Chapter 11
Cash Flow Estimation
and Risk Analysis
ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS
11-1
a. Cash flow, which is the relevant financial variable, represents the actual flow of cash.
Accounting income, on the other hand, reports accounting data as defined by
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
b. Incremental cash flows are those cash flows that arise solely from the asset that is
being evaluated. For example, assume an existing machine generates revenues of
$1,000 per year and expenses of $600 per year. A machine being considered as a
replacement would generate revenues of $1,000 per year and expenses of $400 per
year. On an incremental basis, the new machine would not increase revenues at all,
but would decrease expenses by $200 per year. Thus, the annual incremental cash
flow is a before-tax savings of $200. A sunk cost is one that has already occurred and
is not affected by the capital project decision. Sunk costs are not relevant to capital
budgeting decisions. Within the context of this chapter, an opportunity cost is a cash
flow that a firm must forgo to accept a project. For example, if the project requires
the use of a building that could otherwise be sold, the market value of the building is
an opportunity cost of the project.
c. Net operating working capital changes are the increases in current operating assets
resulting from accepting a project less the resulting increases in current operating
liabilities, or accruals and accounts payable. A net operating working capital change
must be financed just as a firm must finance its increases in fixed assets. Salvage
value is the market value of an asset after its useful life. Salvage values and their tax
effects must be included in project cash flow estimation.
d. The real rate of return (rr), or, for that matter the real cost of capital, contains no
adjustment for expected inflation. If net cash flows from a project do not include
inflation adjustments, then the cash flows should be discounted at the real cost of
capital. In a similar manner, the IRR resulting from real net cash flows should be
compared with the real cost of capital. Conversely, the nominal rate of return (r NOM)
does include an inflation adjustment (premium). Thus if nominal rates of return are
used in the capital budgeting process, the net cash flows must also be nominal.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 1
e. Sensitivity analysis indicates exactly how much NPV or other output variables such
as IRR or MIRR will change in response to a given change in an input variable, other
things held constant. Sensitivity analysis is sometimes called “what if” analysis
because it answers this type of question. Scenario analysis is a shorter version of
simulation analysis that uses only a few outcomes. Often the outcomes considered
are optimistic, pessimistic and most likely. Monte Carlo simulation analysis is a risk
analysis technique in which a computer is used to simulate probable future events and
thus to estimate the profitability and risk of a project.
f. A risk-adjusted discount rate incorporates the risk of the project’s cash flows. The
cost of capital to the firm reflects the average risk of the firm’s existing projects.
Thus, new projects that are riskier than existing projects should have a higher riskadjusted discount rate. Conversely, projects with less risk should have a lower riskadjusted discount rate. This adjustment process also applies to a firm’s divisions.
Risk differences are difficult to quantify, thus risk adjustments are often subjective in
nature. A project’s cost of capital is its risk-adjusted discount rate for that project.
g. Real options occur when managers can influence the size and risk of a project’s cash
flows by taking different actions during the project’s life. They are referred to as real
options because they deal with real as opposed to financial assets. They are also
called managerial options because they give opportunities to managers to respond to
changing market conditions. Sometimes they are called strategic options because
they often deal with strategic issues. Finally, they are also called embedded options
because they are a part of another project.
h. Investment timing options give companies the option to delay a project rather than
implement it immediately. This option to wait allows a company to reduce the
uncertainty of market conditions before it decides to implement the project. Capacity
options allow a company to change the capacity of their output in response to
changing market conditions. This includes the option to contract or expand
production. Growth options allow a company to expand if market demand is higher
than expected. This includes the opportunity to expand into different geographic
markets and the opportunity to introduce complementary or second-generation
products. It also includes the option to abandon a project if market conditions
deteriorate too much.
11-2
Only cash can be spent or reinvested, and since accounting profits do not represent cash,
they are of less fundamental importance than cash flows for investment analysis. Recall
that in the stock valuation chapters we focused on dividends and free cash flows, which
represent cash flows, rather than on earnings per share, which represent accounting
profits.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 2
11-3
Since the cost of capital includes a premium for expected inflation, failure to adjust cash
