Presentation on
New HEC Ranking Criteria
SCHEME OF PRESENTATION
• Parameters of old & new Ranking Criteria
•
Comparative Study - HEC Ranking Criteria
Old & New
•
Current BU Status
•
Recommendations
OLD & NEW PARAMETERS OF RANKINGS
S.No
1
Old Ranking Criteria
Score S.No
(2010)
Implementation of
QA Criteria
New Ranking Criteria
(2012)
Quality Assurance &
Enhancement
Score
18
1
2 Teaching Quality
42
2 Teaching Quality
35
3 Research
40
3 Research
35
4 Employer Perception
5
5 Peer Perception
5
Total Score
100
Total Score
20
100
COMPARATIVE STUDY - HEC RANKING CRITERIA NEW & OLD
1. QA Criteria / Sub parameters
S# Old Ranking Criteria (2010)
MAX
Points
Implementation of QA
Criteria
18
1
a Plagiarism policy implementation
New Ranking Criteria
(2012)
Quality Assurance
& Enhancement
MAX
Points
20
6
a
Plagiarism policy
implementation
6
b
Eligibility Criteria for appointments
of faculty members
4
b
Eligibility Criteria for
appointments of
faculty members
4
c
Criteria for M.Phil./MS & Ph.D.
Programmes
4
c
Compliance of M.Phil./MS
& Ph.D. criteria
4
d
Quality Enhancement Cell
Categorization
4
d
Quality Enhancement Cell
Categorization
6
Total Score
20
Total Score
18
System for Assessment & Marking
Based on evidence on various stages of
implementation :
1. Constitution of Plagiarism standing
committee (PSC)
2. Notifications/Minutes of
Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body
meetings.
3. Functioning of the committee (PSC) by
resolving the plagiarism cases.
Based on adherence HEC criteria
appointments of faculty members :
1. Notifications/Minutes of
Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body
meetings for implementation of
criteria by university.
Based on compliance of HEC criteria :
1. Notifications/Minutes of
Syndicate/BOG/Statutory body
meetings for implementation of criteria by
university.
As per scorecard developed and shared
with Universities by QAA of HEC.
2. Teaching Quality/Sub-Parameters
S#
Old Ranking Criteria (2010)
2 Teaching Quality
a Student Teacher Ratio
MAX
Points
42
New Ranking
MAX
Criteria (2012) Points
Teaching Quality
35
Student Teacher
Ratio
12
a
9
b
Ratio of PhD faculty
to total faculty
6
5
c
Selectivity
5
4
d
Computers
4
e Library books
4
e
Library books
4
f Full Time PhD faculty
3
g Total PhD output for 2010
5
b
Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty
c Selectivity
d
Computers (Number of computers
provided to students by university)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Total Score
42
7
System for Assessment & Marking
Total regular faculty and FTE (Full Time Equivalent)
faculty will be considered for calculating overall
Student Teacher Ratio.
It is the PhD faculty divided by total faculty. For
medical FRCS, FCP etc. will be treated as terminal
degrees.
It is the ratio of the total applicants seeking
admission in the university and students actually
selected.
The total number of computers available to students
and faculty of university.
Total number of books at campus library
excluding electronic books.
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
f
Ratio of Full time
faculty to part time
3
g
Teacher Evaluation
3
h
Training of faculty
3
Total Score
35
It is the ratio of full time faculty to part time faculty.
Full time faculty is regular and contractual faculty
whereas part time faculty is the visiting faculty.
Mechanism of teacher evaluation established within
the framework of QEC or universities’ own
conducted faculty evaluation survey .
As per HEC record and data provided by
universities on ranking proforma will be used for this
component.
Other faculty training information (National as well as
international) as per evidence provided by
universities will be considered.
3.Research/Sub-Parameters
S.No
3
Old Ranking
Criteria (2010)
Research
MAX
Points
New Ranking
Criteria (2012)
40
3
MAX Points
Research
MAX
Points
System for Assessment & Marking
35
HEC Approved supervisors are those
who can enroll HEC scholars. Whereas HEC
registered supervisors are those who can only
supervise scholars which are not funded by HEC.
i
HEC Approved
supervisors
5
i
Approved
supervisors
5
ii
Indigenous
scholarship
4
ii
Indigenous
scholarship
4
Total number of HEC indigenous scholars
enrolled in university as per records of HEC
scholarship section.
