June 6, 2016

advertisement

Investor Presentation

June 2016

1

Table of Contents

Company Overview & 2016 Highlights

Multifamily Fundamentals

Camden’s Portfolio

Real Estate Transactions

Capital Structure & Liquidity

Summary

Appendix

2016 Guidance

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions & Reconciliations

Forward-Looking Statements

3 – 6

7 – 11

12 – 18

19 – 25

26 – 29

30 – 31

32 – 38

2

Company Overview & 2016 Highlights

3

About Camden

Publicly traded since 1993

S&P 400 Company

Net Asset Value (NAV) per Share (1) - $89

Total Market Capitalization $10 billion

Over 55,000 apartment homes located in 14 major markets across the U.S.

(1) Average NAV per covering analysts

4

Camden’s Strategy

Operate in high growth markets

Maximize portfolio cash flow growth

Recycle capital through acquisitions and dispositions

Create value through development and redevelopment

Maintain strong balance sheet with low leverage

5

2016 Highlights

Completed sale of Las Vegas portfolio for $630 million in April

2016

Expect $400 - $600 million of additional asset sales in 3Q16

Anticipate special dividend for 2016 of $4.25 - $5.25 per share o

Approximately 90% of dividend should be paid in 3Q16 o

Remainder paid in early 2017

66

Multifamily Fundamentals

7

Outlook for Multifamily Industry

Same property net operating income (“NOI”) projected above long-term trend for next several years

Strong demand from: o

Growing “Echo Boom” population with high propensity to rent o o o

Large share of jobs going to the 20-34 age cohort

Pent-up demand from young adults living at home or with roommates

Homeownership rate declining steadily and n egative sentiment toward home ownership

New supply still being met by strong demand

70

68

66

64

62

60

58

Favorable Demographics Trends*

Over 60% of this age group choose to rent

1500

1000

500

0

‐ 500

‐ 1000

‐ 1500

‐ 2000

‐ 2500

Young Adults Steadily Finding Employment*

0.0

‐ 0.5

‐ 1.0

1.5

Pent-Up Demand From Young Adults Living At Home*

1.0

Potential Pent-Up

Moveouts from

Home

Annual Change in

20-34 Population

0.5

Estimated

Home

Move-Backs

2015: 1.2M more young adults than usual living with parents

8

* Witten Advisors – data through May 2016

Negative Sentiment Toward Home Ownership

Many people choosing to rent rather than buy

Moveout rates from apartment residents purchasing homes remain low

(23% at peak vs. 14% in 1Q16 for Camden’s portfolio)

Strong credit scores and significant down payments required by mortgage lenders

Young adults carrying significant amount of student debt

Homeownership Rate

70%

68%

66%

64%

62%

1Q16*

63.6%

* Witten Advisors – seasonally adjusted homeownership rate

9

Manageable Levels of Supply

Multifamily starts expected to peak in 2016 then begin to decline

Rising construction costs and interest rates make future development starts more challenging

Single family rentals don’t compete with well-located, amenity-rich apartment homes

400,000

350,000

300,000

250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0

Actual Starts

Projected

Deficit of 450,000 starts from 2009-2012

Source: Witten Advisors

10

Demand projected to exceed supply in most markets

2-year average ratio of estimated job growth to multifamily completions (2016-2017)

10.0

8.0

6.0

4.0

2.0

0.0

Long-term

Equilibrium

Ratio of 5:1

11

Source: Witten Advisors and Axiometrics

Camden’s Portfolio

12

Portfolio Statistics

Operating Communities

Apartment Homes

Total Monthly Revenues per Occupied Unit

Average Age of Portfolio (years)

Development Communities

Development Apartment Homes

Value per Home

(2)

(1) Excludes Las Vegas portfolio sold in April 2016

(2) Green Street Advisors as of 5/26/16

1Q16

(1)

158

55,254

$1,569

13

7

2,477

$213,500

13

Geographic Diversity & Market Balance

Washington, DC

Houston

Southern California

Southeast Florida

Atlanta

Dallas

Tampa

Orlando

Denver

Charlotte

Phoenix

Raleigh

Austin

Corpus Christi, TX

Overall

Apartment 1Q16 % of

Homes NOI (1)(2)