flows means that the denominator, but not the numerator, rises with inflation, and this
lowers the calculated NPV.
11-4
Capital budgeting analysis should only include those cash flows which will be affected
by the decision. Sunk costs are unrecoverable and cannot be changed, so they have no
bearing on the capital budgeting decision. Opportunity costs represent the cash flows the
firm gives up by investing in this project rather than its next best alternative, and
externalities are the cash flows (both positive and negative) to other projects that result
from the firm taking on this project. These cash flows occur only because the firm took
on the capital budgeting project; therefore, they must be included in the analysis.
11-5
When a firm takes on a new capital budgeting project, it typically must increase its
investment in receivables and inventories, over and above the increase in payables and
accruals, thus increasing its net operating working capital. Since this increase must be
financed, it is included as an outflow in Year 0 of the analysis. At the end of the project’s
life, inventories are depleted and receivables are collected. Thus, there is a decrease in
NOWC, which is treated as an inflow.
11-6
Simulation analysis involves working with continuous probability distributions, and the
output of a simulation analysis is a distribution of net present values or rates of return.
Scenario analysis involves picking several points on the various probability distributions
and determining cash flows or rates of return for these points. Sensitivity analysis
involves determining the extent to which cash flows change, given a change in one
particular input variable. Simulation analysis is expensive. Therefore, it would more
than likely be employed in the decision for the $200 million investment in a satellite
system than in the decision for the $12,000 truck.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 3
SOLUTIONS TO END-OF-CHAPTER PROBLEMS
11-1
Equipment
NWC Investment
Initial investment outlay
$ 9,000,000
3,000,000
$12,000,000
11-2
Operating Cash Flows: t = 1
Sales revenues
Operating costs
Capital cost allowance (CCA)
Operating income before taxes
Taxes (28%)
Operating income after taxes
Add back CCA
Operating cash flow
$10,000,000
7,000,000
2,000,000
$ 1,000,000
280,000
$ 720,000
2,000,000
$ 2,720,000
11-3
Initial
Land
investment
Building &
Equipment
Total
$ 700,000 Cash inflows
$1,000,000
$1,700,000
Cranberry
apple product
Existing
apple product
Dried fruit
snack
Total inflows
$12,000,000
($2,000,000)
$1,000,000
$11,000,000
The original land cost is a sunk cost. The current market value is an opportunity cost
which must be considered. The feasibility study cost is a sunk cost. The decrease in apple
juice sales are due to cannibalization and should be considered, while the increase in fruit
snack sales is due to the complementary nature of the new product and should also be
considered.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 4
11–4
a.
Initial cost
Retooling cost =
$5,000,000
Re-training =
$80,000
Initial cost =
$5,080,000
The market research, R&D, and testing are all sunk costs, therefore they are not relevant
to the capital budgeting decision.
The design of the new HQ and subsequent construction costs are independent of the new
project and are therefore also not relevant.
b.
Annual cash flows before tax
Quantity sold x contribution margin:
Lost sales of existing product:
Increased fixed costs:
Annual cash flows before tax:
300,000 x $40 = $12,000,000
60,000 x $30 =
(1,800,000)
(200,000)
$10,000,000
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 5
11-5
a. The net cost is $126,000:
Price
($108,000)
Modification
(12,500)
Increase in NWC
(5,500)
Cash outlay for new machine ($126,000)
b. The operating cash flows follow:
Year 1
$44,000
15,400
$28,600
1. Project cash flows before tax
2. Tax (35%)
Project cash flows after tax
Year 2
$44,000
15,400
$28,600
Year 3
$44,000
15,400
$28,600
Using a financial calculator, input N = 30, I = 12, PMT = 28600, FV = 0 to solve for
PV = $68,692.
c. The present value of the CCA tax shield is
120,500 × 0.2 × 0.35 1 + 0.5 × 0.12 65,000 × 0.2 × 0.35
1
×
−
×
0.12 + 0.20
1 + 0.12
0.12 + 0.20
1 + 0.12
=
26,359.38
=
$14,827
×
0.946428571 –
14,218.75
×
3
0.711780247
d. The terminal year cash flow is $70,500:
Salvage value
Return of NWC
$65,000
5,500
$70,500
To calculate the present value of the terminal cash inflows, input N = 3, I = 12,
FV = 70500, PMT = 0, to solve for PV = $50,181.
e. The project has an NPV of $7,700; thus, it should be accepted.
NPV
=
=
=
Initial
investment
($126,000)
$7,700
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 6
+
+
PV Project
cash flows
$68,692
+
+
PVCCA
tax shield
$14,827
+
+
PV of ending
cash flows
$50,181
11 – 6
The initial investment is $780,000:
Equipment cost
Set up & training
Investment in NWC
Total
$700,000
30,000
50,000
$ 780,000
The present value of the after-tax project cash flows is $779,000:
(000s)
Sales
Less forgone rental income
Costs
Project cash flows before tax
Tax (28%)
Project cash flows after tax
Year 1
$2,500
100
2,100
$ 300
84
$ 216
Year 2
$2,500
100
2,100
$ 300
84
$ 216
Year 3
$2,500
100
2,100
$ 300
84
$ 216
Year 4
$2,500
100
2,100
$ 300
84
$ 216
Year 5
$2,500
100
2,100
$ 300
84
$ 216
Using a calculator to calculate the present value of the project cash flows after tax
input N = 5, I = 12, PMT = 216, FV = 0 and then solve for PV = $779.
The present value of the CCA tax shield is $130,235.

