Uploaded by mustafa massadi

anesthesia breathing system

advertisement
Anesthesia Breathing
Systems
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Purpose

To deliver anesthetic gases and oxygen

Offer a means to deliver anesthesia without significant increase in
airway resistance

To offer a convenient and safe method of delivering inhaled
anesthetic agents
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Basic Principles


All anesthesia breathing systems have 2 fundamental purposes

Delivery of O2/Anesthetic gases

Elimination of CO2
All breathing circuits create some degree of resistance to flow
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Resistance to flow can be minimized by:
 Reducing
the circuit’s length
 Increasing
the diameter (who’s law is that??)
 Hagen-Poiseuille
P = (L)(v)(V)
r4


P is pressure gradient. L is length. v is viscosity. V is flow rate
RESISTANCE IS INDIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO FLOW RATE WITH LAMINAR FLOW

Flow = P1-P1/R where P1 is pressure at one end of a tube and P2 is pressure at the
other end of the tube

FOR TURBULENT FLOW, GAS DENSITY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN VISCOSITY

RESISTANCE IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE “SQUARE” OF FLOW RATE (TURBULENT FLOW)

IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, FLOW IS USUALLY A MIXTURE OF LAMINAR & TURBULENT FLOW
 Avoiding
the use of sharp bends (turbulent flow)
 Eliminating unnecessary valves
 Maintaining laminar flow
Another look at Poiseuille’s Law
Laminar flow: orderly movement of gas inside a “hose”
(gas in the center of the tube moves faster than gas
closer to walls)
 Turbulent flow: resistance is increased (seen with
sudden narrowing or branching of tube)
 Poiseuille’s Law follows Laminar flow

R
= 8 n l (R: resistance, n: viscosity, l: length, r: radius)
r4
Example: doubling the radius of the tube will decrease the resistance 16
times (2)4=16
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications (controversial)
 Traditional
attempts to classify circuits combine
functional aspects (eg, extent of rebreathing) with
physical characteristics (eg, presence of valves)
 Based
A
on the presence or absence of
gas reservoir bag

provides gas for the moments during inspiration where flow in the
trachea is greater than fresh gas flow (FGF)
 Rebreathing
 Means
of exhaled gases
to chemically neutralize CO2
 Unidirectional
valves
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications

Open

Semiopen

Semiclosed

Closed
Anesthesia Breathing Systems
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications

Open

NO reservoir

NO rebreathing

No neutralization of CO2

No unidirectional valves

Examples include

Nasal Cannula

Open drop ether
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications

Semiopen
Gas reservoir bag present
 NO rebreathing
 No neutralization of CO2
 No unidirectional valves
 Fresh gas flow needed exceeds minute ventilation (two to three
times minute ventilation to prevent rebreathing). Minimum FGF
5L/min
 Examples include


Mapleson A, B, C, D

Bain

Jackson-Rees
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications
 Semiclosed
A
type of “circle system”
 Always
has a gas reservoir bag
 Allows
for PARTIAL rebreathing of exhaled gases
 Always
provides for chemical neutralization of CO2
 Always
contains 3 unidirectional valves (insp, exp, APL)
 Fresh
gas flow is less than minute ventilation
 Examples
– The machine we use everyday!
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Classifications
 Closed
 Always
has a gas reservoir bag
 Allows
for TOTAL rebreathing of exhaled gases
 Always
provides for chemical neutralization of CO2
 Always
contains unidirectional valves
 We
don’t use these….Suffice to say you can do this with the
machines we have now if you keep your fresh gas flow to
metabolic requirements around 150ml/min (supply of O2, N2O
and VAA just matches pt’s requirements)
 If
pt spontaneously ventilating, APL valve should totally closed
(no scavenging since no waste  total rebreathing)
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Non-rebreathing circuits

Mapleson Classification – 1954

Mapleson D still commonly used

Modified Mapleson D is also called Bain. Arrangement of components (entry
point of fresh gas, reservoir gas, APL valve) is similar in both. The main
difference is that the Bain has the fresh gas hose inside the expiratory
corrugated limb (tube within a tube). Unrecognized kinking of inner
inspiratory hose will convert the expiratory outer hose into dead space.

