Using Video Modeling to Teach Daily Living Skills to

advertisement

U SING AN I P OD T OUCH

TO TEACH SOCIAL AND

SELF MANAGEMENT SKILLS

TO STUDENTS WITH E/BD

E RIKA B LOOD & W OODY J OHNSON

N ORTHERN I LLINOIS U NIVERSITY

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

Video-based instruction has been used effectively to teach various skills to individuals with disabilities.

Although researchers have demonstrated its effectiveness, few educators are using this technology.

The purpose of this presentation is to provide an overview of research and to demonstrate how video materials can be created using common software applications and how video-based materials can be presented on video iPods.

V IDEO -B ASED I NSTRUCTION

Video-based instruction has been used effectively as a technique for teaching functional skills.

More and more researchers are investigating the use of multimedia applications for teaching critical skills using portable, handheld solutions.

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION

Type of Model

Self-modeling: Video self-modeling (VSM)

is a technique that allows learners to observe themselves engaging in positive performances of a target behavior and has been used to teach skills such as math

(Schunk & Hanson, 1989) language

(Buggey, 1995; Buggey, 2005) and social skills (Buggey, 2005; Lonnecker, Brady,

McPherson, & Hawkins, 1994), Kern-

Dunlap et al, 1992).

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Other Models: Involves taping models other than the learner to demonstrate skills, or to serve as models in instructional videos.

Peer models have been used to instruct persons on community skills (Branham et al., 1999) vocational skills (Martin et al., 1992), social skills

(Nikopoulos & Keenan, 2004), and cooking skills

(Bidwell & Rehfeldt, 2004).

Other models have been used for a variety of skills including social and communication skills

(Charlop & Milstein, 1989; Charlop-Christy et al.,

2000; Conyers et al., 2004; LeBlanc et al., 2003), daily living skills (Van Laarhoven & Van

Laarhoven-Myers, 2006), and community skills

(Alcantara, 1994; Ayers & Langone, 2002).

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Subjective Models: With this approach, the learner watches the video as if they were completing the task themselves.

Typically, there is no model present, but rather, learners watch a video that shows what it would look like if they were completing the task.

Subjective models have been used for video instruction of various skills, including self help skills (Norman et al., 2001), daily living skills

(Shipley-Benamou, Lutzker, & Taubman, 2002), behavior regulation/transitioning from one activity to the next (Schreibman, Whalen, &

Stahmer, 2000), and cooking skills (Graves et al.,

2005).

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Video feedback typically involves having the learner evaluate their own performance by watching themselves engage in the task, or by watching a positive example of someone performing the skill as an error correction procedure.

VARIATIONS WITH VIDEO-BASED

INSTRUCTION (CONT)

Self-evaluation Video Feedback Learners are shown a video of their own performance following task engagement (they are videotaped as they engage in the task and view the tapes of themselves following practice).

Self-evaluation feedback has often been part of a treatment package and has been used to reduce challenging behavior (Embregts, 2000; Embregts,

2002; Embregts, 2003), decrease playground aggression and increase pro-social behavior (O’Reilly et al 2005), increase on-task behavior (Walther & Beare,

1991) and to teach social communication (Maione &

Mirenda, 2006; Thieman & Goldstein), daily living skills (Lasater & Brady, 1995), and shopping skills

(Haring et al., 1987).

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Error Correction Feedback Learners are shown a positive model of either themselves or someone else performing the skill correctly following errors (they watch a correct performance of the task if they make an error) (Goodson, et al., 2007;

Van Laarhoven, Van Laarhoven-Myers, & Zurita,

2007).

This form of video feedback has been used in conjunction with video modeling procedures, which involves having learners first watch a video-based skill sequence prior to engaging in the activity, or video prompting procedures, which involves having learners watch a “step” in a skill sequence prior to engaging in that particular step.

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Video Modeling refers to an instructional approach where learners view an entire video skill sequence prior to engaging in a task. This has also been referred to as “video priming”

(Schreibman et al., 2000) or “video rehearsal”

(Van Laarhoven & Van Laarhoven-Myers, 2006).

