Uploaded by Cater Kaine

chapter 4-ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS

advertisement
Chapter Four: ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES
4.1
Introduction
EQUIVALENCE
It is important to note that a series connection of current sources or a parallel connection of voltage sources is
forbidden unless the sources are pointing in the same direction and have exactly the same values.
Table 4.1: Equivalent circuit forms
LINEARITY
All the circuits we have analyzed thus far have been linear circuits, which are described by a set of linear
algebraic equations. Linearity requires both additivity and homogeneity (scaling). It can be shown that the
circuits that we are examining satisfy this important property. The following example illustrates one way in
which this property can be used.
′
For the circuit shown in Fig. 4.1, we wish to determine the output voltage π‘‰π‘œπ‘’π‘‘
. However, rather than
′
′
approach the problem in a straightforward manner and calculate 𝐼0 then 𝐼1 then 𝐼2′ , and so on, we will use
linearity and simply assume that the output voltage is π‘‰π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ = 1𝑉. This assumption will yield a value for the
source voltage. We will then use the actual value of the source voltage and linearity to compute the actual
′
value of π‘‰π‘œπ‘’π‘‘
.
π΄π‘ π‘ π‘’π‘šπ‘–π‘›π‘” π‘‰π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ = 𝑉2 = 1𝑉
Then 𝐼2 =
𝑉2
2π‘˜
= 0.5 π‘šπ΄
𝑉1 can be calculated as 𝑉1 = 4π‘˜πΌ2 + 𝑉2 = 3𝑉
𝑉
Hence 𝐼1 = 3π‘˜1 = 1π‘šπ΄
Applying KCL, 𝐼0 = 𝐼1 + 𝐼2 = 1.5 π‘šπ΄
𝑉0 = 2π‘˜πΌ0 + 𝑉1 = 6𝑉
Therefore the assumption that π‘‰π‘œπ‘’π‘‘ = 1𝑉 produced a source voltage of 6V. However, since the actual source
voltage is 12V, the actual output voltage is 1V(12/6)=2V.
1|Page
Figure 4.1
Exercise
Use linearity and the assumption that 𝐼0 = 1π‘šπ΄ to compute the correct current 𝐼0 in the circuit in fig. below
if I = 6 mA. (3mA)
4.2
Superposition
The principle of superposition states that “In any linear circuit containing multiple independent sources, the
current or voltage at any point in the network may be calculated as the algebraic sum of the individual
contributions of each source acting alone”
When determining the contribution due to an independent source, any remaining voltage sources are made
zero by replacing them with short circuits, and any remaining current sources are made zero by replacing
them with open circuits.
Although superposition can be used in linear networks containing dependent sources, it is not useful in this
case since the dependent source is never made zero.
Let us use superposition to find Vo in the circuit in Fig. 4.2a.
Figure 4.2
2|Page
Considering the 2-mA source (4.2 b).
Using current division
2
1π‘˜ + 2π‘˜
οΏ½ = π‘šπ΄, π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑉0′ = 𝐼0 (6π‘˜) = 4𝑉
𝐼0 = (2 × 10−3 ) οΏ½
3
1π‘˜ + 2π‘˜ + 6π‘˜
Considering the 3-V source (4.2c). using voltage division
6π‘˜
οΏ½ = 2𝑉
𝑉0′′ = 3 οΏ½
1π‘˜ + 2π‘˜ + 6π‘˜
𝑉0 = 𝑉0′ + 𝑉0′′ = 6𝑉
Exercise: Use nodal analysis to prove the result
Example 2
Consider now the network in Fig. 4.3a. Let us use superposition to find 𝑉0′ .
Figure 4.3
Considering 6-V source (4.3b, c)
By voltage division
8
π‘˜
24
οΏ½=
𝑉
𝑉1 = 6 οΏ½ 3
8
7
π‘˜ + 2π‘˜
3
Applying voltage division again
6π‘˜
18
𝑉0′ = 𝑉1 οΏ½
οΏ½=
𝑉
6π‘˜ + 2π‘˜
7
Considering 2-mA source (4.3 d, e)
3|Page
10
𝑉0′′ = (2 × 10−3 ) οΏ½ π‘˜//6π‘˜οΏ½ = 30/7𝑉
3
48
𝑉
𝑉0 = 𝑉0′ + 𝑉0′′ =
7
A nodal analysis of the network can be performed using fig. 4.3 f. The equation for the supernode is
(𝑉0 − 6) − 𝑉1 𝑉0 − 𝑉1 𝑉0
−2 × 10−3 +
+
+
=0
2π‘˜
4π‘˜
6π‘˜
The equation for the node labeled 𝑉1 is
𝑉1 − 𝑉0 𝑉1 − (𝑉0 − 6) 𝑉1
+
+
=0
4π‘˜
2π‘˜
2π‘˜
Solving the two equations gives
48
𝑉0 =
𝑉
7
Exercise: Refer to figure 4.3f and use mesh analysis to obtain the result.