Mapleson F is better known as Jackson-Rees modification of Ayre’s T-piece

Used almost exclusively in children
 Very
low resistance to breathing

The degree of rebreathing is influenced by method of ventilation

Adjustable overflow valve

Delivery of FGF should be at least 2x the minute volume
Anesthesia Breathing Systems
(APL)
APL
Insp
Exp
Non-rebreathing Circuits

All non-rebreathing (NRB) circuits lack unidirectional valves (insp &
exp) and soda lime CO2 absorption

Amount of rebreathing is highly dependent on fresh gas flow (FGF)

Work of breathing is low (no unidirectional valves or soda lime
granules to create resistance)
How do NRB’s work?

During expiration, fresh gas flow (FGF) pushes exhaled gas down the
expiratory limb, where it collects in the reservoir (breathing) bag and opens
the pop-off (APL) valve.

The next inspiration draws on the gas in the expiratory limb. The expiratory
limb will have less carbon dioxide (less rebreathing) if FGF inflow is high,
tidal volume (VT) is low, and the duration of the expiratory pause is long (a
long expiratory pause is desirable as exhaled gas will be flushed out more
thoroughly).

All NRB circuits are convenient, lightweight, easily scavenged (if using
appropriate FGF).
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Mapleson

Advantages
Used during transport of children
 Minimal dead space, low resistance to breathing
 Scavenging (variable ability, depending on FGF used)


Disadvantages
Scavenging (variable ability, depending on FGF used)
 High flows required (cools children, more costly)
 Lack of humidification/heat (except Bain)
 Possibility of high airway pressures and barotrauma
 Unrecognized kink of inner hose in Bain
 Pollution and higher cost
 Difficult to assemble


The classification is according to the relative positions of the APL
valve, reservoir bag and FGF.

Mapleson systems need significantly higher FGF to prevent rebreathing
compared to the circle breathing system and therefore the expensive
use of volatile agents.

Their use in modern anaesthesia is very limited with the wide spread
of the circle breathing system.
Mapleson Components


Breathing Tubes

Corrugated tubes connect components of Mapleson to pt

Large diameter (22mm) creates low-resistance pathway for gases & potential reservoir
for gases

Volume of breathing circuit = or > TV to minimize FGF requirements
Fresh Gas Inlet (position will determine type of Mapleson performance and
classification)
Mapleson Components


Pressure-Relief Valve (Pop-Off Valve, APL)

If gas inflow > pt’s uptake & circuit uptake = press buildup
opens APL (gas out via scavenger)

APL fully open during spontaneous ventilation

APL partial closure while squeezing breathing bag (assisted
ventilation)
Breathing Bag

Reservoir Bag of gases

Method of generating positive pressure ventilation
Mapleson A ( Magill vs Lack )

Since No gas is vented during expiration, high
unpredictable FGF (> 3 times minute ventilation)
needed to prevent rebreathing during mechanical
ventilation (Poor choice)

Most efficient design during spontAneous ventilation
since a FGF = minute ventilation will be enough to
prevent rebreathing)

In practice, a higher FGF is selected to compensate
for leaks; the rate selected is usually equal to the
patient’s total minute volume.

Dead space ?

The major disadvantage of the Magill
attachment during surgery is that the spill
valve is attached close to the mask.

This makes the system heavy, particularly
when a scavenging system is used, and it is
inconvenient during head or neck surgery.

The Lack system is a modification of the
Mapleson A system with a coaxial arrangement
of tubing. This permits positioning of the spill
valve at the proximal end of the system.

The inner tube must be of sufficient wide
bore to allow the patient to exhale with
minimal resistance.

The Lack system is not quite as efficient as
the Magill attachment
Mapleson D
• FGF forces alveolar gas away from pt
toward APL valve
• Efficient during ControlleD Ventilation
• has a swivel mount at the patient end.
This ensures that the internal tube cannot
kink, thereby ensuring delivery of fresh
gas to the patient.
Mapleson
Mapleson D
Mapleson C
(Jackson-Rees)
Mapleson F
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Bain system
 Coaxial (tube within a tube) version of Mapleson D


Fresh gas enters through narrow inner tube

Exhaled gas exits through corrugated outer tube

FGF required to prevent rebreathing :

200-300ml/kg/min with spontaneous breathing (2 times VE)

70ml/kg/min with controlled ventilation
Increasing the length of the tubing does not affect the physical
properties of the breathing system.
Bain at work (spontaneous)

Spontaneous: The breathing system should be filled with FG before
connecting to pt. During inspiration, the FG from the machine, the
reservoir bag and the corrugated tube flow to the pt.

During expiration, there is a continuous FGF into the system at the pt’s
end. The expired gas gets continuously mixed with the FG as it flows
back into the corrugated tube and the reservoir bag. Once the system is
full, the excess gas is vented to the scavenger.

