Work Environments and Morale: Setting Up Your Program For Success

advertisement

Work Environments and Morale:

Setting Up Your Program For Success

N I C H O L A S H . A P O S T O L E R I S , P H D M B A

H E A L T H C E N T E R D I R E C T O R

A C T I O N H E A L T H S E R V I C E S

V P O F B E H A V I O R A L H E A L T H S E R V I C E S

C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H C O N N E C T I O N S , I N C .

A S S I S T A N T P R O F E S S O R

D E P A R T M E N T O F F A M I L Y M E D I C I N E A N D

C O M M U N I T Y H E A L T H

U M A S S M E D I C A L S C H O O L

Work Environments and Morale: Goals

Participants will:

Share experiences from their programs regarding morale challenges

Share experiences regarding successful approaches to improving morale

Learn the principles of Self Determination Theory as they apply to the work place environment

Learn how to change workplace environments to improve employee satisfaction

Work Environments and Morale

 Is morale an important issue for your program?

 What does high morale look like?

 When have you had times of high morale?

 What brings down morale?

Morale Challenges

 Mission-related

When personnel feel they are not adhering to the mission

 Personnel-related

In all positions

Personality

Non-work stressors

Others?

 Resource-related

On mission, but insufficient resources to do the job right

Morale improvement successes

 Any common themes from your experiences?

 Could they work without additional resources?

 Where did the good ideas come from?

 Who was listening for these ideas?

Self Determination Theory

Developed at the University of Rochester in the past

30 years

Focuses on better understanding why we do what we do and on how to improve social environments

When people are self-determined, they experience the satisfaction of doing something that is important to them

To feel self-determined, fundamental psychological needs must be met

Motivation and Morale

Self Determination Theory poses that people have three fundamental psychological needs

Autonomy

Competence

Relatedness

Environments can be supportive or unsupportive of the fulfillment of these needs

Environments supportive of the person fulfilling these needs will result in more intrinsically motivated action

Fundamental Psychological Needs

Autonomy

The perception that we have choices and can act on those choices

Competence

The perception that we can function in the world, doing what we need to do to survive and succeed

Relatedness

The perception that we are related to others and ourselves in a positive way

Motivation Orientation

 External

Act to avoid punishment

Act to get an external reward

 Internal/Extrinsic

Act to avoid negative self-evaluation

Act to obtain a positive self-evaluation

Intrinsic

Act for the love of the act

Immersed in the act – sense of time can be lost

Enhancing Intrinsic Motivation

 Potential negative effects from tangible rewards

Intrinsically motivated behaviors become extrinsically motivated

A lowering of intrinsic motivation for the activity

How to avoid the negative effects of rewards

Detach from a specific task request

Make the tangible reward unexpected

Verbal recognition rather than tangible rewards

Controlling Environments

Work environments, especially when stressed, tend to adopt a bottom-line approach

Workplace well-being issues can be framed exclusively in dollar terms, which can make for poor work environments

Recruitment, retention, productivity all are related to work environment

Tendency is to just push harder and to value compliance and obedience of employees

Vertical hierarchies can be efficient – but at a cost

Controlling Environments

“Control” in this context is not good

Attempting to control the actions of others rather than setting up the situation so that the actions are self-determined

Feeling ‘controlled’ versus feeling ‘self-determined’ or

‘autonomous’

Negative consequences of controlling environments

When people feel controlled, they act in a more oppositional, even anti-social way

Environments that Support Basic Needs

Fulfillment of each of the basic needs can be supported or damaged by the nature of the environment

 Autonomy-supportive environments

 Competence-supportive environments

 Relatedness-supportive environments

Autonomy-Supportive Environments

 When a person perceives that they have meaningful choices, that is autonomy-supportive

 When a person’s point of view is valued and brought into consideration in decision-making, that is autonomy-supportive

 Autonomy-supportive environments tend to produce more proactive and engaged people

Competence-Supportive Environments

 Determine areas where people perceive their own competence to be high

 Be careful about moving people into areas where they will have a sharp drop off in perceived competence

 Provide trainings with adequate time to assimilate information

Trainings that overload with too much information too fast are not helpful

Relatedness-Supportive Environments

 Relatedness is to one’s self and to others

 Relatedness to self

Realistic expectations

Limiting negative self-talk

Valuing self-care

 Relatedness to others

Positive, appropriate connections to others

Respect for personal boundaries

Warmth and good will

Where does personality fit in?

 Causality Orientations

Autonomy Orientation

Some people will perceive environments as being more autonomysupportive than will other people

Organize life around personally meaningful goals

Control Orientation

Some people will perceive environments as being more controlling than will other people

Lots of ‘shoulds’

Seek/need deadlines

Impersonal Orientation

Things happen for reasons out of our control

Do what has been done – no ability to do things differently

Depressed about present, anxious about future

What can we do to improve our workplace?

 Suggestions for increasing Autonomy Supportiveness and reducing how controlling our workplace can feel?

 Suggestions for increasing Competence

Supportiveness?

 Suggestions for increasing Relatednesssupportiveness?

Valuing our Colleagues

 Well-being of the person as an end value

Not solely as a means to an end

Higher productivity

Lower recruitment costs

Colleagues are not machines and are not disposable

They stay or go back to the community

Improved or harmed by their work experiences

Strengthening communities by strengthening and elevating our workforce

References

 Self Determination Theory

 http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/

 Interpersonal control, dehumanization, and violence. Moller & Deci.

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 41-53.

 http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/documents/2010_MollerDeci_GPIR.pdf

Intrinsic Need Satisfaction. Baard, Deci & Ryan

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045-2068 http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/documents/2004_BaardDeciRyan.pdf

 Self determination theory and work motivation. Gagne & Deci.

Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331-362 http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/documents/2005_GagneDeci_JOB_SDTt heory.pdf

Contact Information

Nicholas H. Apostoleris, Ph.D.

ACTION Health Services

Community Health Connections, Inc.

Fitchburg Family Medicine Residency Program

UMass Medical School

275 Nichols Road, Fitchburg, MA 01420 nhaphd@gmail.com

Download