Legal Protection of Urban Trees

advertisement

Legal Protection of Urban Trees

Paul Leadbeter

Adelaide Law School

University of Adelaide, South Australia

Urban trees- ‘natural air conditioner for the city’

What are ‘urban trees’

• Trees growing within a town or city as opposed to trees growing in a rural setting

• Peri- urban areas?- transitioning areas create questions

• Should include trees on both public and private land

Why protect urban trees?

• Number of reasons:

1. Reduces the ‘urban heat island effect’

2. Provision of shade &aesthetic improvements to streetscapes

3. Privacy

4. Shelter for humans & animals during inclement weather

5. Contribution to biodiversity

Contribution to biodiversity

Koala in Urban tree in Adelaide

How can we protect urban trees?

• Identify urban trees ( list or define them)

• Make removal or damaging of them something requiring approval

• Is land use planning legislation the ideal mechanism for legal protection?

What trees should be protected?

• Range of possible criteria for protected status:

1. Species of tree

2. Tree’s size

3. Tree’s location

4. Tree’s cultural or heritage significance

5. Aesthetic or urban design reasons

• In South Australia size of tree, its location, its position re buildings and its species are all factors influencing whether a tree has a protected status

• Should any trees not be protected? Eg pest plants, woodlots, orchards, other plantations, non indigenous?

What is tree damaging activity?

• In South Australia broadly defined to include: a) The killing or destruction of a tree; or b) The removal of a tree; or c) The severing of branches, limbs, stems or trunk of a tree; or d) The ringbarking, topping or lopping of a tree; or e) Any other substantial damage to a tree but not

‘maintenance pruning’ ( removal of less than 30% of tree’s crown for purposes of removing dead or diseased wood or preventing risks to human safety or damage to buildings)

Relevant factors when assessing applications for tree damaging activity?

• Is tree diseased or has short life expectancy?

• Does it pose material risk to public or private safety?

• Is tree causing damage to a building?

• Is work in general interests of tree’s health?

• Have all reasonable alternative development options & design solutions been considered to prevent substantial tree damaging activity occurring?

Consequences for persons who damage trees without authorisation?

• In South Australia options include:

1. Prosecution and financial penalty

2. Court orders in nature of injunctive relief

3. Make good orders ( eg remove buildings, structures, plantings, plant replacement trees

& nurture to maturity)

Potential problems with tree protection systems?

1. Conflict between urban consolidation & tree retention.

2. Impacts of trees on buildings, public and private infrastructure eg drains , roads and footpaths

3. Inappropriate plantings

4. Unlawful & surreptitious tree damaging activities

5. Public liability concerns

Inappropriate plantings

Tasmanian Blue gum ( Eucalyptus globulus) in South Australian suburban backyard- healthy tree, limb dropper , totally inappropriate in suburban context

4.Unlawful and surreptitious tree damaging activities

Trees pre Poisoning

Trees some months after poisoning

Conclusions

• Trees play important role in reducing urban temperatures

• Useful and cheap adaptation measure

• Greatest risks for urban trees come from development & urban consolidation

• Legal protection via land use planning laws & policies is important

• Essential laws have defined criteria for listing, damaging or removing, and recognition of potential risks to human safety and building and infrastructure integrity

Download