V ARIATIONS WITH V IDEO -B ASED

I NSTRUCTION ( CONT )

Video prompting An instructional approach that involves showing each step in a skill sequence on video followed immediately by task engagement with that particular step

(Cihak et al., 2004; Van Laarhoven, Johnson,

Van Laarhoven-Myers, Grider & Grider,

2009).

This requires that the learner has access to a television, computer, iPod, or portable DVD player in the environment where the skill is being practiced so that they can watch a clip, go perform the step, and then return to the device to complete the remainder of the steps.

VIDEO-BASED INSTRUCTION FOR

STUDENTS WITH EBD

Emerging literature base surrounding the use of video-modeling specifically for students with EBD

Baker, Lang, O’Reilly, 2009

To date, studies have focused on using a combination of video-modeling (or self-modeling) and discussion

(teacher/therapist) to:

 increase positive peer interactions

 increase on-task behavior decrease inappropriate behavior

T EACHING S OCIAL S KILLS

P URPOSE

To determine if a combination of video modeling, on an iPod Touch, and a daily check-in sheet results in increases in appropriate behavior during morning routine and small group instruction.

Setting

All baseline and instructional sessions took place at a table in the special education classroom in an elementary school in northern Illinois.

Math Group Instruction

All math group instruction was conducted by a paraprofessional.

The target student and 2-3 other students sat at a table with across from the paraprofessional.

Math instruction was highly structured and conducted in a model-lead-test format. Students were provided with frequent opportunities for active responding, and received high rates of descriptive praise for behaving appropriately, following directions, and completing work.

V IDEO M ODELING

A short (5 min.) video sequence was recorded with peers as models.

The peers demonstrated engaging in appropriate on-task behavior, following directions, and completing work.

A narration was added to describe the expectations of Math Group while each expectation was demonstrated by the models.

The video was loaded onto an iPod Touch

M ORNING R OUTINE V IDEO

P ROCEDURES

At the beginning of the video modeling phase, the teacher explained to Andy that he would be watching a short video before math to help remind him of the expectations during math group.

Immediately before math group, the paraprofessional prompted Andy to touch the icon on the iPod Touch to play the video.

Target Behaviors

Disruptive

Talking or Blurting out, inappropriate language

Off task

 out of seat, dancing/silly, bothering others, waiving/flapping pencil

On task

Attending to teacher, following directions, appropriately manipulating materials, working independently

Data Collection

Observer(s) collected data during math group 2-3 times per week.

On task/Off task behavior was recorded using momentary time sampling with 15 second intervals.

Disruptive behavior was recorded using partial interval recording with 15 second intervals.

Two observers were present during 25 % of the observation sessions. IOA = 94% for On Task/Off Task and 91 % for

Disruptive Behavior

M ATH G ROUP V IDEO

M ATH G ROUP V IDEO M ODELING

Baseline Video Modeling on iPod Touch

100

80

60

40

20

0

1 2 3 4 5 6

Sessions

7 8 9 10 11

On Task

Disruptive

S ELF M ONITORING

Four Components

Goal setting

Self-monitoring

Self-instruction

Self-reinforcement

Goal Setting

Goals should be:

Specific and measurable

Appropriate level of difficulty (not too hard, not too easy)

Attainable in a short period of time (Graham, 1992)

S ELF -M ONITORING

Self-Monitoring begins with

Self-assessment

Student observes his/her own behavior

Self-record

Student records behaviors s/he observed

IMPORTANT: Reinforces existing skills, doesn’t teach new skills (Graham, 1992)

S ELF -I NSTRUCTION

Student instruct him/herself either overtly or covertly to regulate own behavior

Self-instruction used to

Direct attention

Control behavior

Focus thinking

Assist memory

Complete a task

Manage emotional reactions

Determine success criteria (Graham, 1992)

Students actively participate in the development of the self-instruction procedure

Teacher must teach students how to implement the procedures

Teacher teaches and gradually fades prompting

S ELF R EINFORCEMENT

Student evaluates own behavior

Student determines if the behavior meets the pre-identified criteria and provides reinforcement

Student records behavior

Teacher usually spot checks this for accuracy and may provide additional reinforcement

S USAN

Susan disrupts lesson by constantly making off-topic comments in class (baseline ave. 3.5 times per 15 min.)

Teacher instructs Susan how to record her off-topic comments on a chart by putting an “X” over a “mouth” indicating the 15 minute interval in which each “talk out” occurred.