2
As per the record of HEC R&D Division the
number of research grants approved by the HEC
will be used. Documentary evidence viz. MOUs
etc. will be required for those research grants
received by the university other than the HEC.
Last 3 years data will be considered.
2
As per the record of HEC R&D Division,
number of travel grants received by the
faculty members of the universities will be used.
Documentary evidence will be required for those
travel grants received by the university faculty
other than the HEC sources.
Last 3 years data will be considered.
Research
iii grants
approved
iv
Travel Grants
approved
2
2
iii
iv
Research grants
approved other than
HEC
Travel Grants
approved
Old Ranking Criteria
(2010)
Publications in Impact
v
Factor Journals
Number of papers
vi published by the
university
Citations
vii
S.No
viii
University H Index
Number of W, X, Y , Z
Journals Published by
ix the University
MAX
Points
S.No
New Ranking Criteria (2012)
MAX
Points
5
v
Publications in Impact Factor
Journals
4
3
vi
Number of papers published by
the university
3
4
vii
Citations
3
4
viii University H Index
5
ix
Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals
Published by the University
ISI web of knowledge will be benchmark and
(research output extracted by HEC
Digital Library will be used. Details of Research
Publications of Universities by HEC as flashed
2
3
x
Internet Bandwidth
(PERN) utilization
4
x
Internet Bandwidth (PERN)
utilization
3
xi
Number of Conferences
Organized
2
xi
Number of Conferences
Organized
2
-
-
xii
Total PhD output for 2011
2
Total Score
40
Total Score
System for Assessment & Marking
35
As
per Quality
Assurance Division’s
record,,
number of HEC recognized journals published
by the university in W, X, Y, Z category will be
used.
Average utilization of Internet bandwidth by
the universities acquired through PERN and
other ISPs will be used. Documentary proof
MRTG (Multi Router Traffic Grapher), PRTG (Paessier
Router Traffic Grapher) etc. of Internet bandwidth
utilization will be required of other ISPs.
As per the record of R&D Division, HEC the
number
of
seminars,
conferences,
workshops
& symposia organized by university through HEC funding
will
be
used.
In
addition
conferences
etc.
organized
by
universities
through
national/international
collaboration
from
sources
other
than
HEC
funding
will
also
be
accounted,
for
which
documentary
evidence
will
be
required.
Last 3 years data will be considered.
Data
provided
by
universities
through
ranking
proforma
and
records
of
PhD
Country Directory data will be used.
04. New Parameters added
S# Old Ranking Criteria (2010)
MAX
Points
3 Employer Perception Survey
N/A
3
4
N/A
Nil
Total Score
Nil
Peer Perception
5
Each university has been given
opportunity to consider academic
standing of other universities among
peers and rank them as1,2,3, …. to 10,
accordingly. Each university has to rate
other one falling in the same category,
excluding itself. Universities in ‘General
Category’ will be providing peer
perception according to respective size
of distributed on enrollment basis, given
below:
Large>=7000
Medium>=3000 & <7000
Small <3000
The relevant list has been provided by
HEC to each university.
Peer Perception
Total Score
System for Assessment & Marking
All Universities have been requested to
Provide the 05 top recruiters
information in the relevant field.
Employer perception survey will be
finalized based on responses received
from potential employers of university
graduates.
