ppt

advertisement

Project MATV

Final Presentation

April 7, 2010

Jonathan Cole

Fabio Faragalli

Trevor Dwyer

Outline

 Project MATV

– Initial Vision

Project Objectives

Design Iterations

 MATV Solid Model

– Model Overview

Drive-train

Suspension Design

 FEA Analysis

Axles

Suspension Arms

 Final Design

Initial Vision

 Small all-terrain vehicle

– Able to navigate rough terrain and water obstacles

 Battery powered

Chain driven from two electric motors

Provide enough power and clearance to climb stairs

Remote control operation

Skid steer design

6 independently sprung wheels

 Water tight platform

Able to fit through a standard door

Ample room for the mounting of recording, navigational, and controls equipment

Term Objectives

 Initial design iteration

– Hydraulic powered concept

Independent hydraulic wheel motors

Tandem bi-directional hydraulic pump

Driven by a 4 stroke gasoline engine

 Objectives:

Enough torque to navigate vertical obstacles

Lift nose of vehicle with leading wheels

– 24 hour autonomy

MATV Specifications

 6 wheel platform

– Amphibious

Weight less than 300lbs

50lbs payload

Minimum 2ft 3 cargo space

 Robust off-road suspension

Independently sprung wheels

1214” ground clearance

Less than 48” wide

Vmax 30km/h

Initial Design Issues

 Weight

Spec: 300 lbs with a payload of 50 lbs

Actual: 600+ lbs total

Large weight of independent wheel motors & suspension arms

 Cost

Cost estimate ~$10,000

Wheel motors $720 US per motor ($4200+ total)

Tandem pump $1000+

 Operating Pressures

– 2000 psi for entire hydraulic system

Motor limited

1/3 operating pressure drop per motor (series)

Improvement Opportunities

 Drive-train

– Hydraulic transmission / chain driven system

Torque potential

Weight & cost savings

 Suspension Design

– Swing-arm suspension

Ground clearance & width potential

More suitable for chain drive

Simplified hub & shock design

System Regression Analysis

Operating P. (PSI) Climb Angle Tire D. (in) Weight (lb) Required Hp Pump Dp (in^3/rev) Pump Flow (L/min) Trans RPM GR

3000 45 16.0

600 5.22

0.43

28.25

1695.00

3.25

Weight vs Hp @ 45deg

10

8

6

4

2

0

Max

2000 PSI

3000 PSI

4000 PSI

300 400 500

Weight

600 1000

Weight vs Dp @ 45deg

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0.0

Max

2000 PSI

3000 PSI

4000 PSI

300 400 500

Weight

600 1000

System Characteristics

 Required HP dependent only on weight.

Regardless of operating pressure.

Limit of 5.5HP engine is 600lb @ 45 ° slope.

 Required pump displacement and flow rate highly dependent on operating pressure.

Transmission (pump/motor) can handle 4500psi intermittent and 3000psi continuous.

This translates to 1300lb(+) capacity @ 3000psi.

 Tire diameter only affects gear ratio.

Required torque at wheels dependent on gear ratio.

Engine governed at 3600rpm, transmission Max 4000rpm.

Solid Model

 80/20 frame

Allows for easy adjustments

Light weight while maintaining strength

Platform Design

 Aluminum outer shell

Light weight and corrosion resistant

Amphibious

Houses components

Drive Train

 Upper Shaft

 Notched at either end to allow the bearing to be secured

 Partially keyed to allow the attachment of the gears without hindering the bearings

Drive Train

 Lower Shaft

 Similarly Notched to allow the bearings to be securely attached

 Keyed to allow the attachment of the gear

Suspension

 Swing Arm Design

– Allows for greater travel and ground clearance

– Reduces overall width and supports the use of the chain drive

Wheel Assembly

Pillowblock Bearings

3/4 inch

5/8 inch

Flange mounts

5/8 inch

2 ½ inch bolted

Gear

– 5/8 inch

U-channel

– 3/16 inch

FEA Analysis

 Axles

 Suspension Arms

Upper Axles

(Impulse momentum)

Displacement (10 kN)

0.7 inch

Strain (10 kN)

Axial Load

Swing arm 3/16 inch

Displacement (10 kN)

Strain (10 kN)

Axial Load

Swing arm 5/8 inch

Strain (10 kN)

Displacement (10 kN)

MATV Weight Estimate

MATV Cost Estimate

Final Component Design

 Honda GX690 Engine

22.3 Hp @ 3600rpm

35.6 ft ∙lb @ 2500rpm

 Sauer Danfoss BDU-21H

Output Torque = 72.1 N·m

Operating pressure 3250 psi

Dp/Dm = 1.28 in 3

Optimal Gear Ratio

Gear

Ratio Torque Vmax Compare Torque Engine

2.51

118 ft∙lbs 110 km/h

2010

Honda

Civic 128 @ 4300 1.8L 4 Cyl

5.00

235 ft∙lbs 55 km/h

2010

Hyundai

Genesis 223 @ 2000 2.0L Turbo 4 Cyl

8.00

375 ft∙lbs 35 km/h

2010

Audi R8

Quattro 391 @ 6500 5.2L V10

9.00

422 ft∙lbs 30 km/h

2010

Nissan

GTR 434 @ 3200 3.8L V6 Twin Turbo

Picture

Questions?

Download