Leading as designing: how educational developers in leadership

advertisement

Leading as Designing:

How Educational Developers in Leadership and Management

Studies Can Use Architectural Design to Facilitate Student

Learning About Delivering Innovation

Conference: “Educational Development in a Changing World”

International Consortium for Educational Development

Stockholm, 16 June 2014

Steven Cranfield 1 , Sheila Marsh 2 & Jud Stone 2

1 University of Westminster

2 PublicServiceWorks, London, UK

Focus of presentation

– Novel approach to use of creative industry

(architectural design) as focus of learning in a work based leadership masters programme – a ‘creative assignment’

– Assignment provided a powerful learning experience for most participants

– But it led some others to question their capacity as leaders for fostering creativity

– Activity theory and associated theory used to explain these differing outcomes and develop learning

– Challenges and opportunities for educational developers

Research approach

• Observational case study, by module tutors

• Conceptual framework – activity theory

(Engeström, 1987, 1999, 2000, 2007)

• Data collected 2001-13 visually and verbally

• Thematic and content analysis of verbal data

• Variety of evaluation tools used, including some secondary data from an independent evaluation

Delivering innovation for leaders in health and social care

‘How do ideas get translated into real world practice?’

Intersection of leadership theory, education and real-world practice of leaders – creative, dynamic but can be uncomfortable

Programme and rationale

– Work based Masters in Leadership in Health and Social Care

– Commissioned initially by National Health Service Executive

(NHSE) in England

– Goal – practical delivery of improvement of public services

– Service level leaders – multidisciplinary, multiprofessional

– Delivered 2001-2013 at two post-1992 universities by independent educational developers

Approach to learning

– Action learning (Revans, 2011)

– Activity theory – focus on dialogue, systems, role of tools/equipment, informal and formal procedures, division of labour (Engeström, 1999; McCaslin & Hickey,

2001)

Approach to leadership

– Embodying Leadership – What Do Good Leaders Do?

(NHSE, 2000)

– From normative and transactional to transformative -

‘participation, consultation and inclusion’ (Silvestri, 2007: 39)

– Organisations espouse the rhetoric of transformation but do not consistently support the practice of it (Marsh et al., 2003)

– Creative industries as inspiring models of delivering innovation, improvisational leadership and collaborative, cross-disciplinary ways of learning and working (Latham,

2013)

Why architectural design?

– ‘Creative’ activity needed to be justifiable use of time – enduring impact on local economy and people’s quality of life

– Interrogate connections between creative concept, innovative product and decision making

– Tensions, shortcomings, dilemmas and achievements of delivering innovation – activity theory

Creative assignment o Introductory task for 20-credit level 7 module on creativity, innovation and decision-making o Select an innovative architectural design project

(completed within previous 10 years) o Find out how creative idea was turned into a tangible, collaboratively created product o No prior knowledge of architectural design assumed or required o Present findings in posters created at first module workshop o Workshop activities identify common principles of creativity and innovation translated to participants’ work (i.e. activity system) o Formative feedback via action learning sets and tutorial support

Creative assignments

7 cohorts (n=89)

– redevelopment programmes

– civic landmarks

– housing and regeneration projects

– office buildings

– shopping centres

– football stadiums and sports facilities

– ecological centres

– public gardens

– bridges

– sculptural installations

– churches

Themes from Posters and Workshops

– Core components of creativity - expertise, creative thinking skills, and motivation (Amabile, 2001)

– Collaborative working, responsiveness to multiple stakeholders and clarity of purpose

– ‘People skills’

– Relative freedom over reaching specified goals

– Risk aversion

– Tools for facilitation - organisational support

Key Messages from Participants

‘I observed the creativity, determination and dedication of Tim Smit, inspiration and driver for the Eden Project. What could I learn from this to transform my practice? ... As I complete this assignment I reflect on the impossible

Biomes of Eden, now described as the eighth wonder of the world. I remember purpose, dedication, motivation and reward.’ Eden Project Cornwall,

England, 2001

Creative self image of public sector leaders

– ‘But I’m not creative’

A positive self-image is associated with creative productivity

– Leaders and managers ‘lack creative edge’

– They do not see innovation from start to finish, or learn from the results

– ‘I didn’t view any of my current projects in work as particularly innovative; this may be my interpretation of the concepts of innovation and creativity.’

Creative self image of public sector leaders

– ‘But I’m not creative’

A positive self-image is associated with creative productivity

– Perceived as anti-creative by clinicians

– Innovation linked to ‘creative destruction’ and downsizing

– ‘The current climate is one of insecurity, distrust and lack of resources, all of which are identified to block creativity.’

Stabilisation knowledge and possibility knowledge

(Engeström, 2007)

– Stabilisation knowledge

 Simplifies and fixes an otherwise bewildering reality

 Hard won cognitive achievement ensuring a certain level of survival in a complex, unruly world

– Possibility knowledge

 Embraces uncertainty, sees meanings in transformation and opens up possibilities

– Both are collaborative, both more or less creative

Stabilisation knowledge and possibility knowledge

(Engeström, 2007)

– Stabilisation knowledge

 assignments on more linear aspects of delivering innovation e.g. problem-solving techniques to circumscribed issues like ordering systems

– Possibility knowledge

 assignments more non-linear, exploratory e.g. applying a ‘home-grown’ computer-generated montage technique to use visual metaphor to identify significant blocks to effective communication between consultant medical staff and managers in the redevelopment of a hospital

Stabilisation knowledge and possibility knowledge

(Engeström, 2007)

– Both types of knowledge could result in successful assignments and guide positive action and change in the workplace

– Distinction helped make sense of participants’ differing expectations and aspirations, and …

• paradoxes and double-binds of art-and-management discourse experienced as ‘paralyzing in some contexts and inspiring in others’ (Parush & Koivunen,

2014: 104)

• and enabled more nuanced feedback to participants.

Conclusions 1

– Architectural design provided a potent source of learning for students and for us as educational developers

– Assignment developed conceptual and applied links between leadership performance, creative collaboration and the goal of delivering innovation

– Carefully integrated into the curriculum, it can prompt applicable insights into the above

Conclusions 2

– Formative, non-assessed and non-competitive

– Opened up discussion about creative self-image in a purposeful way

– Positively evaluated by 7 consecutive cohorts

– Cost-effective and does not rely on subject specific knowledge

– Merits further research

References

Amabile, T. (2001). How to kill creativity. In J. Henry (Ed.) Creative Management , Second Edition, pp.

4 –10. London: Sage

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental

Research . Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation, Perspectives on Activity

Theory , 19-38.

Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work,

Ergonomics , 43(7), 960-974.

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work , 14(1), 133-156.

Engeström, Y. (2007). From stabilization knowledge to possibility knowledge in organizational learning, Management Learning , 38(3), 271-275.

Latham, S. D. (2013). Leadership research: an arts-informed perspective, Journal of Management

Inquiry , 1056492613491434.

McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view, Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical perspectives , 2 , 227-252.

NHS Executive (NHSE) London Region (2000). Embodying Leadership: What Do Effective Leaders

Do?

London: NHS Executive. Revans, R. (2011). ABC of Action Learning . Farnham: Gower Publishing.

Parush, T., & Koivunen, N. (2014). Paradoxes, double binds, and the construction of ‘creative’ managerial selves in art-based leadership development, Scandinavian Journal of Management , 30(1),

104 –113.

Silvestri, M. (2007). ‘Doing’ police leadership: enter the ‘New Smart Macho’, Policing & Society , 17(1),

38-58.

Download