Sustainability at Sea - Slides

advertisement

Sustainability at Sea:

Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes

Mark White, University of Virginia

Dan Abel, Coastal Carolina University

Amy Predmore, Charlottesville

Erin Webb, Commerce/ETP ’12

Sarah Peterson, Politics ’11

Version 2-0

you are here

the margin for action narrows

580 students / 32 faculty

90 classes

250 field practica/trips

26,000 miles

109 days

15 ports in 10 countries

One Earth, One Future

Sustainability is the theme of the Spring 2010 voyage of Semester at Sea.

We define sustainability as a “society of permanence” – a world in which humanity ensures its well-being across the generations by improving the stability of ecological and sociocultural systems ...

4

SOURCE: SAS Voyage Theme, Spring 2010

DOMINANT

SOCIAL PARADIGM

• Support for free enterprise

• Belief in unlimited growth

• Commitment to limited government

• Devotion to private property rights

• Emphasis on individualism

• Faith in science and technology

• Faith in future material abundance and prosperity

• Support for the status quo

NEW

ECOLOGICAL PARADIGM

• Recognition of limited resources

• Awareness of the fragility of nature’s balance

• Rejection of human exemptionalism

Ecocentric vs. anthropocentric point of view

• Belief in the probability of an eco-crisis aka “Spaceship Earth

Dunlap and van Liere (1978); Dunlap et al. (2000)

5

Sustainability on the Voyage

What Did We Do?

Empirical Study

6

global studies elective courses field practica evening programs co-curricular activities “walking the talk”

7

8

Empirical Study

New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) Scale

Dunlap and Van Liere (1978); Dunlap et al. (2000)

Research Questions

1.

Are our results comparable with other studies? (validity)

2.

How is ecological worldview related to various demographic characteristics?

3.

Did participation in the voyage shift students’ ecological worldview and/or environmental attitudes?

9

Characteristics of the

Sample Population

• n = 215

• 71% female

• 68% juniors

• variety of disciplines

26% business/economics

• diversity of geographic regions, institutional sizes,

Sustainability Report Card scores

11

Comparisons with Other Studies

56.88 Pre-Survey

50.86 - 57.08 USA students

Hawcroft and Milfont, 2010

57.14

Post-Survey

Range = +15 (weak ecological worldview) to +75 (strong ecological worldview)

12

NEP Scores and Demographic Characteristics

75

65

35

25

55

45

15

Females Males Western

Regions

Non-

Western

Regions

Business

Majors

Non-

Business

Majors

13

14

Shifts in Pre- and Post-Survey

Environmental Attitudes

Human ingenuity will insure that we do NOT make the earth unlivable (4)

Anti-Exemption

Anti-Anthropomorphism

Humans will eventually learn enough about how nature works to control it (14)

Human have the right to modify the natural world to suit their needs (2)

The so-called “ecological crisis” facing humankind has been greatly exaggerated (10)

The earth has plenty of natural resources if we just learn how to develop them (6)

0 1 2

1 = Strongly agree, 2 = Mildly agree, 3 = Unsure, 4 = Mildly disagree, 5 = strongly disagree.

Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Greater disagreement with even-numbered items indicates greater acceptance of the NEP.

3

Limits

4

Eco-Crisis

Pre-Survey

Post-Survey

5

15

Change in NEP Scores and Report Card Grades

6.00

4.00

2.00

0.00

-2.00

-4.00

-6.00

Below Average Average Above Average

Sustainability Report Card Grades

16

Summary

Around-the-world sustainability-themed voyage

Learning objective = changed worldview

Integrated curricular and co-curricular activities

Survey evidence

Behavioral evidence

Anecdotal evidence

17

“Now, let me share with you one word, “sustainability” … I cannot possibly share with you all that I have learned about our environmentally twisted planet from these past four months but I can give you a summary. We’re on the wrong track. The state of this planet both environmentally and socially is heading down a road that we probably shouldn’t be on …

Environmentally, the planet is heating up.

Like a bowl of microwaveable Easy-Mac, bad things happen when you let it get too hot. To identify only a few concerns from the extensive list of issues, waters are rising, extinction is becoming too common, and many lives, both human and not, are at risk.

18

“Each day in the classroom we were pummeled and overwhelmed with information regarding the unstable conditions of our planet. We saw current problems, potential future ones, and learned of catastrophic possibilities. I won’t lie to you -- we didn’t stop global warming. We didn’t eradicate hunger or end poverty. In fact, we may have only shot one tiny bullet in this battle for the improvement of our planet. But as the old saying goes, “knowledge is power!” It is.

Trust me. What we learned from this program was all the weapons and coat of arms we need to have a chance in winning this fight. By arming us with knowledge for both now and the future, 586 students disembarked yesterday with a firm grasp on what needs to be done to support the soil we stand on.

-- Chris Constantine http://chrisconstantinesas.blogspot.com/2010_05_01_archive.html

19

Environmental Attitudes in Germany and the USA

Sarah Peterson, Harrison Award (2010-11)

QuickTime™ and a

TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are needed to see this picture.

Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 1712-1778

• US business students will be less likely to support the NEP than German business students; neither group will strongly support the NEP

• American students will express more support for the DSP tenets of human exemptionalism, exaggeration of ecocrises, and anthropocentrism

QuickTime™ and a

TIFF (Uncompress ed) dec ompres sor are needed t o s ee this pic ture.

• The difference between the two groups on the issue of limits to human growth will be less distinct

John Locke, 1632-1704

21

If You’d Like to Learn More ...

White, M. A., Abel, D. & A. Predmore (2011). Transformative Sustainability Education in a

Shipboard Living-learning Community. Forthcoming in World Trends in Education for

Sustainable Development, W. Leal, Ed., Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

White, M. A., Predmore, A. and D. Abel. (2011). Effectiveness of a Seagoing Global Immersion

Program in Fostering Ecological Awareness. Working paper. Under review at the Journal of Environmental Education

Dunlap, R. E., & van Liere, K. D. (1978). The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’: A Proposed

Measuring Instrument and Preliminary Results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-

19.

Dunlap, R. E., van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the

New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.

Hawcroft, L. J., & Milfont, T. L. (2010). The Use (and Abuse) of the New Environmental

Paradigm Scale over the Last 30 years: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental

Psychology, 30, 143-158.

22

Sustainability at Sea:

Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes

Mark White, University of Virginia

Dan Abel, Coastal Carolina University

Amy Predmore, Charlottesville

Erin Webb, Commerce/ETP ’12

Sarah Peterson, Politics ’11

Version 1-8

Download