1
 730,000x 0.30x 0.28   1  0.5x 0.12   (700,000x10%) x 0.30x 0.28  


 x

 x
5 
0.12  0.30
0.12  0.30

  1  0.12  
  (1  0.12) 

146,000
x 0.946428571 14,000
x 0.567426855
 $130,235.
The present value of the ending cash flows is $68,091
Salvage value
Return of NWC
Total ending cash flow
$70,000
50,000
$120,000
With a calculator, to calculate the present value of the ending cash flows enter N = 5,
I = 12, FV = 120000, PMT = 0 and solve for PV = $68,091.
The NPV of the project is $197,326 therefore invest in the project.
NPV = ($780,000) + $779,000 + $130,235 + $68,091 = $197,326.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 7
11-7
a. Sales = 1,000($138)
Cost = 1,000($105)
Net before tax
Taxes (34%)
Net after tax
$138,000
105,000
$ 33,000
11,220
$ 21,780
Not considering inflation, NPV is -$4,800. This value is calculated as
-$150,000 +
$21,780
= -$4,800.
0.15
Considering inflation, the real cost of capital is calculated as follows:
(1 + rr)(1 + i) = 1.15
(1 + rr)(1.06) = 1.15
rr = 0.0849.
Thus, the NPV considering inflation is calculated as
-$150,000 +
$21,780
= $106,537.
0.0849
After adjusting for expected inflation, we see that the project has a positive NPV and
should be accepted. This demonstrates the bias that inflation can induce into the
capital budgeting process: Inflation is already reflected in the denominator (the cost
of capital), so it must also be reflected in the numerator.
b. If part of the costs were fixed, and hence did not rise with inflation, then sales
revenues would rise faster than total costs. However, when the plant wears out and
must be replaced, inflation will cause the replacement cost to jump, necessitating a
sharp output price increase to cover the now higher depreciation charges.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 8
11-8
Base Case
Sales
$3,000,000
Δ Price
Δ Quantity
Δ Variable cost
$2,700,000 $2,700,000
$3,000,000
Variable cost
1,200,000
1,200,000
1,080,000
1,320,000
Contribution margin
1,800,000
1,500,000
1,620,000
1,680,000
Fixed costs
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
Cash flow before tax
800,000
500,000
620,000
680,000
Tax
240,000
150,000
186,000
204,000
Cash flow after tax
$560,000
$350,000
$434,000
$476,000
+CCA tax shield 1
$120,000
$120,000
$120,000
$120,000
Project cash flows
$680,000
$470,000
$554,000
$596,000
PV5 years, 10% r
$2,577,735
$1,781,670 $2,100,096
$2,259,309
- Investment
$2,000,000
$2,000,000 $2,000,000
$2,000,000
NPV
$577,735
$218,330
$100,096
$259,309
For a 10% decrease in selling price NPV falls by $359,405 ($577,735 - $218,330).
For a 10% decrease in quantity sold NPV falls by $477,639 ($577,735 - $100,096).
For a 10% increase in variable cost NPV falls by $318,426 ($577,735 - $259,309).
1
CCA tax shield = (Capital cost/5) x tax rate = ($2,000,000/5) x 0.30 = $120,000
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 9
11-9
a.
The initial investment is $950,000 + $30,000 = $980,000.
The present value of the project’s cash flows is $741,610.
Sales
Delivery revenue
Variable costs
Project cash flows before tax
Taxes
Project cash flows after tax
$550,000
30,000
(330,000)
$250,000
(87,500)
$162,500
Using a calculator to calculate the present value of the project cash flows after tax input
N = 7, I = 12, PMT = 162500, FV = 0 and then solve for PV = $741,610.
The present value of the CCA tax shield is $219,122.

1
 950,000x 0.30x 0.35   1  0.5x 0.12   50,000x 0.30x 0.35  


 x

 x
7 
0.12  0.30
0.12  0.30

  1  0.12  
  (1  0.12) 

237,500
x 0.946428571 12,500 x 0.452349215
 $219,122.
The present value of the ending cash flows is $36,188.
Salvage value
Return of NWC
Total ending cash
flow
$50,000
30,000
$80,000
With a calculator, to calculate the present value of the ending cash flows enter N = 7,
I = 12, FV = 80000, PMT = 0 and solve for PV = $36,188.
The NPV of the project is $16,920, therefore invest in the project.
NPV = ($980,000) + $741,610 + $219,122 + $36,188 = $16,920.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 10
b.
The only item to be recalculated is the present value of the CCA tax shield.

1
 950,000x 0.50x 0.35   1  0.5x 0.12   50,000x 0.50x 0.35  


 x

 x
7 
0.12  0.50
0.12  0.50

  1  0.12  
  (1  0.12) 

