A Novel Isolated Buck

advertisement
A Novel Isolated Buck-Boost Converter
Soo-Seok Kim1*, WOO-JIN JANG1, JOONG-HO SONG1 , Ok-Koo Kang1 , and Hee-Joon Kim2
1
Dept. of Electrical Eng ., Seoul National University of Technology, Korea
2
School of Electrical and Computer Eng., Hanyang University, Korea
E-mail: soodol@snut.ac.kr
Abstract — This paper proposed a novel Isolated BuckBoost PWM DC-DC converter circuit. The topology which
merged buck-boost mode with flyback mode can share the
transformer and switch. Not only isolated buck-boost
mode current but also flyback mode current added on the
one output current of the converter because the topology
merged buck-boost mode with flyback mode. A new
converter has outstanding advantages over the
conventional dc-dc converters with respect to high
efficiency, high power density, and component utilization.
The operation principle of the proposed converter is
described and verified by simulation and experiment
results. Also this paper presents novel circuit and
simulation result of new active isolated buck-boost
converter.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Recently, a Switched-Mode Power Supply is widely used
as a power equipment to supply a stable DC power to an
electronic circuit part of all of electronics and communication
equipments
such
as
portable
telecom
devices,
telecommunication power system, power conditioning system
for renewable energy etc. There are two types of the isolated
converter of which main switch uses only a single one: one is
a forward type which transfers power when a switch is turned
on, and the other is a flyback type which transfers power when
a switch is turned off. The isolated DC-DC converter is more
efficient than non-isolated converter because of most
applications require the isolation between the input and the
output. Therefore, if possible, it is desirable to make the DCDC converter in the form of an isolated type.
However, the efficiency of isolated DC-DC converters is
limited because isolated DC-DC converters can transfer
energy of a primary circuit to a secondary circuit only when a
switch is turned on or off.
Accordingly, this paper present a new type of isolated
buck-boost converter which can increase the efficiency of the
converter.
II. ISOLATED BUCK-BOOST CONVERTER
Fig. 1 shows new isolated buck-boost converter (hereafter
called “IBB” converter). IBB converter according to a Fig.1 in
which an input circuit is isolated from an output circuit by a
transformer T, wherein the input circuit comprises a DC
source, a primary coil of the transformer T connected in series
to the DC source, and a switch Q which is connected in series
to the primary coil of the transformer T and which performs
on/off switching; and wherein the output circuit comprises a
secondary coil of the transformer T corresponding to the
primary coil of the transformer T, an inductor L connected in
parallel to the secondary coil of the transformer T, a diode D
of which cathode is connected to one node between the
secondary coil of the transformer T and the inductor L, a
capacitor C connected to the other node between the
secondary coil of the transformer T and an anode of the diode
D, and a load resistor R connected in parallel to the capacitor
C. Proposed converter performs as a buck-boost converter. It
can either increase or decrease the magnitude of the dc voltage
of the converter. Merging buck-boost converter with flyback
topology can share the transformer and power MOSFET. Not
only isolated buck-boost mode current but also flyback mode
current added on the one output current of the converter. A
new converter has outstanding advantages over the
conventional dc-dc converters with respect to high efficiency,
high power density, and component utilization.
Fig. 1. A Novel IBB Converter.
A. Behavior of novel IBB converter
The proposed IBB converter is analyzed. There are two
topological states in one switching cycle. The equivalent
circuits for these states are shown in Fig. 2. Now we explain
the operation of the circuit shown in Fig.1.
For this description of circuit operation, the following
assumptions are made.
1-4244-2491-7/09/$20.00 ©2009 IEEE
z
z
Ideal switching components.
Steady-state CCM operation.
Stage 1: If the switch (Q) is turned on (t0-t1), the input
voltage (Vin) is supplied to the primary portion of the
transformer and the input energy is then stored in the inductor
(L). Now, the diode (D) is reverse-biased and thus is turned
off. Therefore, the buck-boost converter circuit is operated as
shown in Fig. 2.
⎡0 0 ⎤
D1 = ⎢⎢0 0⎥⎥
⎢⎣0 0⎥⎦
Stage 2: Also, when the switch (Q) is turned off (t1-t2), the
diode (D) is forward-biased and then is turned on. Therefore,
the isolated buck-boost circuit is operated as shown in Fig. 3.