6,405

4,449

2,781

(1) Including pro-rata share of NOI from joint venture communities

(2) Excludes Las Vegas portfolio sold in April 2016

(3) 2Q16 occupancy data through 5/30/16

15.8%

8,434 11.9%

11.7%

7.9%

4,246 7.3%

5,243 7.1%

3,788 5.7%

3,540 5.6%

2,365 5.4%

2,753 5.1%

2,929 5.3%

3,054 4.3%

3,360 3.8%

1,907 3.1%

55,254 100.0%

1Q16

Total Monthly

Revenue per

Occupied Home (2)

$1,917

1,562

2,023

2,069

1,515

1,377

1,325

1,351

1,626

1,451

1,435

1,207

1,370

1,325

$1,569

Same Store Occupancy

1Q16 2Q16 (3)

94.9%

94.2%

95.4%

93.8%

95.3%

96.9%

95.4%

96.3%

95.4%

96.8%

95.9%

96.2%

95.9%

95.7%

94.3%

96.1%

95.8%

95.4%

96.2%

92.4%

95.4%

95.4%

96.4%

95.7%

96.0%

94.9%

95.3%

95.9%

92.5%

95.4%

14

Focus on High-Growth Markets

Employment Growth

(in thousands)

Rank Metro area

1 Dallas-Plano-Irving TX

2 New York-Jersey City-White Plains NY-NJ

3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale CA

4 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale AZ

5 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell GA

6 Chicago-Naperville-Arlington Heights IL

7 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land TX

8 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria DC-VA-MD-WV

9 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford FL

10 Austin-Round Rock TX

11 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood CO

12 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater FL

13 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington MN-WI

14 Seattle-Bellevue-Everett WA

15 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario CA

16 Fort Worth-Arlington TX

17 San Diego-Carlsbad CA

18 Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine CA

19 Warren-Troy-Farmington Hills MI

20 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia NC-SC

21

22

23

24

25

San Antonio-New Braunfels TX

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley CA

Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro OR-WA

Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise NV

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara CA

194.2

180.6

134.6

129.2

128.9

126.7

125.5

121.0

Gain

343.5

341.4

328.7

277.8

271.2

232.8

202.1

118.2

116.4

113.3

108.1

103.9

102.9

102.5

101.7

101.2

98.0

Population Growth

(in thousands)

Rank Metro area

1 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell GA

2 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land TX

3 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale AZ

4 Dallas-Plano-Irving TX

5 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford FL

6 New York-Jersey City-White Plains NY-NJ

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale CA

Austin-Round Rock TX

Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia NC-SC

Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise NV

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater FL

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario CA

Fort Worth-Arlington TX

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria DC-VA-MD-WV

Raleigh NC

San Antonio-New Braunfels TX

West Palm Beach-Boca Raton-Delray Beach FL

Seattle-Bellevue-Everett WA

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood CO

Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall FL

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington MN-WI

San Diego-Carlsbad CA

Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach-Deerfield Beach FL

Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley CA

Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine CA

Nearly 97% of Camden’s NOI is derived from these markets

Source: Moody’s Analytics – April 2016 – Estimated Gains: 2015-2020

Highlighted represents Camden markets

214.4

211.6

210.5

209.6

199.6

197.5

182.4

180.2

157.4

147.5

312.5

297.9

289.9

277.6

259.7

256.8

246.5

234.6

Gain

692.1

685.5

569.8

502.3

409.1

354.6

344.9

15

Camden’s Same Property Growth

4%

2%

0%

Revenue Growth

8%

6%

2011

NOI Growth

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

2011

* 2016 Guidance provided 4/28/16

2012

2012

2013

2013

2014

2014

2015

2015

2016*

2016*

Long-term

Industry Avg

~3%

Long-term

Industry Avg

~3%

16

Same Property Revenue Growth by Market

Over 5%

2015 Actual

Atlanta

Austin

Charlotte

Dallas

Denver

Orlando

Phoenix

Raleigh

South Florida

Southern California

Tampa

2016 Guidance*

Atlanta

Austin

Dallas

Denver

Orlando

Phoenix

Raleigh

South Florida

Southern California

Tampa

3% - 5%

Under 3%

* 2016 Guidance provided 4/28/16

Washington, DC

Houston

Charlotte

Washington, DC

Houston

17

New Leases & Renewals

Average change in same property new lease and renewal rates vs. expiring lease rates when signed