Employer
Perception Survey
N/A
4 Peer Perception
New Ranking
MAX
Criteria (2012)
Points
Employer
Perception Survey
5
10
Note: Relative method of scoring or grading will be used
among 18 General Large Universities
STATUS OF BU AMONG GENERAL UNIVERSITY (LARGE) OLD RANKING 2010
S.N
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Institute Name
University of Punjab, Lahore
University of Karachi
Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan
University of Peshawar
Intemational Islamic University,
Islamabad
Govt College University, Faisalabad
Federal Urdu University,Arts, Science &
Technolgy
University of Sargodha
University of Sindh, Jamshoro
The Islamia University, Bahawalpur
Hazara University, Mansehra
Bahria University
University of Education, Lahore
National University of Modern
Languages, Islamabad
University of Gujrat
Preston University, Kohat
University of Lahore
Teaching
Quality (42)
QA Criteria
(18)
Research
(40)
Total Score
(100)
15.89
15.11
12.08
12.06
17
10
12
10
12.18
10.67
9.76
10.43
45
36
34
32
9.12
15
6.83
32
8.06
18
2.95
29
8.84
17
2.84
29
8.35
8.30
9.33
8.63
6.35
4.94
13
11
10
13
15
15
4.61
5.74
5.69
3.16
2.18
2.70
26
25
25
25
24
23
5.69
14
2.54
22
5.97
7.05
6.31
14
7
5
1.58
0.37
0.72
22
14
12
BU STATUS Old V/S New
Status (2010)
S.No
Points
scored out
1
Implementation of QA
Criteria
18
1
Plagiarism Standing
Committee
3
2
Appointment Criteria
3
Criteria for MS/Mphil &
Phd
4
QEC Categorization
Total
Out of 6
4
Out of 4
4
Out of 4
4
Out of 4
15
Out of 18
Status (2012)
Quality Assurance &
Enhancement
Plagiarism policy
implementation
Eligibility Criteria for
appointments of
faculty members
Compliance of M.Phil./MS &
Ph.D. criteria
Quality Enhancement Cell
Categorization
Max
Points
20
BU STATUS Old V/S New
Status (2010)
S.No
Ratio /
Nos
Teaching Quality (6.35 out of
2
3
Student Teacher Ratio (8308:593)
Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty
40:1007
Selectivity (No of applicants against
available seats) 8500:2500
Ratio/
Nos
Teaching Quality (35)
42)
1
Status (2012)
14:1
Student Teacher Ratio (9867:813)
Ratio of PhD faculty to total faculty
1:25
(76:737)
Selectivity (No of applicants against
3:1
available seats) 12000:3000
Computers (No of computers for the
642
students and faculty provided by
university)
50,000 Library books
41
Full Time PhD faculty
406
Full Time faculty
4
Computers (No of computers for the
students provided by university)
5
6
7
Library books
Full Time PhD faculty
Full Time faculty
8
Part Time Faculty
560
9
Full Time Equivalent Faculty
593
10
Total PhD output for 2010
0
11
Not Asked
-
12
Not Asked
-
13
Not Asked
Part Time Faculty
12:1
1:9
4:1
1027
55,001
40
392
345
Not Asked
Not Asked
Ratio of Full time faculty to part time
(392:345)
Teacher Evaluation
1:1
Training of faculty
226
BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No
Status (2010)
Nos
Status (2012)
i
HEC Approved supervisors
7
Approved supervisors
15
ii
Indigenous scholarship
6
Indigenous scholarship
16
iii Research grants approved
4
Research grants approved other
than HEC
24
iv Travel Grants approved
10
Travel Grants approved
13
Nos
BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
Status (2010)
Publications in Impact
Factor Journals
Number of papers
published by the
university
Citations
University H Index
Number of W, X, Y , Z
Journals Published by
the University
Status (2012)
Nos
-
Publications in Impact Factor
Journals
Nos
14 (July 11-June12)
10
Number of papers published by
the university
25
3
Citations
7
2
University H Index
Number of W, X, Y , Z Journals
Published by the University
-
0
x
18
Mbs
Internet Bandwidth (PERN)
Internet Bandwidth (PERN)
out of
utilization
utilization
48
Mbs
xi
Number of Conferences
Organized
0
-
• 28.64%
Utilization in
Islamabad
Campus
• 25.91%
Utilization in
Karachi Campus
Number of Conferences
Organized
28
Total PhD output for 2011
0
BU STATUS Old V/S New
S.No
Status (2010)
Employer Perception Survey
1
Not Asked
Peer Perception
2
Not Asked
Max
Points
Status (2012)
Employer Perception Survey
Employer Perception Survey
Peer Perception
Peer Perception
Max
Points
COMPARATIVE STUDY – QA CRITERIA GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)
Appointment Criteria
S.No
Institute Name
2010
1
2
3
4
Govt. College University,
Faisalabad.
