G OVERNANCE I NNOVATION FOR
S ECURITY AND D EVELOPMENT
(GISD)
Interim Program Report
30 Sept – 30 Dec 2013
Karen Guttieri, Principal Investigator

M OTIVATION


Civil Affairs are…

“the vanguard of DoD’s support to U.S. government efforts to assist partner governments in the fields of rule of law, economic stability, governance, public health and welfare, infrastructure, and public education and information” ( US
Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2010 )


 highly-valued in US foreign and defense policy under-valued as strategic assets in planning/operations divided and neglected (Lamont memo)
“Functional specialties” are…

 flawed – the system of classifying and managing needs reworking (RAND) to be reformed as new Military Occupational Specialty –
38G

G OVERNANCE I NNOVATION FOR S ECURITY
AND D EVELOPMENT (GISD) IS …
…a research project that seeks solutions to the challenges of supporting governance in fragile environments.
GISD aims to develop a framework to promote peace and well-being through good governance—provision of essential services, political moderation and accountability, stewardship
of state resources, and civic participation and empowerment.
GISD researchers address current issues and trends in stability sectors —social well-being, promotion of safe and secure environments, stable governance, rule of law, sustainable economies and infrastructure, and homeland integration—and the competencies needed when the military is called upon to support to civilians in those sectors.

38G
•Requirements
•Competencies
•Classifications
•Certifications
FOCUS
Education
Research
Problem Set
•Civilian Education
•Military Education
•Tailored Programs
•Stable Governance
•Rule of Law
•Safe and Secure
Environment
•Sustainable Economy
•Social Well-Being
•Homeland Integration
•Support to Civil
Authority
•Transitional
Authority
•Theater Security
Cooperation
•JP 3-57 Civil-
Military Operations
Statement of
Work: Research
Establish cross-disciplinary team and outreach
Produce reviews of military governance, stability sectors, and homeland integration
Support
IMSG professionalization of Civil Affairs / 38G classifications
Identify educational needs
Consider context, behavior, info and technological enablers of peace and stability operations
Final Report due 20 Aug 2014

P RIMARY S PONSOR P OINT OF CONTACT :
IMSG

The Institute for Military Support to Governance
(IMSG) manages the provision of civil sector expertise across the range of military operations in order to support USG obligations under international law and promote stability. On order, supports Theater Security Cooperation,
Transitional Military Authority, and Support to
Civil Administration operations.

BG Hugh Van Roosen, Director

38G
Marc Ventresca
Tony Vacha
Tech/Behavior
Curt Blais
Margarita Quihuis
Mark Nelson
GISD Sector Leads / Key Colleagues
Melanne Civic
Margalynne Armstrong
OTJAG
Marc Ventresca
Maria Pineda
Peter Walker Tufts
Jon Czarnecki
NWC Team- USMA
Maria Pineda
Marc Ventresca
UCLA/Notre Dame
Karen Guttieri
Charles Palmares
Herman Semes
Stanford
Homeland
Integration
Paula Philbin
Program
Karen Guttieri, PI
Curt Blais
Charles Palmares

C OLLABORATIVE S ITES E STABLISHED





Internal team website: GISD Google site *

Team calendar




Project updates
To-do list
Reference documents – doctrine, etc.
Collaborative documents – meeting notes, etc.
Public info website: GISD site
Public GISD Research Site NPS Library
GISD Refworks Site - bibliographies
New -GISD Community in All Partners Access
Network (APAN)
* Google sites are private (controlled access list).

GISD M EETINGS 1: C ONVENED




Weekly Team Meetings
Design Meeting 17-18 Oct 2013
Video Teleconference- 351 CACOM/Fort Bragg, Stanford

Added review of military governance per se;



Initiated lit review protocol
Consensus on stability sectors
Analysis of Civil Affairs mission
Interim Program Review 5-6 Nov 2013*
Fort Bragg, NC

Human behavior / field lab / Initiated 38G classifications


New occupational specialty 38G problem analysis
Persuasive Tech and Field Lab Network concepts
Interim Program Review 16-19 Dec 2013*
Naval Postgraduate School and Stanford University

Social well-being, Rule of law, Governance panels/presentations
*additional beyond statement of work

GISD M EETINGS 2: S ECTOR R EVIEWS

Sector Reviews


14-15 January 2014: Rule of Law (DC)
27-28 March 2014: Social Well-Being / Economy (DC)