268,145
x 0.946428571 14,113
x 0.452349215
 $247,396.
The new NPV is $45,194.
NPV = ($980,000) + $741,610 + $247,396 + $36,188 = $45,194.
11-10 a)
The initial investment is $124,000:
Equipment cost
Installation & training
Investment in NWC
Total
$100,000
20,000
4,000
$124,000
The present value of the after-tax project cash flows is $86,868:
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Project cash flows before tax
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
$40,000
Taxes (25%)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
(2,000)
(2,000)
(2,000)
(2,000)
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
$28,000
Net working capital
Project cash flows after tax
Using a calculator to calculate the present value of the project cash flows after tax, input
N = 4, I = 11, PMT = 28000, FV = 0 and then solve for PV = $86,868.
The present value of the CCA tax shield is $20,863.
 120,000 x0.30 x0.25   1  0.5 x0.11 

 x

0.11  0.30

  1  0.11 

21,951
x 0.95045045
 $20,863.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 11
The present value of the ending cash flows is $7,905:
Salvage value
Return of NWC
Total ending cash flow
$0
12,000
$12,000
Using a calculator, calculate the present value of the ending cash flows. Enter N = 4,
I = 11, FV = 12000, PMT = 0 and solve for PV = $7,905.
The NPV of the project is ($8,364), therefore do not invest in the new market.
NPV = ($124,000) + $86,868 + $20,863 + $7,905 = ($8,364).
b) The initial cost and present value of the project cash flows are not affected by the
salvage value therefore those costs remain the same. We need to recalculate the
present value of the CCA tax shield and the present value of the ending cash flows.
The present value of the CCA tax shield is $18,453:

1
 120,000x 0.30x 0.25   1  0.5x 0.11   20,000x 0.30x 0.25  


 x

 x
4 
0.11  0.30
0.11  0.30

  1  0.11  
  (1  0.11) 

21,951
x 0.95045045
3,659
x 0.658730974
 $18,453.
The present value of the ending cash flows is $21,079:
Salvage value
Return of NWC
Total ending cash flows
$20,000
12,000
$32,000
With a calculator, to calculate the present value of the ending cash flows enter N = 4,
I = 11, FV = 32000, PMT = 0 and solve for PV = $21,079.
The NPV of the project is $2,400 therefore invest in the new market.
NPV = ($124,000) + $86,868 + $18,453 + $21,079 = $2,400.
c) With no salvage value and a new CCA rate, we need to recalculate the PV of the CCA
tax shield and the PV of the ending cash flows.
 120,000 x0.10 x0.25   1  0.5 x0.11 

