Self-Governance 2.0 - National Congress of American Indians

advertisement

Self-Governance

2.0

Objectives

 Advise about OMB Passback request for a paper on

Tribal Self-Governance 2.0 that expands the principles of Self-Governance

Develop tribal workgroup

 Brief discussion of other models of U.S. governmentto-government financial relationships

 As part of 2.0, how to increase the number of Self-

Governance Tribes

2

 258 Tribes in Self-Governance, out of 567 Tribes

 105 Funding Agreements

 Included in Self-Governance are 11 consortia in

Alaska

3

Self-Governance

4

Briefly the Self-Governance Program was intended to:

Formalize relations between the United States and Indian

Tribes on a government-to-government basis

Allow Indian Tribes to determine internal priorities, redesign programs and reallocate resources to more effectively and efficiently meet the needs of our tribal communities

Promote greater social, economic, political self-sufficiency among Indian Tribes

4

Self-Governance

5

Establish better tribal accountability through local autonomy

Reduce the size and inefficiency of the Bureau of Indian Affairs by shifting the agency’s role from day-to-day management of tribal affairs to protectors and advocates

“Shaping Our Own Future: An Overview and Red Paper Issued by the Jamestown Klallam and Lummi Indian Tribes and the

Quinault Indian Nation,” 1989

5

Goals for 2.0

 STREAMLINE oversight process

 PROVIDE Tribes lump sum funding agreements for all programs, not just TPA base

 ALLOW Tribes to determine how the funds are spent

 ALLOW Tribes to track performance data and outcomes

REPORT how the funds were spent as part of the single audit process

6

Questions

 Can it be done administratively?

 Is there a need for a change to the Indian Self-

Determination Act?

 Which Tribes are interested in doing this?

 What criteria, if any, should be used to select Tribes for participation?

 How would the lump sum be calculated?

 How can the number of Self-Governance Tribes be increased?

7

Questions

 Define what is meant by “all programs?”

 A-133 Single Audits check compliance with OMB circulars, require accounting and management systems, do not necessarily report on how funds are spent, what kind of reporting is envisioned beyond single audits, if any?

 Should the role of the federal government be defined in tribal self-governance plans?

 Should the role of OST and other federal offices be identified and defined?

8

Questions

 Should an information dissemination network be established and used to identify best practices?

 Should venture capital be made available?

 Should strategies to develop income and employment be developed for implementation?

 Should a process and IT system be developed to adjust lump sum funding to appropriations for a given year?

9

Current Activity

 Alert Tribes that this process is beginning

 Solicit tribal ideas

 Develop a small workgroup of tribal representatives

 Continue discussions with U.S. agencies that have government-to-government financial relationships with territories and foreign governments

10

First Steps to 2.0 for Consideration

 Determine what needs to be done internally to reduce regional reprograming of funds back to OSG

 Determine what needs to be done to avoid OSG doing fund returns back to the regions

 Determine what additional funds, not in a Tribe’s

TPA base, can be moved as a part of a lump sum amount

11

First Steps to 2.0 for Consideration

 Determine if Tribes should track performance data and outcomes

 Maintain that a single audit is all that is needed for purposes of reporting

 Determine how to address competitive, special need, or earmarked, non-recurring funds or programs

12

First Steps to 2.0 for Consideration

13

 Determine if any BIA review and monitoring of programs are required:

Trust Program Evaluation

Law enforcement, courts, and detention

13

Brainstorming about 2.0

14

 Should there be a standardized, simplified funding document for all federal programs? (contrary to original self-governance principles)

 What else?

14

Ongoing Comparative Research of Other

Government-to-Government Programs

1.

2.

Millennium Challenge

– Country Compacts

US AID

– Country Agreements

3.

4.