Federal Urdu University of
Arts, Science & Technology.
University of The Punjab,
Lahore
Bahria University,
Islamabad
2012
Criteria for MS/Mphil
& Phd
2010
2012
QEC Categorization
2010
2012
Plagiarism Standing
Committee
2010
2012
Total
2010
4
4
4
6
18
4
4
3
6
17
4
4
3
6
17
4
4
4
3
15
4
4
4
3
15
4
4
1
6
15
4
4
3
3
14
4
4
3
3
14
4
4
2
3
13
4
4
2
3
13
0
4
2
6
12
4
4
3
0
11
4
4
2
0
10
4
0
3
3
10
14
International Islamic
University.
University of Education,
Lahore.
National University of
Modern Languages,
Islamabad.
University of Gujrat.
Hazara University Mansehra,
KPK.
University of Sargodha.
Bahauddin Zakariya
University, Multan.
University of Sindh.
The Islamia University of
Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
University of Karachi.
15
University of Peshawar.
0
4
3
3
10
16
Preston University, Kohat
4
0
0
3
7
17
University of Lahore, Lahore
National University of
Science & Technlogy
(NUST)
0
0
2
3
5
4
4
4
4
18
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
18
COMPARATIVE STUDY - TEACHING QUALITY GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)
S.No
Institute
Name
Student /
Teacher Ratio
2010
1 BZU
17:1
Bahria
2
14:1
University
3 FUUAST
14:1
GCU,
4
16:1
Faisalabad
Hazara
5 University 19:1
Mansehra
6 IIUI
23:1
7 IUB
21:1
8 KU
23:1
9 NUML
26:1
10 NUST
17:1
11 PU
25:1
Preston
12 University, 27:1
Kohat
13 UOE, LHR 47:1
14
15
16
17
UOS,
Sargodha
UOP,
Peshawar
UOS,
Sindh
University
of Gujrat
2012
25:1
22:1
33:1
20:1
University
18
16:1
of Lahore
18:1
Computers
2010
2012
Applicants
2010
3,500
35,000
642
1027 8,476
474
2,418
800
16,942
950
11,000
3,478
16,642
2,100
22,602
5,500
30,000
600
6,156
6,519
46,832
6,500
140,054
2,630
4,693
893
30,000
1,500
18,263
1,350
20,000
1,458
15,372
800
15,942
1,680
11,693
2012
Graduate/
PhD Output Postgraduate
students
Library
2010
2012
304,573
11,539
50,000 55,001
127,973
19,500
107,000
119,560
225,000
366,441
115,000
2010
15
0
51,472
169,964
78,721
191,197
382,201
2010
2,054 2933
4,509
1
3,530
0
1,175
16
8,333
35
7,974
125
12,042
24
9,741
10
108
0
890
13,715
4,689
5
8,213
3
6,521
7
5,938
15
3,628
25,141
0
25,409
0
2012
7,256
1
0
342,896
1,223,600
2012
2,668
2,679
Undergraduate
Students
2010
2012
7,594
6,254 6934
FT PhD
Faculty
2010
2012
175
41
5,163
114
8,603
117
7,090
79
11,323
156
6,654
115
15,162
342
4,146
49
7,337
303
16,893
367
7,434
65
5,051
29
8,244
132
5,706
179
16,039
133
7,001
38
11,290
44
FT Faculty
2010
2012
523
40
406
PT Faculty
FTE
Faculty
2010 2012
2010
960
392
843
560 345 593
432
655
650
592
426
734
405
81
432
585
777
844
533
487
695
739
1,276
1,164
513
29
523
912
116
1,006
614
1,211
363
246
445
247
104
282
559
55
577
419
267
508
570
67
592
458
18
464
770
163
824
951
COMPARATIVE STUDY - RESEARCH GENERAL UNIVERSITIES (LARGE)
S.N
o
Institute
Name
Conferences
2010
1 BZU
2
2012 2010
3
Bahria
University
2012
25
28
18
H-INDEX
2010
2012
16
25
2
Citations
HEC Aprvd
Suprvsrs
HEC
Travel
Grants
Indigenous
Scholars
2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012
141
-
Research
Papers
3
143
7
10
25
96
19
280
7
15 10 13
6
Research
Grants
24
61
11
12
27
17
6
9
88
73
46
7
14
22
2
4
6
63
58
33
6
19
3
6 IIUI
3
33
7
61
57
55
69
172
14
7 IUB
2
14
9
99
88
36
41
155
8
8 KU
2
25
305
392
80
53
122
135
7
1
3
4
18
6
62
0
9 NUML
2010 2012 2010 2012 2010 2012
2
1
1
4
35
GCU,
Faisalabad
Hazara
5 UniversityM
ansehra
2012
21
5
4
W Category X Category Y Category Z Category
2010 2012 2010
9
3 FUUAST
2
PERN
2
1
3
1
3
4
6
3
10 NUST
4
42
19
273
155
170
44
103
80
11 PU
3
40
20
487
356
182
48
441
53
1
3
9
7
3
4
11
9
7
4
25
2
9
13
228
193
