AYP vs. AEIS
Talking Accountability @ Carroll Elementary
October 5, 2010
Learning Objective #1
I can distinguish between Adequate
Yearly Progress (AYP) and
Academic Excellence Indicator
System (AEIS)?
Learning Objective #3
I know the different student
populations that affect the campus
rating as defined by AYP?
Learning Objective #2
I know the different student
populations that affect the campus
rating as defined by AEIS?
AYP
vs
AEIS
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

NCLB

Federal funding

Three indicators

Two standards
◦ Reading/Language Arts
◦ Mathematics
◦ Attendance rate
◦ Performance
◦ Participation
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Performance Standard
◦ In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the performance
standard for percent proficient.
 2009 – 2010
 2010 – 2011
 2011 – 2012
 2012 – 2013
 2013 – 2014
73% (Rdg.)
80% (Rdg.)
87% (Rdg.)
93% (Rdg.)
100% (Rdg.)
67% (Math)
75% (Math)
83% (Math)
92% (Math)
100% (Math)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Performance Standard – Student Groups
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
All Students
African-American
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
Special Education
LEP
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Performance Standard – Assessments
◦ TAKS and TAKS-Accommodated
 Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
 Reading and Math (Grades 3-5 Spanish)
◦ TAKS-Modified and TAKS-Alternate
 Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
◦ LAT – TAKS
 Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
 Reading and Math (Grades 3-6 Spanish)
◦ LAT – TAKS-M
 Reading/ELA and Math (Grades 3-8 and 10)
◦ TELPAS
 Used in AYP Participation for students in their first year of enrollment in US
schools
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

Participation Standard
◦ In order to meet AYP, a campus must meet the participation
standard for students enrolled on testing date.
95%
Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)

Tailored for the State of Texas

4 Ratings
◦
◦
◦
◦
Exemplary
Recognized
Academically Acceptable
Academically Unacceptable
Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)

Exemplary
All subjects
≥ 90%
Recognized
All subjects
≥ 80%
Acceptable
Reading/ELA
Writing
Social Studies
Math
Science
≥ 70%
≥ 70%
≥ 70%
≥ 60%
≥ 55%
 25 % Commended Performance for AS and ED
 Mathematics and Reading

 15 % Commended Performance for AS and ED
 Mathematics and Reading

Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)

Student Groups
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
All Students
African-American
Hispanic
White
Economically Disadvantaged
Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)

Assessments Used…
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
◦
TAKS
TAKS-Accommodated
TAKS-Modified
TAKS-Alternate
LAT
TELPAS
Academic Excellence Indicator System
(AEIS)
 Additional
Information
◦ The 1st and 2nd administration results of Grades 5
and 8 TAKS Reading and Math are combined.
Students must be tested on the same campus for
results to be used.
Data Analysis
Let’s analyze some
actual campus data…
Met AYP? AEIS Rating?
Mathematics
% Pass
%
Commended
AS
91% (95%)
28% (31%)
AA
86% (93%)
20% (25%)
Hispanic
94% (96%)
33% (34%)
Eco Disadv
90% (94%)
27% (28%)
Reading
% Pass
%
Commended
AS
87% (91%)
20% (22%)
AA
84% (88%)
15% (15%)
Hispanic
89% (92%)
23% (25%)
Eco Disadv
85% (89%)
19% (21%)
Met AYP? AEIS Rating?
Writing
% Pass
%
Commended
AS
89% (99%)
22% (37%)
AA
86% (100%)
17% (24%)
Hispanic
91% (98%)
27% (45%)
Eco Disadv
86% (99%)
19% (36%)
Science
% Pass
%
Commended
AS
79% (90%)
29% (32%)
AA
73% (80%)
13% (13%)
Hispanic
83% (98%)
40% (45%)
Eco Disadv
79% (89%)
28% (30%)
Evaluation
 List
some differences between AYP
and AEIS.
Evaluation
List the student populations used to
calculate AEIS and AYP data.