Insular Affairs

– Compacts of Free Association

State Department

– Country Agreements

15

Ongoing Comparative Research

 Millennium Challenge, USAID, Insular Affairs, and the State Department

Internal financial and program processes for offices that move US monetary aid as a lump sum to foreign countries

Delegation of roles and responsibilities

Accountability standards for the countries

16

DOI – Insular Affairs

“Compacts of Free Association” between the United

States and territories:

American Samoa

Guam

Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands

U.S. Virgin Islands

Republic of Marshall Islands

Federated States of Micronesia

Republic of Palau

Each gets a lump sum payment and also other discretionary funds

17

DOI – Insular Affairs

American Samoa

Guam

Commonwealth of the Northern

Mariana Islands

Insular Affairs FY 2012

$36,249,000

$85,816,000

Republic of

Marshall Islands

$16,798,000

U.S. Virgin Islands $262,500,000

Federated States of Micronesia

$69,524,000

$106,044,000

Republic of Palau $13,747,000

Insular Affairs 2012 Budget

$619 million

SG Tribes 2012 Budget

$408 million

VS.

Office of Insular Affairs 2013

$9.5 million

Office of Self-Governance 2013

$1.5 million

18

Compact of Free Association

 Goals

To support the “long-term security interests of the United

States in the western Pacific and Caribbean and address serious economic and fiscal problems impacting the insular areas…”

To provide funds for said territories to become economically self-sustaining by a date certain

Example: Micronesia Compact’s projected date of expiration is

2023

19

Implementing “Compact of Free Association”

 Implementation

Requires monitoring, quarterly reports, heavy federal interventions and involvement in territories’ financial and programmatic internal operations

 Single Lump Sum

A good idea

Accountability pieces are very intrusive in terms of financial operations as compared to how Self-Governance is organized

20

State Department

 Some discussion has started with the State

Department concerning U.S. assistance to foreign countries

Discovered a Treasury program that helps foreign countries with financial infrastructure

21

 Every year there are at least 3 or 5 tribes that apply to enter Self-Governance

 Some of these Tribes do not have 3 years of audits that are free of material weaknesses and these Tribes are not accepted to the Self-Governance Program because the statutory/regulatory criteria is not met

 What can be done to address this?

22

Challenges To All Tribes

23

 A remotely located tribe loses its finance person or

CFO and is unable to find expertise in the community.

A Tribe continually does not submit its Single Audit year after year.

A new tribal administration arrives and the tribal finance office undergoes a total replacement.

What happens?

23

U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Technical

Assistance (OTA)

 Core Mission:

To develop strong financial sectors

To develop sound public financial management

 Where:

Countries where federal U.S. assistance is provided and there is a strong commitment to reform

24

OTA’s Five Core Areas

 Budget Policy and Accountability

 Banking and Financial Services

 Government Debt Issuance and Management

 Financial Crimes

 Revenue Policy and Administration

25

OTA’s Technical Assistance

 OTA has the ability to assist in areas, such as:

Auditing

Accounting

Information technology system development

Macroeconomic and monetary policy management

Infrastructure finance

26

OTA’s Technical Assistance

 OTA currently operates programs in more than 50 countries.

 Use of the Office’s services are free to the countries requesting service

27

OTA Structure Offers Ideas for Technical

Assistance Model for Tribes

 OTA – a starting point for Tribal TA?

 Tribes might receive assistance for:

Addressing audits

Reviewing financial management systems

Stabilizing financial infrastructure when tribal governments change hands

28

Technical Assistance Possibilities

 Develop a federal contract with Indian organization or agency that could directly contract with individuals who have expertise in tribal finance for all federal grant/contracted/compacted programs available to Tribes

OR

 Develop a federal office with a team of financial and audit experts on tribal finances

29

Technical Assistance Possibilities

 The organization could provide a core group of seasoned tribal finance and audit experts

 The organization would provide its services for free to the Tribes

 The organization would help Tribes with recruitment of finance and audit staff

30

Technical Assistance Possibilities

 The organization could provide internships and jobs for Native students through regional university-tribal partnerships

Develop students and staff expertise in:

Finance

Accounting

Audits

All federal and state programs that Tribes receive

31

The End or the Beginning

Comments, Questions, and

Concerns

Sharee.Freeman@bia.gov

Director, Office of Self-Governance

32

Download