In such a circuit, the energy stored in the inductor (L) is
discharged to a load resistor, and also the energy stored in the
magnetizing inductor (LM) is discharged via the secondary coil
of the transformer. And, the inductor current (IL) and the
current (IS2) on the secondary coil of the transformer are added
to a diode current. Consequently, the following equation is
established:
Fig. 2. Stage 1( at t0-t1).
In this case, let a voltage of DC source (S) be Vin, a switch
turn-on resistor be Ron, a transformer magnetizing inductance
be LM, a magnetizing current be IM, the inductance of an
inductor be L, an inductor current be IL, the output voltage be
Vo, and a ratio of turns of the primary coil to the secondary
coil be N(=N2/N1), the circuit equation are as follows:
k1 X = A1 X + B1U (t )
Y = C1 X + D1U (t )
(1)
(t0 ≤ t ≤ t1 )
0 0⎤
L 0⎥⎥ z
0 0⎥⎦
⎡− Ron
⎢
A1 = ⎢ 0
⎢ 0
⎣
⎡1
B1 = ⎢⎢ N
⎢⎣ 0
0
− N Ron
0
2
0⎤
0⎥⎥
0⎥⎦
⎡1 0
C1 = ⎢⎢0 N
⎢⎣0 0
k 2 X = A2 X + B2U (t )
Y = C2 X + B2U (t )
(t1 ≤ t ≤ t 2 )
Where X (t ) = [iM (t ) iL (t ) Vo (t )]
Where X (t ) = [iM (t ) iL (t ) Vo (t )]
⎡ LM
K1 = ⎢⎢ 0
⎢⎣ 0
Fig. 3. Stage 2( at t1-t2).
0⎤
0⎥⎥
0⎥⎦
0 ⎤
⎥
0 ⎥
−1 ⎥
R⎦
⎡ LM
K 2 = ⎢⎢ 0
⎢⎣ 0
0 0⎤
L 0⎥⎥
0 0⎥⎦
⎡ 0
⎢
A2 = ⎢ 0
⎢1
⎣ N
⎤
N ⎥
0
1 ⎥
−1 − 1 ⎥
R⎦
0
⎡0 − 1 ⎤
N⎥
⎢
B2 = ⎢0
−1 ⎥
⎢0
0 ⎥
⎣
⎦
⎡0 0 0 ⎤
C2 = ⎢⎢0 0 0⎥⎥
⎢⎣0 0 0⎥⎦
1
(2)
⎡0 0 ⎤
D2 = ⎢⎢0 0⎥⎥
⎢⎣0 0⎥⎦
Vo =
In the steady state, a DC analysis by the duty ratio D is as
follows:
X = − A−1BU
(3)
Y = (−CA−1B + D)U
⎡ − DR
on
⎢
⎢
0
A =
⎢(1 − D )
⎢
N
⎣
0
− (1 − D )
⎤
N⎥
(1 − D ) ⎥
⎥
−1
R ⎥⎦
⎡ D − (1 − D) ⎤
N⎥
⎢
B = ⎢ ND − (1 − D) ⎥
⎥
⎢
0
⎥⎦
⎢⎣ 0
⎡D
C = ⎢⎢ 0
⎢⎣ 0
(9)
So the conversion ratio of the proposed converter is similar
to the buck-boost converter, but contains an added factor of
N
N . Where N = 2
N1
And also, the output current I o consists of the inductance
current I L and the transformer magnetizing current I M . It
can be understood that when N1=N2, the output of the isolated
buck-boost converter increases in power and the current of the
buck-boost mode and the current of the flyback mode are
combined into one output current of the converter.
(1 − D)
− DN 2 Ron
N2 D
Vin
N1 1 − D
Fig. 4 shows the time sequence of gate drive voltages for
switch Q, the main switch voltage VDS , the main switch
current Is1 , the current through transformer coil of secondary
side Is2 , the diode current ID, and the inductor current IL.