48
17
35
14
8
27
14
247
153
73
32
171
26
4
5
3
20
21
179
95
15
36
12
18
1
6
18
1
6
20
20
8
5
3
6
13
2
Preston
12 University,
Kohat
13 UOE, LHR
UOS,
14
Sargodha
UOP,
15
Peshawar
UOS,
16
Sindh
University
17
of Gujrat
University
18
of Lahore
1
1
3
9
8
0
1
1
0
1
RECOMMENDATIONS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
There must be some benchmark to measure performance. Despite
weaknesses and flaws in the assessment, HEC benchmark be
followed in letter & spirit.
Any suggestion on proposed New Criteria of Ranking be
forwarded to QA Dte for onward submission to HEC for
consideration / review.
Number of HEC enrolled indigenous scholars be increased
Number of Research Grants from HEC & from other sources like:
USAID, JICA, Corporate sector & NGOs etc be increased.
Number of travel grants from HEC & other services be increased
More utilization of PERN
Organizing Conferences, National & International with the funding
from HEC or atleast HEC may be intimated
Thank You
GENERAL UNIVERSITIES MEDIUM
No.
Institute
1
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad
2
3
Government College University, Lahore
Gomal University, D.I Khan
Kohat University of Science and
Technology, Kohat
Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur
The University of Azad Jammu &
Kashmir, AJ&K
Riphah International University,
Islamabad
Fatima Jinnah Women University,
Rawalpindi
University of Balochisan, Quetta
University of Management &
Technology, Lahore
Forman Christian College, Lahore
Mohammad Ali Jinnah University,
Karachi
Hamdard University, Karachi
Jinnah University for Women, Karachi
University of Central Punjab, Lahore
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Teaching
Quality
23.88
QA Criteria
Research
Total Score
11
32.46
67
14.65
10.64
13
17
11.95
4.71
40
32
9.54
15
4.07
29
9.18
14
4.39
28
9.72
15
3.58
28
9.74
15
2.67
27
8.22
15
2.71
26
9.44
13
3.73
26
7.49
13
4.81
25
14.45
7
1.92
23
7.53
3
6.7
17
6.82
7.39
5.68
7
7
8
2.12
0.69
1.47
16
15
15
GENERAL UNIVERSITIES SMALL
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Institute
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad
University of Faisalabad, Faisalabad
Sardar Bahadur Khan Women's University, Quetta
National Defence University, Islamabad
Karakurum International University, Gilgit
Textile Institute of Pakistan, Karachi
University of Malakand, Dir, Malakand
Foundation University, Islamabad
Beaconhouse National University, Lahore
Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi
Frontier Women University, Peshawar
Sarhad University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar
University of South Asia, Lahore
GIFT University, Gujranwala
Indus Institute of Higher Education, Karachi
Mohiuddin Islamic University, AJ&K
Hajvery University, Lahore
Kinnaird College For Women, Lahore
The Superior College, Lahore
Karachi Institute of Economics & Technology, Karachi
Newport Institute of Communications & Economics, Karachi
Greenwich University, Karachi
Minhaj University, Lahore
Preston Institute of Management, Science and Technology, Karachi
Preston University, Karachi
Teaching
Quality
23.43
16.14
12.13
12.23
11.23
14.16
7.29
11.96
7.59
6.05
4.86
10.05
7.7
8.52
8.59
7.7
6.73
8.19
10.91
9.93
5.89
8.31
11.03
7.76
7.3
QA
Total
Research
Criteria
Score
6
7.72
37
15
0.78
32
15
2.39
30
11
3.96
27
12
1.77
25
11
0
25
13
3.33
24
7
3.3
22
13
0.4
21
15
0
21
15
1.46
21
11
0.26
21
11
1.9
21
11
0
20
10
0
19
11
0.01
19
11
0
18
9
0.48
18
7
0.06
18
7
0.56
17
11
0.25
17
7
0.25
16
3
0
14
3
0
11
0
1.01
8
ENGINEERING
No.
