CIVIL SOCIETY

advertisement

“CIVIL SOCIETY “

IN TURBULENT TIMES:

RUSSIAN CASE

Svetlana Kirdina

Institute of Economics,

Russian Academy of Sciences,

Moscow, Russia

1

Outline

“Civil society” = an Ideologem?

“Civil society” and a state: opponents or partners?

“Civil society” in Russia: theory and empirical data

2

The importance of terms’ meaning

 Once disciple of Confucius asked his

Teacher (488 BC): “New governor is going to involve you in the state administration.

Where do you start?”. Confucius replied:

"First we need to refine the names that do not correspond to the essence ... If the words are unfavorable, the case will not be going well ... (Lun Yu, XIII, p. 8)

3

“ Civil society” in different ideological contexts (examples)

 The New Left : civil society has a key role in defending people against the capitalist state and the market and in asserting the collective will to influence the state;

 Neo-liberals : civil society needs the market and is created for the satisfaction of individual interests and private property in accordance with liberal values. .

[

4

“Civil society” as

“liberal” Ideologem

 CSI (Civil Society Index): 2 of 4 parameters characterize the basic freedoms and values;

 CSSI (Civil Society Strength Index): 1 of

2 groups of parameters is named as Civil

Society values factor;

 GCSI (Global Civil Society Index): 2 of 5 parameters reflect the distribution of tolerance values.

5

Civil society and a state

 Civil society is the state (since Thomas

Hobbes, John Locke)

 Civil society is an opponent of the state, or

“political superstructure” (since the Great Scots

David Hume, Adam Smith, Patrick Ferguson)

 Civil society is a complement rather than an alternative to the state , “the state is seen as a precondition of civil society” (Whaites, 1996;

Zaleski, 2006)

6

Civil society and a state

(Russian version)

 Civil society is a part of the state . Its main objective is to promote the social integration through: o o o

Legitimization of state power;

Public control of state decisions;

Participation in the process of state decision making.

(Russian school of constitutional economics,

Russian civil and public law studies).

7

Table 1. In your opinion, what could promote the welfare of Russia, %?

(Levada-Center. Press release 21.01.2010. What is democracy and whether it is necessary in Russia?)

The strengthening of

“the vertical of power”

The strengthening of civil rights and freedoms, civil society

Neither one nor the other

Don’t know

December

2004

31

42

13

14

December

2005

December

2006

December

2009

31

38

14

17

29

42

11

18

31

48

8

12

8

Table 2. Do you think the majority of public movements and initiatives in modern Russia is emerging…

Levada-Center. Press release 25.06.2010. Problems of social and political participation.

on the private initiative of citizens,

“bottom-up”, independently of the government or other political forces initiated by the authorities initiated by opposition political forces initiated by external forces interested in a particular way of Russia's development

Don’t know

June 2008 June 2010

14

32

21

11

22

13

30

22

13

22

9

Table 3. What type of state would you like to see to exist in Russia?

Levada-Center. Press release 16.03.2010. State and society interrelations in Russian public opinion.

March

1998

February

2006

February

2010

A unitary centralized state with the heads of local authorities appointed by the Center

State with the most extensive rights of local authorities and central government coordinating their interests

Don’t know

25

52

23

41

39

20

46

36

19

10

Table 4. In your opinion, on which of the following principles a society, in which you want to live, should be based?

Levada-Center. Press release 14.01.2011. On state and society interrelations.

The authorities should take care of people

People should be able to obtain from authorities what they need

Don’t know

November February

2001 2006

December

2006

December

2007

December

2010

66

33

3

68

28

4

74

21

5

66

30

4

65

29

6

11

Institutional matrices theory

(X- and Y-theory) as one of theoretical explanations

Kirdina S. G. Institutional Matrices and Development in Russia (2 edition).

Novosibirsk, 2001 (In Russian).

Kirdina S. The Institutional Matrices Theory in the Context of Modern

Sociology. /Visions and Divisions: the Russian Outlook The Russian

Academy of Sciences - The Russian Society of Sociologists. - Moscow-

Helsinki, 2001.

Kirdina S. Fundamental Difference in the Transformation Process between

Russia and East European Countries // Berliner Osteuropa Info, №

16/2001.

Kirdina S. Institutional Matrices and Institutional Changes / Economic

Transformation and Evolutionary Theory of J. Schumpeter. The 5th

International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics, Pushchino, Moscow region, Russia, 2003.

Institutional matrix in sociology / Sociological encyclopedia. Moscow, 2003

(in Russian),

Institutional matrices theory/ Sociological dictionary. Moscow, 2010 (in

Russian).

12

13

X- and Y-matrices

Redistributive economy

X

Y

Market economy

Combinations of X- and Ymatrices

Y

X X

Y

Russia, China, and North American most of Asian and countries and most of

Latin American countries European countries

14

X- and Y-institutions in politics and their functions

Functions of institutions X-institutions Y-institutions

1.Territorial administrative organization of the state

Administrative division

(unitarity)

Federative structure

(federation)

2. Governance system (flow of decision making)

3.Type of interaction in the order of decision making

Vertical hierarchical authority with Centre on the top

General assembly and unanimity

Self-government and subsidiarity

Multi-party system and democratic majority

Election 4. Filling of governing positions

Appointment

5. Feed-back mechanism Appeals to higher levels of hierarchical authority

Law suits

15

Conclusion

“Civil society” remains an ideologem rather than a rigorous scientific concept.

 A critical interpretation of civil society discourse needs placing it in the context of contingent policy regimes defined by institutional factors.

 A version of civil society discourse contextualized in the Russian transitional society calls for interpreting it not as an opponent of the state but as a part of the state with main objective to promote the social integration.

16

Thank you for your attention!

Contacts : www.kirdina.ru

kirdina@bk.ru

17

Download