 x

0.11  0.10

  1  0.11 

14,286
x 0.95045045
 $13,578.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 12
The present value of the ending cash flows is $7,905:
Return of NWC
Total ending cash flows
12,000
$12,000
With a calculator, to calculate the present value of the ending cash flows enter N = 4,
I = 11, FV = 12000, PMT = 0 and solve for PV = $7,905.
The NPV of the project is ($15,649) therefore do not invest in the new market.
NPV = ($124,000) + $86,868 + $13,578 + $7,905 = ($15,649).
11-11 E(NPV) = 0.05(-$70) + 0.20(-$25) + 0.50($12) + 0.20($20) + 0.05($30)
= -$3.5 + -$5.0 + $6.0 + $4.0 + $1.5
= $3.0 million.
σNPV= [0.05(-$70 - $3)2 + 0.20(-$25 - $3)2 + 0.50($12 - $3)2
+ 0.20($20 - $3)2 + 0.05($30 - $3)2]0.5
= $23.622 million.
CV =
$23.622
= 7.874.
$3.0
11-12
Year
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
a
b
Beginning
UCC
$0
$3,875
$2,131.25
$7,372.19
$3,614.71
Additions or
disposals to
asset class
$5,000
Proceeds
$8,000
($800)
($1,500)
$800
$1,500
UCC before
CCA
$5,000
$3,875
$10,131.25
$6,572.19
$2,114.71
CCA taken
$1,125a
$1,743.75
$2,759.06b
$2,957.48
$5,000 x 50% x 45% = $1,125.
($8,000 x 50% x 45%) + ($2,131.25 x 45%) = $2,759.06
Taxable income before CCA
Terminal loss
Taxable income
Tax (30%)
$50,000.00
2,114.71
$47,885.29
$14,365.59
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 13
11-13 a. Expected annual cash flows:
Project A:
Probable
Probability  Cash Flow = Cash Flow
0.2
$6,000
$1,200
0.6
6,750
4,050
0.2
7,500
1,500
Expected annual cash flow = $6,750
Project B:
Probable
Probability  Cash Flow = Cash Flow
0.2
$ 0
$
0
0.6
6,750
4,050
0.2
18,000
3,600
Expected annual cash flow = $7,650
Coefficient of variation:
CV =
Standard deviation
 NPV
=
Expected value
Expected NPV
Project A:
σA =
(-$750 ) 2 (0.2) + ($0 ) 2 (0.6) + ($750 ) 2 (0.2) = $474.34.
Project B:
σB = (-$7,650 ) 2 (0.2) + (-$900 ) 2 (0.6) + ($10,350 ) 2 (0.2)
= $5,797.84.
CVA = $474.34/$6,750 = 0.0703.
CVB = $5,797.84/$7,650 = 0.7579.
b. Project B is the riskier project because it has the greater variability in its probable
cash flows, whether measured by the standard deviation or the coefficient of
variation. Hence, Project B is evaluated at the 12 percent cost of capital, while
Project A requires only a 10 percent cost of capital.
Project A: With a financial calculator, input the appropriate cash flows into the cash
flow register, input I = 10, and then solve for NPV = $10,036.25.
Project B: With a financial calculator, input the appropriate cash flows into the cash
flow register, input I = 12, and then solve for NPV = $11,624.01.
Project B has the higher NPV; therefore, the firm should accept Project B.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 14
c. The portfolio effects from Project B would tend to make it less risky than otherwise.
This would tend to reinforce the decision to accept Project B. Again, if Project B
were negatively correlated with the GDP (Project B is profitable when the economy is
down), then it is less risky and Project B’s acceptance is reinforced.
11-14 a. The resulting decision tree is:
t=0
t=1
t=2
t=3
$3,000,000
($1,000,000)
P = 0.80
($500,000)
P
0.24
NPV
$881,718
NPV
Product
$211,612
P = 0.5
1,500,000
0.24
(185,952)
(44,628)
P = 0.5
P = 0.60
100,000
($10,000)
0.12
(376,709)
(45,205)
(10,000)
(4,000)
P = 0.20
0
0.40
P = 0.40
1.00
Exp. NPV= $117,779
The NPV of the top path is:
$3,000,000
(1.12)3
-
$1,000,000
(1.12) 2
-
$500,000
(1.12)1
- $10,000 = $881,718.
Using a financial calculator, input the following: CF0 = -10000,
CF1 = -500000, CF2 = -1000000, CF3 = 3000000, and I = 12 to solve for
NPV = $881,718.29  $881,718.
The other NPVs were determined in the same manner. If the project is of average risk, it
should be accepted because the expected NPV of the total project is positive.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 15
b. σ2NPV = 0.24($881,718 - $117,779)2 + 0.24(-$185,952 - $117,779)2
+ 0.12(-$376,709 - $117,779)2 + 0.4(-$10,000 - $117,779)2
= 198,078,470,853.
σNPV = $445,060.
CVNPV =
$445,060
= 3.78.
$117,779
Since the CV is 3.78 for this project, while the firm’s average project has a CV of 1.0 to
2.0, this project is of high risk.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 16
SOLUTION TO SPREADSHEET PROBLEM
11-15 The detailed solution for the problem is available in the file Solution for FM1 Ch 11
Build a Model.xls on the textbook’s Web site.
Answers and Solutions: 11 - 17
MINI CASE
Shrieves Casting Company is considering adding a new line to its product mix, and the
capital budgeting analysis is being conducted by Sidney Johnson, a recent business school
graduate. The production line would be set up in unused space in Shrieves’ main plant.
The machinery’s invoice price would be approximately $200,000; another $10,000 in
shipping charges would be required; and it would cost an additional $30,000 to install the
equipment. The machinery has an economic life of 4 years, and would be in Class 8 with a
CCA rate of 20%. The machinery is expected to have a salvage value of $25,000 after 4
years of use.
The new line would generate incremental sales of 1,250 units per year for four years at an
incremental cost of $100 per unit in the first year, excluding depreciation. Each unit can be
sold for $200 in the first year. The sales price and cost are expected to increase by 3% per
year due to inflation. Further, to handle the new line, the firm’s net operating working
capital would have to increase by an amount equal to 12% of sales revenues. The firm’s
tax rate is 28 percent, and its overall weighted average cost of capital is 10 percent.
a.
Define “incremental cash flow.”
Answer: This is the firm’s cash flow with the project minus the firm’s cash flow without the
project.
a.
1. Should you subtract interest expense or dividends when calculating project cash
flow?
Answer: The cash flow statement should not include interest expense or dividends. The return
required by the investors furnishing the capital is already accounted for when we
apply the 10 percent cost of capital discount rate, hence including financing flows
would be "double counting." Put another way, if we deducted capital costs in the
table, and thus reduced the bottom line cash flows, and then discounted those CFS by
the cost of capital, we would, in effect, be subtracting capital costs twice.
a.
2. Suppose the firm had spent $100,000 last year to rehabilitate the production line
site. Should this cost be included in the analysis? Explain.
Answer: The $100,000 cost to rehabilitate the production line site was incurred last year, and