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

1Q15 2Q15 3Q15

New Leases

4Q15

Renewals

1Q16 2Q16*

* 2Q16 data through 5/30/16

18

Real Estate Transactions

19

Capital Recycling

Since 2011 we have significantly improved the quality of our portfolio with minimal cash flow dilution

Increased total monthly revenues per occupied unit from $1,042 to $1,566 and maintained average age of 13 years

$1.3B Total Acquisitions $2.4B Total Dispositions

$635M

$644M

$757M

$1,596M

Wholly-owned Joint Ventures

Average Age of 6 years*

* Average age at time of purchase or sale

Wholly-owned Joint Ventures

Average Age of 23 years*

20

Development Value Creation

Communities

Apartment Homes

Total Cost

Market Value *

Value Creation

NAV Creation (per share)

Completed/

Stabilized

(2011-2016)

18

5,117

$0.8B

$1.2B

$339M

$3.69

Current

Pipeline

10

3,539

$1.0B

$1.3B

$290M

$3.16

Combined

Total

28

8,656

$1.8B

$2.4B

$629M

$6.85

21

* Value assuming current market cap rates ranging from 4.0%-5.25% for new product in our markets

Current Development Pipeline

($ in millions)

Name

Camden Paces

Camden Glendale

Camden Chandler

Camden Gallery

Camden Victory Park

The Camden

Camden Lincoln Station

Camden NoMa II

Camden Shady Grove

Camden McGowen Station

Total

Location

Atlanta, GA

Glendale, CA

Chandler, AZ

Charlotte, NC

Dallas, TX

Los Angeles, CA

Denver, CO

Washington, DC

Rockville, MD

Houston, TX

Total

Homes

379

303

380

323

423

287

267

405

457

315

3,539

Estimated

Total Initial Construction Stabilized %

Cost Occupancy Completion Operations Leased *

$117

113

2Q14

2Q15

4Q15

3Q15

2Q16

2Q16

94%

82%

68

58

82

145

56

1Q15

1Q16

1Q16

2Q16

4Q16

1Q16

3Q16

3Q16

4Q16

2Q17

4Q16

1Q17

1Q18

2Q17

1Q18

77%

42%

28%

25%

-

115

116

90

$960

2Q17

1Q17

4Q17

4Q17

1Q18

2Q18

4Q19

4Q19

3Q19

-

-

-

Development pipeline 77% funded with only $224M remaining to complete *

* As of 5/31/16

22

Current Development Pipeline

Camden Glendale – Glendale, CA Camden Paces – Atlanta, GA Camden Chandler – Chandler, AZ Camden Gallery – Charlotte, NC

Camden Victory Park – Dallas, TX The Camden – Los Angeles, CA Camden Lincoln Station – Denver, CO

Camden NoMa II – Washington, DC Camden Shady Grove – Rockville, MD Camden McGowen Station – Houston, TX

23

Future Development Projects

($ in millions)

Project

Camden Washingtonian

Camden North End (1)

Camden Buckhead

Camden Arts District

Camden Conte (2)

Camden Atlantic

Total

Location

Gaithersburg, MD

Phoenix, AZ

Atlanta, GA

Los Angeles, CA

Houston, TX

Plantation, FL

Projected

Homes

365

1,069

336

354

519

286

2,929

Total

Estimated

Cost

$90

225

80

150

170

62

$777

(1) Project to be developed in 3 phases

(2) Project to be developed in 2 phases

24

Redevelopment Activity

Target well-located 15-20 year old assets

Update kitchen & bath areas, appliances, flooring, fixtures, lighting, etc.

