The Impact of Social Media on the Encouragement for Adult’s Vaccinations
Conclusion and Recommendation
Research Title:The Impact of Social Media on the Encouragement for Adult’s
Vaccinations
Summary of Findings
Conclusion
Recommendation
Majority of the respondents
were female, 56% of the
respondents had an age of
25 years old and above but
rest assured that 100% of
the respondents are adults.
Regarding their responses,
most
of
them(77%)
disagree to the fact that
social media carries wrong
information regarding the
COVID-19 vaccine, and it
should not be taken without
consulting specialists, 60%
of the respondents follow
medical professionals on
social media in order to get
updated on the latest news
on vaccinations. A lot of the
respondents (87%) prefer to
get
information
from
appropriate
authorities
rather than other social
media sources. 67% of the
respondents would rather
follow on the interests of the
number of vaccinated adults
while 33% does not. 56% of
the respondents were eager
to get vaccinated because
of social media while all 30
of them(100%) refuses to
share invalid information
about COVID19 vaccines
and advises others to follow
social media constantly to
get updates on the latest
developments
about
vaccines while 53% of them
already do.
In conclusion, most adults
believe that social media
carries
legitimate
information
regarding
COVID 19 vaccinations.
They
follow
medical
professionals online in order
to stay updated on the latest
news about COVID 19.
Most of them would prefer
to get information from
appropriate
authorities,
medical professionals as
said, instead of other social
media sources (Influencers,
vloggers, etc...). All adults
refuses to share invalid
information from social
media to their friends and
family as it would be a risk
to their safety, yet they
advise them to follow social
media constantly in order to
get updates themselves..
Meanwhile,
majority
of
adults are influenced by the
number of people getting
vaccinated per day and all
of
them
are
greatly
influenced
by
social
media
itself
which
encourages them to get
vaccinated.
I recommend that the minor
details
be
addressed.
Details like minorities, the
conclusion only mentioned
how
majority
of
the
respondents perceive the
problem, yet it does not
tackle how the minority of
the
said
population
perceives the said issue. In
regards to the results, it can
be more emphasized by
giving
additional
background to the result
itself. Above all that, nothing
more.