Allowable CT Secondeary Lead Lenghts for Automatic Power

advertisement
Allowable CT Secondary Lead Lengths for Automatic
Capacitor Bank and Harmonic Filter Bank Controllers
Introduction
Current Transformers utilized with automatic capacitor banks and harmonic filter banks
need to be placed within a limited range of the capacitor bank’s control system for
proper and accurate operation. This technote provides a basis for determining the
allowable CT secondary conductor length for ANSI metering class and relay class
current transformers. The tables and figures provided in this technote assume the
following:
•
The CT metering and relay class are based on ANSI C57.13 – ANSI/IEEE Standard
Requirements for Instrument Transformers
•
A typical control system burden of 0.1 ohms. This is typical of systems provided by
Northeast Power Systems, Inc.
•
Current transformer secondary conductors are Copper.
Table 1 – Resistance and Reactance for CT Secondary Conductors
Copper Conductor Size
Resistance
(Ohms/1,000 Feet)
Reactance
(Ohms/1,000 Feet)
#6
#8
#10
#12
#14
0.98
1.56
2.4
4.0
6.2
0.102
0.104
0.100
0.108
0.116
Definitions
Burden: That property of the circuit connected to the secondary winding of the current
transformer that determines its active and reactive power requirement. The burden is
normally expressed either as total ohms impedance with the effective resistance and
reactance components, or as the total volt-amperes and power factor at the specified
value of current or voltage, and frequency.
Ratio Correction Factor (RCF): Is defined as the factor by which the marked ratio must
be multiplied in order to obtain the true ratio.
Transformer Correction Factor (TCF): Is defined as the factor by which a wattmeter
reading or similar device must be multiplied to correct for the effect of instrument
transformer RCF and phase-angle error.
Metering Class Current Transformers
Current transformers manufactured and rated in accordance with ANSI C57.13 are
rated and name plated with a Metering Accuracy Classification and Standard Burden.
Standard Burdens per the ANSI standard include the following: B-0.1, B-0.2, B-0.5, B-0.9,
B-1.8. The burden value is the allowable maximum secondary impedance value in
ohms for which the CT accuracy classification is based on.
The accuracy classification for metering is based on the requirement that the current
transformer correction factor is within specified limits when the power factor of the
metered load has any value from 0.6 to 1.0 at the CT rated primary current. ANSI has
three standard classifications, 0.3, 0.6, and 1.2. The accuracy classifications are based
on the current transformers ratio correction factor (RCF) and transformer correction
factor (TCF). In the most simplistic terms, the accuracy classification can be thought of
as the percent error of the CT at a specific burden. For power factor correction, the
lowest accuracy classification of 1.2% is adequate.
Table 2 below provides the allowable CT conductor lengths for various standard burden
ratings. As an example, a 600/5 current transformer with an accuracy rating of 1.2% and
a burden rating of B-0.5 could be placed as far as 507’ away from the power factor
control system when a #6 Copper conductor is utilized.
Table 2 – Allowable CT Secondary Conductor Lengths for Various Sized
Copper Conductors (in feet)
Burden Rating
Wire Gauge
#6
#8
#10
#12
#14
B-0.1
101
64
41
24
15
B-0.2
203
128
83
50
32
B-0.5
507
320
208
124
80
B-0.9
913
576
374
224
144
B-1.8
1826
1153
749
449
289
Note: Above values based on a control system with a burden of 0.1
ohms.
When lower accuracy ratings are acceptable, the allowable CT secondary conductor
length can be considerably greater. Using the example above, the 600/5 current
transformer could be placed as far as 1800 conductor feet away from the power factor
controller and still have accuracy near 2%. The calculation of CT accuracy outside of
the highest ANSI metering class accuracy rating of 1.2% is accomplished utilizing the
current transformer secondary saturation curves as published by the CT manufacturer.
The procedure for doing these calculations are as presented below for ANSI relay class
current transformers.
Relay Class Current Transformers
ANSI C57.13 has standardized on the accuracy classes and the conditions under which
the standard accuracy of relay class current transformers apply. These ratings are on
the basis of the standard secondary terminal voltage a transformer will deliver at 20
times rated secondary amperes without exceeding 10 percent ratio error. Thus, a
transformer classified with a C100 or T200 will deliver 200 volts at 20 times rated
secondary current without exceeding 10 percent ratio error. Standard secondary
voltage ratings include: 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800. These correspond to standard
relay burden ratings of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 respectively. The ratio error must
not exceed 10 percent at any current from 1 to 20 times rated current at any lesser
burden ohms.
To determine the ratio accuracy of a Relay Class Current Transformer for a specific
application, the following are required:
•
The secondary excitation curve for the current transformer as shown in Figure 1
below. These curves are normally provided by the CT manufacturer.
•
The current transformer’s secondary winding resistance. This value is normally
provided by the CT manufacturer.
•
The total secondary burden impedance of the control system and secondary
conductors. Normally the burden impedance of a typical NEPSI control system
can be taken as 0.1 ohms.
By way of example, this technote will calculate in four easy steps the ratio error
associated with a 600/5 current transformer having a saturation curve as shown in
Figure 1. The distance between the power factor control system and the current
transformer is 792 conductor feet. The design calls for a #10 Copper conductor.
1. Calculate the total secondary burden impedance: The total secondary burden
impedance of the current transformer consists of the conductor impedance, CT
secondary winding resistance, and the control and protection system
impedance. The CT winding resistance from Figure 1 is 0.116 ohms. The control
and protection system has an impedance is 0.1 ohms. The conductor
impedance from table 1 is 2.4 ohms/1000’ X 743’=1.78 ohms. The total secondary
impedance is equal to the control and protection system impedance, CT
secondary winding resistance, and the conductor impedance (0.1 ohms + 1.78
ohms, 0.116 ohms = 1.996 ohms).
2. Calculate the CT Secondary Excitation Voltage: The CT secondary excitation
voltage is calculated by multiplying the total secondary burden impedance by
the nominal CT secondary current of 5 Amps. (5 amps x 2.0 Ohms = 10 Volts).
3. Obtain the Secondary Excitation Current: From Figure 1, the excitation current
with 10 volts of excitation voltage for the 600/5 CT is 0.1 amps.
4. Calculate the turns ratio error: The turns ratio error is calculated by multiplying the
ratio of the exciting current, 0.1 amps, to the assumed secondary current of 5
amps by 100. The error for this example was calculated to be 2%. This error would
be considered acceptable.
Figure 1 – Typical CT Secondary Excitation Curve. The Excitation Current Associated with a 600/5
Current Transformer Operating with a Secondary Voltage of 10 Volts is 0.1 Amps.
Conclusion
This technote provided a basis for determining the allowable CT secondary conductor
length for ANSI metering class and relay class current transformers. This technote
focused on current transformers dedicated for the power factor correction control
system. When a CT is to supply, or be shared with multiple devices, the burden
impedance of all connected devices must be considered. In addition, proper
operation of secondary connected devises for the full operating range of the CT must
be considered. For example, CT’s used for relaying should remain accurate through the
maximum expected secondary current during faults.
Northeast Power Systems, Inc.
66 Carey Road
Queensbury, New York 12804
Phone: 518-792-4776
Fax: 518-792-5767
E-mail: sales@nepsi.com
Website: www.nepsi.com
Copyright © 1999 - 2012 Northeast Power Systems, Inc.
Download