EASA ATM/ANS Standardisation
“State Inspection”
Milen DENTCHEV
ADQ Implementation workshop
29.05.2013
Brussels
EASA ATM/ANS Standardisation Inspection
Agenda
STD Inspection process overview
ADQ – part of the STD inspection
Q/A
09/04/2015
S.1.5.
2
Standardisation Inspection Process Overview
Basic principle:
Overall objective:
to establish and maintain a high uniform level of civil
aviation safety in Europe
Standardisation inspections objective:
Monitoring whether NAA/CA/NSA are
implementing EU rules:
Not less than required
Not more than required
field
09/04/2015
to protect EU citizens
to ensure a level playing
S.1.5. Standardisation Meeting
3
Standardisation Inspection Process Overview
Preliminary
meeting
Opening
session
Closing
session
Wrap-up
meeting
Finding
Classification
Committee
On Site
10 weeks
min
As necessary
12 weeks
max
16 weeks max
Preparatory
phase
Visiting phase
Reporting
phase
Follow-up
phase
Notice of inspection
Visit programme
09/04/2015
Preliminary
Report
Final
Report
S.1.5. Standardisation Meeting
As necessary
Closure
Phase
Action
Plan
Closure
4
Standardisation Inspection Process Overview
Preparation for inspection
Pre-visit questionnaires
NSA
ANSP
Analysis of AIP content
Other information available in EASA
(part of the risk-based approach required by the new Regulation 736)
09/04/2015
S.1.5. Standardisation Meeting
5
Standardisation Inspection Process Overview
Visits to Undertakings
Undertakings are visited as samples to evaluate the
oversight activities by NSA.
No findings, only Undertaking Non-Compliances
(UNCs), can be raised by EASA against undertakings.
UNCs are used to substantiate findings to be resolved
by NSA.
NSA is the competent authority.
No de-briefing to undertakings by EASA.
09/04/2015
S.1.5. Standardisation Meeting
6
Addressing ADQ
Regulatory requirement:
Reg.(EU) 1035/2011 Annex IV:
Specific requirements for the provision of aeronautical information services
2. WORKING METHODS AND OPERATING PROCEDURES
Providers of aeronautical information services shall be able to demonstrate that
their working methods and operating procedures are compliant with the
standards in:
(a) Commission Regulation (EU) No 73/2010 ( 1 );
To address the above mention requirement EASA has two
counterparts:
NSAs
ANSPs (Undertakings)
09/04/2015
S.1.5.
7
Addressing ADQ
What we can address at the NSA level :
Whether this requirement was checked during “certification or
recertification process of ANSP”
Important issue is the applicability of Reg.(EU) 73/2010
Reg.(EU) 73/2010 applies
with some options for derogation
2013
1 July 2013
2014
NSA should verify compliance during
certification of new ANSP (AISP)
or recertification of existing ANSP (AISP)
09/04/2015
S.1.5.
8
Addressing ADQ
Or whether it was addressed during the on-going oversight cycle
Reg.(EU) 73/2010 applies
with some options for derogation
2013
Note:
1.7.2013
2014
NSA should verify compliance during oversight
cycle in case of no need of certification or
recertification of AISP
Oversight cycles is define in art.7§3(d) of Reg. (EU) 1034/2011
“ensure that sufficient audits are conducted over a period of 2 years to check the compliance of all
these organisations with applicable safety regulatory requirements in all the relevant areas of the
functional system”
Important all depends on NSA planning of two years period, when it starts and when AIS part is
addressed.
09/04/2015
S.1.5.
9
Addressing ADQ
What we can address at ANSP level :
WORKING METHODS AND OPERATING PROCEDURES
We will sample and check whether working methods and
operating procedures are addressing the applicable
requirements stemming from Reg.(EU) 73/2010 for AISP
E.g. Art.7§2
Aeronautical information service providers shall ensure that aeronautical data and
aeronautical information items published in the AIP of their Member State are annotated
to indicate those that do not meet the data quality requirements laid down in this
Regulation.
If not “UNC” will be raised and the CA/NSA will have to
solve it
09/04/2015
S.1.5.
10
Q/A?