Institute
Teaching
QA Criteria Research
Quality
Total
Score
4
Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied
Sciences, Islamabad
National University of Sciences and Technology,
Islamabad
Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering
Sciences & Technology, Topi
University of Engineering and Technology- Lahore
5
University of Engineering and Technology-Taxila
16.82
10
12.23
39.05
6
Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad
14.72
14
9.92
38.64
7
KPK University of Engineering and Technology
Mehran University of Engineering & Technology,
Jamshoro
NED University of Engineering & Technology,
Karachi
Air University, Islamabad
12.48
12
6.05
30.53
12.11
12
5.59
29.7
10.66
13
4.5
28.16
13.77
10
4.27
28.04
9.68
8
8.44
26.12
7.97
14
1.54
23.51
8.37
13
1.52
22.89
7.59
14
0.86
22.45
6.78
13
2.18
21.96
5.78
14
0
19.78
1
2
3
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
National Textile University, Faisalabad
Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science
& Technology, Nawabshah
Balochistan University of Engg & Technology,
Khuzdar
Sir Syed University of Engineering & Technology,
Karachi
Mirpur University of Science & Technology, AJ&K
Dawood College of Engineering & Technology,
Karachi
36.51
17
28.27
81.79
25.83
18
18.22
62.05
24.37
9
22.67
56.03
16.15
12
11.65
39.79
Business Education
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Institute
Lahore University of Management
Sciences, Lahore
Institute of Business Administration Karachi
Iqra University,Karachi
Sukkar, Institute of Business Administration,
Sukkar
National College of Business Administration
& Economics, Lahore
Shaheed Zulfikar Ali Bhutto Institute of
Science & Technology, Karachi
Institute of Management
Sciences,Peshawar
Lahore School of Economics, Lahore
Imperial College of Business Studies,
Lahore
Institute of Management Sciences, Lahore
Institute of Business Management, Karachi
Institute of Business and Technology,
Karachi
KASB Institute of Technology, Karachi
Teaching
Quality
QA
Criteria
Research
Total
Score
30.38
17.09
20.09
14
15
14
24.83
8.42
5.96
69
41
40
17.32
15
7.31
40
22.11
1
14.59
38
11.51
11
8.94
31
9.14
13.48
14
11
8.3
4.61
31
29
20.11
10.6
10.29
7
11
10
0
2.47
1.74
27
24
22
17.8
11.66
2
7
0.25
0.35
20
19
Computer Sciences & IT Category
No. Institute
1
2
3
4
5
6
COMSATS Institute of Information
Technology (CIIT), Islamabad
National University of Computer and
Emerging Sciences (NU-FAST),
Islamabad
Qurtaba University of Science and
Information Technology, D I Khan
Balochistan University of Information
Technology and Management
Sciences, Quetta
City University of Science and
Information Technology, Peshawar
CECOS University of Information
Technology and Emerging Sciences,
Peshawar
Teaching
QA
Research Total
Quality Criteria
(40)
Score
(42)
(18)
Position
28.67
15
24.77
68
1
33.06
9
18.85
61
2
26.72
11
5.55
43
3
16.79
14
6.04
37
4
16.1
11
0.91
28
5
14.61
11
0
26
6
Download

Academic Council Presentation QA Criteria