presumably also expensed for tax purposes. Since, it is a sunk cost, it should not be
included in the analysis.
Mini Case: 11 - 18
a.
3. Now assume that the plant space could be leased out to another firm at $25,000 a
year. Should this be included in the analysis? If so, how?
Answer: If the plant space could be leased out to another firm, then if Shrieves accepts this
project, it would forgo the opportunity to receive $25,000 in annual cash flows. This
represents an opportunity cost to the project, and it should be included in the analysis.
Note that the opportunity cost cash flow must be net of taxes, so it would be a
$25,000(1 - t) = $25,000(0.72) = $18,000 annual outflow.
a.
4. Finally, assume that the new product line is expected to decrease sales of the
firm’s other lines by $50,000 per year. Should this be considered in the analysis?
If so, how?
Answer: If a project affects the cash flows of another project, this is an "externality" which
must be considered in the analysis. If the firm's sales would be reduced by $50,000,
then the net cash flow loss would be a cost to the project. Note that this annual loss
would not be the full $50,000, because Shrieves would save on cash operating costs if
its sales dropped. Note also that externalities can be positive as well as negative.
b.
Calculate the annual sales revenues and costs (other than CCA). Why is it
important to include inflation when estimating cash flows?
Answer: With an inflation rate of 3%, the annual revenues and costs are:
Units
Unit Price
Unit Cost
Sales
Costs
Year 1
1250
$200.00
$100.00
Year 2
1250
$206.00
$103.00
$250,000
$125,000
$257,500
$128,750
Year 3
1250
$212.18
$106.09
Year 4
1250
$218.55
$109.27
$265,225 $273,188
$132,613 $136,588
The cost of capital is a nominal cost; i.e., it includes a premium for inflation. In other
words, it is larger than the real cost of capital. Similarly, nominal cash flows (those
that are inflated) are larger than real cash flows. If you discount the low, real cash
flows with the high, nominal rate, then the resulting NPV is too low. Therefore, you
should always discount nominal cash flows with a nominal rate, and real cash flows
with a real rate. In theory, you could do either way and get the correct answer.
However, there is no accurate way to convert a nominal cost of capital to a real cost.
Therefore, you should inflate cash flows and then discount at the nominal rate.
Mini Case: 11 - 19
c.
Construct annual incremental operating project cash flows.
Answer:
Year 1
$250,000
$125,000
$125,000
$35,000
$90,000
Sales
Costs
Project cash flows before tax
Taxes (28%)
Project cash flows after tax
d.
Year 2
$257,500
$128,750
$128,750
$36,050
$92,700
Year 3
$265,225
$132,613
$132,612
$37,131
$95,481
Year 4
$273,188
$136,588
$136,600
$38,248
$98,352
Estimate the required net operating working capital for each year, and the cash
flow due to investments in net operating working capital.
Answer: The project requires a level of net operating working capital in the amount equal to
12% of the next year’s sales. Any increase in NOWC is a negative cash flow, and
any decrease is a positive cash flow.
Year 0
Sales
NOWC (% of sales)
CF due to NOWC
e.
$30,000
($30,000)
Year 1
$250,000
$30,900
($900)
Year 2
$257,500
$31,827
($927)
Year 3
Year 4
$265,225 $273,188
$32,783
$0
($956) $32,783
Calculate the present value of the CCA tax shield.
PV of the CCA tax shield:
240,000 × 0.20 × 0.28 1 + 0.5 × 0.10 25,000 × 0.20 × 0.28
1
×
−
×
0.10 + 0.20
1 + 0.10
0.10 + 0.20
1 + 0.10
f.
=
$44,800
=
$39,576.
× 0.954545454
–
4,667
×
4
0.683013455
What is the after-tax salvage cash flow?
Answer: When the project is terminated at the end of year 4, the equipment can be sold for
$25,000.
Mini Case: 11 - 20
g.
What is the project’s NPV? Should the project be undertaken?
Answer:
The initial investment is $240,000:
Machine
Shipping
Installation
$200,000
$10,000
$30,000
$240,000
The present value of the project cash flows after tax is $297,342:
Using a financial calculator input the yearly cash flows from t=1 of 90000, 92700,
95481, 98352 in the cash flow registers, I = 10, and solve for the PV = $297,342.
The present value of the CCA tax shield is $39,576. (from part e.)
The present value of the NOWC is ($9,911):
Input the yearly cash flows from t=0 of -30000, -900, -927, -956, 32783, I=10, and
solve for the PV = ($9,911).
The present value of the salvage value is $17,075;
Input N=4, I=10, PMT=0, FV=25000 and solve for the PV=$17,075.
NPV = ($240,000) + $297,342 + $39,576 + ($9,911) + $17,075 = $104,082. Proceed!
h.
What does the term “risk” mean in the context of capital budgeting? To what
extent can risk be quantified? When risk is quantified, is the quantification
based primarily on statistical analysis of historical data or on subjective,
judgmental estimates?
Answer: Risk throughout finance relates to uncertainty about future events, and in capital
budgeting, this means the future profitability of a project. For certain types of
projects, it is possible to look back at historical data and to statistically analyze the
riskiness of the investment. This is often true when the investment involves an
expansion decision; for example, if Sears were opening a new store, if ScotiaBank
were opening a new branch, or if GM were expanding its Chevrolet plant, then past
experience could be a useful guide to future risk. Similarly, a company that is
considering going into a new business might be able to look at historical data on
existing firms in that industry to get an idea about the riskiness of its proposed
investment. However, there are times when it is impossible to obtain historical data
regarding proposed investments; for example, if GM were considering the
Mini Case: 11 - 21
development of an electric auto, not much relevant historical data for assessing the
riskiness of the project would be available. Rather, GM would have to rely primarily
on the judgment of its executives, and they, in turn would have to rely on their
experience in developing, manufacturing, and marketing new products. We will try to
quantify risk analysis, but you must recognize at the outset that some of the data used
in the analysis will necessarily be based on subjective judgments rather than on hard
statistical observations.
i.
1. What are the three types of risk that are relevant in capital budgeting?
2. How is each of these risk types measured, and how do they relate to one
another?
Answer: Here are the three types of project risk:

Stand-alone risk is the project’s total risk if it were operated independently. Standalone risk ignores both the firm’s diversification among projects and investors’
diversification among firms. Stand-alone risk is measured either by the project’s
standard deviation of NPV (σNPV) or its coefficient of variation of NPV (CVNPV).
Note that other profitability measures, such as IRR and MIRR, can also be used to
obtain stand-alone risk estimates.

Within-firm risk is the total riskiness of the project giving consideration to the firm’s
other projects, that is, to diversification within the firm. It is the contribution of the
project to the firm’s total risk, and it is a function of (a) the project’s standard
deviation of NPV and (b) the correlation of the projects’ returns with those of the rest
of the firm. Within-firm risk is often called corporate risk, and it is measured by the
project’s corporate beta, which is the slope of the regression line formed by plotting
returns on the project versus returns on the firm.

Market risk is the riskiness of the project to a well-diversified investor, hence it
considers the diversification inherent in stockholders’ portfolios. It is measured by
the project’s market beta, which is the slope of the regression line formed by plotting
returns on the project versus returns on the market.
Mini Case: 11 - 22
i.
3. How is each type of risk used in the capital budgeting process?
Answer: Because management’s primary goal is shareholder wealth maximization, the most
relevant risk for capital projects is market risk. However, creditors, customers,
suppliers, and employees are all affected by a firm’s total risk. Since these parties
influence the firm’s profitability, a project’s within-firm risk should not be
completely ignored.
Unfortunately, by far the easiest type of risk to measure is a project’s stand-alone
risk. Thus, firms often focus on this type of risk when making capital budgeting
decisions. However, this focus does not necessarily lead to poor decisions, because
most projects that a firm undertakes are in its core business. In this situation, a
project’s stand-alone risk is likely to be highly correlated with its within-firm risk,
which in turn is likely to be highly correlated with its market risk.
j.
1. What is sensitivity analysis?
Answer: Sensitivity analysis measures the effect of changes in a particular variable, say
revenues, on a project’s NPV. To perform a sensitivity analysis, all variables are
fixed at their expected values except one. This one variable is then changed, often by
specified percentages, and the resulting effect on NPV is noted. (One could allow
more than one variable to change, but this then merges sensitivity analysis into
scenario analysis.)
j.
2. Perform a sensitivity analysis on the unit sales, salvage value, and cost of capital
for the project. Assume that each of these variables can vary from its base case,
or expected, value by plus and minus 10 and 20 percent. Include a sensitivity
diagram, and discuss the results.
Answer:
The sensitivity data is given here in tabular form:
NPV Deviation From Base Case
WACC
Units Sold
Deviation From
Base Case
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
$123,528
$113,599
$104,082
$94,954
$86,192
$44,610
$74,344
$104,082
$133,811
$163,545
$100,667
$102,375
$104,082
$105,790
$107,497
Range
$37,336
$118,935
$6,830
Salvage
Mini Case: 11 - 23
Sensitivity Analysis
NPV
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000
$100,000
WACC
Units Sold
Salvage
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
Deviation from Base Case Value
A. The sensitivity lines intersect at 0% change and the base case NPV, $104,082.
Since all other variables are set at their base case, or expected values, the zero
change situation is the base case.
B. The plots for unit sales and salvage value are upward sloping, indicating that
higher variable values lead to higher NPVs. Conversely, the plot for cost of
capital is downward sloping, because a higher cost of capital leads to a lower
NPV.
C. The plot of unit sales is much steeper than that for salvage value. This indicates
that NPV is more sensitive to changes in unit sales than to changes in salvage
value.
D. Steeper sensitivity lines indicate greater risk. Thus, in comparing two projects,
the one with the steeper lines is considered to be riskier.
Mini Case: 11 - 24
j.
3. What is the primary weakness of sensitivity analysis? What is its primary
usefulness?
Answer: The two primary disadvantages of sensitivity analysis are (1) that it does not reflect
the effects of diversification and (2) that it does not incorporate any information about
the possible magnitudes of the forecast errors. Thus, a sensitivity analysis might
indicate that a project’s NPV is highly sensitive to the sales forecast, hence that the
project is quite risky, but if the project’s sales, hence its revenues, are fixed by a longterm contract, then sales variations may actually contribute little to the project’s risk.
It also ignores any relationships between variables, such as unit sales and sales price.
Therefore, in many situations, sensitivity analysis is not a particularly good indicator
of risk. However, sensitivity analysis does identify those variables which potentially
have the greatest impact on profitability, and this helps management focus its
attention on those variables that are probably most important.
k.
k.
Assume that Sidney Johnson is confident of her estimates of all the variables that
affect the project’s cash flows except unit sales and sales price: if product