Exercise
Compute 𝑉0 in circuit below using superposition. (4/3 V)
Compute 𝑉0 in circuit below using superposition. (5.6 V)
Find I0 in Fig. below using superposition.(-2/3 mA)
4|Page
4.3
Thévenin’s and Norton’s Theorems
Suppose that we are given a circuit and that we wish to find the current, voltage, or power that is delivered to
some resistor of the network, which we will call the load. Thévenin’s theorem tells us that we can replace the
entire network, exclusive of the load, by an equivalent circuit that contains only an independent voltage
source in series with a resistor in such a way that the current–voltage relationship at the load is unchanged.
Norton’s theorem is identical to the preceding statement except that the equivalent circuit is an independent
current source in parallel with a resistor.
Note that this is a very important result. It tells us that if we examine any network from a pair of terminals,
we know that with respect to those terminals, the entire network is equivalent to a simple circuit consisting of
an independent voltage source in series with a resistor or an independent current source in parallel with a
resistor.
Applying Thévenin’s Theorem
Step 1. Remove the load and find the voltage across the open-circuit terminals.
Step 2. Determine the Thévenin equivalent resistance of the network at the open terminals with the load
removed. Three different types of circuits may be encountered in determining the resistance,
a) If the circuit contains only independent sources, they are made zero by replacing the voltage sources
with short circuits and the current sources with open circuits. RTh is then found by computing the
resistance of the purely resistive network at the open terminals.
b) If the circuit contains only dependent sources, an independent voltage or current source is applied at the
open terminals and the corresponding current or voltage at these terminals is measured. The
voltage/current ratio at the terminals is the Thévenin equivalent resistance. Since there is no energy
source, the open-circuit voltage is zero in this case.
c) If the circuit contains both independent and dependent sources, the open-circuit terminals are shorted
and the short-circuit current between these terminals is determined. The ratio of the open-circuit
voltage to the short-circuit current is the resistance
Step 3. If the load is now connected to the Thévenin equivalent circuit, consisting of RTh in series with VTh
the desired solution can be obtained.
Applying Norton’s Theorem
The problem-solving strategy for Norton’s theorem is essentially the same as that for Thévenin’s theorem
with the exception that we are dealing with the short-circuit current instead of the open-circuit voltage.
CIRCUITS CONTAINING ONLY INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Example
Let us use Thévenin’s and Norton’s theorems to find V0 in the network in figure 4.2. Its redrawn in figure
4.4a.
To determine the Thévenin equivalent, we break the network at the 6kΩ load as shown in Fig. 4.4b.
KVL indicates that the open-circuit voltage
π‘‰π‘œπ‘  = 3𝑉 + 𝑉1
𝑉1 = (2 × 10−3 )(1π‘˜ + 2π‘˜) = 6𝑉
π‘‰π‘œπ‘  = 9𝑉.
Therefore, By making both sources zero, we can find the Thévenin equivalent resistance, using the circuit in
Fig 4.4c.
π‘…π‘‡β„Ž = 3π‘˜π›Ί
Figure 4.4d shows the Thévenin’s equivalent circuit.
Using a simple voltage divider, we find that 𝑉0 = 6𝑉.
5|Page
Figure 4.4
To determine the Norton equivalent circuit at the terminals of the load, we must find the short-circuit current
as shown in Fig. 4.4e. Note that the short circuit causes the 3-V source to be directly across (i.e., in parallel
with) the resistors and the current source. Therefore, 𝐼1 =
3
1π‘˜+2π‘˜
= 1π‘šπ΄
Then, using KCL, 𝐼𝑠𝑐 = 3π‘šπ΄ .We have already determined π‘…π‘‡β„Ž , and, therefore, connecting the Norton
equivalent to the load results in the circuit in Fig. 4.4f.
Hence 𝑉0 , is equal to the source current multiplied by the parallel resistor combination, which is 6 V.
Example 2
Let us use Thévenin’s theorem to find 𝑉0 in the network in Fig. 4.4a.
Figure 4.4
If we break the network to the left of the current source, the open-circuit voltage π‘‰π‘œπ‘1 is as shown in Fig.
