Uploaded by DPT Learnings

Ram Partap Vs State (6).docx

advertisement
OFFICE OF THE
SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
DISTRICT LAHAUL AND SPITI HIMACHAL PRADESH
To
The Inspector General of Police,
Traffic, Tourist and Railway,
Himachal Pradesh, Shimla-2.
Subject:
Compliance of the Hon’ble High Court orders Passed in CWP No.
9677/2011- Titled as Ram Partap Vs State:Pending arrears of
TaxesUnder the HP Motor Vehicle Taxation Act,1972
Sir,
Kindly refer to your office letter no. TTR/clerk/2012-4379-91 dated
16-05-12 on the subject cited above.
In this regard, it is submitted that the requisite information for the month
of September on the prescribed performa is enclosed herewith this letter please.
Yours faithfully,
Superintendent of Police,
District Lahaul and Spiti.
Annexure -I
September-2022
Sr.
No.
Offense on Road
Total number of
challan during the
Month
1.
2.
3.
W/o Permit (192A) -W/o Insurance
17
W/o Payment of
-Taxes
Total No. of Challans
Compounded by
Police
Total No. of
Challans sent to
Court
Compounding fee
Realized
-34,000/--
----
----
Superintendent of Police,
District Lahaul and Spiti.
Download