Remote Connectivity to XA R7 R9 Powerlink and Netlink 1

advertisement

Remote Connectivity to

XA R7/R9

Power-Link & Net-Link

Denise Burns denise.burns@cistech.net

(423)235-0673

Agenda

1. Summary of Remote Connectivity Options

2. Review of Each Option

– Features

– Hardware/Software requirements

3. Pros/Cons of Options

4. Demo of each Option

5. How We Can Help

Summary of Options

Power-Link

Power-Link to

Terminal Server/

Citrix

XAX

Net-Link

XA

Power-Link direct on WAN

– Easiest option if you have enough bandwidth

• Depends on number of users, applications, size of database, etc.

– Client needs memory, 1 GB minimum

– Total network performance is critical

• Hubs, switches, cabling, etc.

XA

Power-Link direct on WAN

PC

Server XA

Performance can be ‘tweaked ’:

– Remote fix server

• Reduces startup time

• Reduces effort to update clients

– Utilize preferences to tailor user views and subsets

• minimize subsets that bring up all records, i.e. IMHIST , items, orders

Power-Link via Terminal Server

Terminal

Server

XA

– Remote user logs into Terminal Server

• Terminal Server installed at iSeries location

– Faster response time than running Power-Link client remotely

– Terminal Services application included in

Windows Server operating system

– Must buy CAL for each user

Power-Link via Terminal Server

Terminal

Server

XA

– Windows Terminal Server with user CAL’s: OS –

Windows 2000, 2003 or 2008. Terminal Server

CAL’s are approximately $80 each

– Power-Link client on Terminal Server requires

100+ MB disk space (each env.) and minimum of

256 MB RAM

Net-Link

Auxiliary

Server

XA

– Faster response time than running Power-Link client over same bandwidth remotely

– Auxiliary Server Required:

• OS – Windows 2000, 2003 or 2008

• Minimum hardware – P4, 2.8 GHz, 1 GB RAM (more recommended)

– Allow 2 GB of memory for every 50 Net-Link users

Pros/Cons – Power-Link

If performance is not acceptable with Power-Link:

• Power-Link via Terminal Server

 Full functionality of Power-Link software

≠ Additional server required for Terminal

Services

≠ Terminal Server CAL required for each user

• Approximate cost $80/each

Pros/Cons - Net-Link

≠ Subset of Power-Link functionality

– Probably not appropriate for Power User

– Might be fine for limited/inquiry user

 Utilizes less bandwidth with faster response time compared to Power-Link

 Connection can be through VPN or external address can be set up in firewall for a connection from internet

 No additional installation or software licensing required

≠ Requires Auxiliary Server running a set of processes for every 50 Net-Link users

Demonstration:

Power-Link

Power-Link with Terminal Server

Net-Link

How We Can Help

• Power-Link via WAN

– Install remote fix server

• 1 day to implement if server OS is installed

• Power-Link via Terminal Server

– Install Terminal Server

– 1 - 2 days to implement

How We Can Help

• Net-Link

– Install Auxiliary Server

– Assist network administrator with configuration of

Net-Link for external access (across internet)

– 1 day to implement

• Other

– Analyze network infrastructure and troubleshoot connectivity problems/performance issues

Questions ??

Thank you!!

Technical Information

Denise Burns

423-235-0673 denise.burns@cistech.net

Technical Information

Ruth A. Pharr

704.814.0007

ruth.pharr@cistech.net

Sales Information

Ben McCormick

704.814.0016

ben.mccormick@cistech.net

Download