Innovation Union
Scoreboard 2013
Presentation to the 14th meeting of
the ERAC on 19 April 2013
Framework of the Innovation Union Scoreboard
Summary
Innovation
Index (SII)
FIRM
ACTIVITIES
ENABLERS
Human
resources
Open, excellent, attractive research
systems
Finance and
support
Firm
investments
Linkages &
entrepreneurship
OUTPUTS
Intellectual
assets
Innovators
Economic
effects
New doctorate
graduates
International
scientific copublications
R&D
expenditure in
the public
sector
R&D
expenditure in
the business
sector
SMEs
innovating inhouse
PCT patent
applications
SMEs with
product or
process
innovations
Employment
in knowledgeintensive
activities
Population
aged 30-34
with tertiary
education
Top 10% most
cited scientific
publications
Venture
capital
investments
Non-R&D
innovation
expenditure
Innovative
SMEs
collaborating
with others
PCT patent
applications in
societal
challenges
SMEs with
marketing or
organisational
innovations
MHT
contribution to
the trade
balance
Youth with at
least upper
secondary
education
Non-EU
doctorate
students
Public-private
copublications
Community
trademarks
High-growth
innovative
firms
Knowledgeintensive
services
exports
Community
designs
Sales of new
to market and
new to firm
innovations
as % of
turnover
License and
patent
revenues from
abroad
Summary Innovation Performance of the
EU27 Member States (2013 Summary Innovation Index)
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
B G RO LV P L LT M T HU SK EL CZ P T ES
M ODEST INNOVA TORS
IT
M ODERA TE INNOVA TORS
EE CY SI EU FR IE
A T UK B E LU NL
INNOVA TION FOLLOWERS
FI DK DE SE
INNOVA TION LEA DERS
Note: Average performance is measured using a composite indicator building on data for 24 indicators going from a lowest
possible performance of 0 to a maximum possible performance of 1.
Growth in innovation performance 20082012
0.800
0.750
SE
DE
0.700
FI
Innovation performance
0.650
LU
IE
0.600
NL
UK
BE
AT
0.550
FR
SI
CY
0.500
0.450
ES
EL
PT
CZ
SK
HU
0.300
MT
PL
0.250
LT
LV
RO
0.200
0.150
-2.0%
EE
IT
0.400
0.350
DK
BG
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
Average annual growth in innovation performance
7.0%
8.0%
Progress since the launch of the Europe
2020 strategy in 2010
0.800
0.700
0.600
0.500
0.400
0.300
0.200
0.100
0.000
B G RO LV P L LT M T HU SK EL CZ P T ES IT
M ODEST INNOVA TORS
EE CY SI EU FR IE A T UK B E LU NL
M ODERA TE INNOVA TORS
INNOVA TION FOLLOWERS
FI DK DE SE
INNOVA TION LEA DERS
Country groups: innovation performance
per dimension
Human resources
0.80
Economic effects
0.60
Open, excellent research systems
0.40
0.20
Innovators
Modest innovators
0.00
Finance and support
Moderate innovators
Innovation follow ers
Innovation leaders
Intellectual assets
Firm investments
Linkages & entrepreneurship
Innovation Performance per dimension
Human resources
1.00
0.80
0.600.800
0.40
0.20
0.00
M T PT
0.700
1.00
0.800.600
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0.500
LV RO
IT RO B G ES LV HU EL CZ LU P L EU EE CY A T DK DE B E LT NL FR SI SK UK IE
1.000.400
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.200.300
0.00
CY SI
P T EU ES A T FI DE FR IE
RO B G P L LV HU M T LT ES SK IT
LU B E SE UK DK NL
Firm investments
0.100
LV B G RO SK EL ES LU HU P T IT
IE P L NL FR M T LT EU CZ B E SI UK A T CY DK EE FI DE SE
LU FI CY DE NL A T SE B E DK UK
RO EL LT SK B G HU P L CZ M T P T LV ES IE CY UK EE SI FR IT
B E EU NL LU FI SE A T DE DK
Innovators
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
SK IE CZ LV P L P T ES A T SI B E LT EU DE FR LU NL DK UK EE FI SE
