Uploaded by David8Chai

Security studies 11092019

advertisement
Security studies 11092019
Levels of analysis
Realism
Liberalism
International System Level of Analysis




Alliances
Intergovernmental Organizations
International norms/rules
Multinational Corporation
Realist Claims





Individuals are selfish & powerseeking
States pursue national interest
International system is anarchy
Goal is to reduce insecurity
Rely on balance of power & deterrence
Key Assumptions



Humans organize in groups (groupism)
Humans are concerned about themselves (egoism)
Humans seek to dominate others (power-centrism)
Classical Realist Assumptions about Human
Nature & Human Relations



People seek power
People are selfish
People are antagonistic
Neorealism






International Structure
Anarchy
State capabilities
Balance of Power
International cooperation difficult
Domestic politics irrelevant
Other Types of Realism



Defensive realism
Offensive realism
Neoclassical realism
What causes international stability?




Individual freedom
Political participation
Private property
Equality of opportunity
International Peace & Security



Democratic states
Trade
International Organizations
Economic Interdependence & Peace


Leaders avoid costs of war
Private businesses pressure government
Neoliberal Institutionalism


People cooperate out of self-interest
International institutions mitigate conflict
How do international institutions mitigate
conflict?




Cooperate to promote peace
Mediate disputes or provide arbitration
Monitor compliance with agreements
Promote conflict-reducing norms
Conclusion



Levels of Analysis
Realism
Liberalism
New class woo
Outline




Concept
Philosophies of War
Functions of War
Causes of War
Concept of War
Groups using organized violence for collective purpose. War is connected to core sources of
human identity such as heroism, sacrifice, honour & peace. Although war is possible because
people are biologically predisposed for violence, biology is not destiny.
Political




Act of violence intended to compel opponent to fulfill will
Rational instrument to achieve a goal
Goal is victory in battle
Key actors are people, government, military
Eschatological

Teleological view of history


"Final" war leading to unfolding of grand design
Examples: Crusaders, Nazi doctrine of master race, global caliphate
Cataclysm



War is catastrophe
Ethnocentric - war affects "us"
Global - war affects humanity as a whole
New Wars





Cannot tell combatant and civilian
Driven by economic aspirations
Asymmetric actors, military capabilities, methods of warfare
Exclusive concpetions of identity used to seize political power
New forms of international terrorism
Conclusion




Concept
Philosophies of War
Functions of War
Causes of War
Download