During the expiratory pause the FG continues to flow and fill the
proximal portion of the corrugated tube while the mixed gas is vented
through the valve.
Bain at work (spontaneous)

During the next inspiration, the pt breathes in FG as well as the mixed
gas from the corrugated tube. Many factors influence the composition
of the inspired mixture (FGF, resp rate, expiratory pause, TV and CO2
production in the body). Factors other than FGF cannot be
manipulated in a spontaneously breathing pt.

It has been mathematically calculated and clinically proved that the
FGF should be at least 1.5 to 2 times the patient’s minute ventilation
in order to minimize rebreathing to acceptable levels.
Bain at work (controlled)

Controlled: To facilitate intermittent positive pressure ventilation, the
APL has to be partly closed so that it opens only after sufficient
pressure has developed in the system. When the system is filled with
fresh gas, the patient gets ventilated with the FGF from the machine,
the corrugated tube and the reservoir bag.

During expiration, the expired gas continuously gets mixed with the
fresh gas that is flowing into the system at the patient’s end.

During the expiratory pause the FG continues to enter the system and
pushes the mixed gas towards the reservoir.
Bain at work (controlled)

When the next inspiration is initiated, the patient gets
ventilated with the gas in the corrugated tube (a mixture
of FG, alveolar gas and dead space gas).

As the pressure in the system increases, the APL valve
opens and the contents of the reservoir bag are
discharged into the scavenger (gas follows the path of
least resistance)
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Bain
 Advantages
 Warming
of fresh gas inflow by surrounding exhaled gases
(countercurrent exchange)
 Improved
 Ease
humidification with partial rebreathing
of scavenging waste gases
 Overflow/pressure
 Disposable/sterile
valve (APL valve)
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Bain
 Disadvantages
 Unrecognized
 Kinking
disconnection
of inner fresh gas flow tubing
 Requires
high flows
 Not
easily converted to portable when commercially used
anesthesia machine adapter Bain circuit used
 Look
at the Bain and identify what makes it modified
from the standard Mapleson D
Pethick’s Test for the Bain Circuit

A unique hazard of the use of the Bain circuit is
occult disconnection or kinking of the inner hose
(fresh gas delivery hose). To perform the Pethick’s
test, use the following steps:

Occlude the patient's end of the circuit (at the elbow).

Close the APL valve.

Fill the circuit, using the oxygen flush valve (like
pressurizing the circuit when you are doing a leak test)

Release the occlusion at the elbow and flush. A Venturi
effect flattens the reservoir bag if the inner tube is patent.
T-piece system (Mapleson E and F)


This is a valveless breathing system used in anaesthesia for children up to
25–30 kg body weight .
It is suitable for both spontaneous and controlled ventilation.
1. The system requires an FGF of 2.5–3 times the minute volume
to prevent rebreathing with a minimal flow of 4 L/min.
2. The double-ended bag acts as a visual monitor during
spontaneous ventilation. In addition, the bag can be used for
assisted or controlled ventilation.
3. The bag can provide a degree of continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP) during spontaneous ventilation.
4. Controlled ventilation is performed either by manual
squeezing of the double-ended bag (intermittent occlusion of
the reservoir tubing in the Mapleson E) or by removing the bag
and connecting the reservoir tubing to a ventilator such as the
Penlon Nuffield 200.
5. The volume of the reservoir tubing determines the degree of
rebreathing (too large a tube) or entrainment of ambient air (too
small a tube). The volume of the reservoir tubing should
approximate to the patient’s tidal volume.
Circle System
CAN: Canister of CO2 absorber
RB: Reservoir bag
Optimization of Circle Design

Unidirectional Valves


Placed in close proximity to pt to prevent backflow into
inspiratory limb if circuit leak develops.
Fresh Gas Inlet

Placed b/w absorber & inspiratory valve. If placed downstream
from insp valve, it would allow FG to bypass pt during exhalation
and be wasted. If FG were placed b/w expiration valve and
absorber, FG would be diluted by recirculating gas
Optimization of Circle Design

APL valve


Placed immediately before absorber to conserve absorption
capacity and to minimize venting of FG
Breathing Bag

Placed in expiratory limb to decrease resistance to exhalation. Bag
compression during controlled ventilation will vent alveolar gas
thru APL valve, conserving absorbent
Circle system can be:

closed (fresh gas inflow exactly equal to patient uptake,
complete rebreathing after carbon dioxide absorbed,
and pop-off closed)

semi-closed (some rebreathing occurs, FGF and pop-off
settings at intermediate values), or

semi-open (no rebreathing, high fresh gas flow)
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Circle systems