0.200
P T CZ EL FR EU IE EE SI
Intellectual assets
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
Finance and support
B G M T EL CY RO HU IT
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
FI SE
Open, excellent and attractive research systems
P L B G SK LT HU M T CZ EE EL IT
Linkages & entrepreneurship
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
B G P L LV RO HU LT UK SK ES M T SI CY CZ FR EU EE IT
NL FI DK A T EL SE IE B E P T LU DE
Economic effects
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
LT LV B G P L EL P T EE M T RO SK A T SI CZ ES
IT
CY B E HU NL EU FR SE UK LU FI DK DE IE
0.000
LV B G LT RO P L SK M T GR HU ES CZ P T IT
M ODEST INNOVA TORS
M ODERA TE INNOVA TORS
EE CY SI
EU FR IE
LU A T NL UK B E FI
INNOVA TION FOLLOWERS
DE DK SE
INNOVA TION LEA DERS
HUM A N RESOURCES
1.3%
0.0%
1.1.1New do cto rate graduates
1.1.2 P o pulatio n aged 30-34 co mpleted tertiary educatio n
3.6%
0.4%
1.1.3 Yo uth aged 20-24 upper seco ndary level educatio n
OP EN, EXCELLENT, A TTRA CTIVE RESEA RCH SYSTEM S
3.3%
4.0%
1.2.1Internatio nal scientific co -publicatio ns
Innovation
expenditures
of firms
and venture
capital
decreasing
1.2.2 To p 10% mo st cited scientific publicatio ns wo rldwide
1.8%
4.1%
1.2.3 No n-EU do cto rate students
FINA NCE A ND SUP P ORT
0.0%
3.2%
1.3.1R&D expenditures in the public secto r
1.3.2 Venture capital investments
-3.1%
-1.7%
FIRM INVESTM ENTS
2.1.1R&D expenditures in the business secto r
1.9%
-5.2%
2.1.2 No n-R&D inno vatio n expenditures
LINKA GES & ENTREP RENEURSHIP
3.4%
0.4%
2.2.1SM Es inno vating in-ho use
2.2.2 Inno vative SM Es co llabo rating with o thers
7.9%
2.2%
2.2.3 P ublic-private scientfic co -publicatio ns
INTELLECTUA L A SSETS
1.3%
-0.6%
2.3.1P CT patent applicatio ns
2.3.2 P CT patent applicatio ns in so cietal challenges
0.4%
5.2%
2.3.3 Co mmunity trademarks
2.3.4 Co mmunity designs
0.3%
1.7%
INNOVA TORS
3.1.1SM Es intro ducing pro duct o r pro cess inno vatio ns
3.6%
-0.1%
3.1.2 SM Es intro ducing marketing o r o rganisatio nal inno vatio ns
ECONOM IC EFFECTS
1.8%
0.7%
3.2.1Emplo yment in Kno wledge-Intensive A ctivities
3.2.2 Co ntributio n M HT pro duct expo rts to trade balance
0.3%
3.2.3 Kno wledge-intensive services expo rts
0.4%
3.2.4 Sales o f new to market and new to firm inno vatio ns
1.9%
6.1%
3.2.5 License and patent revenues fro m abro ad
-8%
-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
Innovation performance:
international comparison + growth
International comparison with the global
economic partners
United States
50
40
30
20
10
0
36
31
27
Japan
25
50
40
30
20
10
0
20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
South Korea
25
20
15
31
27
19
20
15
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
-7
-10
-10
7
12
-12
-18
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
-32
15
16
20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Australia
Canada
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
10
5
0
-33
-35
-36
-38
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
International comparison with the global
economic partners
India
China
0
0
-20
-59
-59
-58
-56
-55
-20
-40
-40
-60
-60
-80
-80
-61
-62
-71
-73
South Africa
0
-62
-72
Brazil
0
-20
-71
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Russia
-70
-61
-65
-20
-40
-40
-60
-60
-80
-67
-72
-74
-73
-74
-81
-80
-83
-85
-85
-40
-60
-80
-100
-80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
0
-20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012