$235 million spent through 1Q16

$16 million budgeted for 2016

21,800 apartment homes completed at average cost of $11,200 per unit

Average rental rate increase >$100 per month

Over 10% cash-on-cash return

Before - Kitchen

After - Kitchen

Before - Bath

After - Bath

25

Capital Structure & Liquidity

26

Strong Capital Structure

($ in millions – as of 5/31/16)

Equity*

$7,820

Mortgages

$899

Senior

Unsecured

Notes

$1,582

• 4.5x net debt-to-EBITDA

• 4.4% weighted average interest rate on all debt

• 91.7% fixed-rate debt

• 63.8% unsecured debt

• 5.6 years weighted average maturity of debt

• Manageable debt maturities over next several years

Total Market Capitalization = $10 Billion

* Based on closing share price of $85.21 on 5/31/16

27

Manageable Debt Maturities

Future scheduled maturities excluding Credit Facility (as of 5/31/16)

($ in millions)

$700

$600

$500

$400

$300

$200

$100

$0

$0.1

2016

$246.2

2017

$175.8

2018

$645.2

2019

$1.1

2020

$251.5

2021

$351.9

2022

$253.0

2023

$503.8

2024

$51.2

2025

28

Liquidity

(as of 5/31/16)

$284M cash on hand

No amounts drawn under $600M unsecured credit facility

$315M equity issuance available under ATM program

Sufficient liquidity to meet near-term capital needs

Unencumbered asset pool of approximately $6.3B

Strong credit ratings o

Moody’s: o o

Fitch:

Standard & Poor’s:

Baa1

BBB+

BBB+

Positive

Positive

Stable

29

Summary

30

Why Camden?

Experienced management team with proven history of performance and sound business plan

Consistent long-term focus and commitment to high-growth markets

Strong balance sheet with ample liquidity

Well-positioned to capitalize on future opportunities

Ranked #9 by FORTUNE ® Magazine as one of the “100 Best

Companies to Work For” in America

31

Appendix

32

2016 Guidance

EARNINGS

FFO per share

EPS per share

SAME PROPERTY PERFORMANCE

Revenue Growth

Expense Growth

NOI Growth

TRANSACTIONS

Acquisitions

Dispositions

Development Starts

LOW

$4.45

$5.62

3.60%

3.25%

3.50%

$0 million

$1.0 billion

$0 million

MIDPOINT

$4.55

$5.72

4.10%

3.75%

4.25%

HIGH

$4.65

$5.82

4.60%

4.25%

5.00%

$0 million

$1.1 billion

$100 million

$0 million

$1.2 billion

$200 million

33

* 2016 Guidance provided 4/28/16

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions & Reconciliations

This document contains certain non-GAAP financial measures management believes are useful in evaluating an equity REIT's performance.

Camden's definitions and calculations of non-GAAP financial measures may differ from those used by other REITs, and thus may not be comparable. The non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered as an alternative to net income as an indication of our operating performance, or to net cash provided by operating activities as a measure of our liquidity.

FFO

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) currently defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP")), excluding gains (or losses) associated with previously depreciated operating properties, real estate depreciation and amortization, impairments of depreciable assets, and adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures. Our calculation of diluted FFO also assumes conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, including certain noncontrolling interests, which are convertible into common shares. We consider FFO to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance because, by excluding gains or losses on dispositions of operating properties, and depreciation, FFO can assist in the comparison of the operating performance of a company’s real estate investments between periods or to different companies. A reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO is provided below:

Net income attributable to common shareholders

Real estate depreciation and amortization

Real estate depreciation from discontinued operations

Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax

Funds from operations

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2016

$41,730

2015

$115,599

60,485

4,327

2,358

1,210

$110,110

56,459

3,904

2,245

5,466

(85,145)

$98,528

34

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions & Reconciliations

Adjusted FFO

In addition to FFO, we compute Adjusted FFO ("AFFO") as a supplemental measure of operating performance. AFFO is calculated utilizing FFO less recurring capital expenditures which are necessary to help preserve the value of and maintain the functionality at our communities. Our definition of recurring capital expenditures may differ from other REITs, and there can be no assurance our basis for computing this measure is comparable to other REITs. A reconciliation of FFO to AFFO is provided below:

Net income attributable to common shareholders

Real estate depreciation and amortization

Real estate depreciation from discontinued operations

Adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures

Income allocated to non-controlling interests

Gain on sale of operating properties, net of tax

Funds from operations

Less: recurring capitalized expenditures

Adjusted funds from operations

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

EPS diluted

FFO/AFFO diluted

Total Earnings per common share - diluted

FFO per common share - diluted

AFFO per common share - diluted

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2016

$41,730

2015

$115,599

60,485

4,327

2,358

1,210

56,459

3,904

2,245

5,466

$110,110

(85,145)