4.4b. Since there is no current in the 2kΩ resistor and therefore no voltage across it, π‘‰π‘œπ‘1 is equal to the
voltage across the 6-k Ω resistor, which can be determined by voltage division as
6π‘˜
π‘‰π‘œπ‘1 = 12 οΏ½
οΏ½ = 8𝑉
6π‘˜ + 3π‘˜
6|Page
The Thévenin equivalent resistance π‘…π‘‡β„Ž1 , is found from Fig. 4.4c as
π‘…π‘‡β„Ž1 = 2π‘˜ + 3π‘˜//6π‘˜ = 4π‘˜π›Ί.
Connecting this Thévenin equivalent back to the original network produces the circuit shown in Fig. 4.4d.
We can now apply Thévenin’s theorem again, and this time we break the network to the right of the current
source as shown in Fig. 4.4e. In this case π‘‰π‘œπ‘2 is
π‘‰π‘œπ‘2 = (2π‘š)(4π‘˜) + 8 = 16𝑉.
And π‘…π‘‡β„Ž2 = 4π‘˜π›Ί.
Connecting this Thévenin equivalent to the remainder of the network produces the circuit shown in Fig. 4.4g.
Simple voltage division applied to this final network yields π‘‰π‘œ = 8𝑉 .
Exercise: Use Norton’s theorem to solve the above example.
Exercise
Use the two theorems and solve V0 in the circuit below. (48/7 V)
Find I0 using Norton’s theorem in the figure below (-0.587mA)
.
CIRCUITS CONTAINING ONLY DEPENDENT SOURCES
We wish to determine the Thévenin equivalent of the network in Fig. 4.5a at the terminals A-B.
Our approach to this problem will be to apply a 1V voltage source at the terminals A-B and then compute the
current 𝐼0 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘…π‘‘β„Ž = 1/𝐼0.
The equations for the network in Fig. 4.5b are as follows. KVL around the outer loop specifies that
𝑉1 + 𝑉π‘₯ = 1
KCL equation at node 𝑉1 is
𝑉1 𝑉1 − 2𝑉π‘₯ 𝑉1 − 1
+
+
=0
1π‘˜
2π‘˜
1π‘˜
𝑉π‘₯ = 3/7𝑉.
7|Page
Figure 4.5
We can now compute the currents
3
1
1
𝐼1 = π‘šπ΄, 𝐼2 = π‘šπ΄, 𝐼3 = π‘šπ΄
7
7
2
15
And thus 𝐼0 = 𝐼1 + 𝐼2 + 𝐼3 = π‘šπ΄ and π‘…π‘‘β„Ž =
14
1
𝐼0
=
14
π‘˜π›Ί.
14
Exercise: Determine π‘…π‘‘β„Ž at the terminals A-B for the network in Fig. below (10/7kΩ)
CIRCUITS CONTAINING BOTH INDEPENDENT AND DEPENDENT SOURCES
In these types of circuits we must calculate both the open-circuit voltage and short-circuit current to calculate
the Thévenin equivalent resistance. Furthermore, we must remember that we cannot split the dependent
source and its controlling variable when we break the network to find the Thévenin or Norton equivalent.
Example
Let us use Thévenin’s theorem to find π‘‰π‘œ in the network in Fig. 4.6a.
8|Page
Figure 4.6
To begin, we break the network at points A-B. Could we break it just to the right of the 12-V source? No!
Why? The open-circuit voltage is calculated from the network in Fig. 4.6b. Note that we now use the source
2000𝐼π‘₯′ because this circuit is different from that in Fig. 4.6a. KCL for the supernode around the 12-V source
is
(π‘‰π‘œπ‘ + 12) − (−2000𝐼π‘₯′ ) π‘‰π‘œπ‘ + 12 π‘‰π‘œπ‘
+
+
=0
2π‘˜
1π‘˜
2π‘˜
π‘‰π‘œπ‘
Where 𝐼π‘₯′ = 2π‘˜
, yielding π‘‰π‘œπ‘ = −6𝑉.
𝐼𝑠𝑐 can be calculated from the circuit in Fig. 4.6c. Note that the presence of the short circuit forces 𝐼π‘₯′′ to
zero and, therefore, the network is reduced to that shown in Fig. 4.6d.
Therefore
12
𝐼𝑠𝑐 = −
= −18π‘šπ΄
2
π‘˜
3
𝑉
1
Then π‘…π‘‘β„Ž = π‘œπ‘ = π‘˜π›Ί.
𝐼𝑠𝑐
3
Connecting the Thévenin equivalent circuit to the remainder of the network at terminals A-B produces the
circuit in Fig. 4.6e. At this point, simple voltage division yields
𝑉0 = (−6) οΏ½
Example 2
1π‘˜
1
1π‘˜ + 1π‘˜ + π‘˜
3
οΏ½=−
18
𝑉
7
Let us use Thévenin’s theorem to find π‘‰π‘œ in the network in Fig. 4.7a.