Teacher reminds Susan to record her behavior in the beginning (as needed)

Teacher prompts are gradually faded

Susan is reinforced by teacher attention at the end of the lesson for recording her off-topic comments, and

Teacher provides an activity reward if her off topic comments decrease to an acceptable level as identified on her goal

The acceptable level is gradually reduced when she meets a criterion

Step 1

TALK OUTS Time

9:00-9:15

9:15-9:30

9:30-9:45

9:45-10:00

Were you able to circle yes 3 out of 4 times?

One left?

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

I did!

Not this time.

Step 2

TALK OUTS Time

9:00-9:15

9:15-9:30

9:30-9:45

9:45-10:00

Were you able to circle yes 4 out of 4 times?

One left?

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

I did!

Not this time.

Step 3

TALK OUTS Time

9:00-9:15

9:15-9:30

9:30-9:45

9:45-10:00

Were you able to circle yes 4 out of 4 times?

One left?

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

I did!

Not this time.

Step 4

Time

9:00-9:15

9:15-9:30

TALK OUTS One left?

Yes No

Yes No

9:30-9:45 Yes No

9:45-10:00 Yes No

Were you able to circle yes 4 out of 4 times?

I did!

Not this time.

Time

9:00-9:30

9:30-10:00

Step 5

TALK OUTS

Were you able to circle yes 2 out of 2 times?

One left?

Yes No

Yes No

I did!

Not this time.

N OW B ACK TO ANDY!

While video modeling led to improved on-task behavior and deductions in the number of disruption, his performance still varied from day to day.

The team decided to add self-monitoring to

Andy’s intervention package.

Since he had responded well to video models, the decision was made to use video to teach selfmonitoring skills.

Andy is was taught to self monitor his “on task” behavior.

During the initial instruction phase, Andy viewed video of himself while learning to independently discriminate his own “on task” and “off task” behavior.

Video self-modeling was then used to teach him to selfrecord his behavior using the

“Timer” application on the iPod and a self monitoring sheet.

S ELF M ONITORING V IDEO

V IDEO M ODELING + S ELF M ONITORING

Baseline Video Modeling Video Modeling + Self Monitoring

100

80

60

40

20

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Sessions

On Task

Disruptive

HOW YOU PREPARE VIDEO BASED

MATERIALS FOR USE WITH AN

I P OD

P REPARING V IDEO BASED I NSTRUCTION

ON THE I P OD T OUCH !

F IRST , YOU HAVE TO RECORD VIDEO AND

EDIT ON A DESKTOP COMPUTER

Video files have to be saved in a format that will work on the iPod (MP4).

Mac users can use iMovie

PC users can use Windows Movie Maker, but each file will have to be converted a video conversions program.

Pinnacle Studio will allow PC users to edit video and save files in the MP4 format.

Pinnacle is similar to Movie Maker but has some nice features.

Pinnacle sells for around $100 depending on the features and is well worth the investment.

http://www.jankuj.com/Picture_Scheduler.html

The “Picture Scheduler” is an inexpensive application (less than $3) that is very useful for arranging a sequence of video segments or pictures with voice narrations.

Open the app and create a new

“category” by clicking the little file folder in the bottom left corner.

Create a new “task” or sequence by touching the little plus sign in the top right corner.

U

SE I

T

UNES TO TRANSFER VIDEO FILES FROM A DESKTOP COMPUTER

TO THE I P OD T OUCH USING THE FILE SHARING FEATURE OF I T UNES

Entering information under “Create new task”

If desired, an “Alert” can be set up to notify the students at a specific day and time.

An audio narration can be assed directly onto the iPod by selecting “audio”

Video files can be selected from those available on the iPod.

Once the videos are on the iPod, can begin to set them up in a sequence by touching

“save” after you have selected the picture, typed in the name, and selected the video for each step or activity in the sequence. If you wish for the sequence to be in a specific order, start with the last video and work up to the first.

Y OU CAN SAVE MULTIPLE SEQUENCES OR

“ LISTS ” ON ONE I P OD T OUCH

T HANK Y OU !

Erika Blood

 eblood@niu.edu

Woody Johnson

 jwjohnson@niu.edu

Download