Analytical Benthic Flux Model Forced by Surface-Gravity Waves Application to the

advertisement
Analytical Benthic Flux Model Forced by
Surface-Gravity Waves
Application to the
South Atlantic Bight
j.n. king
U.S. Geological Survey
Florida Integrated Science Center
Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Definition ::
Benthic Flux
Benthic flux is the rate of flow
of some quantity across the
bed of a water body, per unit
area of bed.
Benthic flux is a vector quantity,
where the vector is oriented
normal to the bed.
Benthic flux units are a function of
the quantity under consideration:
•volume quantity: L3 T-1 L-2
(=LT-1)
•mass quantity: M T-1 L-2
Benthic flux is a transient process.
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Definition ::
Benthic Flux
Benthic flux is the rate of flow
of some quantity across the
bed of a water body, per unit
area of bed.
Benthic flux is a vector quantity,
where the vector is oriented
normal to the bed.
Benthic flux units are a function of
the quantity under consideration:
•volume quantity: L3 T-1 L-2
(=LT-1)
•mass quantity: M T-1 L-2
Benthic flux is a transient process.
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
newer
…
Burnett et. al. (2003)
older
Also known as:
• Seepage
• Irrigation
• Flushing
• Ventilation
• Percolation
• Sub-tidal pump
• Submarine ground water
discharge (SGD)
• Submarine ground water
recharge (SGR)
• Submarine pore water
exchange (SPE)
Benthic flux is independent of direction:
•benthic discharge (flux): gw => sw
•benthic recharge (flux): sw => gw
Related processes:
• Deposition & Resuspension
• Bio-turbation
• Bio-irrigation
• Salt fingering
• Fluidization of sediment in the
surf zone
Benthic flux is independent of water body:
wetland, river, lake, estuary, lagoon, ocean
Benthic flux is independent of location in the
water body: surf zone, shelf, deep ocean
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Processes that Drive Benthic Flux
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
+z
Surface-Gravity Wave over Rigid, Porous Media
4Unknowns – 4Equations
Assume
z=0
+x
 ( x, z , t )  A cosh  (h  z )  B sinh  (h  z )e i ( x t )
ps ( x, z , t )  Ce k ( h  z ) e i ( x t )
1 
(DFSBC)
g t

(KFSBC)
w( x, z , t ) 
t
p ( x, z   h, t )  ps ( x, z   h, t ) (DBBC)
 2  0
 ( x, z , t ) 
z=-h
w( x, z   h, t )  ws ( x, z   h, t ) (KBBC)

t

w( x, z   h, t )  
z
k ps
ws ( x, z   h, t )  
 z
p ( x , z   h, t )  

 ps  0
2
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
(Bernoulli)
(velocity potential)
(Darcy)
Conclusions
Reid & Kajiura (1957)
u  0
k
u   p s
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
King, Mehta & Dean (2008?)
Generalized Analytical Model
for Benthic Water Flux
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Moore (1999)
Moore (1996)
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Moore (1996)
SAB
Moore (1999)
Estuaries
0.01 dpm/L
A 226Ra = 0.19
dpm/L
Ocean
0.08 dpm/L
A 226Ra.Excess = 0.19-0.01-0.08
= 0.10 dpm/L
VSAB.InS = 20km × 320km × 10m
= 6.4×1013L
Tresidence.226Ra = 30d
Å 226Ra.Excess = 0.10×(6.4×1013)÷30
=2.1×1011dpm/d
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Moore (1996)
SAB
Estuaries
0.01 dpm/L
A 226Ra = 0.19
dpm/L
7 dpm/L
Å 226Ra.Excess =2.1×1011dpm/d
Pore Water
QMoore=2.1×1011÷7
=3×1010L/d
=350m3/s
qMoore=0.5cm/d
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Ocean
0.08 dpm/L
Li and others (1999)
• Three (nearshore) processes:
– Tidal pumping on sloped beach
• 130m3/s or 37%QMoore
– Wave set up
• 190m3/s or 54%QMoore
– Terrestrial hydraulic gradient (from Younger,1996)
• 14m3/s or 4%QMoore
• Linear sum
= 14+130+190 = 334m3/s or 95%QMoore
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Application of Case I to SAB
1.4E-05
1.2E-05
shoaled and damped
a [m /s]
1.0E-05
8.0E-06
6.0E-06
4.0E-06
2.0E-06
0.0E+00
0
500
1000
1500
distance offshore [m ]
99%Qbd .w
bathymetry from Riedl et al. (1972)
[m2]
3
[kg/m ]
2
[m /s]
[s]
[m]
Qbd . w [m3/s]
k

u
T
a
1E-11
1030
1.17E-06
6.0
0.55
9475
Definition
5.5
0.50
8082
◊
Riedl et al. (1972)
canonical
canonical
Riedl et al. (1972)
Riedl et al. (1972)
5.0
0.45
6582
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
2000
2500
Moore & Wilson
(2005)
Moore & Wilson (2005)
7dpm/L?
1.3dpm/L
0.2dpm/L
0
Ra [dpm/L ]
0.5
10
Wave mixed zone
20
30
40
50
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
1
0
depth [cm ]
Martin et. al. (2006)
226
◊
Conclusions
1.5
Updated
Moore (1996)
SAB
Estuaries
0.01 dpm/L
A 226Ra = 0.19
dpm/L
Ocean
0.08 dpm/L
Pore Water
0.5
0.19
7
dpm/L
dpm/L
dpm/L
Pore Water
QMoore= 2.1×1011÷0.3
= 7×1011L/d
= 8100m3/s
qMoore= 11cm/d
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Conclusions
• Waves matter! Surface gravity waves advect pore
water constituents into surface waters.
• Shelf-wide processes are probably larger
contributors than near-shore processes.
• Qbd . w= 8,100m3/s too large? What about bedform
effects?
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Future Work (?)
• Wave mixed-zone: other forcing mechanisms
transport pore water constituents onto the
wave-mixed zone
– Density gradients
– Pressure gradients
– Concentration gradients
– Episodic gradients
• Numerical model!
Definition
◊
Model
◊
SAB
◊
Conclusions
Questions?
Download