acceptance is poor, unit sales would be only 900 units a year and the unit price
would only be $160; a strong consumer response would produce sales of 1,600
units and a unit price of $240. Sidney believes that there is a 25 percent chance
of poor acceptance, a 25 percent chance of excellent acceptance, and a 50 percent
chance of average acceptance (the base case).
1. What is scenario analysis?
Answer: Scenario analysis examines several possible situations, usually worst case, most likely
case, and best case. It provides a range of possible outcomes.
Mini Case: 11 - 25
k.
2. What is the worst-case NPV? The best-case NPV?
k.
3. Use the worst-, base-, and best-case NPVs and probabilities of occurrence to find
the project’s expected NPV, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation.
Answer: We used a spreadsheet model to develop the scenarios (in thousands of dollars),
which are summarized below:
Scenario
Probability
Unit Sales
Unit Price
Best Case
Base Case
Worst Case
25%
50%
25%
1600
1250
900
$240
$200
$160
Mini Case: 11 - 26
NPV
$339,568
$104,082
($64,811)
Expected NPV =
$120,730
Standard Deviation =
$143,936
Coefficient Of Variation =
Std Dev / Expected NPV =
1.19
l.
Are there problems with scenario analysis? Define simulation analysis, and
discuss its principal advantages and disadvantages.
Answer: Scenario analysis examines several possible scenarios, usually worst case, most likely
case, and best case. Thus, it usually considers only 3 possible outcomes. Obviously
the world is much more complex, and most projects have an almost infinite number
of possible outcomes.
Simulation analysis is a type of scenario analysis which uses a relatively powerful
financial planning software such as interactive financial planning system (IFPs) or
@risk (a spreadsheet add-in). Simple simulations can also be conducted with other
spreadsheet add-ins, such as Simtools. Here the uncertain cash flow variables (such as
unit sales) are entered as continuous probability distribution parameters rather than as
point values. Then, the computer uses a random number generator to select values for
the uncertain variables on the basis of their designated distributions. Once all of the
variable values have been selected, they are combined, and an NPV is calculated. The
process is repeated many times, say 1,000, with new values selected from the
distributions for each run. The end result is a probability distribution of NPV based
on a sample of 1,000 values. The software can graph the distribution as well as print
out summary statistics such as expected NPV and σNPV. Simulation provides the
decision maker with a better idea of the profitability of a project than does scenario
analysis because it incorporates many more possible outcomes.
Although simulation analysis is technically refined, its usefulness is limited because
managers are often unable to accurately specify the variables’ probability
distributions. Further, the correlations among the uncertain variables must be
specified, along with the correlations over time. If managers are unable to do this
with much confidence, then the results of simulation analyses are of limited value.
Recognize also that neither sensitivity, scenario, nor simulation analysis provides a
decision rule--they may indicate that a project is relatively risky, but they do not
indicate whether the project’s expected return is sufficient to compensate for its risk.
Finally, remember that sensitivity, scenario, and simulation analyses all focus on
stand-alone risk, which is not the most relevant risk in capital budgeting analysis.
m.
1. Assume that Shrieves’ average project has a coefficient of variation in the range
of 0.7 - 0.9. Would the new line be classified as high risk, average risk, or low
risk? What type of risk is being measured here?
Answer: The project has a CV of 1.19, which is above the average range of 0.7-0.9, so it falls
into the high risk category. The CV measures a project’s stand-alone risk-it is merely
a measure of the variability of returns (as measured by NPV) about the expected
return.
Mini Case: 11 - 27
m.
2. Shrieves typically adds or subtracts 3 percentage points to the overall cost of
capital to adjust for risk. Should the new furniture line be accepted?
Answer: Since the project is judged to have above-average risk, its differential risk-adjusted, or
project, cost of capital would be 13 percent. At this discount rate, its NPV would be
$77,775, so it would still be acceptable.
m.
3. Are there any subjective risk factors that should be considered before the final
decision is made?
Answer: A numerical analysis such as this one may not capture all of the risk factors inherent
in the project. If the project has a potential for bringing on harmful lawsuits, then it
might be riskier than first assessed. Also, if the project’s assets can be redeployed
within the firm or can be easily sold, then, as a result of “abandonment possibilities,”
the project may be less risky than the analysis indicates.
n.
What is a real option? What are some types of real options?
Answer: Real options exist when managers can influence the size and risk of a project’s cash
flows by taking different actions during the project’s life in response to changing
market conditions.
1. Investment timing options
2. Growth options
a.
Expansion of existing product line
b.
New products
c.
New geographic markets
3. Abandonment options
a.
Contraction
b.
Temporary suspension
c.
Complete abandonment
4. Flexibility options.
Mini Case: 11 - 28