Most commonly used

Adult and child appropriate sizes

Can be semiopen, semiclosed, or closed dependent solely on fresh
gas flow (FGF)

Uses chemical neutralization of CO2

Conservation of moisture and body heat

Low FGF’s saves money
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Circle systems


Unidirectional valves

Prevent inhalation of exhaled gases until they have passed through the CO2 absorber
(enforced pattern of flow)

Incompetent valve will allow rebreathing of CO2

Hypercarbia and failure of ETCO2 wave to return to baseline
Pop off (APL) Valve

Allows pressure control of inspiratory controlled ventilation

Allows for manual and assisted ventilation with mask, LMA, or ETT (anesthetist will regulate
APL valve to keep breathing bag not too deflated or inflated)
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Circle system

Allows for mechanical ventilation of the lungs using the attached ventilator

Allows for adjustment of ventilatory pressure

Allows for semiopen, semiclosed, and closed systems based solely on FGF

Is easily scavenged to avoid pollution of OR environment
Anesthesia Breathing Systems


Advantages of rebreathing

Cost reduction (use less agent and O2)

Increased tracheal warmth and humidity

Decreased exposure of OR personnel to waste gases

Decreased pollution of the environment
REMEMBER that the degree of rebreathing in an
anesthesia circuit is increased as the fresh gas flow (FGF)
supplied to the circuit is decreased
Anesthesia Breathing Systems
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Dead space







Increases with the use of any anesthesia system
Unlike Mapleson circuits, the length of the breathing tube of a
circle system DOES NOT directly affect dead space
Like Mapleson’s, length DOES affect circuit compliance
(affecting amount of TV lost to the circuit during mech vent)
Increasing dead space increases rebreathing of CO2
To avoid hypercarbia in the face of an acute increase in dead
space, a patient must increase minute ventilation
Dead space ends where the inspiratory and expiratory gas
streams converge
Use of a mask is associated with greater dead space than an
ETT
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Carbon dioxide neutralization

Influenced by
Size of granules
 Presence or absence of channeling in the canister (areas of loosely
packed granules, minimized by baffle system)
 Tidal volume in comparison to void space of the canister



TV should not exceed air space between absorbent granules (1/2
absorbent capacity)
Ph sensitive dye
Ethyl violet indicator turns purple when soda lime exhausted (change
when 50-70% has changed color)
 Regeneration: Exhausted granules may revert to original color if
rested, no significant recovery of absorptive capacity occurs (change
canister!!)

Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Carbon dioxide neutralization

Maximum absorbent capacity 26L of CO2/100g granules

Granules designated by Mesh size (4-8 mesh)


A compromise between higher absorptive surface area of small granules
& the lower resistance to gas flow of larger granules
Toxic byproducts

The drier the soda lime, the more likely it will absorb & degrade volatile
anesthetics
Disadvantages of Circle System


Greater size, less portability
Increased complexity


Increased resistance (of valves during spontaneous
ventilation)


Higher risk of disconnection or malfunction
Dissuading use in Pediatrics (unless a circle pedi system used)
Difficult prediction of inspired gas concentration during low
fresh gas flow
Anesthesia Breathing Systems

Airway Humidity Concerns

Anesthesia machine FGF dry and cold
Medical gas delivery systems supply dehumidified gases at room
temp.
 Exhaled gas is saturated with H2O at body temp
 High flows (5 L/min)  low humidity
 Low flows (<0.5 L/min)  allow greater H2O saturation
 Absorbent granules: significant source of heat/moisture
(soda lime 14-19% water content)

Normal upper airway humidification bypassed under General
Anesthesia
 Passive heat and humidity (“Artificial Nose”)
 Active heat and humidity (electrically heated humidifier)

Bacterial Contamination

Slight risk of microorganism retention in Circle system that could
(theoretically) lead to respiratory infections in subsequent pts

Bacterial filters are incorporated into EXPIRATORY LIMB of the circuit
Mode
Reservoir
Rebreathing
Example
Open
No
No
Open drop
Semi-open
Yes
No
Nonrebreathing
circuit or
Circle at high FGF
(>VE)
Semi-closed
Yes
Yes, partial
Circle at low FGF
(<VE)
Closed
Yes
Yes, complete
Circle (if APL valve
closed)
Download