$98,528

(9,294) (10,644)

$100,816 $87,884

90,509

91,593

$0.46

$1.20

$1.10

90,464

91,275

$1.27

$1.08

$0.96

35

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions & Reconciliations

Expected FFO – Expected FFO is calculated in a method consistent with historical FFO, and is considered an appropriate supplemental measure of expected operating performance when compared to expected earnings per common share (EPS). Guidance excludes gains, if any, on properties not currently held for sale due to the uncertain timing and extent of property dispositions and the resulting gains/losses on sales. A reconciliation of the ranges provided for diluted EPS to expected FFO per diluted share is provided below:

Expected earnings per common share - diluted

Expected real estate depreciation and amortization

Expected adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures

Expected income allocated to non-controlling interests

Estimated (gain) on properties held for sale

Expected FFO per share - diluted

2Q16 Range

Low High

$4.60

0.72

$4.64

0.72

0.02

0.01

(4.22)

$1.13

0.02

0.01

(4.22)

$1.17

Low

$5.62

2.89

0.10

0.06

(4.22)

$4.45

2016 Range

High

$5.82

2.89

0.10

0.06

(4.22)

$4.65

EBITDA

EBITDA is defined by the Company as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, including net operating income from discontinued operations, excluding equity in (income) loss of joint ventures, (gain) loss on sale of unconsolidated joint venture interests, gain on acquisition of controlling interest in joint ventures, gain on sale of operating properties including land, net of tax, and income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interests. The Company considers EBITDA to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance to net income attributable to common shareholders because it represents income before non-cash depreciation and the cost of debt, and excludes gains or losses from property dispositions. A reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders to EBITDA is provided below:

Net income attributable to common shareholders

Plus: Interest

Plus: Depreciation and amortization

Plus: Income allocated to non-controlling interests from continuing operations

Plus: Income tax expense

Plus: Real estate depreciation from discontinued operations

Less: Gain on sale of operating properties, including land

Less: Equity in income of joint ventures

EBITDA

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2016 2015

$41,730 $115,599

23,790

62,091

1,210

25,052

57,984

5,466

315

4,327

(443)

(1,497)

429

3,904

(85,192)

(1,382)

$131,523 $121,860

36

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions & Reconciliations

Net Operating Income (NOI)

NOI is defined by the Company as total property income less property operating and maintenance expenses less real estate taxes. The

Company considers NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure of operating performance to net income attributable to common shareholders because it reflects the operating performance of our communities without allocation of corporate level property management overhead or general and administrative costs. A reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders to net operating income is provided below:

Net income

Less: Fee and asset management

Less: Interest and other income

Less: Income on deferred compensation plans

Plus: Property management

Plus: Fee and asset management

Plus: General and administrative

Plus: Interest

Plus: Depreciation and amortization

Plus: Expense on deferred compensation plans

Less: Gain on sale of operating properties, including land

Less: Equity in income of joint ventures

Plus: Income tax expense

Less: Income from discontinued operations

Net Operating Income (NOI)

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2016 2015

$42,940 $121,065

(1,765)

(224)

(63)

7,140

952

(1,563)

(60)

(1,864)

5,792

1,076

12,223

23,790

62,091

63

(443)

9,748

25,052

57,984

1,864

(85,192)

(1,497)

315

(1,382)

429

(5,076) (4,869)

$140,446 $128,080

“Same Property” Communities

Non-"Same Property" Communities

Development and Lease-Up Communities

Dispositions/Other

Net Operating Income (NOI)

$124,968 $117,511

11,899 8,470

2,734

845

343

1,756

$140,446 $128,080

37

Forward-Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this presentation contains forward-looking statements under the federal securities law. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which Camden (the “Company”) operates, management's beliefs, and assumptions made by management. Forwardlooking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties which are difficult to predict. Factors which may cause the Company’s actual results or performance to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements are described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Camden’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Forward-looking statements made in this presentation represent management’s opinions as of the date of this presentation, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement these statements because of subsequent events.

38

Notes

39

40

Download