5-28.
Searle, W., Paulin, J., & Waldegrave, T. (1998). The activation of suspended
sentences of imprisonment. In P. Spier (Ed.), Conviction and sentencing of offenders
(pp. 119-130). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry
of Justice.
Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., &
Bushway, S. (1998).
.
Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Shoham, S., & Sandberg, M. (1964). Suspended sentences in Israel: An evaluation
10(1), 74-83.
Sims, B., & Jones, M. (1997). Predicting success or failure on probation: Factors
associated with felony probation outcomes.
(3), 314327.
Skeem, J. L., Eno Louden, J., Polaschek, D., & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing
relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with
control.
(4), 397-410.
Skeem, J. L., & Manchak, S. (2008). Back to the future: From Klockars’ model of
effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender
(3), 220-247.
Snowball, L. (2011).
. Sydney, Australia:
NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau. (2009). De sociale staat van Nederland 2009. The Hague,
the Netherlands: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Soothill, K. (1981). The suspended sentence for ex-prisoners revisited. Criminal
Law Review, 821-828.
Stalans, L. (2002). Measuring attitudes to sentencing. In J. V. Roberts & M. Hough
(Eds.), Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, crime and justice (pp. 15-32).
Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
Stichting Verslavingsreclassering GGZ (2014). Feiten en cijfers. Retrieved 18 february
2014, from http://www.svg.nl/over_de_svg/feiten_en_cijfers/feiten_en_
cijfers_2011_archief.html.
Sundt, J. L., Cullen, F. T., Applegate, B. K., & Turner, M. G. (1998). The tenacity
of the rehabilitative ideal revisited: Have attitudes toward offender treatment
changed?
(4), 426-442.
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003a). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy
in shaping public support for policing.
162
References
Sykes, G. M. (2007).
. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tak, P. J. (2001). Sentencing and punishment in the Netherlands. In M. Tonry & R.
Frase (Eds.), Sentencing and sanctions in western countries (pp. 151-187). New York,
NY: Oxford University Press.
Taxman, F. S. (2002). Supervision - Exploring the dimensions of effectiveness.
Federal Probation, 66, 14-27.
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975).
. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Thomas, D. R., & Ragona, A. J. (1987). Popular moderation versus governmental
authoritarianism: An interactionist view of public sentiments toward criminal
sanctions.
(3), 337-357.
TK 2000/01, 27 419, no. 1.
TK 2003/04, 29 200, no. 167.
TK 2007/08, 24 587, no. 299.
TK 2009/10, 32 319, no. 3.
Tonry, M., & Bijleveld, C. (2007). Crime, criminal justice, and criminology in the
Netherlands.
, 1-30.
majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions?
Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 19(2), 215-235.
Tyler, T. R. (2006).
. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton
University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the
police and courts. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Tyler, T. R., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013). Psychology of procedural justice and
cooperation. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.),
and Criminal Justice (pp. 4011-4034). New York: Springer.
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups.
, 115-191.
Tyler, T. R., Sherman, L., Strang, H., Barnes, G. C., & Woods, D. (2007).
Reintegrative shaming, procedural justice, and recidivism: The engagement
of offenders’ psychological mechanisms in the Canberra RISE drinking-anddriving experiment.
(3), 553-586.
Ugwudike, P. (2010). Compliance with community penalties: The importance of
interactional dynamics. In F. McNeill, P. Raynor & C. Trotter (Eds.), Offender
(pp. 325-343). New York:
Willan Publishing.
UK Ministry of Justice. (2010). Offender management caseload statistics 2009. An overview
. UK: Ministy of Justice.
163
References
UK Sentencing Council (2013). Suspended sentences. Retrieved 29 April 2013, from
http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/sentencing/suspended-sentences.
htm.
Van Bommel, A. (2009). Beginselen van legitimiteit en resocialisatie bij
voorwaardelijke straffen.
(6), 356-362.
Van Der Brug, W. (1999). Voters’ Perceptions and Party Dynamics.
(2), 147-169.
Van der Eijk, C., & Niemöller, B. (1983). Electoral change in the Netherlands: Empirical
results and methods of measurement. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: CT-Press.
Van Der Knaap, L. M., Leenarts, L. E. W., & Nijssen, L. T. J. (2007).
kwaliteiten van de Recidive Inschattingsschalen (RISc). The Hague, the Netherlands:
WODC.
Van Der Linden, B. (2004). Terugdringen recidive.
, 94-101.
Van Der Meer, T., Lubbe, R., Van Elsas, E., Elff, M., & Van Der Brug, W. (2012).
structure of changing vote intentions in the Netherlands during 2006-2010.
, 333-355.
Van Gelder, J. L., Aarten, P., Lamet, W., & Van Der Laan, P. (2011). Unknown,
unloved? Public opinion on and knowledge of suspended sentences in The
Netherlands.
. doi: 10.1177/0011128711426537
Van Kalmthout, A., & Tigges, L. (2008). Netherlands. In A. M. Van Kalmthout & I.
Durnescu (Eds.), Probation in Europe (pp. 677-723). Nijmegen, the Netherlands:
Wolf Legal Publishers.
Van Koppen, P. J. (2003). Verankering van rechtspraak: Over de wisselwerking tussen burger,
politiek, justitie en rechter. Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
Villettaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial
. The Campbell
Collaboration. Retrieved 25 January 2014 from www.campbellcollaboration.
org/lib/download/108/.
Waldo, G. P., & Chiricos, T. G. (1972). Perceived penal sanction and self-reported
criminality: a neglected approach to deterrence research. Social Problems, 19,
522-540.
Walker, N., Farrington, D. P., & Tucker, G. (1981). Reconviction rates of adult
males after different sentences.
(4), 357-360.
Wansink, H. A. (2007). Tussen populisme en rechts-radicalisme. Overeenkomsten en
verschillen tussen Leefbaren, de fortuynisten en Wilders. Justitiële Verkenningen,
(2), 68-74.
Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in
offender rehabilitation.
(3), 243-257.
164
References
Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007).
. London,
England: Routledge.
Wartna, B. S. J. (2009). In de Oude Fout: Over het Meten van Recidive en het vaststellen van het
Succes van Strafrechtelijke Interventies. Meppel, the Netherlands: Boom Juridische
Uitgevers.
Wartna, B. S. J., Blom, M., & Tollenaar, N. (2011). The Dutch Recidivism Monitor, 4th
. The Hague, the Netherlands: WODC.
Wartna, B. S. J., & Tollenaar, N. (2006). Voorwaardelijk voor onvoorwaardelijk. Substitutie
van onvoorwaardelijke vrijheidsstraffen bij gering recidivegevaar: Een raming van de te
besparen gevangeniscapaciteit. The Hague, the Netherlands: WODC.
Wasik, M. (1994). Sentencing guidelines: The problems of conditional sentences.
(1), 50-57.
Weatherburn, D., & Bartels, L. (2008). The recidivism of offenders given suspended
sentences in New South Wales, Australia.
(5),
667-683.
Weatherburn, D., & Trimboli, L. (2008).
studies of offenders on supervised bonds. New South Wales, Australia: NSW Bureau
of Crime Statistics and Research.
Williams, K. R., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence:
A critical review.
, 545-572.
Wilson, J. Q. (1983). Thinking about crime. New York: Vintage Books.
Wodahl, E. J., Garland, B., Culhane, S. E., & McCarty, W. P. (2011). Utilizing
behavioral interventions to improve supervision outcomes in communitybased corrections.
(4), 386-405.
165