Draft initial proposal for infrastructure project

advertisement
Infrastructure projects
Initial proposals for SJWS #5
ENTSOG offices – Brussels
Stakeholder Joint Working Session – 20 April 2012
Online questionnaire
Streamlined process
> For every project submitted to ENTSOG for TYNDP 2011-2020, online
>
>
questionnaire will be set with previous values as a default setting
Even if answer will remain the same, promoter will have to click-submit the
questionnaire
Online form will ease the data process and make it more robust
Updated questionnaire
> Given past experience, questionnaire will be fine-tuned in order to avoid
misunderstanding and lack of clarity
2
Main evolution
Project capacity for modelling purpose
> Key information required for modelling purpose
> Intermediate entry/exit capacity is a requirement for long-haul projects
> In case of different options, project promoter should identify the one to be
modeled by ENTSOG
Project benefits
> Questions could be based on Annex IV of the EIP proposal
> Promoters could be asked if they will apply for PCI status
Project timeline
> Mode detailed questions in order to help reader to monitor the evolution of
projects from one edition to the other
3
Project stage outlook
Synthetic information on project timeframe
> As there is no single timeline for projects and challenging steps often differ, a
>
robust clustering can only be based on FID status
Additional proposal is to provide a synthetic outlook of project steps highlighting:
• Last completed step
• Main challenge (is it possible to anticipate such difficulty?)
• Remaining steps
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Step 6
Project A
Planned
FEED
Permitting
Market test
FID
Construction
Project B
Planned
FEED
Permitting
Market test
FID
Construction
Project C
Planned
FEED
Permitting
FID
Construction
Project D
Planned
FEED
Permitting
Supply
contract
FID
Construction
Project E
Planned
FEED
Supply
contract
FID
Permitting
Construction
Step 7
4
Expected construction load
Graphical representation of the effort
> Aggregated figures on a 10-year range are not sufficient to express the expected
>
load in term of works
Using the same data as Annex A (Infra. Projects) it is possible to give more
visibility based on the construction phase of transmission lines, UGS and LNG
Equivalent km
5
Thank You for Your Attention
Olivier Lebois, Adviser, System Development
ENTSOG -- European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas
Avenue de Cortenbergh 100, B-1000 Brussels
EML:
T:
WWW:
Olivier.Lebois@entsog.eu
+ 32 2 894 5105
www.entsog.eu
6
Download