ERP/SAP in Public
Administration
Matthijs Kerkvliet
Agenda
•
Doha 2009, 18th meeting of WGITA
•
Activities after Doha
•
Results of the questionnaire
•
Proposal to continue
•
Discussion
2
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Doha 2009
•
Views of project team
members
•
Discussion about scope
•
Decision: Rethink project by:
–Defining scope
–Assess needs and contributions
3
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Activities after Doha
•
Further scoping
•
Online survey, autumn 2009
(all 37 WGITA-members)
•
Rethink project
4
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Survey results
Country experience: Global map
6
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Country experience: Europe
7
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
ERP-systems in use: Global map
8
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
ERP-systems in use: Europe
9
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI audit experience: Global map
10
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI audit experience: Europe
11
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI audit views: Global map
12
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI audit views: Europe
13
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI guidance needs: Global map
14
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI guidance needs: Europe
15
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI contribution: Global map
16
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI contribution: Europe
17
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI contribution views: Global map
18
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
SAI contribution views: Europe
19
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Summary of survey results
•
Response: low (14 out of 37)
•
Needs:
–9 SAIs expressed needs
–Needs vary (‘we want it all’)
•
Contribution:
–6 SAIs prepared or able to contribute
–Contribution mainly technical issues
20
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Conclusions
•
Costs/ benefits don’t justify to proceed
as planned
(One or two guidance papers won’t fulfil
the needs)
•
Find another way of knowledge sharing
21
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Proposal
•
Share knowledge and guidance material
bilaterally
•
Start this by connecting demand and
supply of expertise during the meeting
•
NL prepared to facilitate
22
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Mapping needs and contribution
Use
Implementation
Phase
23
View
Country (needs)
Country (contribution)
Technical
Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania,
Sweden, Slovakia, Poland,
Colombia
Slovakia, Colombia,
South Africa
Netherlands
Organisational
Netherlands,
Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania,
Sweden, Slovakia, Poland,
Colombia
Political
Netherlands, Kuwait,
Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia,
Poland, Colombia
Netherlands, Slovakia
Technical
Australia, Kuwait, Austria,
Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia,
Poland, Colombia
Australia, Canada,
Slovakia, Colombia,
South Africa
Organisational
Netherlands,
Kuwait, Austria, Lithuania,
Sweden, Slovakia, Poland,
Colombia
Political
Netherlands, Kuwait,
Lithuania, Sweden, Slovakia,
Poland, Colombia
Slovakia
ERP/SAP in Public Administration - 19th WGITA - Beijing April 2010
Discussion