0⎤
ND 0⎥⎥
0 0⎥⎦
0
⎡0 0 ⎤
D = ⎢⎢0 0⎥⎥
⎢⎣0 0⎥⎦
If
Ron = 0, VD = 0
0=
(1 − D)
Vo + DVin
N
0 = −(1 − D)(
1
1
IM + IL + V )
N
R
(4)
(5)
From equation (4),(5)
Vo = − N
D
Vin
1− D
1
1
I M + I L= − Vo
N
R
1
I o = − Vo
R
Where I o =
1
IM + IL
N
(6)
(7)
(8)
Fig. 4. Key Waveform of the IBB converter.
B. A Novel Active Clamp IBB Converter
Fig. 5 shows new active clamp IBB converter.
And Fig. 6 shows the key waveform of the active clamp
IBB converter. The auxiliary switch Q2 is used to provide a
path for recycling the magnetizing energy.
The new converter’s features are as the following
advantages.
Both the main and auxiliary switches operate with zero
voltage switching.
Soft switching can be maintained for full line range and
load range.
through transformer coil of secondary side Is2 , the diode
current ID, and the inductor current IL.
Fig. 5. Novel Active Clamp IBB Converter.
Fig. 8. Experiment Waveforms of the IBB Converter.
Fig. 6. Key Waveforms of the Active Clamp IBB Converter.
III. SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT RESULT
We did the simulations using the Fig. 1 circuit and Fig. 5
circuit for proposed converter. The simulation was done with
50% duty ratio.
The simulation and experiment results of the IBB converter
are presented in Fig. 7, Fig. 8 and Fig. 9.
Fig. 9. Experiment Waveforms of the IBB Converter.
Fig. 8, Fig. 9 shows the main switch voltage VDS , the diode
current ID, and the inductor current IL.
The simulation and experiment results agree well with the
theoretical waveforms.
And also we could identify that the IBB converter’s output
current I o consists of the inductance current I L and the
transformer magnetizing current I M through the experiment
waveform of the diode current ID, and the inductor current IL.
From the simulation and experiment results, the proposed
converter could transfer energy of a primary circuit to a
secondary circuit when a switch is on and off because isolated
DC-DC converters which main switch uses only a single one
can transfer energy of a primary circuit to a secondary circuit
only when a switch is turned on or off.
And we also do the simulation for a new active clamp IBB
converter. The simulation and experiment results of the active
clamp IBB converter are presented in Fig. 10.
Fig. 7. Simulation Waveforms of the IBB Converter.
Fig. 7 shows the gate drive voltages for switch Q, the main
switch voltage VDS , the main switch current Is1 , the current
Fig. 10. Simulation Waveforms of Active Clamp IBB Converter.
Fig. 10 shows the gate drive voltages for the switch Q1 and
clamp switch Q2, the main switch voltage VDS1 , the main
switch current IDS1, the clamp capacitor current ICc, the current
through the coil of transformer’s secondary side IT2, the diode
current ID, and the inductor current IL.
The simulation results agree well with the theoretical
waveforms.
IV. CONCLUSION
A new IBB converter topology has been presented. The
topology which merged buck-boost mode with flyback mode
can share the transformer and switch. Not only buck-boost
mode current but also flyback mode current added on the one
output current of the converter because the topology merged
buck-boost mode with flyback mode. A new converter has
outstanding advantages over the conventional dc-dc converters
with respect to high efficiency, high power density, and
component utilization. The operation principle of the proposed
converter is described and verified by simulation and
experiment results. Also this paper presents novel circuit and
simulation result of new active isolated buck-boost converter.
The incorporation of the active clamp circuit into the proposed
converter topology provides a mechanism for achieving ZVS
for both the main and auxiliary switches.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
Robert W. Erickson, Dragan Maksimovic, Fundamental of Power
Electronics, International Thomson publishing.
R. Watson, G. C. Hua, F. C. Lee, “Characterization of an active clamp
flyback topology for power factor correction applications”, Proceedings
of the Ninth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference, PP 412418,1994.
R. Watson, G. C. Hua, F. C. Lee, “Characterization of an active clamp
flyback topology for power factor correction applications”, Proceedings
of the Ninth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference, PP 412418,1994.
R. Watson, G. C. Hua, F. C. Lee, “Characterization of an active clamp
flyback topology for power factor correction applications”, Proceedings
of the Ninth Annual Applied Power Electronics Conference, PP 412418,1994.
Download