9|Page
Figure 4.7
π‘‰π‘œπ‘ is determined from the network in Fig. 4.7b. Note that
𝑉π‘₯′
𝑉π‘₯′
𝐼2 = 2π‘šπ΄ π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ 𝑉π‘₯′ = 4π‘˜ οΏ½ − 2π‘šοΏ½
𝐼1 =
2π‘˜
2π‘˜
Solving these yields 𝐼1 = 4π‘šπ΄ and hence π‘‰π‘œπ‘ = 2π‘˜πΌ1 + 3 = 11𝑉
𝐼𝑠𝑐 is derived from the circuit in Fig. 4.7c. Note that if we collapse the short circuit, the network is reduced
′
we can easily find the branch currents
to that in Fig. 4.7d. Although we have temporarily lost sight of 𝐼𝑠𝑐
′
and they, in turn, will yield 𝐼𝑠𝑐 .
KCL at the node at the bottom left of the network is
𝑉π‘₯′′
𝑉π‘₯′′
=
− 2 × 10−3
4π‘˜ 2000
Or 𝑉π‘₯′′ = 8𝑉
3
3
𝐼3 =
= π‘šπ΄
2π‘˜ 2
𝑉π‘₯′′
11
𝐼𝑠𝑐 =
+ 𝐼3 =
π‘šπ΄
2000
2
𝑉
Then π‘…π‘‡β„Ž = πΌπ‘œπ‘ = 2π‘˜π›Ί.
𝑠𝑐
Connecting the Thévenin equivalent circuit to the remainder of the original network produces the circuit in
Fig. 4.7e. Simple voltage division yields π‘‰π‘œ =
Exercise
33
𝑉.
4
Find π‘‰π‘œ in the fig. below using Thévenin’s theorem. (6.29V)
10 | P a g e
4.4
Maximum Power Transfer
In circuit analysis we are sometimes interested in determining the maximum power that can be delivered to a
load. By employing Thévenin’s theorem, we can determine the maximum power that a circuit can supply and
the manner in which to adjust the load to effect maximum power transfer.
Suppose that we are given the circuit shown in Fig. 4.8. The power that is delivered to the load is given by
the expression
Figure 4.8: Equivalent circuit for examining maximum power transfer
2
𝑣
π‘ƒπ‘™π‘œπ‘Žπ‘‘ = 𝑖 2 𝑅𝐿 = οΏ½
οΏ½ 𝑅𝐿
𝑅 + 𝑅𝐿
We want to determine the value of 𝑅𝐿 that maximizes this quantity. Hence, we differentiate
this expression with respect to 𝑅𝐿 and equate the derivative to zero:
π‘‘π‘ƒπ‘™π‘œπ‘Žπ‘‘ (𝑅 + 𝑅𝐿 )2 𝑣 2 − 2𝑣 2 𝑅𝐿 (𝑅 + 𝑅𝐿 )
=
=0
(𝑅 + 𝑅𝐿 )4
𝑑𝑅𝐿
Which yields
𝑅𝐿 = 𝑅
In other words, maximum power transfer takes place when 𝑅𝐿 = 𝑅
Although this is a very important result, we have derived it using the simple network in Fig. 5.19. However,
we should recall that v and R in Fig. 4.8 could represent the Thévenin equivalent circuit for any linear
network.
Example
Let us find the value of𝑅𝐿 for maximum power transfer in the network in Fig. 4.9a and the maximum power
that can be transferred to this load.
Figure 4.9
11 | P a g e
To begin, we derive the Thévenin equivalent circuit for the network exclusive of the load.
Voc can be calculated from the circuit in Fig. 4.9b. The mesh equations for the network are
𝐼1 = 2 × 10−3
3π‘˜(𝐼2 − 𝐼1 ) + 6π‘˜πΌ2 + 3 = 0
1
3
Solving the two, gives 𝐼2 = π‘šπ΄, β„Žπ‘’π‘›π‘π‘’ π‘‰π‘œπ‘ = 4π‘˜πΌ1 + 6π‘˜πΌ2 = 10𝑉
π‘…π‘‘β„Ž 𝑖𝑠 6π‘˜π›Ί; π‘‡β„Žπ‘’π‘  𝑅𝐿 = π‘…π‘‡β„Ž = 6π‘˜π›Ί for maximum power transfer.
The maximum power transferred to the load in Fig. 4.9d is
10 2
25
οΏ½ (6π‘˜) =
π‘šπ‘Š
𝑃𝐿 = οΏ½
12π‘˜
6
Exercise
Find RL for maximum transfer and the maximum power transferred to RL in the figure below. (24/13kΩ,
27/26mW)
12 | P a g e
Download