Upcoming sector reviews:



12-13 May 2014: Safe and Secure Environment IPR
(PKSOI)
17-19 June 2014: Governance (NPS or TBD)
24-26 June 2014: Homeland Integration (DC)

22-24 July 2014: Project Wrap-Up (NPS)

GISD M EETINGS 3: PSOTEW

DoD + Conference*

24-28 March 2014: (GMU)

GSID research team will host two full days of panels

One of three official
Working Groups (WG)

Based on a proposal submitted by the PI

Reaching wide community of scholars and practitioners
*additional beyond statement of work

GISD O UTREACH - S AMPLE














Atlantic Council
Caerus Assoc.
Civ-Mil Working Group*
Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF)
Geneva Centre for Security Policy
George Mason University
Institute for State Effectiveness
JAG School
National Defense University
NATO
Naval War College
Notre Dame
PKSOI
PSOTEW Stakeholders*












Stanford University

Center for Deliberative Democracy



Center for Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law
Law School
Peace Innovation Lab
State Partnership Program
TJAG
Tufts University
UCLA
UNDPKO
University of Geneva
US Military Academy
USAID
US Dept of State CSO
USARC
World Economic Forum
*umbrella organizations

•
Requirements across:
Theater Security
Cooperation
•
Support to Civil
Authority
•
Transitional
Military
Authority
38A and 38G:
•
Not clear 38A capable of organizing 38G
•
38A tactically focused
Categorization:
•
Too broad categories will not discriminate
•
Too narrow categories will leave empty cells

C OMMENTS / Q UESTIONS ?
Karen Guttieri
Global Public Policy Academic Group
Naval Postgraduate School
Guttieri@nps.edu
831-869-5275

MISSION
1-1. The mission of CA forces is to is to mitigate or defeat threats to civil society and conduct responsibilities normally performed by civil governments across the range of military operations by engaging and influencing the civil populace and authorities through the planning and conducting of CAO, or to enable CMO, to shape the civil environment and set the conditions for military operations. CA forces plan, prepare for, execute, assess, and transition CAO at all levels of war. Joint Publication (JP) 3-
57, Civil-Military Operations, states Civil Affairs forces are designated Active and
Reserve Component forces and units organized, trained, and equipped specifically to
conduct civil affairs operations and to support civil-military operations. As defined,
CA refers to the force structure—Soldiers, teams, staff personnel, and units. CA forces conduct CAO supported by other forces. CAO support the JFC’s CMO intent and are synchronized with the supported commander’s operational concept.
1-2. CA forces support unified land operations in every environment across the range of military operations. During unified land operations, CA forces conduct CAO that support and are nested within the overall mission and commander’s intent. CAO are a cornerstone to the successful execution of stability tasks.
FM 3-57 Change 1, 30 September 2013

CIVIL ENGAGEMENT: COGNITIVE SCALE
Inform
C1
Facilitate
C2
Coordinate
C3
Collaborate
C4
De-conflict
C5
Resolve
C5
Mitigate
C5
Influence
C6
Develop
C6
Distribute
P1
Deliver
P2
CIVIL ENGAGEMENT: PHYSICAL SCALE
Contract
P2
Supervise
P3
Construct
P3
Conduct
P4
Sustain
P4
CIVIL RECONNAISANCE: COGNITIVE SCALE
Identify
C1
Verify
C2
Refute
C3
Process
C3
CIVIL RECONNAISANCE: PHYSICAL SCALE
Observe
P1
Inspect
P2
Monitor
P3
Detect
P4
Analyze
C4
Review
C5
Assess
C6
Verbs in Red do not exist in TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-1

MISSION
METT-TC
POPULATION
Civil Considerations
• Size
• Ethnicities
• Religions
AREA
Terrain & Weather
• Urban, Desert,
Jungle, Mountain
• Season / Temp
METT-T C
RESOURCES
Troops,Time,Support
MET T -TC
HN CAPACITY
Civil Considerations
ME T T T C METT-T C

SCA & TMA: COGNITIVE SCALE
Estimate
C2
Implement
C3
Manage
C4
Integrate
C5
Mitigate
C5
Influence
C6
Develop
C6
SCA & TMA: PHYSICAL SCALE
Train
P1
Educate
P2
Advise
P3
Assist
P4
Direct
P4
Conduct
P5
TMA ONLY
Govern
P6
Verbs in Red do not exist in TRADOC Pamphlet 350-70-1