Multi Company Design – Scenario 1

advertisement

Seradex ERP Implementations for Multi Company Organizations

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

1

Seradex ERP Implementation in a Multi Company Environment

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

2

Why have Multiple Legal Entities?

• Legal Firewalls

• Tax Benefits

• Business Efficiencies

• Different Shareholders

• Future Divestiture

If These Don’t Exist

Consider Merging

To Save $

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

3

Multi Company Hierarchy

• There is no ONE correct setup - a buffet of options

• No Free Lunch – Every Alternative has Downsides

• Trade off Operational, Finance And Legal Factors

• Thoughtful And Detailed Planning Required

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

4

Multi-Entity Multi-Company Wish List

• Balance Centralization / Decentralization

• Real Time Reporting Across All Entities

• Global Supply Chain Visibility

• Regulatory Compliance At Least Cost

• Minimize Income Taxes, Sales Taxes And Tariffs

• Standardize Business Methods

• Automate Intercompany Transactions

• Maintain Local Customer Relationships

• Allow For Easy Acquisitions / Divestures

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

5

What is Not Covered Today

Info Tech Architecture

• Server Locations

• Database Locations

• Remote Connectivity

• Bandwidth

• Network Security

• Single Sign on

• Email

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

6

What to Centralize?

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

7

Decision 1 – What Remains Decentralized?

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

Usually No Debate on:

• Inventory Control

• Shipping

• Production Control

• Field Service

8

Decision 2 – What to Centralize?

What Activities Here?

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

What Activities Here?

What Activities Here?

• Inventory Control

• Shipping

• Production Control

9

Financial Reporting

General Ledger

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Payables

Payroll

Banking

IT

Engineering

Purchasing

Order Entry

Invoicing

Shipping / Receiving

Inventory & Production

Multi Company Design – Scenario 1

Head Office

Company Each Location

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

10

Multi Company Design – Scenario 1

• Financial Reporting

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• Order Entry

• IT

• Engineering

• Purchasing

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

11

Multi Company Design – Scenario 1

Advantages

• Conventional Setup

• Mirrors operations at time of Acquisition • Financial Reporting

• Built in Segregation of Company Data

• Each Company has Uncluttered View of

Orders, Production Schedules Etc,

• Can have different Fiscal Yrs & Currencies for each company

Disadvantages

• No Cost Savings from Centralization

• No Global Supply Chain Visibility

• Distributed Customer, Vendor, Item Data

• Decentralized Credit Control

• Company Wide Reporting is Difficult

• Difficult to Standardize Business Processes

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• Order Entry

• IT

• Engineering

• Purchasing

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

12

Considerations

Financial Reporting

General Ledger

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Payables

Payroll

Banking

IT

Engineering

Purchasing

Order Entry

Invoicing

Shipping / Receiving

Inventory & Production

Multi Company Design – Scenario 2

Company Each Location Head Office

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

13

Multi Company Design – Scenario 2

• Financial Reporting

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• Order Entry

• IT

• Engineering

• Purchasing

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

14

Multi Company Design – Scenario 2

Advantages

• Possible Cost Savings from Centralization

• Global Supply Chain Visibility

• Company Wide Reporting

• Standardize Business Processes

• Distribute Orders to Optimal Location

• Centralized Customer, Vendor, Item Data

• Financial Reporting

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• Order Entry

• IT

• Engineering

• Purchasing

Disadvantages

• Costs to Segregate Company Data

• Bureaucracy Costs and Response Delays

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

15

Multi Company Design – Scenario 3

Each Location

Financial Reporting

General Ledger

Accounts Receivable

Accounts Payables

Payroll

Banking

IT

Engineering

Purchasing

Order Entry

Invoicing

Shipping / Receiving

Inventory & Production

Head Office Company

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

16

Multi Company Design – Scenario 3

• Financial Reporting

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• IT

• Order Entry

• Engineering

• Purchasing

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

17

Multi Company Design – Scenario 3

Advantages

• Possible Cost Savings from Centralization

• Global Supply Chain Visibility

• Company Wide Reporting

• Standardize Business Processes

• Centralized Customer, Vendor, Item Data

• Costs to Segregate Company Data

• Centralized Credit Control

• Financial Reporting

• GL/AR/AP

• Payroll

• Banking

• IT

• Order Entry

• Engineering

• Purchasing

Disadvantages

• Can’t Distribute Orders to other Companies

• Bureaucracy Costs and Response Delays

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

• Inventory Control

• Shipping / Receiving

• Production Control

• Invoicing

18

Issue

Vendors / Initial Cost

Typical Architecture

Data Separation by Co

Separate Fiscal Yrs by Co

Period End by Co

Choose Base Currency by

Co

Consolidation Approach

General Ledger Selection

Tier 1

SAP, Oracle

$200K+

Single

GL/AR/AP

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Tier 2

Great Plains, ACCPAC, MAS90

$10K - $20K

Each Co has a GL/AR/AP

Not within 1 GL

Not within 1 GL

Not within 1 GL

Not within 1 GL

Company Field on Journal

Entries

Integrated Typically - External Batch

Function to Role up Multiple

GL’s

Yes No - but can use GL Segment if using Single GL Approach

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

19

Multiple Company

Security Costs and Data Segregation

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

20

Multi Company Design – Seradex Implementation

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

21

Multi Company Design – Seradex Implementation

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

22

Multi Company Design – Seradex Implementation

Next Steps

• Finalize Number of Legal Entities

• Select Centralized & Decentralized Functions

• Select & Implement General Ledger, AR, AP Software

• Architect IT

– Servers – File & Print, Exchange, SQL Server, Citrix

– Network Domains

– Remote Connectivity

– Bandwidth Analysis

• Finalize GL Chart of Accounts

• Create Seradex Project Plan

• Architect Seradex

– Number of Databases

– Intercompany Transactions

• Implement Seradex according to Plan

COA and Multiple Company Design

Considerations

23

Download